Effect of dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) on caecum microbioma and productive performance in broiler chickens

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  De Cesare, Alessandra ^a   Sirri, Federico ^a   Manfreda, Gerardo ^a   Moniaci, Paola ^a   Giardini, Alberto ^b   Zampiga, Marco ^a   Meluzzi, Adele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b CSL Centro Sperimentale del Latte   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA GLUCOSIDASE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL HEALTH; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BROILER; CECUM; CLOSTRIDIUM CLOSTRIDIOFORME; CONTROLLED STUDY; COPROCOCCUS EUTACTUS; DERMATITIS; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; FOOT DISEASE; FOOT PAD; INCIDENCE; INTESTINE FLORA; LACHANOSPIRACEAE; LACHNOSPIRACEAE; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; MALE; METABOLISM; MOISTURE; NONHUMAN; PH; ROSEBURIA INTESTINALIS; RUMINOCOCCUS; RUMINOCOCCUS OBEUM; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; CHICKEN; DIETARY SUPPLEMENT; MICROBIOLOGY; MICROFLORA; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CECUM; CHICKENS; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS; MICROBIOTA;

EID: 85018269719     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176309     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Dominguez-Bello MG, Blaser MJ. Do you have a probiotic in your future? Microbes and Infection. 2008; 10(9):1072-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2008.07.036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2008.07.036 PMID: 18762263
2. Huyghebaert G, Ducatelle R, Van Immerseel F. An update on alternatives to antimicrobial growth promoters for broilers. The Veterinary Journal. 2011; 187(2):182-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.03.003 PMID: 20382054
3. Tannock GW. A Special Fondness for Lactobacilli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2004; 70(6):3189-94. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.6.3189-3194.2004 PMID: 15184111
4. Zhao R, Sun J, Mo H, Zhu Y. Analysis of functional properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007; 23(2):195-200.
5. Tannock GW, Fuller R, Pedersen K. Lactobacillus succession in the piglet digestive tract demonstrated by plasmid profiling. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1990; 56(5):1310-6. PMID: 2339885
6. Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Sanei B, Parvizi P, et al. Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology. 2005; 12(12):1387-92. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.12.1387-1392.2005 PMID: 16339061
7. Souza MR, Moreira JL, Barbosa FHF, Cerqueira MMOP, Nunes AC, Nicoli JR. Influence of intensive and extensive breeding on lactic acid bacteria isolated from Gallus gallus domesticus ceca. Veterinary Microbiology. 2007; 120(1-2):142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.10.019 PMID: 17113730
8. Nousiainen J, Javanainen P, Setälä J, Wright Av, Salminen S, von Wright A, et al. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In: Lactic acid bacteria: microbiology and functional aspects. 2004. Ed. 3; pp. 547-80.
9. Pineiro M, Stanton C. Probiotic bacteria: legislative framework-requirements to evidence basis. The Journal of nutrition. 2007; 137(3):850S-3S.
10. Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1989; 66(5):365-78. PMID: 2666378
11. Patterson J, Burkholder K. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poultry Science. 2003; 82(4):627-31. PMID: 12710484
12. Willis WL, Reid L. Investigating the effects of dietary probiotic feeding regimens on broiler chicken production and Campylobacter jejuni presence. Poultry Science. 2008; 87(4):606-11. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2006-00458 PMID: 18339979
13. Huang MK, Choi YJ, Houde R, Lee J-W, Lee B, Zhao X. Effects of Lactobacilli and an acidophilic fungus on the production performance and immune responses in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2004; 83(5):788-95. PMID: 15141837
14. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science. 1998; 77(9):1259-65. PMID: 9733111
15. Angelakis E, Raoult D. The increase of lactobacillus species in the gut flora of newborn broiler chicks and ducks is associated with weight gain. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(5):e10463. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010463 PMID: 20454557
16. Mountzouris KC, Tsirtsikos P, Kalamara E, Nitsch S, Schatzmayr G, Fegeros K. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poultry Science. 2007; 86(2):309-17. PMID: 17234844
17. FAO/WHO. Working group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. London, Ontario, Canada. 2002.
18. Gallazzi D, Giardini A, Mangiagalli GM, Marelli S, Ferrazzi V, Orsi C, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL on laying hen performance. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2008; 7(1):27-37.
19. Gaskins HR, Collier CT, Anderson DB. Antibiotics as growth promotants: mode of action. Animal Biotechnology. 2002; 13(1):29-42. https://doi.org/10.1081/ABIO-120005768 PMID: 12212942
20. Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Versalovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clinical chemistry. 2009; 55(5):856-66. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107565 PMID: 19264858
21. Commission European. Council Directive 43/EC of 28 June 2007, laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. Official Journal of the European Union L. 2007; 182:19-28.
22. Bianchi Salvadori B, Camaschella P, Lavezzari D. Les lactobacilles specifiques du poulet. Leur influence sur la microflore du tube digestif Microbiologie Aliment Nutrition. 1985; 3:73-82.
23. Meluzzi A, Fabbri C, Folegatti E, Sirri F. Effect of less intensive rearing conditions on litter characteristics, growth performance, carcase injuries and meat quality of broilers. British Poultry Science. 2008; 49(5):509-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802290424 PMID: 18836896
24. Ekstrand C, Carpenter TE, Andersson I, Algers B. Prevalence and control of foot-pad dermatitis in broilers in Sweden. British Poultry Science. 1998; 39(3):318-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669888845 PMID: 9693810
25. Danzeisen JL, Kim HB, Isaacson RE, Tu ZJ, Johnson TJ. Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(11): e27949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027949 PMID: 22114729
26. Meyer F, Paarmann D, D'Souza M, Olson R, Glass E, Kubal M, et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008; 9(1):386.
27. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007; 35(21):7188-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864 PMID: 17947321
28. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 72(7):5069-72. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05 PMID: 16820507
29. Cole JR, Chai B, Marsh TL, Farris RJ, Wang Q, Kulam SA, et al. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003; 31(1):442-3. PMID: 12520046
30. Kanehisa M. The KEGG database. silico simulation of biological processes. 2002; 247:91-103.
31. SAS Institute. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6. SAS Institute Inc Cary, NC; 1988.
32. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG. STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(21):3123-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 PMID: 25061070
33. Brisbin JT, Gong J, Orouji S, Esufali J, Mallick AI, Parvizi P, et al. Oral treatment of chickens with lacto-bacilli influences elicitation of immune responses. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2011; 18(9):1447-55. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.05100-11 PMID: 21734067
34. Kim JS, Ingale SL, Kim YW, Kim KH, Sen S, Ryu MH, et al. Effect of supplementation of multi-microbe probiotic product on growth performance, apparent digestibility, cecal microbiota and small intestinal morphology of broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 2012; 96(4):618-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01187.x PMID: 21699585
35. Askelson TE, Campasino A, Lee JT, Duong T. Evaluation of phytate-degrading Lactobacillus culture administration to broiler chickens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2014; 80(3):943-50. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03155-13 PMID: 24271165
36. Loh TC, Thanh NT, Foo HL, Hair-Bejo M, Azhar BK. Feeding of different levels of metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, fecal microflora, volatile fatty acids and villi height in broilers. Animal Science Journal. 2010; 81(2):205-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00701.x PMID: 20438502
37. Shim YH, Ingale SL, Kim JS, Kim KH, Seo DK, Lee SC, et al. A multi-microbe probiotic formulation processed at low and high drying temperatures: effects on growth performance, nutrient retention and caecal microbiology of broilers. British Poultry Science. 2012; 53(4):482-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2012.690508 PMID: 23130583
38. Ghareeb K, Awad WA, Mohnl M, Porta R, Biarnés M, Böhm J, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of an avian-specific probiotic to reduce the colonization of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2012; 91(8):1825-32. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02168 PMID: 22802174
39. Neal-McKinney JM, Lu X, Duong T, Larson CL, Call DR, Shah DH, et al. Production of organic acids by probiotic lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in poultry. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7(9):e43928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043928 PMID: 22962594
40. La Ragione RM, Narbad A, Gasson MJ, Woodward MJ. In vivo characterization of Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785 for use as a defined competitive exclusion agent against bacterial pathogens in poultry. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2004; 38(3):197-205. PMID: 14962040
41. Chen C-Y, Tsen H-Y, Lin C-L, Yu B, Chen C-S. Oral administration of a combination of select lactic acid bacteria strains to reduce the Salmonella invasion and inflammation of broiler chicks. Poultry Science. 2012; 91(9):2139-47. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02237 PMID: 22912447
42. Bouzaine T, Dauphin RD, Thonart P, Urdaci MC, Hamdi M. Adherence and colonization properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosusTB1, a broiler chicken isolate. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2005; 40(5):391-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01684.x PMID: 15836745
43. Edelman S, Westerlund-Wikström B, Leskelä S, Kettunen H, Rautonen N, Apajalahti J, et al. In vitro adhesion specificity of indigenous Lactobacilli within the avian intestinal tract. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002; 68(10):5155-9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.10.5155-5159.2002 PMID: 12324367
44. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali MA, Abdullah N, Ong KB, Jalaludin S. Adhesion of Lactobacillus isolates to intestinal epithelial cells of chicken. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 1996; 22(3):229-32. PMID: 8852352
45. Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S, Ho YW. Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. British Poultry Science. 2003; 44(1):139-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085445 PMID: 12737236
46. Timmerman HM, Veldman A, van den Elsen E, Rombouts FM, Beynen AC. Mortality and growth performance of broilers given drinking water supplemented with chicken-specific probiotics. Poultry Science. 2006; 85(8):1383-8. PMID: 16903468
47. Zulkifli I, Abdullah N, Azrin NM, Ho YW. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. British Poultry Science. 2000; 41(5):593-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/713654979 PMID: 11201439
48. Awad WA, Ghareeb K, Abdel-Raheem S, Böhm J. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poultry Science. 2009; 88(1):49-56. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00244 PMID: 19096056
49. Roy A, Haldar S, Mondal S, Ghosh TK. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine International. 2010.
50. Oakley BB, Morales CA, Line J, Berrang ME, Meinersmann RJ, Tillman GE, et al. The poultry-associated microbiome: network analysis and farm-to-fork characterizations. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(2):e57190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057190 PMID: 23468931
51. Bjerrum L, Engberg RM, Leser TD, Jensen BB, Finster K, Pedersen K. Microbial community composition of the ileum and cecum of broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and culture-based techniques. Poultry Science. 2006; 85(7):1151-64. PMID: 16830854
52. Gong J, Si W, Forster RJ, Huang R, Yu H, Yin Y, et al. 16S rRNA gene-based analysis of mucosa-associated bacterial community and phylogeny in the chicken gastrointestinal tracts: from crops to ceca. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2007; 59(1):147-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00193.x PMID: 17233749
53. Lund M, Bjerrum L, Pedersen K. Quantification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii- and Subdoligranulum variabile-like bacteria in the cecum of chickens by real-time PCR. Poultry Science. 2010; 89(6):1217-24. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00653 PMID: 20460669
54. Van den Abbeele P, Grootaert C, Marzorati M, Possemiers S, Verstraete W, Gérard P, et al. Microbial community development in a dynamic gut model is reproducible, colon region specific, and selective for Bacteroidetes and Clostridium Cluster IX. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010; 76(15):5237-46. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00759-10 PMID: 20562281
55. Scupham AJ. Succession in the intestinal microbiota of preadolescent turkeys. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2007; 60(1):136-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00245.x PMID: 17284250
56. Fernandez-Rubio C, Ordoñez C, Abad-Gonzalez J, Garcia-Gallego A, Honrubia MP, Mallo JJ, et al. Butyric acid-based feed additives help protect broiler chickens from Salmonella Enteritidis infection. Poultry Science. 2009; 88(5):943-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00484 PMID: 19359681
57. Dalmasso G, Nguyen HTT, Yan Y, Charrier-Hisamuddin L, Sitaraman SV, Merlin D. Butyrate transcriptionally enhances peptide transporter PepT1 expression and activity. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3(6):e2476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002476 PMID: 18575574
58. Gong J, Yu H, Liu T, Gill JJ, Chambers JR, Wheatcroft R, et al. Effects of zinc bacitracin, bird age and access to range on bacterial microbiota in the ileum and caeca of broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2008; 104(5):1372-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03699.x PMID: 18201175
59. Barnes EM, Mead GC, Barnuml DA, Harry EG. The intestinal flora of the chicken in the period 2 to 6 weeks of age, with particular reference to the anaerobic bacteria. British Poultry Science. 1972; 13(3):311-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667208415953 PMID: 4555258
60. Gong J, Forster RJ, Yu H, Chambers JR, Sabour PM, Wheatcroft R, et al. Diversity and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria in the mucosa of chicken ceca and comparison with bacteria in the cecal lumen. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2002; 208(1):1-7. PMID: 11934485
61. Wise MG, Siragusa GR. Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one-to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable-based diets. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2007; 102(4):1138-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03153.x PMID: 17381758
62. Kenneth HW, Ikeda JS, Rhonda BB. Phylogenetic placement of community members of human colonic biota. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1997; 25:S114-S6. PMID: 9310646
63. Hoskins LC, Boulding ET. Mucin degradation in human colon ecosystems: evidence for the existence and role of bacterial subpopulations producing glycosidases as extracellular enzymes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1981; 67(1):163-72. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110009 PMID: 6161136
64. Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2004; 54(5):1469-76.
65. Ruseler-van Embden JGH, van Lieshout LMC, Gosselink MJ, Marteau P. Inability of Lactobacillus casei Strain GG, L. acidophilus, and Bifidobacterium bifidumto degrade intestinal mucus glycoproteins. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 1995; 30(7):675-80. PMID: 7481531
66. Reese ET. Degradation of polymeric carbohydrates by microbial enzymes. In: Loewus FA, Runeckles VC, editors. The structure, biosynthesis, and degradation of wood. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1977. pp. 311-67.
67. Donkor ON, Shah NP. Production of β-glucosidase and hydrolysis of isoflavone phytoestrogens by Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium lactis, and Lactobacillus casei in soymilk. Journal of Food Science. 2008; 73(1):M15-M20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00547.x PMID: 18211356
68. Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G. Isoflavone phytoestrogens in soymilk fermented with β-glucosidase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2011; 62(2):111-20. https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2010.513680 PMID: 21091296
69. Ismail B, Hayes K. β-glycosidase activity toward different glycosidic forms of isoflavones. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2005; 53(12):4918-24. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0404694 PMID: 15941336
70. Izumi T, Piskula MK, Osawa S, Obata A, Tobe K, Saito M, et al. Soy isoflavone aglycones are absorbed faster and in higher amounts than their glucosides in humans. The Journal of Nutrition. 2000; 130(7):1695-9. PMID: 10867038
71. Brouns F. Soya isoflavones: a new and promising ingredient for the health foods sector. Food Research International. 2002; 35(2-3):187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00182-X.
72. Fritz WA, Coward L, Wang J, Lamartiniere CA. Dietary genistein: perinatal mammary cancer prevention, bioavailability and toxicity testing in the rat. Carcinogenesis. 1998; 19(12):2151-8. PMID: 9886571
73. Qian L, Sun J. Effect of β-glucosidase as a feed supplementary on the growth performance, digestive enzymes and physiology of broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 2009; 22(2):260-6.