RecG controls DNA amplification at double-strand breaks and arrested replication forks

FEBS Letters

Volumn 591, Issue 8, 2017, Pages 1101-1113

  Azeroglu, Benura ^a   Leach, David R F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

DNA amplification; double strand break repair; RecG

Indexed keywords

RECG HELICASE; RUVABC; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; DNA HELICASE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; HOLLIDAY JUNCTION DNA HELICASE, E COLI; RECG PROTEIN, E COLI; RUVB PROTEIN, BACTERIA; RUVC PROTEIN, E COLI;

DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAK REPAIR; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RECG GENE; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ENZYMOLOGY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; ENDODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENE AMPLIFICATION; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; RECOMBINATIONAL DNA REPAIR;

EID: 85014274244     PISSN: 00145793     EISSN: 18733468     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.12583     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Lloyd RG (1991) Conjugational recombination in resolvase-deficient ruvC mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 depends on recG. J Bacteriol 173, 5414–5418.
2. Lloyd RG and Sharples GJ (1993) Processing of recombination intermediates by the RecG and RuvAB proteins of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 21, 1719–1725.
3. Lloyd RG and Sharples GJ (1993) Dissociation of synthetic Holliday junctions by E. coli RecG protein. EMBO J 12, 17–22.
4. Mandal TN, Mahdi AA, Sharples GJ and Lloyd RG (1993) Resolution of Holliday intermediates in recombination and DNA repair: indirect suppression of ruvA, ruvB, and ruvC mutations. J Bacteriol 175, 4325–4334.
5. Meddows TR, Savory AP and Lloyd RG (2004) RecG helicase promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Microbiol 52, 119–132.
6. Wardrope L, Okely E and Leach D (2009) Resolution of joint molecules by RuvABC and RecG following cleavage of the Escherichia coli chromosome by EcoKI. PLoS One 4, e6542.
7. Whitby MC and Lloyd RG (1995) Branch migration of three-strand recombination intermediates by RecG, a possible pathway for securing exchanges initiated by 3′-tailed duplex DNA. EMBO J 14, 3302–3310.
8. Whitby MC, Ryder L and Lloyd RG (1993) Reverse branch migration of Holliday junctions by RecG protein: a new mechanism for resolution of intermediates in recombination and DNA repair. Cell 75, 341–350.
9. Abd Wahab S, Choi M and Bianco PR (2013) Characterization of the ATPase activity of RecG and RuvAB proteins on model fork structures reveals insight into stalled DNA replication fork repair. J Biol Chem 288, 26397–26409.
10. Buss JA, Kimura Y and Bianco PR (2008) RecG interacts directly with SSB: implications for stalled replication fork regression. Nucleic Acids Res 36, 7029–7042.
11. Gupta S, Yeeles JT and Marians KJ (2014) Regression of replication forks stalled by leading-strand template damage: I. Both RecG and RuvAB catalyze regression, but RuvC cleaves the holliday junctions formed by RecG preferentially. J Biol Chem 289, 28376–28387.
12. Manosas M, Perumal SK, Bianco P, Ritort F, Benkovic SJ and Croquette V (2013) RecG and UvsW catalyse robust DNA rewinding critical for stalled DNA replication fork rescue. Nat Commun 4, 2368.
13. McGlynn P and Lloyd RG (1999) RecG helicase activity at three- and four-strand DNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res 27, 3049–3056.
14. McGlynn P and Lloyd RG (2000) Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression. Cell 101, 35–45.
15. McGlynn P and Lloyd RG (2001) Rescue of stalled replication forks by RecG: simultaneous translocation on the leading and lagging strand templates supports an active DNA unwinding model of fork reversal and Holliday junction formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 8227–8234.
16. Mawer JS and Leach DR (2014) Branch migration prevents DNA loss during double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet 10, e1004485.
17. Azeroglu B, Mawer JS, Cockram CA, White MA, Hasan AM, Filatenkova M and Leach DR (2016) RecG directs DNA Synthesis during double-strand break repair. PLoS Genet 12, e1005799.
18. Rudolph CJ, Mahdi AA, Upton AL and Lloyd RG (2010) RecG protein and single-strand DNA exonucleases avoid cell lethality associated with PriA helicase activity in Escherichia coli. Genetics 186, 473–492.
19. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Briggs GS and Lloyd RG (2010) Is RecG a general guardian of the bacterial genome? DNA Repair (Amst) 9, 210–223.
20. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Harris L and Lloyd RG (2009) Pathological replication in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase. Mol Microbiol 73, 352–366.
21. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL and Lloyd RG (2009) Replication fork collisions cause pathological chromosomal amplification in cells lacking RecG DNA translocase. Mol Microbiol 74, 940–955.
22. Rudolph CJ, Upton AL, Stockum A, Nieduszynski CA and Lloyd RG (2013) Avoiding chromosome pathology when replication forks collide. Nature 500, 608–611.
23. Wendel BM, Courcelle CT and Courcelle J (2014) Completion of DNA replication in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 16454–16459.
24. Lloyd RG and Rudolph CJ (2016) 25 years on and no end in sight: a perspective on the role of RecG protein. Curr Genet 62, 827–840.
25. Gowrishankar J (2015) End of the beginning: elongation and termination features of alternative modes of chromosomal replication initiation in bacteria. PLoS Genet 11, e1004909.
26. Gaidutsik I, Sedman T, Sillamaa S and Sedman J (2016) Irc3 is a mitochondrial DNA branch migration enzyme. Sci Rep 6, 26414.
27. Odahara M, Masuda Y, Sato M, Wakazaki M, Harada C, Toyooka K and Sekine Y (2015) RECG maintains plastid and mitochondrial genome stability by suppressing extensive recombination between short dispersed repeats. PLoS Genet 11, e1005080.
28. Wallet C, Le Ret M, Bergdoll M, Bichara M, Dietrich A and Gualberto JM (2015) The RECG1 DNA translocase is a key factor in recombination surveillance, repair, and segregation of the mitochondrial DNA in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 2907–2925.
29. Betous R, Couch FB, Mason AC, Eichman BF, Manosas M and Cortez D (2013) Substrate-selective repair and restart of replication forks by DNA translocases. Cell Rep 3, 1958–1969.
30. Bansbach CE, Betous R, Lovejoy CA, Glick GG and Cortez D (2009) The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev 23, 2405–2414.
31. Postow L, Woo EM, Chait BT and Funabiki H (2009) Identification of SMARCAL1 as a component of the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 284, 35951–35961.
32. Betous R, Mason AC, Rambo RP, Bansbach CE, Badu-Nkansah A, Sirbu BM, Eichman BF and Cortez D (2012) SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev 26, 151–162.
33. Baradaran-Heravi A, Raams A, Lubieniecka J, Cho KS, DeHaai KA, Basiratnia M, Mari PO, Xue Y, Rauth M, Olney AH et al. (2012) SMARCAL1 deficiency predisposes to non-Hodgkin lymphoma and hypersensitivity to genotoxic agents in vivo. Am J Med Genet A 158A, 2204–2213.
34. Carroll C, Badu-Nkansah A, Hunley T, Baradaran-Heravi A, Cortez D and Frangoul H (2013) Schimke immunoosseous dysplasia associated with undifferentiated carcinoma and a novel SMARCAL1 mutation in a child. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60, E88–E90.
35. Cox KE, Marechal A and Flynn RL (2016) SMARCAL1 resolves replication stress at ALT telomeres. Cell Rep 14, 1032–1040.
36. Poole LA and Cortez D (2016) SMARCAL1 and telomeres: replicating the troublesome ends. Nucleus 7, 270–274.
37. Poole LA, Zhao R, Glick GG, Lovejoy CA, Eischen CM and Cortez D (2015) SMARCAL1 maintains telomere integrity during DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 14864–14869.
38. Bianco PR (2015) I came to a fork in the DNA and there was RecG. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 117, 166–173.
39. Dimude JU, Midgley-Smith SL, Stein M and Rudolph CJ (2016) Replication termination: containing fork fusion-mediated pathologies in Escherichia coli. Genes (Basel) 7, 7080040.
40. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Park JO, Lindeman N, Gale CM, Zhao X, Christensen J et al. (2007) MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 316, 1039–1043.
41. Schwab M, Alitalo K, Klempnauer KH, Varmus HE, Bishop JM, Gilbert F, Brodeur G, Goldstein M and Trent J (1983) Amplified DNA with limited homology to myc cellular oncogene is shared by human neuroblastoma cell lines and a neuroblastoma tumour. Nature 305, 245–248.
42. Sequist LV, Waltman BA, Dias-Santagata D, Digumarthy S, Turke AB, Fidias P, Bergethon K, Shaw AT, Gettinger S, Cosper AK et al. (2011) Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci Transl Med 3, 75ra26.
43. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A and McGuire WL (1987) Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 235, 177–182.
44. Sandegren L and Andersson DI (2009) Bacterial gene amplification: implications for the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 7, 578–588.
45. Brown PC, Tlsty TD and Schimke RT (1983) Enhancement of methotrexate resistance and dihydrofolate reductase gene amplification by treatment of mouse 3T6 cells with hydroxyurea. Mol Cell Biol 3, 1097–1107.
46. Coquelle A, Pipiras E, Toledo F, Buttin G and Debatisse M (1997) Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons. Cell 89, 215–225.
47. Tanaka H, Cao Y, Bergstrom DA, Kooperberg C, Tapscott SJ and Yao MC (2007) Intrastrand annealing leads to the formation of a large DNA palindrome and determines the boundaries of genomic amplification in human cancer. Mol Cell Biol 27, 1993–2002.
48. Tanaka H, Tapscott SJ, Trask BJ and Yao MC (2002) Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 8772–8777.
49. Tlsty TD, Brown PC and Schimke RT (1984) UV radiation facilitates methotrexate resistance and amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in cultured 3T6 mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol 4, 1050–1056.
50. Kondratova A, Watanabe T, Marotta M, Cannon M, Segall AM, Serre D and Tanaka H (2015) Replication fork integrity and intra-S phase checkpoint suppress gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 2678–2690.
51. Bester AC, Roniger M, Oren YS, Im MM, Sarni D, Chaoat M, Bensimon A, Zamir G, Shewach DS and Kerem B (2011) Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435–446.
52. Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG and Bartek J (2008) An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352–1355.
53. Poli J, Tsaponina O, Crabbe L, Keszthelyi A, Pantesco V, Chabes A, Lengronne A and Pasero P (2012) dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 31, 883–894.
54. Zeman MK and Cimprich KA (2014) Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 16, 2–9.
55. Higgins NP, Kato K and Strauss B (1976) A model for replication repair in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 101, 417–425.
56. Seigneur M, Bidnenko V, Ehrlich SD and Michel B (1998) RuvAB acts at arrested replication forks. Cell 95, 419–430.
57. Fujiwara Y and Tatsumi M (1976) Replicative bypass repair of ultraviolet damage to DNA of mammalian cells: caffeine sensitive and caffeine resistant mechanisms. Mutat Res 37, 91–110.
58. Kuzminov A (2001) Single-strand interruptions in replicating chromosomes cause double-strand breaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 8241–8246.
59. Bidnenko V, Ehrlich SD and Michel B (2002) Replication fork collapse at replication terminator sequences. EMBO J 21, 3898–3907.
60. Eykelenboom JK, Blackwood JK, Okely E and Leach DR (2008) SbcCD causes a double-strand break at a DNA palindrome in the Escherichia coli chromosome. Mol Cell 29, 644–651.
61. Leach DR (1994) Long DNA palindromes, cruciform structures, genetic instability and secondary structure repair. BioEssays 16, 893–900.
62. Storm PK, Hoekstra WP, de Haan PG and Verhoef C (1971) Genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. IV. Isolation and characterization of recombination-deficiency mutants of Escherichia coli K12. Mutat Res 13, 9–17.
63. Lloyd RG and Buckman C (1991) Genetic analysis of the recG locus of Escherichia coli K-12 and of its role in recombination and DNA repair. J Bacteriol 173, 1004–1011.
64. Fukuoh A, Iwasaki H, Ishioka K and Shinagawa H (1997) ATP-dependent resolution of R-loops at the ColE1 replication origin by Escherichia coli RecG protein, a Holliday junction-specific helicase. EMBO J 16, 203–209.
65. Zegeye ED, Balasingham SV, Laerdahl JK, Homberset H and Tonjum T (2012) Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG binds and unwinds model DNA substrates with a preference for Holliday junctions. Microbiology 158, 1982–1993.
66. Thakur RS, Basavaraju S, Khanduja JS, Muniyappa K and Nagaraju G (2015) Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG protein but not RuvAB or RecA protein is efficient at remodeling the stalled replication forks: implications for multiple mechanisms of replication restart in mycobacteria. J Biol Chem 290, 24119–24139.
67. Thakur RS, Basavaraju S, Somyajit K, Jain A, Subramanya S, Muniyappa K and Nagaraju G (2013) Evidence for the role of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RecG helicase in DNA repair and recombination. FEBS J 280, 1841–1860.
68. Beyene GT, Balasingham SV, Frye SA, Namouchi A, Homberset H, Kalayou S, Riaz T and Tonjum T (2016) Characterization of the Neisseria meningitidis Helicase RecG. PLoS One 11, e0164588.
69. McGlynn P, Mahdi AA and Lloyd RG (2000) Characterisation of the catalytically active form of RecG helicase. Nucleic Acids Res 28, 2324–2332.
70. Singleton MR, Scaife S and Wigley DB (2001) Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG. Cell 107, 79–89.
71. McGlynn P, Lloyd RG and Marians KJ (2001) Formation of Holliday junctions by regression of nascent DNA in intermediates containing stalled replication forks: RecG stimulates regression even when the DNA is negatively supercoiled. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 8235–8240.
72. Bolt EL and Lloyd RG (2002) Substrate specificity of RusA resolvase reveals the DNA structures targeted by RuvAB and RecG in vivo. Mol Cell 10, 187–198.
73. McGlynn P and Lloyd RG (2002) Genome stability and the processing of damaged replication forks by RecG. Trends Genet 18, 413–419.
74. Gregg AV, McGlynn P, Jaktaji RP and Lloyd RG (2002) Direct rescue of stalled DNA replication forks via the combined action of PriA and RecG helicase activities. Mol Cell 9, 241–251.
75. Robu ME, Inman RB and Cox MM (2004) Situational repair of replication forks: roles of RecG and RecA proteins. J Biol Chem 279, 10973–10981.
76. Briggs GS, Mahdi AA, Weller GR, Wen Q and Lloyd RG (2004) Interplay between DNA replication, recombination and repair based on the structure of RecG helicase. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359, 49–59.
77. Bhattacharjee SM (2010) Interfacial instability and DNA fork reversal by repair proteins. J Phys Condens Matter 22, 155102.
78. Mahdi AA, Briggs GS, Sharples GJ, Wen Q and Lloyd RG (2003) A model for dsDNA translocation revealed by a structural motif common to RecG and Mfd proteins. EMBO J 22, 724–734.
79. Baharoglu Z, Petranovic M, Flores MJ and Michel B (2006) RuvAB is essential for replication forks reversal in certain replication mutants. EMBO J 25, 596–604.
80. De Septenville AL, Duigou S, Boubakri H and Michel B (2012) Replication fork reversal after replication-transcription collision. PLoS Genet 8, e1002622.
81. Flores MJ, Bierne H, Ehrlich SD and Michel B (2001) Impairment of lagging strand synthesis triggers the formation of a RuvABC substrate at replication forks. EMBO J 20, 619–629.
82. Grompone G, Ehrlich D and Michel B (2004) Cells defective for replication restart undergo replication fork reversal. EMBO Rep 5, 607–612.
83. Grompone G, Seigneur M, Ehrlich SD and Michel B (2002) Replication fork reversal in DNA polymerase III mutants of Escherichia coli: a role for the beta clamp. Mol Microbiol 44, 1331–1339.
84. Michel B, Boubakri H, Baharoglu Z, LeMasson M and Lestini R (2007) Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 6, 967–980.
85. Khan SR and Kuzminov A (2012) Replication forks stalled at ultraviolet lesions are rescued via RecA and RuvABC protein-catalyzed disintegration in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 287, 6250–6265.
86. Tanaka T and Masai H (2006) Stabilization of a stalled replication fork by concerted actions of two helicases. J Biol Chem 281, 3484–3493.
87. West SC (1997) Processing of recombination intermediates by the RuvABC proteins. Annu Rev Genet 31, 213–244.
88. Thaler DS, Stahl MM and Stahl FW (1987) Tests of the double-strand-break repair model for red-mediated recombination of phage lambda and plasmid lambda dv. Genetics 116, 501–511.
89. Bizard AH and Hickson ID (2014) The dissolution of double Holliday junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6, a016477.
90. Al-Deib AA, Mahdi AA and Lloyd RG (1996) Modulation of recombination and DNA repair by the RecG and PriA helicases of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 178, 6782–6789.
91. Masai H, Tanaka T and Kohda D (2010) Stalled replication forks: making ends meet for recognition and stabilization. BioEssays 32, 687–697.
92. Liu J and Marians KJ (1999) PriA-directed assembly of a primosome on D loop DNA. J Biol Chem 274, 25033–25041.
93. Marians KJ (1999) PriA: at the crossroads of DNA replication and recombination. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 63, 39–67.
94. Huang YH and Huang CY (2014) Structural insight into the DNA-binding mode of the primosomal proteins PriA, PriB, and DnaT. Biomed Res Int 2014, 195162.
95. Tanaka T, Mizukoshi T, Sasaki K, Kohda D and Masai H (2007) Escherichia coli PriA protein, two modes of DNA binding and activation of ATP hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 282, 19917–19927.
96. Sandler SJ, Samra HS and Clark AJ (1996) Differential suppression of priA2:kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC. Genetics 143, 5–13.
97. Hong X, Cadwell GW and Kogoma T (1995) Escherichia coli RecG and RecA proteins in R-loop formation. EMBO J 14, 2385–2392.
98. Kogoma T and Lark KG (1970) DNA replication in Escherichia coli: replication in absence of protein synthesis after replication inhibition. J Mol Biol 52, 143–164.
99. Kogoma T and Lark KG (1975) Characterization of the replication of Escherichia coli DNA in the absence of protein synthesis: stable DNA replication. J Mol Biol 94, 243–256.
100. Kogoma T, Skarstad K, Boye E, von Meyenburg K and Steen HB (1985) RecA protein acts at the initiation of stable DNA replication in rnh mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 163, 439–444.
101. Torrey TA and Kogoma T (1982) Suppressor mutations (rin) that specifically suppress the recA+ dependence of stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Gen Genet 187, 225–230.
102. Kogoma T (1978) A novel Escherichia coli mutant capable of DNA replication in the absence of protein synthesis. J Mol Biol 121, 55–69.
103. von Meyenburg K, Boye E, Skarstad K, Koppes L and Kogoma T (1987) Mode of initiation of constitutive stable DNA replication in RNase H-defective mutants of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 169, 2650–2658.
104. Asai T and Kogoma T (1994) Roles of ruvA, ruvC and recG gene functions in normal and DNA damage-inducible replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome. Genetics 137, 895–902.
105. Asai T, Sommer S, Bailone A and Kogoma T (1993) Homologous recombination-dependent initiation of DNA replication from DNA damage-inducible origins in Escherichia coli. EMBO J 12, 3287–3295.
106. Kogoma T, Torrey TA and Connaughton MJ (1979) Induction of UV-resistant DNA replication in Escherichia coli: induced stable DNA replication as an SOS function. Mol Gen Genet 176, 1–9.
107. Magee TR and Kogoma T (1990) Requirement of RecBC enzyme and an elevated level of activated RecA for induced stable DNA replication in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 172, 1834–1839.
108. Kogoma T (1997) Stable DNA replication: interplay between DNA replication, homologous recombination, and transcription. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61, 212–238.
109. Dillingham MS and Kowalczykowski SC (2008) RecBCD enzyme and the repair of double-stranded DNA breaks. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 72, 642–671.
110. Lovett ST (2011) The DNA exonucleases of Escherichia coli. EcoSal Plus 4.4.7, 1–30.
111. Dimude JU, Stockum A, Midgley-Smith SL, Upton AL, Foster HA, Khan A, Saunders NJ, Retkute R and Rudolph CJ (2015) The consequences of replicating in the wrong orientation: bacterial chromosome duplication without an active replication origin. MBio 6, 1–13.
112. Jaktaji RP and Lloyd RG (2003) PriA supports two distinct pathways for replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol 47, 1091–1100.
113. Cockram CA, Filatenkova M, Danos V, El Karoui M and Leach DR (2015) Quantitative genomic analysis of RecA protein binding during DNA double-strand break repair reveals RecBCD action in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, E4735–E4742.