Preference organization in oral proficiency interviews: The case of language ability assessments

Research on Language and Social Interaction

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 53-72

  Lazaraton, Anne ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031288014     PISSN: 08351813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3001_2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: The categorization and production of 'formal' interaction. The British Journal of Sociology, 33, 86-117.
2. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in the court. London: Macmillan.
3. Button, G. (1992). Answers as interactional products: Two sequential practices used in interviews. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 212-231). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
5. Frankel, R. M. (1990). Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In G. Psathas & R. Frankel (Eds.), Interaction competence (pp. 231-262). Washington, DC: University Press of America.
6. Greatbatch, D. (1988). A turn-taking system for British news interviews. Language in Society, 17, 401-430.
7. Greatbatch, D. (1992). On the management of disagreements between news interviewees. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 268-301). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, England: Polity.
9. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1989). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In P. A. Forstorp (Ed.), Discourse in professional and everyday culture. Linköping studies in communication (pp. 47-98). Linköping: University of Linköping.
10. Lazaraton, A. (1991). A conversation analysis of structure and interaction in the language interview. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
11. Lazaraton, A. (1992). The structural organization of a language interview: A conversation analytic perspective. System, 20, 373-386.
12. Pittenger, R. E., Hockett, C. F., & Danehy, J. J. (1960). The first five minutes. Ithaca, NY: Paul Martineau.
13. Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses. In J. N. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp. 79-112). New York: Academic.
14. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shape. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
15. Sacks, H. (1987 [1973]). On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 54-69). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
16. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (2 Vols.). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
17. Schegloff, E. (1989). From interview to confrontation: Observations of the Bush/Rather encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 22, 215-240.