Whatever happened to preference organisation?

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 583-604

  Boyle, Ronald ^a  

^a CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Discourse; English; Ethnomethodology; Preference

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034165539     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00060-0     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Ahrens, Ulrike, 1997. The interplay between interruptions and preference organization in conversation: New perspectives on a classic topic of gender research. In: Helga Kotthoff and Ruth Wodak, eds., Communicating gender in context, 79-105. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and Paul Drew, 1979. Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
3. Atkinson, J. Maxwell and John Heritage, eds., 1984. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Atkinson, Paul, 1988. Ethnomethodology: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology 14: 441-465.
5. Bilmes, Jack, 1988. The concept of preference in conversation analysis. Language in Society 17: 161-181.
6. Boden, Deirdre, 1990. People are talking: Conversation analysis and symbolic interaction. In: Howard S. Becker and Michal M. McCall, eds., Symbolic interaction and cultural studies, 244-274. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
7. Boden, Deirdre and Don H. Zimmerman, eds., 1991. Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Oxford: Polity Press.
8. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson, [1978] 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cameron, Deborah, 1990. Integrating conversation. Language and Communication 10, 219-227.
10. Chimombo, Moira P.F. and Robert L. Roseberry, 1998. The power of discourse: An introduction to discourse analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cook, Guy, 1989. Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Coulter, Jeff, 1983. Contingent and a priori structures in sequential analysis. Human Studies 6: 361-376.
13. Coulter, Jeff, 1995. The Sacks Lectures. Human Studies 18: 327-336.
14. Coulthard, Malcolm, 1985. An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.
15. Coupland, Justine, Nikolas Coupland and Jeffrey D. Robinson. 'How are you?': Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society 21: 207-230.
16. Cuff, E.C., W.W. Sharrock and D.W. Francis, 1987. Perspectives in sociology. Third edition. London: Routledge.
17. Czyzewski, Marek, 1989. Garfinkel, 'cognitive revolution', and conversation analysis. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 78: 43-55.
18. Drew, Paul, 1990. Conversation analysis: Who needs it? Text 10(1/2): 27-35.
19. Drew, Paul and John Heritage, eds., 1992. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Firth, Alan, ed., 1995. The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford: Pergamon.
21. Frankel, Richard, 1990. Talking in interviews: A dispreference for patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters. In: George Psathas, ed., 231-262.
22. Garfinkel, Harold, 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey Sacks, [1970] 1990. On formal structures of practical actions. In: Jeff Coulter, ed., Ethnomethodological sociology, 55-84. Aldershot: Elgar.
24. Goffman, Irving, 1955. On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry 19: 213-231.
25. Greatbatch, David, 1992. On the management of disagreement between news interviewees. In: Paul Drew and John Heritage, eds., Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, 268-301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Have, Paul ten, 1991. Talk and institution: A reconsideration of the 'asymmetry' of doctor-patient interaction. In: Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, eds., 138-163.
27. Have, Paul ten, 1999. Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide. London: Sage.
28. Have, Paul ten and George Psathas, eds., 1995. Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
29. Heritage, John, 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
30. Heritage, John, 1987. Ethnomethodology. In: Anthony Giddens and Jonathan H. Turner, eds., Social theory today, 224-272. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
31. Heritage, John, 1988. Explanations as accounts: A conversation analytic perspective. In: Charles Antaki, ed., Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods, 127-144. London: Sage.
32. Hutchby, Ian and Robin Wooffitt, 1998. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33. Jayyusi, Lena, 1991. Values and moral judgement: Communicative praxis as moral order. In: Graham Button, ed., Ethnomethodology and the human sciences, 227-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Jefferson, Gail, 1972. Side sequences. In: D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in social interaction, 294-338, New York: Free Press.
35. Jefferson, Gail, 1980. On 'trouble-premonitory' response to inquiry. Sociological Inquiry 50: 153-185.
36. Jefferson, Gail, 1985. On the interactional unpacking of a 'gloss'. Language in Society 14: 435-466.
37. Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks and Emanuel Schegloff, 1987. Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In: Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and Social Organisation, 152-205. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
38. Kotthoff, Helga, 1993. Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures. Language in Society 22: 193-216.
39. Jong, Erica, 1995. Fear of fifty: A mid-life memoir. London: Chatto.
40. Levinson, Stephen C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Maynard, Douglas W. and Steven E. Clayman, 1991. The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385-418.
42. Mazeland, Harrie, Marjan Huisman and Marca Schasfoort, 1995. Negotiating categories in travel agency calls. In: Alan Firth, ed., The discourse of negotiation: studies of language in the workplace, 271-297. Oxford: Pergamon.
43. Mey, Jacob L., 1993. Pragmatics: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
44. Moerman, Michael, 1977. The preference for self-correction in a Tai conversational corpus. Language 53: 872-882.
45. Moerman, Michael, 1988. Talking culture: Ethnography and conversation analysis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
46. Pomerantz, Anita, 1978. Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In: Jim N. Schenkein, ed., Studies in the organization of conversational interaction, 79-112. New York: Academic Press.
47. Pomerantz, Anita, 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., 57-101.
48. Psathas, George, 1995. Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Richards, Keith, 1996. Opening the staffroom door: Aspects of collaborative interaction in a small language school. Vol. 2. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Aston in Birmingham.
50. Sacks, Harvey, 1975. Everyone has to lie. In: Ben G. Blount and Mary Sanches, eds., Sociocultural dimensions of language use, 57-79. New York: Academic Press.
51. Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In: J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, eds., 21-27.
52. Sacks, Harvey, [1973] 1987. On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In: Graham Button and John R.E. Lee, eds., Talk and social organisation, 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
53. Sacks, Harvey, 1992a. Lectures on conversation: Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
54. Sacks, Harvey, 1992b. Lectures on conversation: Vol. II. Oxford: Blackwell.
55. Sacks, Harvey and Emanuel A. Schegloff, 1979. Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons in conversation and their interaction. In: George Psathas, ed., Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 15-21. New York: Irvington.
56. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff and Gail Jefferson, 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735.
57. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075-1095.
58. Schegloff, Emanuel, A., 1972. Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In: D. Sudnow, ed., Studies in social interaction, 75-119. New York: Free Press.
59. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1986. The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9: 111-151.
60. Schegloff, Emanuel, A., 1988. On an actual virtual servo-mechanism for guessing bad news: A single-case conjecture. Social Problems 35: 442-457.
61. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, eds., 44-70.
62. Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson and Harvey Sacks, [1977] 1990. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. In: George Psathas, ed., 31-61.
63. Schütz, Alfred, 1962. Collected papers 1 : The problem of social reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
64. Seedhouse, Paul, 1997. The case of the missing 'no': The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning 47: 547-583.
65. Taylor, Elizabeth, 1994. Preference organization in teacher-supervisor talk. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 11: 137-152.
66. Taylor, Talbot and Deborah Cameron, 1987. Analysing conversation: Rules and units in the structure of talk. Oxford: Pergamon.
67. Toolan, Michael, 1989. Ruling out rules in the analysis of conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 13: 251-274.
68. Watson, Graham and Robert M. Seiler, eds., 1992. Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
69. Yule, George, 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
70. Zimmerman, Don H. and Deirdre Boden, 1991. Structure-in-action: An introduction. In: Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, eds., 3-21.