Mapping the membrane proteome of anaerobic gut fungi identifies a wealth of carbohydrate binding proteins and transporters

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Seppälä, Susanna ^a,b   Solomon, Kevin V ^b,c   Gilmore, Sean P ^b   Henske, John K ^b   O'Malley, Michelle A ^b  

^a Chalmers University of Technology   (Denmark)

^b University of California   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic fungi; Carbohydrate binding proteins; Lignocellulose; Membrane proteins; Microbial engineering

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE BINDING PROTEIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; ION; PROTEOME; TRACE METAL; TRANSCRIPTOME; CARBOHYDRATE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; LIGNIN; LIGNOCELLULOSE; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANAEROBIC GUT FUNGUS; ANAEROMYCES ROBUSTUS; ARTICLE; CELL SELECTION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS; ION TRANSPORT; MEMBRANE; NEOCALLIMASTIX; NEOCALLIMASTIX CALIFORNIAE; NONHUMAN; PIROMYCES; PIROMYCES FINNIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECRETION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; FECES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; GOAT; HORSE; INTESTINE; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; NEOCALLIMASTIGALES; PROCEDURES; SHEEP; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; CARBOHYDRATES; FECES; FUNGAL PROTEINS; FUNGI; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GOATS; HORSES; INTESTINES; LIGNIN; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; NEOCALLIMASTIGALES; PIROMYCES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEOME; SHEEP; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 85006802775     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0611-7     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Kell DB, Swainston N, Pir P, Oliver SG. Membrane transporter engineering in industrial biotechnology and whole cell biocatalysis. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:237-46.
2. Boyarskiy S, Tullman-Ercek D. Getting pumped: membrane efflux transporters for enhanced biomolecule production. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2015;28:15-9.
3. Nieves LM, Panyon LA, Wang X. Engineering sugar utilization and microbial tolerance toward lignocellulose conversion. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:17.
4. Turner WJ, Dunlop MJ. Trade-offs in improving biofuel tolerance using combinations of efflux pumps. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:1056-63.
5. Hector RE, Qureshi N, Hughes SR, Cotta MA. Expression of a heterologous xylose transporter in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to utilize xylose improves aerobic xylose consumption. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80:675-84.
6. Young E, Poucher A, Comer A, Bailey A, Alper H. Functional survey for heterologous sugar transport proteins, using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a host. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3311-9.
7. Ha SJ, Galazka JM, Joong OhE, Kordić V, Kim H, Jin YS, et al. Energetic benefits and rapid cellobiose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing cellobiose phosphorylase and mutant cellodextrin transporters. Metab Eng. 2013;15:134-43.
8. Dunlop MJ, Dossani ZY, Szmidt HL, Chu HC, Lee TS, Keasling JD, et al. Engineering microbial biofuel tolerance and export using efflux pumps. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:487.
9. Geddes RD, Wang X, Yomano LP, Miller EN, Zheng H, Shanmugam KT, et al. Polyamine transporters and polyamines increase furfural tolerance during xylose fermentation with ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain LY180. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:5955-64.
10. Yu AQ, Pratomo Juwono NK, Foo JL, Leong SSJ, Chang MW. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the overproduction of short branched-chain fatty acids. Metab Eng. 2016;34:36-43.
11. Benson DA, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, et al. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D36-42.
12. von Heijne G, Gavel Y. Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. Eur J Biochem. 1988;174:671-8.
13. Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:567-80.
14. Rapoport TA. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature. 2007;450:663-9.
15. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8:785-6.
16. Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:3420-35.
17. Saier MH, Reddy VS, Tamang DG, Västermark A. The transporter classification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D251-8.
18. Orpin CG. Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol. 1975;91:249-62.
19. Solomon KV, Haitjema CH, Henske JK, Gilmore SP, Borges-Rivera D, Lipzen A, et al. Early-branching gut fungi possess a large, comprehensive array of biomass-degrading enzymes. Science. 2016;351:1192-5.
20. Theodorou MK, Mennim G, Davies DR, Zhu WY, Trinci AP, Brookman JL. Anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of mammalian herbivores and their potential for exploitation. Proc Nutr Soc. 1996;55:913-26.
21. Wood TM, Wilson CA. Studies on the capacity of the cellulase of the anaerobic rumen fungus Piromonas communis P to degrade hydrogen bond-ordered cellulose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1995;43:572-8.
22. Gruninger RJ, Puniya AK, Callaghan TM, Edwards JE, Youssef N, Dagar SS, et al. Anaerobic fungi (phylum Neocallimastigomycota): advances in understanding their taxonomy, life cycle, ecology, role and biotechnological potential. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;90:1-17.
23. Haitjema CH, Solomon KV, Henske JK, Theodorou MK, O'Malley MA. Anaerobic gut fungi: advances in isolation, culture, and cellulolytic enzyme discovery for biofuel production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:1471-82.
24. Krause DO, Nagaraja TG, Wright ADG, Callaway TR. Board-invited review: rumen microbiology: leading the way in microbial ecology. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:331-41.
25. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Ossa F. REVIEW: the rumen microbiome: Composition, abundance, diversity, and new investigative tools. Prof Anim Sci. 2014;30:1-12.
26. Li GJ, Hyde KD, Zhao RL, Hongsanan S, Abdel-Aziz FA, Abdel-Wahab MA, et al. Fungal diversity notes 253-366: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016;78:1-237.
27. Sonnhammer EL, von Heijne G, Krogh A. A hidden Markov model for predicting transmembrane helices in protein sequences. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1998;6:175-82.
28. Teunissen MJ, Op den Camp HJM. Anaerobic fungi and their cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993;63:63-76.
29. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25-9.
30. Theodoulou FL, Kerr ID. ABC transporter research: going strong 40 years on. Biochem Soc Trans. 2015;43:1033-40.
31. Lemmon MA, Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell. 2010;141:1117-34.
32. Hubert P, Sawma P, Duneau J-P, Khao J, Hénin J, Bagnard D, et al. Single-spanning transmembrane domains in cell growth and cell-cell interactions. Cell Adh Migr. 2014;4:313-24.
33. Kemp G, Cymer F. Small membrane proteins - elucidating the function of the needle in the haystack. Biol Chem. 2014;395:1365-77.
34. Zviling M, Kochva U, Arkin IT. How important are transmembrane helices of bitopic membrane proteins? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1768:387-92.
35. Youssef NH, Couger MB, Struchtemeyer CG, Liggenstoffer AS, Prade RA, Najar FZ, et al. The genome of the anaerobic fungus Orpinomyces sp. strain C1A reveals the unique evolutionary history of a remarkable plant biomass degrader. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:4620-34.
36. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403-10.
37. Almén MS, Nordström KJ, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. Mapping the human membrane proteome: a majority of the human membrane proteins can be classified according to function and evolutionary origin. BMC Biol. 2009;7:50.
38. Wimley WC. Toward genomic identification of beta-barrel membrane proteins: composition and architecture of known structures. Protein Sci. 2002;11:301-12.
39. Bigelow HR, Petrey DS, Liu J, Przybylski D, Rost B. Predicting transmembrane beta-barrels in proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:2566-77.
40. Beck M, Förster F, Ecke M, Plitzko JM, Melchior F, Gerisch G, et al. Nuclear pore complex structure and dynamics revealed by cryoelectron tomography. Science. 2004;306:1387-90.
41. Blobel G. Intracellular protein topogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:1496-500.
42. Amm I, Sommer T, Wolf DH. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:182-96.
43. Wickner W, Schekman R. Membrane fusion. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2008;15:658-64.
44. Gerke V, Creutz CE, Moss SE. Annexins: linking Ca2+ signalling to membrane dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:449-61.
45. Marvin-Sikkema FD, Pedro Gomes TM, Gottschal JC, Prins RA, Marvin-Sikkema FD. Characterization of hydrogenosomes and their role in glucose metabolism of Neocallimastix sp. L2. Arch Microbiol. 1993;160:388-96.
46. Makiuchi T, Nozaki T. Highly divergent mitochondrion-related organelles in anaerobic parasitic protozoa. Biochimie. 2014;100:3-17.
47. Becker T, Gebert M, Pfanner N, van der Laan M. Biogenesis of mitochondrial membrane proteins. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:484-93.
48. Strittmatter P, Soll J, Bölter B. The chloroplast protein import machinery: a review. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;619:307-21.
49. Platta HW, Hagen S, Erdmann R. The exportomer: the peroxisomal receptor export machinery. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:1393-411.
50. Dickmanns A, Kehlenbach RH, Fahrenkrog B. Nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport: from structure to function to disease. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2015;320:171-233.
51. Preston GM, Carroll TP, Guggino WB, Agre P. Appearance of water channels in Xenopus oocytes expressing red cell CHIP28 protein. Science. 1992;256:385-7.
52. 2 in living organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840:1592-5.
53. Young EM, Comer AD, Huang H, Alper HS. A molecular transporter engineering approach to improving xylose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:401-11.
54. Young EM, Tong A, Bui H, Spofford C, Alper HS. Rewiring yeast sugar transporter preference through modifying a conserved protein motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:131-6.
55. Farwick A, Bruder S, Schadeweg V, Oreb M, Boles E. Engineering of yeast hexose transporters to transport d-xylose without inhibition by d-glucose. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:5159-64.
56. Wang M, Yu C, Zhao H. Directed evolution of xylose specific transporters to facilitate glucose-xylose co-utilization. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;113:484-91.
57. Chen LQ, Cheung LS, Feng L, Tanner W, Frommer WB. Transport of sugars. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:865-94.
58. Mishra NK, Chang J, Zhao PX, Fotiadis D. Prediction of membrane transport proteins and their substrate specificities using primary sequence information. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100278.
59. Rees DC, Johnson E, Lewinson O. ABC transporters: the power to change. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:218-27.
60. ter Beek J, Guskov A, Slotboom DJ. Structural diversity of ABC transporters. J Gen Physiol. 2014;143:419-35.
61. van der Heide T, Poolman B. ABC transporters: one, two or four extracytoplasmic substrate-binding sites? EMBO Rep. 2002;3:938-43.
62. Fukami-Kobayashi K, Tateno Y, Nishikawa K. Domain dislocation: a change of core structure in periplasmic binding proteins in their evolutionary history. J Mol Biol. 1999;286:279-90.
63. Berntsson RP, Smits SHJ, Schmitt L, Slotboom DJ, Poolman B. A structural classification of substrate-binding proteins. FEBS Lett. 2010;584:2606-17.
64. Gough J, Karplus K, Hughey R, Chothia C. Assignment of homology to genome sequences using a library of hidden Markov models that represent all proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol. 2001;313:903-19.
65. Murzin AG, Brenner SE, Hubbard T, Chothia C. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol. 1995;247:536-40.
66. O'Hara PJ, Sheppard PO, Thøgersen H, Venezia D, Haldeman BA, McGrane V, et al. The ligand-binding domain in metabotropic glutamate receptors is related to bacterial periplasmic binding proteins. Neuron. 1993;11:41-52.
67. Felder CB, Graul RC, Lee AY, Merkle HP, Sadee W. The Venus flytrap of periplasmic binding proteins: an ancient protein module present in multiple drug receptors. AAPS PharmSci. 1999;1:E2.
68. Armstrong N, Sun Y, Chen GQ, Gouaux E. Structure of a glutamate-receptor ligand-binding core in complex with kainate. Nature. 1998;395:913-7.
69. Spurlino JC, Lu GY, Quiocho FA. The 2.3-A resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:5202-19.
70. van der Giezen M, Slotboom DJ, Horner DS, Dyal PL, Harding M, Xue GP, et al. Conserved properties of hydrogenosomal and mitochondrial ADP/ATP carriers: a common origin for both organelles. EMBO J. 2002;21:572-9.
71. Voncken F, Boxma B, Tjaden J, Akhmanova A, Huynen M, Verbeek F, et al. Multiple origins of hydrogenosomes: functional and phylogenetic evidence from the ADP/ATP carrier of the anaerobic chytrid Neocallimastix sp. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44:1441-54.
72. Haferkamp I, Hackstein JHP, Voncken FGJ, Schmit G, Tjaden J. Functional integration of mitochondrial and hydrogenosomal ADP/ATP carriers in the Escherichia coli membrane reveals different biochemical characteristics for plants, mammals and anaerobic chytrids. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:3172-81.
73. Chen B, Ling H, Chang MW. Transporter engineering for improved tolerance against alkane biofuels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:21.
74. Frederix M, Hütter K, Leu J, Batth TS, Turner WJ, Rüegg TL, et al. Development of a native Escherichia coli induction system for ionic liquid tolerance. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101115.
75. Coleman JJ, Mylonakis E. Efflux in fungi: la pièce de résistance. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000486.
76. Sá-Correia I, dos Santos SC, Teixeira MC, Cabrito TR, Mira NP. Drug:H+ antiporters in chemical stress response in yeast. Trends Microbiol. 2009;17:22-31.
77. Xu X, Chen J, Xu H, Li D. Role of a major facilitator superfamily transporter in adaptation capacity of Penicillium funiculosum under extreme acidic stress. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;69:75-83.
78. Costa C, Dias PJ, Sá-Correia I, Teixeira MC. MFS multidrug transporters in pathogenic fungi: do they have real clinical impact? Front Physiol. 2014;5:197.
79. Pomorski T, Menon AK. Lipid flippases and their biological functions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006;63:2908-21.
80. Montigny C, Lyons J, Champeil P, Nissen P, Lenoir G. On the molecular mechanism of flippase- and scramblase-mediated phospholipid transport. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1861:767-83.
81. Gomès E, Jakobsen MK, Axelsen KB, Geisler M, Palmgren MG. Chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis involves ALA1, a member of a new family of putative aminophospholipid translocases. Plant Cell. 2000;12:2441-54.
82. Rodríguez-Vargas S, Sánchez-García A, Martínez-Rivas JM, Prieto JA, Randez-Gil F. Fluidization of membrane lipids enhances the tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to freezing and salt stress. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:110-6.
83. Cyert MS, Philpott CC. Regulation of cation balance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2013;193:677-713.
84. Wang J, Zhang B, Zhang J, Wang H, Zhao M, Wang N, et al. Enhanced succinic acid production and magnesium utilization by overexpression of magnesium transporter mgtA in Escherichia coli mutant. Bioresour Technol. 2014;170:125-31.
85. Duprey A, Chansavang V, Frémion F, Gonthier C, Louis Y, Lejeune P, et al. "NiCo Buster": engineering E. coli for fast and efficient capture of cobalt and nickel. J Biol Eng. 2014;8:19.
86. Kim SK, Lee BS, Wilson DB, Kim EK. Selective cadmium accumulation using recombinant Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;99:109-14.
87. Lagerström MC, Schiöth HB. Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:339-57.
88. Fredriksson R, Lagerström MC, Lundin LG, Schiöth HB. The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. Mol Pharmacol. 2003;63:1256-72.
89. Kolakowski LF. GCRDb: a G-protein-coupled receptor database. Receptors Channels. 1994;2:1-7.
90. Louis JM, Ginsburg GT, Kimmel AR. The cAMP receptor CAR4 regulates axial patterning and cellular differentiation during late development of Dictyostelium. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2086-96.
91. Krishnan A, Almén MS, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. The origin of GPCRs: identification of mammalian like Rhodopsin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled GPCRs in fungi. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e29817.
92. Pin JP, Galvez T, Prézeau L. Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 2003;98:325-54.
93. Liu X, He Q, Studholme DJ, Wu Q, Liang S, Yu L. NCD3G: a novel nine-cysteine domain in family 3 GPCRs. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004;29:458-61.
94. Marin-Rodriguez MC. Pectate lyases, cell wall degradation and fruit softening. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:2115-9.
95. Mayans O, Scott M, Connerton I, Gravesen T, Benen J, Visser J, et al. Two crystal structures of pectin lyase A from Aspergillus reveal a pH driven conformational change and striking divergence in the substrate-binding clefts of pectin and pectate lyases. Structure. 1997;5:677-89.
96. Jenkins J, Mayans O, Pickersgill R. Structure and evolution of parallel beta-helix proteins. J Struct Biol. 1998;122:236-46.
97. Davis CG. The many faces of epidermal growth factor repeats. New Biol. 1990;2:410-9.
98. Bjarnadóttir TK, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. The adhesion GPCRs: a unique family of G protein-coupled receptors with important roles in both central and peripheral tissues. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:2104-19.
99. Zhang Z. A brief review on the evolution of GPCR: conservation and diversification. Open J Genet. 2012;2:11-7.
100. Zhang Z, Wu J, Xiao J, Zhang Z, Zhao Y, Jin Z, et al. Systematic study on G-protein couple receptor prototypes: did they really evolve from prokaryotic genes? IET Syst Biol. 2014;8:154-61.
101. Cao J, Huang S, Qian J, Huang J, Jin L, Su Z, et al. Evolution of the class C GPCR Venus flytrap modules involved positive selected functional divergence. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:67.
102. Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL. A combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction method. J Mol Biol. 2004;338:1027-36.