Polyamine transporters and polyamines increase furfural tolerance during xylose fermentation with ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain LY180

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 80, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 5955-5964

  Geddes, Ryan D ^a   Wang, Xuan ^a   Yomano, Lorraine P ^a   Miller, Elliot N ^a   Zheng, Huabao ^a   Shanmugam, Keelnatham T ^a   Ingram, Lonnie O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINES; BIOASSAY; CLONING; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; FURFURAL; GENES; MINERAL INDUSTRY; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; SALTS;

CELLULAR CONSTITUENTS; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; GENETIC CHANGES; MINERAL SALTS MEDIUMS; NEGATIVELY CHARGED; RESISTANT MUTANTS; TRANSPORTER GENES; XYLOSE FERMENTATION;

ALDEHYDES;

BACTERIUM; FERMENTATION; METABOLISM; MINERAL; MUTATION; STRAIN;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

AGMATINE; ALCOHOL; CADAVERINE; CARRIER PROTEIN; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN; FURFURAL; POLYAMINE; PUTRESCINE; XYLOSE;

DNA MICROARRAY; DNA SEQUENCE; DRUG EFFECTS; DRUG TOLERANCE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASMID;

AGMATINE; BASE SEQUENCE; CADAVERINE; DRUG TOLERANCE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; FURALDEHYDE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PLASMIDS; POLYAMINES; PUTRESCINE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEQUENCE DELETION; XYLOSE;

EID: 84907033507     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01913-14     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Chundawat SPS, Beckham GT, Himmel ME, Dale BE. 2011. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass to fuels and chemicals. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2:121-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chem bioeng-061010-114205
2. Da Costa Sousa L, Chundawat SP, Balan V, Dale BE. 2009. 'Cradle-tograve' assessment of existing lignocellulose pretreatment technologies. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20:339-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio .2009.05.003
3. Jo¨nsson LJ, Alriksson B, Nilvebrant NO. 2013. Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6:16. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-16
4. Mills TY, Sandoval NR, Gill RT. 2009. Cellulosic hydrolysate toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2:26. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-26
5. Almeida JR, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Gorsich S, Liden G. 2009. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 82:625-638. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s00253-009-1875-1
6. Miller EN, Jarboe LR, Turner PC, Pharkya P, Yomano LP, York SW, Nunn D, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2009. Furfural inhibits growth by limiting sulfur assimilation in ethanologenic Escherichia coli strain LY180. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:6132-6141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM .01187-09
7. Miller EN, Turner PC, Jarboe LR, Ingram LO. 2010. Genetic changes that increase 5-hydroxymethyl furfural resistance in ethanol-producing Escherichia coli LY180. Biotechnol. Lett. 32:661-667. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s10529-010-0209-9
8. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. 2000. Effects of Ca(OH)2 treatments ("overliming") on the composition and toxicity of bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 69: 526 -536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0290(20000905)69:5526::AI D-BIT7 3.0.CO;2-E
9. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, Wells ML, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. 2001. Detoxification of dilute acid hydrolysates of lignocellulose with lime. Biotechnol. Prog. 17:287-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bp0001720
10. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slinger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD. 2006. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genesZWF1,GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 71:339-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 /s00253-005-0142-3
11. Liu ZL, Moon J, Andersh BJ, Slininger PJ, Weber S. 2008. Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 81:743-753. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1007/s00253-008-1702-0
12. Liu ZL, Moon J. 2009. A novel NADPH-dependent aldehyde reductase gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae NRRL Y-12632 involved in the detoxification of aldehyde inhibitors derived from lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Gene 446:1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2009.06.018
13. Wang X, Yomano LP, Lee JY, York SW, Zheng H, Mullinnix MT, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2013. Engineering furfural tolerance in Escherichia coli improves the fermentation of lignocellulosic sugars into renewable chemicals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110:4021-4026. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217958110
14. Zheng H, Wang X, Yomano LP, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2012. Increase in furfural tolerance in ethanologenic Escherichia coli LY180 by plasmid-based expression of thyA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:4346-4352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00356-12
15. Glebes TY, Sandoval NR, Reeder PJ, Schilling KD, Zhang M, Gill RT. 2014. Genome-wide mapping of furfural tolerance genes in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 9:e87540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087540
16. Skerker JM, Leon D, Price MN, Mar JS, Tarjan DR, Wetmore KM, Deutschbauer AM, Baumohl JK, Bauer S, Iba´ñez AB, Mitchell VD, Wu CH, Hu P, Hazen T, Arkin AP. 2013. Dissecting a complex chemicalstress: chemogenomic profiling of plant hydrolysates. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9:674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2013.30
17. Kim D, Hahn JS. 2013. Roles of Yap1 transcription factor and antioxidants in yeast tolerance to furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural that function as thiol-reactive electrophiles generating oxidative stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79:5069 -5077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128 /AEM.00643-13
18. Laadan B, Almeida JR, Radstro¨m P, Hahn-Ha¨gerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund M. 2008. Identification of an NADH-dependent 5-hydroxymethylfurfural-reducing alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 25:191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1578
19. Miller EN, Jarboe LR, Yomano LP, York SW, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2009. Silencing of NADPH-dependent oxidoreductase genes (yqhD and dkgA) in furfural-resistant ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:4315-4323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00567-09
20. Wang X, Miller EN, Yomano LP, Zhang X, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2011. Increased furfural tolerance due to overexpression of NADHdependent oxidoreductase FucO in Escherichia coli strains engineered for the production of ethanol and lactate. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77: 5132-5140
21. Zingaro KA, Papoutsakis ET. 2012. Toward a semisynthetic stress response to engineer microbial solvent tolerance. mBio 3(5):e00308-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00308-12
22. Zingaro KA, Papoutsakis ET. 2013. GroESL overexpression imparts Escherichia coli tolerance to i-, n-, and 2-butanol, 1,2,4-butanetriol and ethanol with complex and unpredictable patterns. Metab. Eng. 15:196-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.07.009
23. Chandel AK, Silva SS, Singh OV. 2013. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates: biochemical and metabolic engineering towards white biotechnology. Bioenerg. Res. 6:388-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12155 -012-9241-z
24. Hadi SM, Shahabuddin RA. 1989. Specificity of the interaction of furfural with DNA. Mutat. Res. 225:101-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165 -7992(89)90125-5
25. Allen SA, Clark W, McCaffery JM, Cai Z, Lanctot A, Slininger PJ, Liu L, Gorsich SW. 2010. Furfural induces reactive oxygen species accumulation and cellular damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Biofuels 3:2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-2
26. Modig T, Liden G, Taherzadeh MJ. 2002. Inhibition effects of furfural on alcohol dehydrogenase, aldehyde dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase. Biochem. J. 363:769 -776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042 /0264-6021:3630769
27. Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. 2006. Polyamine modulon in Escherichia coli: genes involved in the stimulation of cell growth by polyamines. J. Biochem. 139:11-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jb/mvj020
28. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:6640-6645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.120163297
29. Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W. 1995. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR andKmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene 158:9-14. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1016/0378-1119(95)00193-A.
30. Turner PC, Miller EN, Jarboe LR, Baggett CL, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2011. YqhC regulates transcription of the adjacent Escherichia coli genes yqhD and dkgA that are involved in furfural tolerance. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38:431-439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010 -0787-5
31. Martinez A, Grabar TB, Shanmugam KT, Yomano LP, York SW, Ingram LO. 2007. Low salt medium for lactate and ethanol production by recombinant Escherichia coli B. Biotechnol. Lett. 29:397-404. http://dx .doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9252-y
32. Martinez A, Rodriguez ME, York SW, Preston JF, Ingram LO. 2000. Use of UV absorbance to monitor furans in dilute acid hydrolysates of biomass. Biotechnol. Prog. 16:637-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021 /bp0000508
33. Schneider J, Wendisch VF. 2011. Biotechnological production of polyamines by bacteria: recent achievements and future perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91:17-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011 -3252-0
34. Purvis JE, Yomano LP, Ingram LO. 2005. Enhanced trehalose production improves growth of Escherichia coli under osmotic stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:3761-3769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.7.3761 -3769.2005
35. Turner PC, Yomano LP, Jarboe LR, York SW, Baggett CL, Moritz BE, Zentz EB, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2012. Optical mapping and sequencing of the Escherichia coli KO11 genome reveal extensive chromosomal rearrangements, and multiple tandem copies of the Zymomonas mobilis pdc and adhB genes. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39:629-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-011-1052-2
36. Sandegren L, Andersson DI. 2009. Bacterial gene amplification: implications for the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7:578-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2174
37. Kusano T, Berberich T, Tateda C, Takahashi Y. 2008. Polyamines: essential factors for growth and survival. Planta 228:367-381. http://dx .doi.org/10.1007/s00425-008-0772-7
38. Liu ZL. 2011. Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 90: 809-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3167-9
39. Zaldivar J, Martinez A, Ingram LO. 2000. Effect of alcohol compounds found in hemicellulose hydrolysate on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 68:524-530. http://dx .doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000605)68:5524::AID-BIT6 3 .0.CO;2-T
40. Zaldivar J, Martinez A, Ingram LO. 1999. Effect of selected aldehydes on the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 65:24-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991 005)65:124::AID-BIT4 3.0.CO;2-2
41. Tkachenko A, Nesterova L, Pshenichnov M. 2001. The role of the natural polyamine putrescine in defense against oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. Arch. Microbiol. 176:155-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002030100301
42. Tkachenko AG, Akhova AV, Shumkov MS, Nesterova LY. 2012. Polyamines reduce oxidative stress in Escherichia coli cells exposed to bactericidal antibiotics. Res. Microbiol. 163:83-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j .resmic.2011.10.009
43. Wang X, Miller EN, Yomano LP, Shanmugam KT, Ingram LO. 2012. Increased furan tolerance in Escherichia coli due to a cryptic ucpA gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78:2452-2455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM .07783-11
44. Wortham BW, Patel CN, Oliveira MA. 2007. Polyamines in bacteria: pleiotropic effects yet specific mechanisms. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 603:106-115http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-72124-8_9
45. Tabor C W, Tabor H. 1984. Polyamines. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 53:749-790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.003533
46. Boyle SM, MacIntyre MF, Sells BH. 1977. Polyamine levels in Escherichia coli during nutritional shiftup and exponential growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 477:221-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0005-2787(77)90047-8
47. Van Dam L, Korolev N, Nordenskiod L. 2002. Polyamine-nucleic acid interactions and the effects on structure in oriented DNA fibers. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:419-428
48. Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. 2000. Polyamines: mysterious modulators of cellular functions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271:559-564. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.2601
49. Fukuchi J, Kashiwagi K, Yamagishi M, Ishihama A, Igarashi K. 1995. Decrease in cell viability due to the accumulation of spermidine in spermidine acetyltransferase-deficient mutant of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 270:18831-18835http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.32.18831
50. Limsuwun K, Jones PG. 2000. Spermidine acetyltransferase is required to prevent spermidine toxicity at low temperatures in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182:5373-5380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JB.182 .19.5373-5380.2000