Energetic benefits and rapid cellobiose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing cellobiose phosphorylase and mutant cellodextrin transporters

Metabolic Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 134-143

  Ha, Suk Jin ^a,d   Galazka, Jonathan M ^b   Joong Oh, Eun ^a   Kordić, Vesna ^b   Kim, Heejin ^a   Jin, Yong Su ^a   Cate, Jamie H D ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

glucosidase; Cellobiose; Cellodextrin transporter; Phosphorylase; Thermodynamics

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; CELLOBIOSE; CELLODEXTRIN; ETHANOL YIELD; FERMENTATION RATE; GLUCOSIDASE; PHOSPHOROLYSIS; PHOSPHORYLASE; PLANT BIOMASS; S.CEREVISIAE; STRESS CONDITION; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BIOMASS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GLUCOSE; PHOSPHORYLATION; REACTION RATES; THERMODYNAMICS;

YEAST;

BETA GLUCOSIDASE; CARRIER PROTEIN; CELLOBIOSE; CELLODEXTRIN TRANSPORTER; PHOSPHORYLASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOMASS FERMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPHOSPHORYLATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; THERMODYNAMICS;

CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOSE; DEXTRINS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84871442608     PISSN: 10967176     EISSN: 10967184     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2012.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alexander J.K. Characteristics of cellobiose phosphorylase. J. Bacteriol. 1961, 81:903-910.
2. Alexander J.K. Purification and specificity of cellobiose phosphorylase from Clostridium thermocellum. J. Biol. Chem. 1968, 243:2899-2904.
3. Almeida J.R., et al. Stress-related challenges in pentose fermentation to ethanol by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. J 2011, 6:286-299.
4. Arendt C.S., et al. Genetic selection for a highly functional cysteine-less membrane protein using site saturation mutagenesis. Anal. Biochem. 2007, 365:185-193.
5. Bergmeyer H.U., et al. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 1983, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1983.
6. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
7. Cantarel B.L., et al. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for Glycogenomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D233-D238.
8. Carroll A., Somerville C. Cellulosic biofuels. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:165-182.
9. Casey E., et al. Effect of acetic acid and pH on the cofermentation of glucose and xylose to ethanol by a genetically engineered strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fems. Yeast Res. 2010, 10:385-393.
10. de Kok S., et al. Increasing free-energy (ATP) conservation in maltose-grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae by expression of a heterologous maltose phosphorylase. Metab. Eng. 2011, 13:518-526.
11. Galazka J.M., et al. Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 2010, 330:84-86.
12. Goldberg R.N. Thermodynamics of hexokinase-catalyzed reactions. Biophys. Chem. 1975, 3:192-205.
13. Goldberg R.N., Tewari Y.B. A calorimetric and equilibrium investigation of the hydrolysis of lactose. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264:9897-9900.
14. Ha S.J., et al. Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2011, 108:504-509.
15. Hahn-Hagerdal B., et al. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 74:937-953.
16. Hess M., et al. Metagenomic discovery of biomass-degrading genes and genomes from cow rumen. Science 2011, 331:463-467.
17. Hosaka K., et al. A dominant mutation that alters the regulation of INO1 expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biochem. 1992, 111:352-358.
18. Humbird D., Tao Kinchin, Hsu Aden, Schoen Lukas, Olthof Worley, Sexton Dudgeon Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover. Technical Report, NREL/TP 2011, 5100-47764.
19. Li S., et al. Overcoming glucose repression in mixed sugar fermentation by co-expressing a cellobiose transporter and a beta-glucosidase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biosyst. 2010, 6:2129-2132.
20. Lou J., et al. Role of phosphorolytic cleavage in cellobiose and cellodextrin metabolism by the ruminal bacterium Prevotella ruminicola. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62:1770-1773.
21. Ma M., Liu Z.L. Mechanisms of ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87:829-845.
22. Machida M., et al. Nucleotide sequences of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera genes for extracellular beta-glucosidases as expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988, 54:3147-3155.
23. Nevoigt E. Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72:379-412.
24. Oh D., Hopper J.E. Transcription of a yeast phosphoglucomutase isozyme gene is galactose inducible and glucose repressible. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990, 10:1415-1422.
25. Parker L.L., Hall B.G. Characterization and nucleotide sequence of the cryptic cel operon of Escherichia coli K12. Genetics 1990, 124:455-471.
26. Piper P., et al. The pdr12 ABC transporter is required for the development of weak organic acid resistance in yeast. EMBO J. 1998, 17:4257-4265.
27. Piper P.W. Resistance of yeasts to weak organic acid food preservatives. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 77:97-113.
28. Reichenbecher M., et al. Purification and properties of a cellobiose phosphorylase (CepA) and a cellodextrin phosphorylase (CepB) from the cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium stercorarium. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997, 247:262-267.
29. Rubin E.M. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 2008, 454:841-845.
30. Russell J.B. Another explanation for the toxicity of fermentation acids at aow pH-anion accumulation versus uncoupling. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1992, 73:363-370.
31. Sadie C.J., et al. Co-expression of a cellobiose phosphorylase and lactose permease enables intracellular cellobiose utilisation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90:1373-1380.
32. Saloheimo M., et al. Enzymatic properties and intracellular localization of the novel Trichoderma reesei beta-glucosidase BGLII (Cel1A). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68:4546-4553.
33. Somerville C., et al. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 2010, 329:790-792.
34. Tewari Y.B., Goldberg R.N. Thermodynamics of hydrolysis of disaccharides. Cellobiose, gentiobiose, isomaltose, and maltose. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264:3966-3971.
35. van Maris A.J., et al. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2006, 90:391-418.
36. Venardos D., et al. Conversion of cellobiose to glucose using immobilized beta-glucosidase reactors. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1980, 2:112-116.
37. Zhang, F., et al., 2011. Metabolic engineering of microbial pathways for advanced biofuels production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
38. Zhang Y.H., Lynd L.R. Kinetics and relative importance of phosphorolytic and hydrolytic cleavage of cellodextrins and cellobiose in cell extracts of Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70:1563-1569.
39. Zhang Y.H., Lynd L.R. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 88:797-824.
40. Zhang Y.H., Lynd L.R. Cellulose utilization by Clostridium thermocellum: bioenergetics and hydrolysis product assimilation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2005, 102:7321-7325.
41. Zheng L., et al. An efficient one-step site-directed and site-saturation mutagenesis protocol. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32:e115.