Constraint-based stoichiometric modelling from single organisms to microbial communities

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 13, Issue 124, 2016, Pages

  Gottstein, Willi ^a   Olivier, Brett G ^a   Bruggeman, Frank J ^a   Teusink, Bas ^a  

^a AMSTERDAM INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Community flux balance analysis; Derivation of flux balance analysis; Genome scale stoichiometric models; Growth strategies; Metabolic interactions; Microbial communities

Indexed keywords

METABOLISM;

FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; GROWTH STRATEGY; METABOLIC INTERACTIONS; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; STOICHIOMETRIC MODELS;

MICROORGANISMS;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; COMMUNITY DYNAMICS; COMPETITION; GENOME; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROORGANISM; NONHUMAN; SPECIES COMPOSITION; STEADY STATE; STOICHIOMETRY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; MICROBIAL CONSORTIUM; PHYSIOLOGY;

MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 85006107025     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0627     Document Type: Review

References (117)

1. Brenner K, You L, Arnold FH. 2008 Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. Trends Biotechnol. 26, 483-489. (doi:10. 1016/j.tibtech.2008.05.004)
2. Alper H, Stephanopoulos G. 2009 Engineering for biofuels: exploiting innate microbial capacity or importing biosynthetic potential? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 715-723. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro2186)
3. Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. 2006 Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 444, 1022-1023. (doi:10. 1038/4441022a)
4. Fukuda S, Ohno H. 2014 Gut microbiome and metabolic diseases. Semin. Immunopathol. 36, 103-114. (doi:10.1007/s00281-013-0399-z)
5. Heintz C, Mair W. 2014 You are what you host: microbiome modulation of the aging process. Cell 156, 408-411. (doi:10.1016/j.cell. 2014.01.025)
6. Moloney RD, Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. 2014 The microbiome: stress, health and disease. Mamm. Genome 25, 49-74. (doi:10.1007/s00335-013-9488-5)
7. Wolfe BE, Dutton RJ. 2015 Fermented foods as experimentally tractable microbial ecosystems. Cell 161, 49-55. (doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.034)
8. Follows MJ, Dutkiewicz S, Grant S, Chisholm SW. 2007 Emergent biogeography of microbial communities in a model ocean. Science 315, 1843-1846. (doi:10.1126/science.1138544)
9. Handelsman J. 2005 Sorting out metagenomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 38-39. (doi:10.1038/nbt0105-38)
10. Kunin V, Copeland A, Lapidus A, Mavromatis K, Hugenholtz P. 2008 A bioinformaticians guide to metagenomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72, 557-578. (doi:10.1128/MMBR.00009-08)
11. Sangwan N, Xia F, Gilbert JA. 2016 Recovering complete and draft population genomes from metagenome datasets. Microbiome 4, 8. (doi:10. 1186/s40168-016-0154-5)
12. Anantharaman K et al. 2016 Thousands of microbial genomes shed light on interconnected biogeochemical processes in an aquifer system. Nat. Commun. 7, 13219. (doi:10.1038/ncomms13219)
13. Freilich S, Zarecki R, Eilam O, Segal ES, Henry CS, Kupiec M, Gophna U, Sharan R, Ruppin E. 2011 Competitive and cooperative metabolic interactions in bacterial communities. Nat. Commun. 2, 589. (doi:10.1038/ncomms1597)
14. Song HS, Cannon W, Beliaev A, Konopka A. 2014 Mathematical modeling of microbial community dynamics: a methodological review. Processes 2, 711-752. (doi:10.3390/pr2040711)
15. Henson MA, Hanly TJ. 2014 Dynamic flux balance analysis for synthetic microbial communities. IET Syst. Biol. 8, 214-229. (doi:10.1049/iet-syb.2013.0021)
16. Ponomarova O, Patil KR. 2015 Metabolic interactions in microbial communities: untangling the Gordian knot. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 27, 37-44. (doi:10. 1016/j.mib.2015.06.014)
17. Biggs MB, Medlock GL, Kolling GL, Papin JA. 2015 Metabolic network modeling of microbial communities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 7, 317-334. (doi:10.1002/wsbm.1308)
18. Forster J. 2003 Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res. 13, 244-253. (doi:10.1101/gr.234503)
19. Famili I, Forster J, Nielsen J, Palsson BØ. 2003 Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA 100, 13134-13139. (doi:10.1073/pnas.2235812100)
20. Price ND, Reed JL, Palsson BØ. 2004 Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 886-897. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro1023)
21. Feist AM, Henry CS, Reed JL, Krummenacker M, Joyce AR, Karp PD, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V, Palsson BØ. 2007 A genome scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 121. (doi:10.1038/ msb4100155)
22. Herrgård MJ et al. 2008 A consensus yeast metabolic network reconstruction obtained from a community approach to systems biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1155-1160. (doi:10.1038/nbt1492)
23. Österlund T, Nookaew I, Nielsen J. 2012 Fifteen years of large scale metabolic modeling of yeast: developments and impacts. Biotechnol. Adv. 30, 979-988. (doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.021)
24. O'Brien EJ, Monk JM, Palsson BØ. 2015 Using genome-scale models to predict biological capabilities. Cell 161, 971-987. (doi:10.1016/j.cell. 2015.05.019)
25. Raman K, Chandra N. 2009 Flux balance analysis of biological systems: applications and challenges. Brief. Bioinform. 10, 435-449. (doi:10.1093/ bib/bbp011)
26. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ. 2010 What is flux balance analysis? Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 245-248. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1614)
27. Schuetz R, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. 2007 Systematic evaluation of objective functions for predicting intra cellular fluxes in Escherichia coli. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 119. (doi:10.1038/msb4100162)
28. Feist AM, Palsson BØ. 2010 The biomass objective function. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 13, 344-349. (doi:10.1016/j.mib.2010.03.003)
29. Schuetz R, Zamboni N, Zampieri M, Heinemann M, Sauer U. 2012 Multidimensional optimality of microbial metabolism. Science 336, 601-604. (doi:10.1126/science.1216882)
30. Overbeek R. 2005 The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5691-5702. (doi:10.1093/nar/gki866)
31. Thiele I, Palsson BØ. 2010 A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 93-121. (doi:10. 1038/nprot.2009.203)
32. Henry CS, DeJongh M, Best AA, Frybarger PM, Linsay B, Stevens RL. 2010 High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genomescale metabolic models. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 977-982. (doi:10.1038/nbt.1672)
33. King ZA, Lu J, Drger A, Miller P, Federowicz S, Lerman JA, Ebrahim A, Palsson BO, Lewis NE. 2015 BiGG models: a platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D515-D522. (doi:10.1093/ nar/gkv1049)
34. van Heck RGA, Ganter M, Martins dos Santos VAP, Stelling J. 2016 Efficient reconstruction of predictive consensus metabolic network models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005085. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1005085)
35. Olivier BG, Bergmann FT. 2015 The systems biology markup language (SBML) level 3 package: flux balance constraints. J. Integr. Bioinform. 12, 269. (doi:10.2390/biecoll-jib-2015-269)
36. Stolyar S, Van Dien S, Hillesland KL, Pinel N, Lie TJ, Leigh JA, Stahl DA. 2007 Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 92. (doi:10.1038/msb4100131)
37. Zomorrodi AR, Maranas CD. 2012 OptCom: a multilevel optimization framework for the metabolic modeling and analysis of microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002363. (doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1002363)
38. Shoaie S, Karlsson F, Mardinoglu A, Nookaew I, Bordel S, Nielsen J. 2013 Understanding the interactions between bacteria in the human gut through metabolic modeling. Sci. Rep. 3, 2532. (doi:10.1038/srep02532)
39. Khandelwal RA, Olivier BG, Röling WFM, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. 2013 Community flux balance analysis for microbial consortia at balanced growth. PLoS ONE 8, e64567. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064567)
40. Wiechert W, Nöh K. 2005 From stationary to instationary metabolic flux analysis. Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol. 92, 145-172. (doi:10.1007/b98921)
41. Sauer U. 2006 Metabolic networks in motion: 13Cbased flux analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 62. (doi:10. 1038/msb4100109)
42. Neufeld JD, Wagner M, Murrell JC. 2007 Who eats what, where and when? Isotope-labelling experiments are coming of age. ISME J. 1, 103-110. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.30)
43. Kovatcheva-Datchary P, Egert M, Maathuis A, Rajili- Stojanovi M, de Graaf AA, Smidt H, de Vos WM, Venema K. 2009 Linking phylogenetic identities of bacteria to starch fermentation in an in vitro model of the large intestine by RNA-based stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 914-926. (doi:10. 1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01815.x)
44. Paterson E. 2013 The use of stable isotope labeling and compound-specific analysis of microbial phospholipid fatty acids to quantify the influences of rhizodeposition on microbial community structure and function. In Molecular microbial ecology of the rhizosphere (ed. FJ de Bruijn), pp. 141-148. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
45. von Bergen M, Jehmlich N, Taubert M, Vogt C, Bastida F, Herbst FA, Schmidt F, Richnow H-H, Seifert J. 2013 Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology. ISME J. 7, 1877-1885. (doi:10.1038/ismej.2013.78)
46. Hawley AK, Brewer HM, Norbeck AD, Pa a-Toli L, Hallam SJ. 2014 Metaproteomics reveals differential modes of metabolic coupling among ubiquitous oxygen minimum zone microbes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 11395-11400. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 1322132111)
47. Verastegui Y et al. 2014 Multisubstrate isotope labeling and metagenomic analysis of active soil bacterial communities. mBio 5, e0115714. (doi:10. 1128/mBio.01157-14)
48. Ghosh A, Nilmeier J, Weaver D, Adams PD, Keasling JD, Mukhopadhyay A, Petzold CJ, Martin HG. 2014 A peptide-based method for 13C metabolic flux analysis in microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003827. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1003827)
49. Hibbing ME, Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Peterson SB. 2010 Bacterial competition: surviving and thriving in the microbial jungle. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 15-25. (doi:10.1038/nrmicro2259)
50. Elias S, Banin E. 2012 Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 990-1004. (doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00325.x)
51. Foster KR, Bell T. 2012 Competition, not cooperation, dominates interactions among culturable microbial species. Curr. Biol. 22, 1845-1850. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.08.005)
52. Oliveira NM, Niehus R, Foster KR. 2014 Evolutionary limits to cooperation in microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17 941-17946. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1412673111)
53. Campbell K et al. 2015 Self establishing communities enable cooperative metabolite exchange in a eukaryote. eLife 4, e09943. (doi:10. 7554/eLife.09943)
54. Deng YJ, Wang SY. 2016 Synergistic growth in bacteria depends on substrate complexity. J. Microbiol. 54, 23-30. (doi:10.1007/s12275-016-5461-9)
55. Klitgord N, Segrè D. 2010 Environments that induce synthetic microbial ecosystems. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1001002. (doi:10.1371/journal. pcbi.1001002)
56. Papoutsakis ET. 1984 Equations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26, 174-187. (doi:10.1002/bit.260260210)
57. Watson MR. 1984 Metabolic maps for the Apple II. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 12, 1093-1094. (doi:10.1042/ bst0121093)
58. Fell DA, Small JR. 1986 Fat synthesis in adipose tissue. An examination of stoichiometric constraints. Biochem. J. 238, 781-786. (doi:10.1042/ bj2380781)
59. Burgard AP, Maranas CD. 2001 Probing the performance limits of the Escherichia coli metabolic network subject to gene additions or deletions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 74, 364-375. (doi:10.1002/bit.1127)
60. Mahadevan R, Schilling CH. 2003 The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome scale metabolic models. Metab. Eng. 5, 264-276. (doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09.002)
61. Reed JL, Palsson BØ. 2004 Genome-scale in silico models of E. coli have multiple equivalent phenol typic states: assessment of correlated reaction subsets that comprise network states. Genome Res. 14, 1797-1805. (doi:10.1101/gr.2546004)
62. Llaneras F, Picó J. 2007 An interval approach for dealing with flux distributions and elementary modes activity patterns. J. Theor. Biol. 246, 290-308. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.12.029)
63. Kelk SM, Olivier BG, Stougie L, Bruggeman FJ. 2012 Optimal flux spaces of genome-scale stoichiometric models are determined by a few subnetworks. Sci. Rep. 2, 580. (doi:10.1038/srep00580)
64. Maarleveld TR, Wortel MT, Olivier BG, Teusink B, Bruggeman FJ. 2015 Interplay between constraints, objectives, and optimality for genome-scale stoichiometric models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004166. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004166)
65. Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. 2003 Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 84, 647-657. (doi:10.1002/bit.10803)
66. Kim J, Reed JL. 2010 OptORF: optimal metabolic and regulatory perturbations for metabolic engineering of microbial strains. BMC Syst. Biol. 4, 53. (doi:10.1186/1752-0509-4-53)
67. Tepper N, Shlomi T. 2010 Predicting metabolic engineering knockout strategies for chemical production: accounting for competing pathways. Bioinformatics 26, 536-543. (doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btp704)
68. Ibarra RU, Edwards JS, Palsson BØ. 2002 Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature 420, 186-189. (doi:10.1038/nature01149)
69. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Jacobs L, Notebaart RA, Smid EJ. 2009 Understanding the adaptive growth strategy of Lactobacillus plantarum by in silico optimisation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000410. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000410)
70. Segrè D, Vitkup D, Church GM. 2002 Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15 112- 15 e117. (doi:10.1073/pnas.232349399)
71. Joyce AR, Palsson BØ. 2008 Predicting gene essentiality using genome-scale in silico models. Methods Mol. Biol. 416, 433-457. (doi:10.1007/ 978-1-59745-321-9-30)
72. Suthers PF, Zomorrodi A, Maranas CD. 2009 Genome-scale gene/reaction essentiality and synthetic lethality analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 301. (doi:10.1038/msb.2009.56)
73. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BØ. 2001 In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 125-130. (doi:10.1038/ 84379)
74. Pfeiffer T, Schuster S, Bonhoeffer S. 2001 Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP producing pathways. Science 292, 504-507. (doi:10.1126/science.1058079)
75. Teusink B, Wiersma A, Molenaar D, Francke C, de Vos WM, Siezen RJ, Smid EJ. 2006 Analysis of growth of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 on a complex medium using a genome-scale metabolic model. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 40 041-40 048. (doi:10. 1074/jbc.M606263200)
76. Schuster S, Pfeiffer T, Fell DA. 2008 Is maximization of molar yield in metabolic networks favoured by evolution? J. Theor. Biol. 252, 497-504. (doi:10. 1016/j.jtbi.2007.12.008)
77. Beg QK, Vazquez A, Ernst J, de Menezes MA, Bar- Joseph Z, Barabási AL, Oltvai ZN. 2007 Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12 663-12 668. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0609845104)
78. Vazquez A, Beg QK, Demenezes MA, Ernst J, Bar- Joseph Z, Barabási AL, Boros LG, Oltvai ZN. 2008 Impact of the solvent capacity constraint on E. coli metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 2, 7. (doi:10.1186/ 1752-0509-2-7)
79. Shlomi T, Benyamini T, Gottlieb E, Sharan R, Ruppin E. 2011 Genome-scale metabolic modeling elucidates the role of proliferative adaptation in causing the Warburg effect. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002018. (doi:10.1371/journal. pcbi.1002018)
80. Zhuang K, Vemuri GN, Mahadevan R. 2011 Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro fermentation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 500. (doi:10.1038/ msb.2011.34)
81. Lerman JA et al. 2012 In silico method for modelling metabolism and gene product expression at genome scale. Nat. Commun. 3, 929. (doi:10. 1038/ncomms1928)
82. O'Brien EJ, Lerman JA, Chang RL, Hyduke DR, Palsson BØ. 2013 Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction. Mol. Syst. Biol. 9, 693. (doi:10.1038/msb.2013.52)
83. Nilsson A, Nielsen J. 2016 Metabolic trade-offs in yeast are caused by F1F0-ATP synthase. Sci. Rep. 6, 22264. (doi:10.1038/srep22264)
84. Mori M, Hwa T, Martin OC, De Martino A, Marinari E. 2016 Constrained allocation flux balance analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004913. (doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1004913)
85. Mahadevan R, Edwards JS, Doyle III FJ. 2002 Dynamic flux balance analysis of diauxic growth in Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 83, 1331-1340. (doi:10. 1016/S0006-3495(02)73903-9)
86. Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D, Teusink B. 2009 Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 323. (doi:10. 1038/msb.2009.82)
87. Gottstein W, Müller S, Herzel H, Steuer R. 2014 Elucidating the adaptation and temporal coordination of metabolic pathways using in-silico evolution. Biosystems 117, 68-76. (doi:10.1016/j. biosystems.2013.12.006)
88. Grosskopf T, Soyer OS. 2014 Synthetic microbial communities. Curr. Opin Microbiol. 18, 72-77. (doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.002)
89. Mahadevan R, Henson MA. 2012 Genome-based modeling and design of metabolic interactions in microbial communities. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 3, e201210008. (doi:10.5936/csbj.201210008)
90. Smith JM. 1964 Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201, 1145-1147. (doi:10.1038/2011145a0)
91. Wilson DS. 1975 A theory of group selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 72, 143-146. (doi:10.1073/ pnas.72.1.143)
92. Rainey PB, Travisano M. 1998 Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 394, 69-72. (doi:10.1038/27900)
93. Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A. 2004 Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430, 1024-1027. (doi:10.1038/nature02744)
94. Wilson DS, Wilson EO. 2007 Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Q. Rev. Biol. 82, 327-348. (doi:10.1086/522809)
95. Strassmann JE, Queller DC, Avise JC, Ayala FJ. 2011 In the light of evolution V: cooperation and conflict. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10 787-10 791. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1100289108)
96. Liao X, Rong S, Queller DC. 2015 Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002098. (doi:10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002098)
97. Hammerstein P, Noë R. 2016 Biological trade and markets. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150101. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0101)
98. Merino MP, Andrews BA, Asenjo JA. 2014 Stoichiometric model and flux balance analysis for a mixed culture of Leptospirillum ferriphilum and Ferroplasma acidiphilum. Biotechnol. Prog. 31, 307-315. (doi:10.1002/btpr.2028)
99. Heinken A, Thiele I. 2015 Anoxic conditions promote species-specific mutualism between gut microbes in silico. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 4049-4061. (doi:10.1128/AEM.00101-15)
100. El-Semman IE, Karlsson FH, Shoaie S, Nookaew I, Soliman TH, Nielsen J. 2014 Genome-scale metabolic reconstructions of Bifidobacterium adolescentis L2-32 and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii A2-165 and their interaction. BMC Syst. Biol. 8, 41. (doi:10.1186/1752-0509-8-41)
101. Heinken A, Sahoo S, Fleming RMT, Thiele I. 2013 Systems-level characterization of a host-microbe metabolic symbiosis in the mammalian gut. Gut Microbes 4, 28-40. (doi:10.4161/gmic.22370)
102. Zhuang K, Izallalen M, Mouser P, Richter H, Risso C, Mahadevan R, Lovley DR. 2011 Genome-scale dynamic modeling of the competition between Rhodoferax and Geobacter in anoxic subsurface environments. ISME J. 5, 305-316. (doi:10.1038/ ismej.2010.117)
103. Zhuang K, Ma E, Lovley DR, Mahadevan R. 2012 The design of long-term effective uranium biore mediation strategy using a community metabolic model. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109, 2475-2483. (doi:10.1002/bit.24528)
104. Hanly TJ, Urello M, Henson MA. 2012 Dynamic flux balance modeling of S. cerevisiae and E. coli cocultures for efficient consumption of glucose/xylose mixtures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93, 2529-2541. (doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3628-1)
105. Zhuang K, Yang L, Cluett WR, Mahadevan R. 2013 Dynamic strain scanning optimization: an efficient strain design strategy for balanced yield, titer, and productivity. DySScO strategy for strain design. BMC Biotechnol. 13, 8. (doi:10.1186/1472-6750-13-8)
106. Hanly TJ, Henson MA. 2013 Dynamic metabolic modeling of a microaerobic yeast co-culture: predicting and optimizing ethanol production from glucose/xylose mixtures. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6, 44. (doi:10.1186/1754-6834-6-44)
107. Zomorrodi AR, Islam MM, Maranas CD. 2014 d-OptCom: dynamic multi-level and multi-objective metabolic modeling of microbial communities. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 247-257. (doi:10.1021/sb4001307)
108. Fell DA. 2005 Metabolic control analysis. Syst. Biol. 13, 69-80. (doi:10.1007/b137745)
109. Bachmann H, Bruggeman FJ, Molenaar D, Branco dos Santos F, Teusink B. 2016 Public goods and metabolic strategies. Curr. Opin Microbiol. 31, 109-115. (doi:10.1016/j.mib. 2016.03.007)
110. Harcombe WR et al. 2014 Metabolic resource allocation in individual microbes determines ecosystem interactions and spatial dynamics. Cell Rep. 7, 1104-1115. (doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014. 03.070)
111. Chiu HC, Levy R, Borenstein E. 2014 Emergent biosynthetic capacity in simple microbial communities. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003695. (doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003695)
112. Kerr B, Riley MA, Feldman MW, Bohannan BJM. 2002 Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real life game of rockpaperscissors. Nature 418, 171-174. (doi:10.1038/nature00823)
113. Fuhrman JA. 2009 Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature 459, 193-199. (doi:10.1038/nature08058)
114. Liu J, Prindle A, Humphries J, Gabalda-Sagarra M, Asally M, Lee D-yD, Ly S, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Süel GM. 2015 Metabolic co dependence gives rise to collective oscillations within biofilms. Nature 523, 550-554. (doi:10.1038/nature14660)
115. Biggs MB, Papin JA. 2013 Novel multiscale modeling tool applied to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 8, e78011. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0078011)
116. Cole JA, Kohler L, Hedhli J, Luthey-Schulten Z. 2015 Spatially-resolved metabolic cooperativity within dense bacterial colonies. BMC Syst. Biol. 9, 15. (doi:10.1186/s12918-015-0155-1)
117. Chen J, Gomez JA, Höffner K, Phalak P, Barton PI, Henson MA. 2016 Spatiotemporal modeling of microbial metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 10, 21. (doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0259-2)