Constrained Allocation Flux Balance Analysis

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2016, Pages

  Mori, Matteo ^a,b,c   Hwa, Terence ^c,d   Martin, Olivier C ^e   De Martino, Andrea ^a,f,g,h   Marinari, Enzo ^a,f,i  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^f Soft and Living Matter Laboratory   (Italy)

^g ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^h Human Genetics Foundation   (Italy)

ⁱ INFN SEZIONE DI ROMA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PHYSIOLOGY;

BACTERIAL GROWTH; CELL METABOLISM; ENSEMBLE AVERAGING; FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; GROWTH YIELD; MASS BALANCE; METABOLIC FUNCTION; PROTEOMICS; SIMPLE METHOD; TOP DOWN APPROACHES;

METABOLISM;

PROTEOME; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL METABOLISM; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOSYNTHESIS; CONSTRAINED ALLOCATION FLUX BALANCE ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE EXPRESSION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; METABOLOME; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ACETATES; CELL PROLIFERATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLOME; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEOME; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84978791333     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004913     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Monod J, (1949) The growth of bacterial cultures. Ann Rev Microbiol3: 371–394doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103
2. Schaechter M, Maaløe O, Kjeldgaard N, (1958) Dependency on medium and temperature of cell size and chemical composition during balanced growth of Salmonella typhimurium. J Gen Microbiol19: 592–606doi: 10.1099/00221287-19-3-59213611202
3. Kjeldgaard N, Kurland C, (1963) The distribution of soluble and ribosomal RNA as a function of growth rate. J Mol Biol6: 341–348doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80093-5
4. Bremer H, Dennis PP, (1996) Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology2: 1553–1569
5. Scott M, Gunderson CW, Mateescu EM, Zhang Z, Hwa T, (2010) Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science330: 1099–1102doi: 10.1126/science.119258821097934
6. You C, et al. (2013) Coordination of bacterial proteome with metabolism by cyclic AMP signalling. Nature500: 301–306doi: 10.1038/nature1244623925119
7. Molenaar D, van Berlo R, de Ridder D, Teusink B, (2009) Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. Mol Sys Biol5: 323
8. Hui S, et al. (2015) Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals a simple strategy of global resource allocation in bacteria. Mol Sys Biol11: 784doi: 10.15252/msb.20145697
9. Papoutsakis ET, (1984) Equations and calculations for fermentations of butyric acid bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng26: 174–187doi: 10.1002/bit.26026021018551704
10. Varma A, Boesch BW, Palsson BØ, (1993) Stoichiometric interpretation of Escherichia coli glucose catabolism under various oxygenation rates. Appl Environ Microbiol59: 2465–2473. 8368835
11. Varma A, Palsson BØ, (1994) Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110. Appl Environ Microbiol60: 3724–3731. 7986045
12. Edwards JS, Ibarra RU, Palsson BØ, (2001) In silico predictions of Escherichia coli metabolic capabilities are consistent with experimental data. Nature Biotechnol19: 125–130doi: 10.1038/84379
13. Ibarra RU, Edwards JS, Palsson BØ, (2002) Escherichia coli K-12 undergoes adaptive evolution to achieve in silico predicted optimal growth. Nature420: 186–189doi: 10.1038/nature0114912432395
14. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ, (2010) What is flux balance analysis?Nature Biotechnol28: 245–248doi: 10.1038/nbt.1614
15. Palsson BØ, (2015) Systems biology. Cambridge University Press.
16. Feist AM, Palsson BØ, (2010) The biomass objective function. Curr Opin Microbiol13: 344–349doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.03.00320430689
17. Goelzer A, Fromion V, (2011) Bacterial growth rate reflects a bottleneck in resource allocation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects1810: 978–988doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.05.014
18. Goelzer A, Fromion V, Scorletti G, (2011) Cell design in bacteria as a convex optimization problem. Automatica47: 1210–1218doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.038
19. Lerman JA, et al. (2012) In silico method for modelling metabolism and gene product expression at genome scale. Natire Comm3: 929doi: 10.1038/ncomms1928
20. O’Brien EJ, Lerman JA, Chang RL, Hyduke DR, Palsson BØ, (2013) Genome-scale models of metabolism and gene expression extend and refine growth phenotype prediction. Mol Sys Biol9: 693doi: 10.1038/msb.2013.52
21. Maaløe O, (1979) Regulation of the protein-synthesizing machinery—ribosomes, tRNA, factors, and so on. In Biological regulation and development. Springer, pp. 487–542
22. Deris JB, et al. (2013) The innate growth bistability and fitness landscapes of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Science342: 1237435doi: 10.1126/science.123743524288338
23. Gottschalk G, (1986) Bacterial Metabolism, chap. 8. Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 208–282
24. Clark DP, (1989) The fermentation pathways of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev5: 223–234doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03398.x2698228
25. Wills C, (1990) Regulation of sugar and ethanol metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Critical Reviews Biochem Mol Biol25: 245–280doi: 10.3109/10409239009090611
26. Wolfe AJ, (2005) The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev69: 12–50doi: 10.1128/MMBR.69.1.12-50.200515755952
27. Diaz-Ruiz R, Rigoulet M, Devin A, (2011) The Warburg and Crabtree effects: On the origin of cancer cell energy metabolism and of yeast glucose repression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics1807: 568–576doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.08.010
28. Dashko S, Zhou N, Compagno C, Piškur J, (2014) Why, when, and how did yeast evolve alcoholic fermentation?FEMS Yeast Res14: 826–832doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.1216124824836
29. Basan M, et al. (2015) Efficient allocation of proteomic resources for energy metabolism results in acetate overflow. Nature528: 99–104
30. Majewski R, Domach M, (1990) Simple constrained-optimization view of acetate overflow in E. coli. Biotechnol Bioeng35: 732–738doi: 10.1002/bit.26035071118592570
31. Beg Q, et al. (2007) Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA104: 12663–12668doi: 10.1073/pnas.060984510417652176
32. Vazquez A, et al. (2008) Impact of the solvent capacity constraint on E. coli metabolism. BMC Syst Biol2: 7doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-2-718215292
33. Zhuang K, Vemuri GN, Mahadevan R, (2011) Economics of membrane occupancy and respiro-fermentation. Mol Syst Biol7doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.3421694717
34. Paul BJ, Ross W, Gaal T, Gourse RL, (2004) rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Genet38: 749–770doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.09134715568992
35. Klumpp S, Scott M, Pedersen S, Hwa T, (2013) Molecular crowding limits translation and cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110: 16754–16759doi: 10.1073/pnas.131037711024082144
36. Potrykus K, Cashel M, (2008) (p)ppGpp: Still Magical?Annu Rev Microbiol62: 35–51doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.16290318454629
37. Scott M, Klumpp S, Mateescu EM, Hwa T, (2014) Emergence of robust growth laws from optimal regulation of ribosome synthesis. Mol Sys Biol10(8): 747doi: 10.15252/msb.20145379
38. Li Z, Nimtz M, Rinas U, (2014) The metabolic potential of Escherichia coli BL21 in defined and rich medium. Microb Cell Fact13: 45doi: 10.1186/1475-2859-13-4524656150
39. Pramanik J, Keasling J, (1998) Effect of Escherichia coli biomass composition on central metabolic fluxes predicted by a stoichiometric model. Biotechnol Bioeng60: 230–238doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981020)60:2%3C230::AID-BIT10%3E3.0.CO;2-Q10099424
40. Taymaz-Nikerel H, Borujeni AE, Verheijen PJ, Heijnen JJ, van Gulik WM, (2010) Genome-derived minimal metabolic models for Escherichia coli MG1655 with estimated in vivo respiratory ATP stoichiometry. Biotechnol Bioeng107: 369–381doi: 10.1002/bit.2280220506321
41. Hermsen R, Okano H, You C, Werner N, Hwa T, (2015) A growth-rate composition formula for the growth of E. coli on co-utilized carbon substrates. Mol Sys Biol11: 801doi: 10.15252/msb.20145537
42. Noor E, et al. (2014) Pathway thermodynamics highlights kinetic obstacles in central metabolism. PLoS Comput Biol10: e1003483doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100348324586134
43. Kochanowski K, et al. (2013) Functioning of a metabolic flux sensor in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110: 1130–1135doi: 10.1073/pnas.120258211023277571
44. Woldringh C, Binnerts J, Mans A, (1981) Variation in Escherichia coli buoyant density measured in Percoll gradients. J Bacteriol148: 58–636270065
45. Reed JL, Vo TD, Schilling CH, Palsson BØ, (2003) An expanded genome-scale model of Escherichia coli K-12 (iJR904 GSM/GPR). Genome Biol4: R54doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-9-r5412952533
46. Peebo K, et al. (2015) Proteome reallocation in Escherichia coli with increasing specific growth rate. Mol BioSyst11: 1184–1193doi: 10.1039/C4MB00721B25712329
47. Li GW, Burkhardt D, Gross C, Weissman JS, (2014) Quantifying absolute protein synthesis rates reveals principles underlying allocation of cellular resources. Cell157: 624–635doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.03324766808
48. Holms H, (1996) Flux analysis and control of the central metabolic pathways in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Rev19: 85–116doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1996.tb00255.x8988566
49. Nanchen A, Schicker A, Sauer U, (2006) Nonlinear dependency of intracellular fluxes on growth rate in miniaturized continuous cultures of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol72: 1164–1172doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1164-1172.200616461663
50. Valgepea K, et al. (2010) Systems biology approach reveals that overflow metabolism of acetate in Escherichia coli is triggered by carbon catabolite repression of acetyl-CoA synthetase. BMC Syst Biol4: 166doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-16621122111
51. Vemuri G, Altman E, Sangurdekar D, Khodursky A, Eiteman M, (2006) Overflow metabolism in Escherichia coli during steady-state growth: transcriptional regulation and effect of the redox ratio. Appl Environ Microbiol72: 3653–3661doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3653-3661.200616672514
52. Sauer U, Canonaco F, Heri S, Perrenoud A, Fischer E, (2004) The soluble and membrane-bound transhydrogenases UdhA and PntAB have divergent functions in NADPH metabolism of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem279: 6613–6619doi: 10.1074/jbc.M31165720014660605
53. Fuhrer T, Fischer E, Sauer U, (2005) Experimental identification and quantification of glucose metabolism in seven bacterial species. J Bacteriol187: 1581–1590doi: 10.1128/JB.187.5.1581-1590.200515716428
54. Flamholz A, Noor E, Bar-Even A, Liebermeister W, Milo R, (2013) Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110: 10039–10044doi: 10.1073/pnas.121528311023630264
55. Stettner AI, Segrè D, (2013) The cost of efficiency in energy metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110: 9629–9630doi: 10.1073/pnas.130748511023729810
56. Lewis NE, et al. (2010) Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol Sys Bio, 6: 390
57. Martelli C, De Martino A, Marinari E, Marsili M, Perez Castillo I, (2009) Identifying essential genes in Escherichia coli from a metabolic optimization principle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA106: 2607–2611doi: 10.1073/pnas.081322910619196991
58. Feist AM, et al. (2007) A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information. Mol Syst Biol3: 121doi: 10.1038/msb410015517593909
59. Orth JD, et al. (2011) A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism. Mol Sys Biol7: 535doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.65
60. Scott M, Hwa T, (2011) Bacterial growth laws and their applications. Current Opin Biotechnol22: 559–565doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.04.014
61. Fisher SH, (1999) Regulation of nitrogen metabolism in Bacillus subtilis: vive la difference!Mol Microbiol32: 223–232doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01333.x10231480
62. Levy S, Barkai N, (2009) Coordination of gene expression with growth rate: a feedback or a feed-forward strategy?FEBS Letters583: 3974–3978doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.10.07119878679
63. Wegener KM, et al. (2010) Global proteomics reveal an atypical strategy for carbon/nitrogen assimilation by a cyanobacterium under diverse environmental perturbations. Mol Cell Proteomics9: 2678–2689doi: 10.1074/mcp.M110.00010920858728
64. Harcombe WR, et al. (2014). Metabolic resource allocation in individual microbes determines ecosystem interactions and spatial dynamics. Cell Rep7: 1104–1115doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.07024794435
65. Holzhütter HG, (2004) The principle of flux minimization and its application to estimate stationary fluxes in metabolic networks. Eur J Biochem271: 2905–2922doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04213.x15233787
66. Tarlak F, Sadıkoǧlu H, Çakır T, (2014) The role of flexibility and optimality in the prediction of intracellular fluxes of microbial central carbon metabolism. Mol BioSyst10: 2459doi: 10.1039/C4MB00117F24993806
67. Schomburg I, et al. (2012) BRENDA in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Research41: D764–D772doi: 10.1093/nar/gks104923203881
68. Labhsetwar P, Cole JA, Roberts E, Price ND, Luthey-Schulten ZA, (2013) Heterogeneity in protein expression induces metabolic variability in a modeled Escherichia coli population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110: 14006–14011doi: 10.1073/pnas.122256911023908403
69. Kiviet DJ, et al. (2014) Stochasticity of metabolism and growth at the single-cell level. Nature514: 376–379doi: 10.1038/nature1358225186725
70. Solopova A, et al. (2014) Bet-hedging during bacterial diauxic shift. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA111: 7427–7432doi: 10.1073/pnas.132006311124799698
71. Lan G, Sartori P, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Tu Y, (2012). The energy-speed-accuracy trade-off in sensory adaptation. Nat Phys8: 422–428doi: 10.1038/nphys227622737175
72. Mehta P, Schwab DJ, (2012) Energetic costs of cellular computation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109: 17978–17982doi: 10.1073/pnas.120781410923045633
73. Govern CC, ten Wolde PR, (2014). Optimal resource allocation in cellular sensing systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111: 17486–17491doi: 10.1073/pnas.141152411125422473
74. Schellenberger J, et al. (2011) Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nature Protoc6: 1290–1307doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.308
75. Keseler IM, et al. (2011) EcoCyc: a comprehensive database of Escherichia coli biology. Nucleic Acids Res39: D583–D590doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq114321097882