Metabolic Trade-offs in Yeast are Caused by F1F0-ATP synthase

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Nilsson, Avlant ^a   Nielsen, Jens ^a,b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b Chalmers University of Technology   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ALCOHOL; F1F0-ATP SYNTHASE; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; PROTON TRANSPORTING ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE SYNTHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BREATHING; CARCINOGENESIS; CATALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYMOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; NEOPLASM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CARCINOGENESIS; CATALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GALACTOSE; GLUCOSE; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTON-TRANSLOCATING ATPASES; NEOPLASMS; PROTEOMICS; RESPIRATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84959560542     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep22264     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Van Dijken, J. P. et al. An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26, 706-714 (2000).
2. van Hoek, P., van Dijken, J. P. & Pronk, J. T. Effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity of baker's yeast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4226-4233 (1998).
3. van Hoek, M. J. & Merks, R. M. Redox balance is key to explaining full vs. partial switching to low-yield metabolism. BMC Syst. Biol. 6, 22 (2012).
4. Vazquez, A. & Oltvai, Z. N. Molecular crowding defines a common origin for the warburg effect in proliferating cells and the lactate threshold in muscle physiology. PLoS One 6, e19538 (2011).
5. Famili, I., Forster, J., Nielsen, J. & Palsson, B. O. Saccharomyces cerevisiae phenotypes can be predicted by using constraint-based analysis of a genome-scale reconstructed metabolic network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13134-13139 (2003).
6. Molenaar, D., van Berlo, R., de Ridder, D. & Teusink, B. Shifts in growth strategies reflect tradeoffs in cellular economics. 25, 323 (2009).
7. de Jongh, W. A. et al. The roles of galactitol, galactose-1-phosphate, and phosphoglucomutase in galactose-induced toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101, 317-326 (2008). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.21890.
8. Ostergaard, S., Olsson, L., Johnston, M. & Nielsen, J. Increasing galactose consumption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through metabolic engineering of the GAL gene regulatory network. Nat Biotech 18, 1283-1286 (2000). URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/82400.
9. Larsson, C., Lidén, G., Blomberg, A. & Niklasson, C. Monitoring and control of batch and Fedbatch Cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by Calorimetry. Pure Appl. Chem. 65, 1933-1937 (1993).
10. Berkhout, J. et al. How biochemical constraints of cellular growth shape evolutionary adaptations in metabolism. Genetics 194, 505-512 (2013).
11. Hui, S. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals a simple strategy of global resource allocation in bacteria. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 784 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/msb.20145697.
12. Beg, Q. K. et al. Intracellular crowding defines the mode and sequence of substrate uptake by Escherichia coli and constrains its metabolic activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12663-12668 (2007).
13. Zhou, Y. et al. Carbon catabolite repression correlates with the maintenance of near invariant molecular crowding in proliferating E. coli cells. BMC Syst. Biol. 7, 138 (2013). URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3924228/.
14. Adadi, R., Volkmer, B., Milo, R., Heinemann, M. & Shlomi, T. Prediction of Microbial Growth Rate versus Biomass Yield by a Metabolic Network with Kinetic Parameters. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002575 (2012).
15. Shlomi, T., Benyamini, T., Gottlieb, E., Sharan, R. & Ruppin, E. Genome-scale metabolic modeling elucidates the role of proliferative adaptation in causing the warburg effect. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002018 (2011).
16. Nissen, T. L., Schulze, U., Nielsen, J. & Villadsen, J. Flux distributions in anaerobic, glucose-limited continuous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 143 Pt 1, 203-218 (1997).
17. Aguilar-Uscanga, B. & François, J. M. A study of the yeast cell wall composition and structure in response to growth conditions and mode of cultivation. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37, 268-274 (2003). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01394.x.
18. de Godoy, L. M. F. et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455, 1251-1254 (2008). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07341.
19. Postma, E., Verduyn, C., Scheffers, W. A. & Van Dijken, J. P. Enzymic analysis of the crabtree effect in glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 468-477 (1989).
20. Larsson, C., Von Stockar, U., Marison, I. & Gustafsson, L. Growth and metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in chemostat cultures under carbon-, nitrogen-, or carbon-and nitrogen-limiting conditions. J. Bacteriol. 175, 4809-4816 (1993).
21. Boer, V. M., Crutchfield, C. A., Bradley, P. H., Botstein, D. & Rabinowitz, J. D. Growth-limiting intracellular metabolites in yeast growing under diverse nutrient limitations. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 198-211 (2010).
22. Heyland, J., Fu, J. & Blank, L. M. Correlation between TCA cycle flux and glucose uptake rate during respiro-fermentative growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 155, 3827-3837 (2009).
23. Frick, O. & Wittmann, C. Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microb. Cell Fact. 4, 30 (2005).
24. Ohlmeier, S., Kastaniotis, A. J., Hiltunen, J. K. & Bergmann, U. The Yeast Mitochondrial Proteome, a Study of Fermentative and Respiratory Growth. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3956-3979 (2004).
25. Egner, A., Jakobs, S. & Hell, S. W. Fast 100-nm resolution three-dimensional microscope reveals structural plasticity of mitochondria in live yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3370-3375 (2002).
26. Dejean, L., Beauvoit, B., Guérin, B. & Rigoulet, M. Growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a non-fermentable substrate: Control of energetic yield by the amount of mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 1457, 45-56 (2000).
27. Verduyn, C., Postma, E., Scheffers, W. a. & Van Dijken, J. P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: A continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 8, 501-517 (1992).
28. Yoshida, M., Muneyuki, E. & Hisabori, T. ATP synthase - a marvellous rotary engine of the cell. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 669-677 (2001).
29. Perry, S. W., Norman, J. P., Barbieri, J., Brown, E. B. & Gelbard, H. A. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: A practical usage guide. Biotechniques 50, 98-115 (2011).
30. Förster, K. et al. Proton transport coupled ATP synthesis by the purified yeast H+-ATP synthase in proteoliposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 1797, 1828-1837 (2010).
31. Fonseca, G. G., Gombert, A. K., Heinzle, E. & Wittmann, C. Physiology of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus during batch and chemostat cultures with glucose as the sole carbon source. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 422-435 (2007).
32. Andreani, A. et al. Effects of new ubiquinone-imidazo[2,1-b]thiazoles on mitochondrial complex I (NADH-ubiquinone reductase) and on mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12, 5525-5532 (2004).
33. UNIPROT. Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D191-8 (2014).
34. de Vries, S. & Grivell, L. A. Purification and characterization of a rotenone-insensitive NADH: Q6 oxidoreductase from mitochondria of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eur. J. Biochem. 176, 377-384 (1988). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1988. tb14292.x.
35. Peebo, K. et al. Proteome reallocation in Escherichia coli with increasing specific growth rate. Mol. Biosyst. 11, 1184-93 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4MB00721B.
36. van Dijken, J. P. & Scheffers, W. A. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 32, 199-224 (1986).
37. Mourier, A., Devin, A. & Rigoulet, M. Active proton leak in mitochondria: A new way to regulate substrate oxidation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Bioenerg. 1797, 255-261 (2010).
38. Bernardi, P. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore: A mystery solved? Front. Physiol. 4, 95 (2013). URL http://dx.doi. org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00095.
39. Orij, R., Postmus, J., Ter Beek, A., Brul, S. & Smits, G. J. In vivo measurement of cytosolic and mitochondrial pH using a pH-sensitive GFP derivative in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals a relation between intracellular pH and growth. Microbiology 155, 268-278 (2009).
40. Bennett, B. D. et al. Absolute metabolite concentrations and implied enzyme active site occupancy in Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 593-599 (2009).
41. Tepper, N. et al. Steady-State Metabolite Concentrations Reflect a Balance between Maximizing Enzyme Efficiency and Minimizing Total Metabolite Load. PLoS One 8, e75370 (2013).
42. Blair, J. M. Magnesium and the Aconitase Equilibrium: Determination of Apparent Stability Constants of Magnesium Substrate Complexes from Equilibrium Data. Eur. J. Biochem. 8, 287-291 (1969). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1969.tb00526.x.
43. Maier, A., Völker, B., Boles, E. & Fuhrmann, G. F. Characterisation of glucose transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with plasma membrane vesicles (countertransport) and intact cells (initial uptake) with single Hxt1, Hxt2, Hxt3, Hxt4, Hxt6, Hxt7 or Gal2 transporters. FEMS Yeast Res. 2, 539-550 (2002).
44. Sonnleitner, B. & Käppeli, O. Growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by its limited respiratory capacity: Formulation and verification of a hypothesis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28, 927-937 (1986).
45. Majewski, R. A. & Domach, M. M. Simple constrained-optimization view of acetate overflow in E. coli. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 35, 732-738 (1990).
46. Lewis, N. E. et al. Omic data from evolved E. coli are consistent with computed optimal growth from genome-scale models. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 390 (2010).
47. Müller, S., Regensburger, G. & Steuer, R. Resource allocation in metabolic networks: kinetic optimization and approximations by FBA. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43, 1195-1200 (2015).
48. Costenoble, R. et al. Comprehensive quantitative analysis of central carbon and amino-acid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under multiple conditions by targeted proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 464 (2011).
49. Daran-Lapujade, P. et al. The fluxes through glycolytic enzymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are predominantly regulated at posttranscriptional levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15753-15758 (2007).
50. Jansen, M. L. A. et al. Prolonged selection in aerobic, glucose-limited chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes a partial loss of glycolytic capacity. Microbiology 151, 1657-1669 (2005).
51. Van Hoek, P., Van Dijken, J. P. & Pronk, J. T. Regulation of fermentative capacity and levels of glycolytic enzymes in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 26, 724-736 (2000).
52. Savir, Y., Noor, E., Milo, R. & Tlusty, T. Cross-species analysis traces adaptation of Rubisco toward optimality in a low-dimensional landscape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3475-3480 (2010).
53. Scott, M., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z. & Hwa, T. Interdependence of Cell Growth Origins and Consequences. Science (80-). 330, 1099-1102 (2010).
54. Schomburg, I. et al. BRENDA in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D764-72 (2013).
55. Förster, J., Famili, I., Fu, P., Palsson, B. Ø. & Nielsen, J. Genome-scale reconstruction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic network. Genome Res. 13, 244-253 (2003).
56. Agren, R. et al. The RAVEN Toolbox and Its Use for Generating a Genome-scale Metabolic Model for Penicillium chrysogenum. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002980 (2013).
57. Ogata, H. et al. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 29-34 (1999).
58. Cline, M. S. et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2366-2382 (2007).
59. Wang, M. et al. PaxDb, a Database of Protein Abundance Averages Across All Three Domains of Life. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, 492-500 (2012).