Institutional complexity and paradox theory: Complementarities of competing demands

Strategic Organization

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 455-466

  Smith, Wendy K ^a   Tracey, Paul ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

competing demands; institutional complexity; institutional theory; paradox; tensions; topics and perspectives

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994378168     PISSN: 14761270     EISSN: 1741315X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1476127016638565     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW, (2009) Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science 20(4): 696–717.
2. Andriopoulos C, Lewis MW, (2010) Managing innovation paradoxes: Ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies. Long Range Planning 43(1): 104–122.
3. Ansari S, Wijen F, Gray B, (2013) Constructing a climate change logic: An institutional perspective on the “tragedy of the commons.” Organization Science 24(4): 1014–1040.
4. Ashforth BE, Reingen PH, (2014) Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly 59(3): 474–516.
5. Audia PG, Locke EA, Smith KG, (2000) The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 837–853.
6. Bartunek J, (1988) The dynamics of personal and organizational reframing. In: Quinn R, Cameron K, (eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 137–162.
7. Battilana J, (2006) Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization 13(5): 653–676.
8. Battilana J, Dorado S, (2010) Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53(6): 1419–1440.
9. Battilana J, Lee M, (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 397–441.
10. Battilana J, Sengul M, Pache A-C. (2014) Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal 58(6): 1658–1685.
11. Beech N, Burns H, de Caestecker L. (2004) Paradox as invitation to act in problematic change situations. Human Relations 57(10): 1313–1332.
12. Besharov ML, (2014) The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Academy of Management Journal 57(5): 1485–1512.
13. Besharov ML, Smith WK, (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review 39: 364–381.
14. Cameron K, (1986) Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science 32(5): 539–553.
15. Chen MJ, (2002) Transcending paradox: The Chinese “Middle Way” perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 19: 179–199.
16. Christensen C, Bower J, (1996) Customer power, strategic investment and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal 17(3): 197–218.
17. Colquitt JA, George G, (2011) Publishing in AMJ—Part 1: Topic choice. Academy of Management Journal 54(3): 432–435.
18. Creed WD, Hudson BA, Okhuysen GA. (2014) Swimming in a sea of shame: incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review 39(3): 275–301.
19. Drucker PF, (1984) A new look at corporate social responsibility. McKinsey Quarterly 4: 17–28.
20. Farjoun M, (2010) Beyond dualism: Stability and change as duality. Academy of Management Review 35(2): 202–225.
21. Ford J, Backoff R, (1988) Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. In: Quinn R, Cameron K, (eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 81–121.
22. Ford JD, Ford LW, (1994) Logics of dualities, contradiction and attraction in change. Academy of Management Review 19(4): 756–795.
23. Friedland R, Alford RR, (1991) Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: Powell W, DiMaggio PJ, (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–266.
24. Gilbert C, (2005) Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource versus routine rigidity. Academy of Management Journal 48(5): 741–763.
25. Glynn MA, (2000) When cymbals become symbols: Conflict over organizational identity within a symphony orchestra. Organization Science 11(3): 285–298.
26. Goodrick E, Reay T, (2011) Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations 38(3): 372–416.
27. Greenwood R, Díaz AM, Li SX. (2010) The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science 21(2): 521–539.
28. Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F. (2011) Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals 5(1): 317–371.
29. Hahn T, Preuss L, Pinkse J. (2014) Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review 39(4): 463–487.
30. Huy QN, (2002) The emotional balancing of organizational continuity and radical change: The contribution of middle managers. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 31–69.
31. Jarzabkowski P, Le J, (2016) We have to do this and that? You must be joking. Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies. Available at: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/12593/1/2015-09-29%20Jarzabkowski%20%20Le%20Humour%20Accepted%20Paper.pdf
32. Jay J, (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 137–159.
33. Kets de Vries MFR, (1995) Organizational Paradoxes: Clinical Approaches to Management. New York: Routledge.
34. Klein KJ, Ziegert JC, Knight A. (2006) Dynamic delegation: Shared, hierarchical and deindividualized leadership in extreme action teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 51: 590–621.
35. Kostova T, Roth K, (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: Institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal 45(1): 215–233.
36. Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT, (2008) Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review 33(4): 994–1006.
37. Lawrence T, Hampel C, Tracey P, (in press) Institutional work. In: Greenwood R, Lawrence TB, Oliver C. (eds) Sage Handbook of Organisational Institutionalism, 2nd edn. London: SAGE.
38. Lawrence TB, Suddaby R, Leca B, (2009) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lewis MW, (2000) Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review 25(4): 760–776.
40. Luscher L, Lewis MW, (2008) Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal 51(2): 221–240.
41. McPherson CM, Sauder M, (2013) Logics in action managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly. Epub ahead of print 11 April. DOI: 10.1177/0001839213486447.
42. Margolis JD, Walsh J, (2003) Misery loves company: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 268–305.
43. Miron-Spektor E, Gino F, Argote L, (2011) Paradoxical frames and creative sparks: Enhancing individual creativity through conflict and integration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 116(2): 229–240.
44. Murnighan JK, Conlon D, (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 165–186.
45. Nigam A, Ocasio W, (2010) Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science 21(4): 823–841.
46. Pache AC, Santos F, (2010) When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review 35(3): 455–476.
47. Poole MS, Van de Ven A, (1989) Using paradox to build management and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review 14(4): 562–578.
48. Putnam L, Fairhurst G, Banghart S, (in press) Contradictions, paradoxes and dialectics in organizations: A constituative approach. Academy of Management Annals.
49. Quinn R, Cameron K, (1988) Paradox and transformation: A framework for viewing organization and management. In: Quinn R, Cameron K, (eds) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a Theory of Change in Organization and Management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp. 289–308.
50. Quirke L, (2013) Rogue resistance: Sidestepping isomorphic pressures in a patchy institutional field. Organization Studies. Epub ahead of print 17 May. DOI: 10.1177/0170840613483815.
51. Raaijmakers AGM, Vermeulen PAM, Meeus MTH. (2015) I need time!: Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal 58(1): 85–110.
52. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, (2008) Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34: 375–409.
53. Reay T, Hinings CR, (2009) Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies 30(6): 629–652.
54. Reinecke J, Ansari S, (2015) When times collide: Temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal 58(2): 618–648.
55. Rothenberg A, (1979) The Emerging Goddess. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
56. Schad J, Lewis M, Raisch S. (in press) Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals.
57. Slawinski N, Bansal P, (2015) Short on time: Intertemporal tensions in business sustainability. Organization Science 26(2): 531–549.
58. Smets M, Jarzabkowski P, Burke GT. (2015) Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal 58(3): 932–970.
59. Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R, (2012) From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal 55(4): 877–904.
60. Smith K, Berg D, (1987) Paradoxes of Group Life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
61. Smith WK, (2014) Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal 57(6): 1592–1623.
62. Smith WK, Gonin M, Besharov ML, (2013) Managing social-business tensions. A review and research agenda for social enterprises. Business Ethics Quarterly 23(3): 407–442.
63. Smith WK, Lewis MW, (2011) Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review 36(2): 381–403.
64. Smith WK, Tushman ML, (2005) Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science 16(5): 522–536.
65. Smith WK, Besharov ML, Wessels A. (2012) A paradoxical leadership model for social entrepreneurs: Challenges, leadership skills, and pedagogical tools for managing social and commercial demands Academy of Management Learning & Education 11(3): 463–478.
66. Smith WK, Lewis MW, Tushman ML, (2011) Organizational sustainability: Organization design and senior leadership to enable strategic paradox. In: Cameron K, Spreitzer G, (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 798–810.
67. Sundaramurthy C, Lewis MW, (2003) Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of Management Review 28(3): 397–415.
68. Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M, (2012) The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
69. Tracey P, (in press) Spreading the word: The microfoundations of institutional persuasion and conversion. Organization Science.
70. Tracey P, Phillips N, Jarvis O, (2011) Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science 22(1): 60–80.
71. Tripsas M, Gavetti G, (2000) Capabilities, cognition and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 18(Summer Special Issue): 119–142.
72. Vince R, Broussine M, (1996) Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies 17(1): 1–21.
73. Voronov M, Vince R, (2012) Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review 37(1): 58–81.
74. Weick K, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D, (1999) Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. In: Sutton RI, Staw BM, (eds) Research In Organizational Behavior. Stamford, CT: JAI Press, pp. 81–123.
75. Wooten M, Hoffman AJ, (2008) Organizational fields: Past, present and future. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE, pp. 130–147.
76. Wright AL, Zammuto RF, (2013) Wielding the willow: Processes of institutional change in English county cricket. Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 308–330.
77. Wright AL, Zammuto RF, Liesch P, (in press) Maintaining the values of a profession: Institutional work and moral emotions in the emergency department. Academy of Management Journal.
78. Zahra SA, Gedajlovic E, Neubaum D. (2009) A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing 24(5): 519–532.
79. Zilber TB, (2013) Institutional logics and institutional work: Should they be agreed. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 39: 77–96.