INSTITUTIONAL LOGICS AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK: SHOULD THEY BE AGREED?

Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Volumn 39 Part A, Issue , 2013, Pages 77-96

  Zilber, Tammar B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Institutional logics; Institutional work

Indexed keywords

EID: 84902499891     PISSN: 0733558X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S0733-558X(2013)0039AB007     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Ahearn, L. M. (2012). Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Astley, W. G. (1985). Administrative science as socially constructed truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 497–513.
3. Battilana, J., & D’Aunno, T. (2009). Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In T. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 31–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1419–1440.
5. Bluhm, D. J., Harman, W., Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. (2011). Qualitative research in management: A decade of progress. Journal of Management Studies, 48(8), 1866–1891.
6. Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (1991). On justification: The economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Bort, S., & Kieser, A. (2011). Fashion in organization theory: An empirical analysis of the diffusion of theoretical concepts. Organization Studies, 32(5), 655–681.
8. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in question. London: Sage.
10. Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (1994). Pfeffer’s barriers to the advance of organizational science, a rejoinder. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 331–341.
11. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travels of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
12. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 45–56.
13. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
14. DiMaggio, P. J. (1988). Interest and agency in institutional theory. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and environment (pp. 3–21). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
15. DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. art museums, 1920–1940. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 267–292). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 263–287.
17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
18. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Dobbin, F. (2010). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 673–676.
20. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.
21. Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practice, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23. Garud, R., Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 28(7), 957–969.
24. Gergen, K. J. (1978). Toward generative theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(11), 1344–1360.
25. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Gioia, D. A. (2003). Give it up! Reflections on the interpreted world (a commentary on Meckler and Baillie). Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 285–292.
27. Gioia, D. A., Thomas, J. B., Clark, S. M., & Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, 363–383.
28. Glick, W. H., Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (2007). Making a life in the field of organization science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 817–835.
29. Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2010). Florence Nightingale endures: Legitimizing a new professional role identity. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 55–84.
30. Goodrick, E., & Reay, T. (2011). Constellations of institutional logics: Changes in the professional work of pharmacists. Work and Occupations, 38(3), 372–416.
31. Goodstein, J. D., & Velamuri, S. R. (2009). States, power, legitimacy, and maintaining institutional control: The battle for private sector telecommunication services in Zimbabwe. Organization Studies, 30(5), 489–508.
32. Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Shalin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Shalin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 41–46). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
33. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317–371.
34. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371.
36. Hwang, H., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Problematizing actors and institutions in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 62–66.
37. Jarzabkowski, P., & Spee, A. P. (2009). Strategy-as-practice: A review and future directions for the field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 69–95.
38. Kaghan, W., & Phillips, N. (1998). Building the Tower of Babel: Communities of practice and paradigmatic pluralism in organization studies. Organization, 5(2), 191–215.
39. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, W. R. Nord & T. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 52–58.
42. Lawrence, T. B., Zilber, T. B., & Leca, B. (2013 forthcoming). Institutional work: Current research, new directions and overlooked issues. Organizations Studies, 34(9).
43. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Zilber, T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, analysis and interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 97–128). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305–1335.
46. Lounsbury, M. (2003). The death of organization science. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 293–298.
47. Lounsbury, M. & Boxenbaum, E. (2013). Institutional logics in action, Part A&B. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 39A&B). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
48. Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178.
49. McKinley, W. (2007). Managing knowledge in organization studies through instrumentation. Organization, 14(1), 123–146.
50. McKinley, W., & Mone, M. A. (1998). The re-construction of organization studies: Wrestling with incommensurability. Organization, 5(2), 169–189.
51. Meckler, M., & Baillie, J. (2003). You can’t handle the truth: A response to Gioia and Lounsbury. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(3), 299–303.
52. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
53. Mohr, J. W., & Duquenne, V. (1997). The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917. Theory and Society, 26(2–3), 305–356.
54. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.
56. Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13(4), 563–588.
57. Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35, 455–476.
58. Perrow, C. (1994). Dialog. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 191–194.
59. Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 599–620.
60. Pfeffer, J. (1995). Mortality, reproducibility, and the persistence of styles of theory. Organization Science, 6(6), 681–686.
61. Pfeffer, J. (2007). Truth’s consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 837–839.
62. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652.
63. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
64. Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30, 629–652.
65. Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2008). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin-Andersson & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996). Imitating by editing success: The construction of organizational fields. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 69–92). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
67. Scherer, A. G., & Steinmann, H. (1999). Some remarks on the problem of incommensurability in organization studies. Organization Studies, 20(3), 519–544.
68. Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (1996). Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 529–557.
69. Smets, M., & Jarzabkowski, P. (forthcoming). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations.
70. Smets, M., Morris, T., & Greenwood, R. (2012). From practice to field: A multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 877–904.
71. Smircich, L., & Stubbart, C. (1985). Strategic management in an enacted world. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 724–736.
72. Spence, D. P. (1984). Narrative truth and historical truth: Meaning and Interpretation in Psychoanalysis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
73. Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
74. Thornton, P. H. (2004). Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
75. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.
76. Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
77. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80.
79. Van Maanen, J. (1995a). Style as theory. Organization Science, 6(1), 133–143.
80. Van Maanen, J. (1995b). Fear and loathing in organization studies. Organization Science, 6(6), 687–692.
81. Ventresca, M., & Mohr, J. (2002). Archival methods in organization studies. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations (pp. 805–828). London: Blackwell.
82. Zietsma, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: The interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189–221.
83. Zilber, T. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes and thinking. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby (Eds.), Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 151–169). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
84. Zilber, T. B. (2009). Institutional maintenance as narrative acts. In T. B. Lawrence, R. Suddaby & B. Leca (Eds.), Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations (pp. 204–235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
85. Zilber, T. B., Tuval-Mashiach, R., & Lieblich, A. (2008). The embedded narrative: Navigating through multiple contexts. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(6), 1047–1069.
86. Zucker, L. G. (1977). Role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42(5), 726–743.