In vitro and ex vivo strategies for intracellular delivery

Nature

Volumn 538, Issue 7624, 2016, Pages 183-192

  Stewart, Martin P ^a   Sharei, Armon ^a,b,c   Ding, Xiaoyun ^a,b   Sahay, Gaurav ^d   Langer, Robert ^a,b   Jensen, Klavs F ^a  

^a USA   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOCARRIER;

CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GENOME; LABORATORY METHOD; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK;

ACCURACY; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL THERAPY; EX VIVO STUDY; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MEMBRANE DAMAGE; MICROFLUIDICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ANIMAL; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; GENETICS; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; LAB ON A CHIP; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALS; CELL MEMBRANE; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; INTRACELLULAR SPACE; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MICROFLUIDICS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84991728459     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature19764     Document Type: Review

References (100)

1. Yin, H. et al. Non-viral vectors for gene-based therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 541-555 (2014).
2. Wittrup, A. & Lieberman, J. Knocking down disease: a progress report on siRNA therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 543-552 (2015).
3. Naldini, L. Ex vivo gene transfer and correction for cell-based therapies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 301-315 (2011).
4. Naldini, L. Gene therapy returns to centre stage. Nature 526, 351-360 (2015).
5. June, C. H., Riddell, S. R. & Schumacher, T. N. Adoptive cellular therapy: a race to the fnish line. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 280ps7 (2015).
6. Rosenberg, S. A. & Restifo, N. P. Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 348, 62-68 (2015).
7. Tebas, P. et al. Gene editing of CCR5 in autologous CD4 T cells of persons infected with HIV. N. Engl. J. Med. 370, 901-910 (2014).
8. Sather, B. D. et al. Efcient modifcation of CCR5 in primary human hematopoietic cells using a megaTAL nuclease and AAV donor template. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 307ra156 (2015).
9. Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
10. Cox, D. B., Platt, R. J. & Zhang, F. Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges. Nat. Med. 21, 121-131 (2015).
11. Kim, D. et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell 4, 472-476 (2009).
12. Warren, L. et al. Highly efcient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed diferentiation of human cells with synthetic modifed mRNA. Cell Stem Cell 7, 618-630 (2010).
13. Anokye-Danso, F. et al. Highly efcient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 8, 376-388 (2011).
14. Marschall, A. L. J. et al. Delivery of antibodies to the cytosol: debunking the myths. Mabs 6, 943-956 (2014).
15. Liu, J., Wen, J., Zhang, Z., Liu, H. & Sun, Y. Voyage inside the cell: microsystems and nanoengineering for intracellular measurement and manipulation. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 1, 15020 (2015).
16. Lee, S. E., Liu, G. L., Kim, F. & Lee, L. P. Remote optical switch for localized and selective control of gene interference. Nano Lett. 9, 562-570 (2009).
17. Heller, D. A., Baik, S., Eurell, T. E. & Strano, M. S. Single-walled carbon nanotube spectroscopy in live cells: Towards long-term labels and optical sensors. Adv. Mater. 17, 2793-2799 (2005).
18. Michalet, X. et al. Quantum dots for live cells, in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307, 538-544 (2005).
19. Karra, D. & Dahm, R. Transfection techniques for neuronal cells. J. Neurosci. 30, 6171-6177 (2010).
20. Peer, D. A daunting task: manipulating leukocyte function with RNAi. Immunol. Rev. 253, 185-197 (2013).
21. Hendel, A. et al. Chemically modifed guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 985-989 (2015).
22. Thomas, C. E., Ehrhardt, A. & Kay, M. A. Progress and problems with the use of viral vectors for gene therapy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 346-358 (2003).
23. Kay, M. A. State-of-the-art gene-based therapies: the road ahead. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 316-328 (2011).
24. Mintzer, M. A. & Simanek, E. E. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem. Rev. 109, 259-302 (2009).
25. Yoo, J. W., Irvine, D. J., Discher, D. E. & Mitragotri, S. Bio-inspired, bioengineered and biomimetic drug delivery carriers. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10, 521-535 (2011).
26. Torchilin, V. P. Multifunctional, stimuli-sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 813-827 (2014).
27. Mitragotri, S., Burke, P. A. & Langer, R. Overcoming the challenges in administering biopharmaceuticals: formulation and delivery strategies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 655-672 (2014).
28. Khalil, I. A., Kogure, K., Akita, H. & Harashima, H. Uptake pathways and subsequent intracellular trafcking in nonviral gene delivery. Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 32-45 (2006).
29. Sahay, G., Alakhova, D. Y. & Kabanov, A. V. Endocytosis of nanomedicines. J. Control. Release 145, 182-195 (2010).
30. Stewart, M. P., Lorenz, A., Dahlman, J. & Sahay, G. Challenges in carrier-mediated intracellular delivery: moving beyond endosomal barriers. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 8, 465-478 (2016).
31. Sahay, G. et al. Efciency of siRNA delivery by lipid nanoparticles is limited by endocytic recycling. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 653-658 (2013).
32. Gilleron, J. et al. Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafcking and endosomal escape. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 638-646 (2013).
33. Schafer, D. V., Fidelman, N. A., Dan, N. & Laufenburger, D. A. Vector unpacking as a potential barrier for receptor-mediated polyplex gene delivery. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 67, 598-606 (2000).
34. Lv, H., Zhang, S., Wang, B., Cui, S. & Yan, J. Toxicity of cationic lipids and cationic polymers in gene delivery. J. Control. Release 114, 100-109 (2006).
35. Yang, B. et al. High-throughput screening identifes small molecules that enhance the pharmacological efects of oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 1987-1996 (2015).
36. Furusawa, M., Nishimura, T., Yamaizumi, M. & Okada, Y. Injection of foreign substances into single cells by cell fusion. Nature 249, 449-450 (1974).
37. Helenius, A., Doxsey, S. & Mellman, I. Viruses as tools in drug delivery. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 507, 1-6 (1987).
38. Daemen, T. et al. Virosomes for antigen and DNA delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 57, 451-463 (2005).
39. Montecalvo, A. et al. Mechanism of transfer of functional microRNAs between mouse dendritic cells via exosomes. Blood 119, 756-766 (2012).
40. El Andaloussi, S., Mäger, I., Breakefeld, X. O. & Wood, M. J. A. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12, 347-357 (2013).
41. He, W. et al. Discovery of siRNA lipid nanoparticles to transfect suspension leukemia cells and provide in vivo delivery capability. Mol. Ther. 22, 359-370 (2014).
42. Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941-951 (2015).
43. Van Meirvenne, S. et al. Efcient genetic modifcation of murine dendritic cells by electroporation with mRNA. Cancer Gene Ther. 9, 787-797 (2002).
44. Wang, Y. et al. Poking cells for efcient vector-free intracellular delivery. Nat. Commun. 5, 4466 (2014).
45. Sharei, A. et al. A vector-free microfuidic platform for intracellular delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2082-2087 (2013).
46. Schumann, K. et al. Generation of knock-in primary human T cells using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10437-10442 (2015).
47. Schulz, I. Permeabilizing cells: some methods and applications for the study of intracellular processes. Methods Enzymol. 192, 280-300 (1990).
48. Hapala, I. Breaking the barrier: methods for reversible permeabilization of cellular membranes. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 17, 105-122 (1997).
49. Agarwal, J., Walsh, A. & Lee, R. C. Multimodal strategies for resuscitating injured cells. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1066, 295-309 (2005).
50. Gurtovenko, A. A., Anwar, J. & Vattulainen, I. Defect-mediated trafcking across cell membranes: insights from in silico modeling. Chem. Rev. 110, 6077-6103 (2010).
51. Bloom, M., Evans, E. & Mouritsen, O. G. Physical properties of the fuid lipid-bilayer component of cell membranes: a perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 24, 293-397 (1991).
52. Barber, M. A. A technic for the inoculation of bacteria and other substances into living cells. J. Infect. Dis. 8, 348-360 (1911).
53. Klein, T. M., Wolf, E. D., Wu, R. & Sanford, J. C. High-velocity microprojectiles for delivering nucleic-acids into living cells. Nature 327, 70-73 (1987).
54. Mcneil, P. L. Incorporation of macromolecules into living cells. Methods Cell Biol. 29, 153-173 (1988).
55. Clarke, M. S. F. & McNeil, P. L. Syringe loading introduces macromolecules into living mammalian cell cytosol. J. Cell Sci. 102, 533-541 (1992).
56. LaPlaca, M. C., Lee, V. M. Y. & Thibault, L. E. An in vitro model of traumatic neuronal injury: loading rate-dependent changes in acute cytosolic calcium and lactate dehydrogenase release. J. Neurotrauma 14, 355-368 (1997).
57. Hallow, D. M. et al. Shear-induced intracellular loading of cells with molecules by controlled microfuidics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 99, 846-854 (2008).
58. Borle, A. B. & Snowdowne, K. W. Measurement of intracellular free calcium in monkey kidney cells with aequorin. Science 217, 252-254 (1982).
59. Groulx, N., Boudreault, F., Orlov, S. N. & Grygorczyk, R. Membrane reserves and hypotonic cell swelling. J. Membr. Biol. 214, 43-56 (2006).
60. Bischof, J. C. et al. Dynamics of cell membrane permeability changes at supraphysiological temperatures. Biophys. J. 68, 2608-2614 (1995).
61. He, X. M., Amin, A. A., Fowler, A. & Toner, M. Thermally induced introduction of trehalose into primary rat hepatocytes. Cell Preserv. Technol. 4, 178-187 (2006).
62. Weaver, J. C. & Chizmadzhev, Y. A. Theory of electroporation: a review. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 41, 135-160 (1996).
63. Kandušer, M. & Miklavcic, D. in Electrotechnologies for Extraction from Food Plants and Biomaterials (eds Vorobiev, E. & Lebovka, N.) Ch. 1, 1-37 (Springer, 2008).
64. Tsukakoshi, M., Kurata, S., Nomiya, Y., Ikawa, Y. & Kasuya, T. A novel method of DNA transfection by laser microbeam cell surgery. Appl. Phys. B 35, 135-140 (1984).
65. Stevenson, D. J., Gunn-Moore, F. J., Campbell, P. & Dholakia, K. Single cell optical transfection. J. R. Soc. Interf. 7, 863-871 (2010).
66. Vogel, A., Noack, J., Huttman, G. & Paltauf, G. Mechanisms of femtosecond laser nanosurgery of cells and tissues. Appl. Phys. B 81, 1015-1047 (2005).
67. Bischofberger, M., Iacovache, I. & van der Goot, F. G. Pathogenic pore-forming proteins: function and host response. Cell Host Microbe 12, 266-275 (2012).
68. Walev, I. et al. Delivery of proteins into living cells by reversible membrane permeabilization with streptolysin-O. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3185-3190 (2001).
69. Frenkel, N., Makky, A., Sudji, I. R., Wink, M. & Tanaka, M. Mechanistic investigation of interactions between steroidal saponin digitonin and cell membrane models. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 14632-14639 (2014).
70. Cooper, S. T. & McNeil, P. L. Membrane repair: mechanisms and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 95, 1205-1240 (2015).
71. Moe, A. M., Golding, A. E. & Bement, W. M. Cell healing: calcium, repair and regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 45, 18-23 (2015).
72. Jimenez, A. J. & Perez, F. Physico-chemical and biological considerations for membrane wound evolution and repair in animal cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 45, 2-9 (2015).
73. Boucher, E. & Mandato, C. A. Plasma membrane and cytoskeleton dynamics during single-cell wound healing. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1853, 2649-2661 (2015).
74. Andrews, N. W., Corrotte, M. & Castro-Gomes, T. Above the fray: surface remodeling by secreted lysosomal enzymes leads to endocytosis-mediated plasma membrane repair. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 45, 10-17 (2015).
75. Steinhardt, R. A., Bi, G. & Alderton, J. M. Cell membrane resealing by a vesicular mechanism similar to neurotransmitter release. Science 263, 390-393 (1994).
76. Venslauskas, M. S. & Šatkauskas, S. Mechanisms of transfer of bioactive molecules through the cell membrane by electroporation. Eur. Biophys. J. 44, 277-289 (2015).
77. Neumann, E., Schaefer-Ridder, M., Wang, Y. & Hofschneider, P. H. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric felds. EMBO J. 1, 841-845 (1982).
78. Movahed, S. & Li, D. Q. Microfuidics cell electroporation. Microfuidics Nanofuidics 10, 703-734 (2011).
79. Geng, T. et al. Flow-through electroporation based on constant voltage for large-volume transfection of cells. J. Control. Release 144, 91-100 (2010).
80. Zhan, Y., Wang, J., Bao, N. & Lu, C. Electroporation of cells in microfuidic droplets. Anal. Chem. 81, 2027-2031 (2009).
81. Boukany, P. E. et al. Nanochannel electroporation delivers precise amounts of biomolecules into living cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 747-754 (2011).
82. McKnight, T. E. et al. Intracellular integration of synthetic nanostructures with viable cells for controlled biochemical manipulation. Nanotechnology 14, 551-556 (2003).
83. Shalek, A. K. et al. Vertical silicon nanowires as a universal platform for delivering biomolecules into living cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1870-1875 (2010).
84. VanDersarl, J. J., Xu, A. M. & Melosh, N. A. Nanostraws for direct fuidic intracellular access. Nano Lett. 12, 3881-3886 (2012).
85. Xie, X. et al. Nanostraw-electroporation system for highly efcient intracellular delivery and transfection. ACS Nano 7, 4351-4358 (2013).
86. Shalek, A. K. et al. Nanowire-mediated delivery enables functional interrogation of primary immune cells: application to the analysis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nano Lett. 12, 6498-6504 (2012).
87. Xu, A. M. et al. Quantifcation of nanowire penetration into living cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 3613 (2014).
88. Marmottant, P. & Hilgenfeldt, S. Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles. Nature 423, 153-156 (2003).
89. Liu, Y., Yan, J. & Prausnitz, M. R. Can ultrasound enable efcient intracellular uptake of molecules? A retrospective literature review and analysis. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 38, 876-888 (2012).
90. Fechheimer, M. et al. Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNA by scrape loading and sonication loading. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 84, 8463-8467 (1987).
91. Prentice, P., Cuschierp, A., Dholakia, K., Prausnitz, M. & Campbell, P. Membrane disruption by optically controlled microbubble cavitation. Nat. Phys. 1, 107-110 (2005).
92. Ohl, C. D. et al. Sonoporation from jetting cavitation bubbles. Biophys. J. 91, 4285-4295 (2006).
93. Wu, Y. C. et al. Massively parallel delivery of large cargo into mammalian cells with light pulses. Nat. Methods 12, 439-444 (2015).
94. Cui, X., Dean, D., Ruggeri, Z. M. & Boland, T. Cell damage evaluation of thermal inkjet printed Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 106, 963-969 (2010).
95. Xiong, R. et al. Comparison of gold nanoparticle mediated photoporation: vapor nanobubbles outperform direct heating for delivering macromolecules in live cells. ACS Nano 8, 6288-6296 (2014).
96. Schomaker, M. et al. Characterization of nanoparticle mediated laser transfection by femtosecond laser pulses for applications in molecular medicine. J. Nanobiotechnol. 13:10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12951-014-0057-1 (2015).
97. Yao, C., Qu, X., Zhang, Z., Hüttmann, G. & Rahmanzadeh, R. Infuence of laser parameters on nanoparticle-induced membrane permeabilization. J. Biomed. Opt. 14, 054034 (2009).
98. Time to deliver. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 961 (2014).
99. Park, K. Facing the truth about nanotechnology in drug delivery. ACS Nano 7, 7442-7447 (2013).
100. Rajendran, L., Knölker, H. J. & Simons, K. Subcellular targeting strategies for drug design and delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 29-42 (2010).