Shear-induced intracellular loading of cells with molecules by controlled microfluidics

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 846-854

  Hallow, Daniel M ^a   Seeger, Richard A ^b   Kamaev, Pavel P ^a   Prado, Gustavo R ^b   LaPlaca, Michelle C ^b   Prausnitz, Mark R ^a,b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Intracellular delivery; MEMS; Microfluidics; Shear stress

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; FLOW VELOCITY; MEMS; MICROCHANNELS; MICROFLUIDICS; SHEAR STRESS;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; CONICAL CHANNELS; INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY;

CELL MEMBRANES;

BOVINE SERUM ALBUMIN; CALCEIN; DEXTRAN; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE; FLUORESCEIN DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CANCER CELL; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL SUSPENSION; CELL TRANSPORT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYPOTHESIS; INTRACELLULAR DELIVERY; INTRACELLULAR MEMBRANE; MICROFLUIDICS; MOLECULE; PERMEABILITY; PROSTATE CANCER; SHEAR STRESS; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; SHEAR STRENGTH; TUMOR CELL LINE;

BOVINAE;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FLOW INJECTION ANALYSIS; FLUORESCEINS; HUMANS; MALE; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MICROFLUIDICS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SERUM ALBUMIN, BOVINE; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 39549119160     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21651     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Azzam T, Domb AJ. 2004. Current developments in gene transfection agents. Curr Drug Deliv 1(2):165-193.
2. Barbee KA. 2005. Mechanical cell injury. Ann NY Acad Sci 1066:67-84.
3. Barber K, Mala RR, Lambert MP, Qiu R, MacDonald RC, Klein WL. 1996. Delivery of membrane-impermeant fluorescent probes into living neural cell populations by lipotransfer. Neurosci Lett 207(1):17-20.
4. Clarke MS, McNeil PL. 1992. Syringe loading introduces macromolecules into living mammalian cell cytosol. J Cell Sci 102(Pt 3):533-541.
5. Davis SP, Martanto W, Allen MG, Prausnitz MR. 2005. Hollow metal microneedles for insulin delivery to diabetic rats. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(5):909-915.
6. Dice JF. 1988. Microinjected ribonuclease A as a probe for lysosomal pathways of intracellular protein degradation. J Protein Chem 7(2): 115-127.
7. Fox RW, McDonald AT, Pritchard PJ. 2004. Introduction to fluid mechanics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
8. Gehl J. 2003. Electroporation: Theory and methods, perspectives for drug delivery, gene therapy and research. Acta Physiol Scand 177(4):437-447.
9. Goyal P, Goyal K, Vijaya Kumar SG, Singh A, Katare OP, Mishra DN. 2005. Liposomal drug delivery systems-clinical applications. Acta Pharm 55(1):1-25.
10. Guzman HR, Nguyen DX, Khan S, Prausnitz MR. 2001. Ultrasound-mediated disruption of cell membranes. I. Quantification of molecular uptake and cell viability. J Acoust Soc Am 110(1):588-596.
11. Guzman HR, Nguyen DX, McNamara AJ, Prausnitz MR. 2002. Equilibrium loading of cells with macromolecules by ultrasound: Effects of molecular size and acoustic energy. J Pharm Sci 91(7):1693-1701.
12. Jensen KD, Nori A, Tijerina M, Kopeckova P, Kopecek J. 2003. Cytoplasmic delivery and nuclear targeting of synthetic macromolecules. J Control Release 87(1-3):89-105.
13. Kodama T, Doukas AG, Hamblin MR. 2002. Shock wave-mediated molecular delivery into cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1542(1-3):186-194.
14. LaPlaca MC, Lee VM, Thibault LE. 1997. An in vitro model of traumatic neuronal injury: Loading rate-dependent changes in acute cytosolic calcium and lactate dehydrogenase release. J Neurotrauma 14(6):355-368.
15. Li S. 2004. Electroporation gene therapy: New developments in vivo and in vitro. Curr Gene Ther 4(3):309-316.
16. Lokhandwalla M, Sturtevant B. 2001. Mechanical haemolysis in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): I. Analysis of cell deformation due to SWL flowfields. Phys Med Biol 46(2):413-437.
17. Martanto W, Baisch SM, Costner EA, Prausnitz MR, Smith MK. 2005. Fluid dynamics in conically tapered microneedles. AIChE J 51(6):1599-1607.
18. McNeil PL, Steinhardt RA. 2003. Plasma membrane disruption: Repair, prevention, adaptation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 19:697-731.
19. McNeil PL, Murphy RF, Lanni F, Taylor DL. 1984. A method for incorporating macromolecules into adherent cells. J Cell Biol 98(4):1556-1564.
20. Melan MA. 1994. Overview of cell fixation and permeabilization. Methods Mol Biol 34:55-66.
21. Mitragotri S. 2005. Healing sound: The use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4(3):255-260.
22. Netz RR, Schick M. 1996. Pore formation and rupture in fluid bilayers. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 53(4): 3875-3885.
23. Oliver JD, Anderson S, Troy JL, Brenner BM, Deen WM. 1992. Determination of glomerular size-selectivity in the normal rat with ficoll. J Am Soc Nephrol 3(2):214-228.
24. Prado GR, Ross JD, DeWeerth SP, LaPlaca MC. 2005. Mechanical trauma induces immediate changes in neuronal network activity. J Neural Eng 2(4):148-158.
25. Schlicher RK, Radhakrishna H, Tolentino TP, Apkarian RP, Zarnitsyn V, Prausnitz MR. 2006. Mechanism of intracellular delivery by acoustic cavitation. Ultrasound Med Biol 32(6):915-924.
26. Simoes S, Filipe A, Faneca H, Mano M, Penacho N, Duzgunes N, de Lima MP. 2005. Cationic liposomes for gene delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2(2):237-254.
27. Young LS, Searle PF, Onion D, Mautner V. 2006. Viral gene therapy strategies: From basic science to clinical application. J Pathol 208(2): 299-318.