Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Mangano, Francesco G ^a,b   Veronesi, Giovanni ^a   Hauschild, Uli ^c   Mijiritsk, Eitan ^d   Mangano, Carlo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c University of Tel Aviv ^*  (Italy)

^d TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDENTULOUS MAXILLA; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; INTRAORAL SCANNER; MAXILLA; ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY; ORAL SURGERY; SIMULATION;

EID: 84991669774     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163107     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ting-Shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. J Prosthodont 2015; 24 (4): 313-321. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12218 PMID: 25220390
2. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Makynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics Lasers Eng 2014; 54 (3): 203-221. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017
3. Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mormann WH, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems - a current overview. Int J Comput Dent 2015; 18 (2): 101-129. PMID: 26110925
4. Means CR, Flenniken IE. Gagging - a problem in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 23 (6): 614-620. PMID: 4911058
5. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139 (6): 761-763. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258 PMID: 18520000
6. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients' perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health, 2014; 14 (10): 7 pages. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10 PMID: 24479892
7. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W. The time efficiency of intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc 2014; 145 (6): 542-551. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.23 PMID: 24878708
8. Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114 (3): 403-406 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003 PMID: 26047800
9. Grunheid T, McCarthy SD, Larson BE. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 146 (5): 673-682. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.023 PMID: 25439218
10. Aragon ML, Pontes LF, Bichara LM, Flores-Mir C, Normando D. Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2016; 38 (4): 429-434 doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjw033 PMID: 27266879
11. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Prosthodont 2016; 25 (4): 282-287. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12410 PMID: 26618259
12. Goracci C, Franchi L, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38 (4): 422-428. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjv077 PMID: 26487391
13. Guth JF, Edheloff D, Schweiger J, Keul C. A new method for the evaluation of the accuracy of full-arch digital impressions in vitro. Clin Oral Investig 2015 Oct 10. [Epub ahead of print] doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1626-x PMID: 26454734
14. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 111 (3): 186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 PMID: 24210732
15. Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. J Prosthet DentJournal of Prosthetic Dent22014 2014; 112 (3): 555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.002 PMID: 24630399
16. Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Guth JF. Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (2): 283-289. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5 PMID: 26121970
17. Abdel-Azim T, Rogers K, Elathamna E, Zandinejad A, Metz M, Morton D. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015; 114 (4): 554-559. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.001 PMID: 26100929
18. Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016; 20 (2): 291-300. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6 PMID: 26070435
19. Pradies G, Zarauz C, Valverde A, Ferreiroa A, Martinez-Rus F. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology. J Dent 2015; 43 (2): 201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.12.007 PMID: 25527248
20. Zarauz C, Valverde A, Martinez-Rus F, Hassan B, Pradies G. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20 (4): 799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5 PMID: 26362778
21. Joda T, Bragger U. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: a cost/time analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26 (12): 1430-1435. doi: 10.1111/clr.12476 PMID: 25179680
22. Joda T, Bragger U. Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25 (11): 1304-1306. doi: 10.1111/clr.12270 PMID: 25040237
23. Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro. J Dent 2014; 42 (6): 677-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.01.016 PMID: 24508541
24. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112 (6): 1461-1471. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027 PMID: 25134995
25. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18 (6): 1687-1694. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y PMID: 24240949
26. Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013; 144 (8): 914-920. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0209 PMID: 23904578
27. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PlosOne 2012; 7 (8): e43312, 2012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043312 PMID: 22937030
28. P. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27 (4): 465-472. doi: 10.1111/clr.12567 PMID: 25682892
29. Gherlone E, Capparè P, Vinci R, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, Crespi R. Conventional Versus Digital Impressions for "All-on-Four" Restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016; 31 (2): 324-330. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3900 PMID: 27004280
30. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Kurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthod Res 2016; 60 (1): 12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001 PMID: 26520679
31. Gkantidis N, Schauseil M, Pazera P, Zorkun B, Katsaros C, Ludwig B. Evaluation of 3-Dimensional Superimposition Techniques on Various Skeletal Structures of the Head Using Surface Models. PLOS ONE 2015; 10(2): e0118810 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118810 PMID: 25706151
32. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012; 28 (1): 3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014 PMID: 22119539
33. Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 25 (10): 1113-1118. doi: 10.1111/clr.12234 PMID: 23941118
34. Dowling AH, Burns A, Macauley D, Garvey TM, Fleming GJ. Can the intra-examiner variability of Little's Irregularity Index be improved using 3D digital models of study casts? J Dent. 2013; 41 (12): 1271-1280. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.020 PMID: 24012518
35. Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016 May 6. doi: 10.1111/clr.12853 [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27150731