Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 144, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 914-920

  Patzelt, Sebastian B M ^a,b   Vonau, Sebastian ^b   Stampf, Susanne ^b   Att, Wael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Digital impression; Edentulous jaws; Intraoral scanner; Precision; Trueness

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; LASER; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; PATHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; LASERS; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84883430030     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0209     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. JADA 2009;140(10): 1301-1304.
2. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? JADA 2008;139(6):761-763.
3. Goodacre CJ, Garbacea A, Naylor WP, Daher T, Marchack CB, Lowry J. CAD/CAM fabricated complete dentures: concepts and clinical methods of obtaining required morphological data. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107(l):34-46.
4. Kanazawa M, Inokoshi M, Minakuchi S, Ohbayashi N. Trial of a CAD/CAM system for fabricating complete dentures. Dent Mater J 2011;30(l):93-96.
5. Sun Y, Lii P, Wang Y. Study on CAD&RP for removable complete denture. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009;93(3):266-272.
6. DIN Deutsches Institut fur Normung. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results, part I: general principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1:1994). Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 1997. www.nqsz.din.de/cmd?artid= 3050093&bcrumblevel=l&contextid=nqsz&subcommitteeid= 54748182&level=tpl-art-detailansicht&committeeid=54739099& languageid=en. Accessed June 21, 2013.
7. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109(2):121-128.
8. Mehl A, Ender A, MOrmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera (in English, German). Int J Comput Dent 2009;12(1):11-28.
9. Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study (in English, German). Int J Comput Dent 2011;14(1):11-21.
10. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression (in English, German). Int J Comput Dent 2005;8(4):283-294.
11. Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007;37(5):579-587.
12. Luthardt RG, Kuhmstedt P, Walter MH. A new method for the computer-aided evaluation of three-dimensional changes in gypsum materials. Dent Mater 2003;19(l):19-24.
13. Singh K, Sahoo S, Prasad KD, Goel M, Singh A. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(1):98-106.
14. Persson AS, Odén A, Andersson M, Sandborgh-Englund G. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual threedimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25(7):929-936.
15. Faria AC, Rodrigues RC, Macedo AP, Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF. Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials. Braz Oral Res 2008;22(4):293-298.
16. Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99(4):274-281.
17. Walstmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22(2): 158-160.
18. Chandran DT, Jagger DC, Jagger RG, Barbour ME. Two- and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials: effects of storage time and moisture contamination. Biomed Mater Eng 2010;2(X5):243-249.
19. Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions. Int J Prosthodont 2011;24(l):49-54.
20. Balkenhol M, Haunschild S, Erbe C, Wastmann B. Influence of prolonged setting time on permanent deformation of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103(5):288-294.
21. Babayoff N, Glaser-Inbari I, inventors; Cadent, Or Yehuda (IL), assignees. Imaging a three-dimensional structure by confocal focusing an array of light beams. U.S. patent 6,697,164 Bl. Feb. 24, 2004.
22. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, Cohen B. 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dent 2009;5(4):70-74.
23. Wachman ES, Niu W, Farkas DL. AOTF microscope for imaging with increased speed and spectral versatility. Biophys J 1997;73(3):1215-1222.
24. Marmann WH, Brandestini M, inventors. Method and apparatus for the fabrication of custom-shaped implants. U.S. patent 4,575,805. March 11,1986.
25. Schwotzer A, inventor; Sirona Dental Systems, assignee. Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. U.S. patent 2007/0296959 Al. Dec. 27,2007.
26. Thiel F, Pfeiffer J, Fornoff P, inventors; Sirona Dental Systems, assignee. Apparatus and method for optical 3D measurement. U.S. patent 2009/0279103. Nov. 12,2009.
27. Schmidt V, inventor; Sirona Dental Systems, assignee. 3D dental camera for recording surface structures of a measuring object by means of triangulation. U.S. patent 2011/0242281 Al. Oct. 6, 2011.
28. Seitz G, Tiziani H-J. Resolution limits of active triangulation systems by defocusing. Opt Eng 1993;32(6):1374-1383.
29. Kovács T. Active triangulation scanner development focusing on the accuracy of the detection. Paper presented at: 5th International Symposium of Hungarian Researchers; Nov. 11-12,2004; Budapest, Hungary, http://conf.uni- obuda.hu/mtn/kovacs.pdf. Accessed June 2, 2013.
30. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3d digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet J Med Technol 2011;5(1). http://archive.ispub.com/journalAhe-internet- journal-of-medicaltechnology/volume-5-number-l/a-comparative-analysis-of- intraoral-3d-digital-scanners-for-restorative-dentistry.html#sthash.RBKUoHLw. dpbs. Accessed June 21, 2013.
31. Berner M, inventor; MHT Optic Research, assignee. Optical system for a confocal microscope. U.S. patent 2010/0085636 Al. April 8, 2010.
32. Frigerio F. 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging Using Active Wavefront Sampling (dissertation). Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2006.
33. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992;14(2):239-256.
34. Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput 1992;(1CK3):145-155.
35. Mada SK, Smith ML, Smith LN, Midha PS. Overview of passive and active vision techniques for hand-held 3D data acquisition. Paper presented at: Opto-Ireland 2002: Optical Metrology, Imaging, and Machine Vision; Sept. 5-6,2002; Galway, Ireland.
36. Malachias A, Paranhos Hde F, da Silva CH, Muglia VA, Moreto C. Modified functional impression technique for complete dentures. Braz Dent J 2005;16(2):135-139.