Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1687-1694

  Patzelt, Sebastian B M ^a,b   Emmanouilidi, Archontia ^a   Stampf, Susanne ^a   Strub, Joerg R ^a   Att, Wael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DENTAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy of intraoral scanners; Digital impression; Full arch scan; Intraoral scanner; Precision of intraoral scanners; Trueness of intraoral scanners

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMAN; MAXILLA; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ARCH; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ARCH; HUMANS; MAXILLA;

EID: 84902765111     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1132-y     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG (2007) Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 35(12): 903-908.
2. Schoenbaum TR (2010) Decoding CAD/CAM and digital impression units. Dent Today 29(2): 140, 142, 144-145.
3. Clancy JM, Scandrett FR, Ettinger RL (1983) Long-term dimensional stability of three current elastomers. J Oral Rehabil 10(4): 325-333.
4. Endo T, Finger WJ (2006) Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material. Quintessence Int 37(1): 47-51.
5. Jamani KD, Harrington E, Wilson HJ (1989) Rigidity of elastomeric impression materials. J Oral Rehabil 16(3): 241-248.
6. Shafa S, Zaree Z, Mosharraf R (2008) The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts. J Contemp Dent Pract 9(6): 49-56.
7. Shetty P, Rodrigues S (2006) Accuracy of elastomeric impression materials on repeated pours. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 6(2): 61-71.
8. Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M (2009) Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 22(2): 158-160.
9. Zweig A (2009) Improving impressions: go digital! Dent Today 28(11): 100, 102, 104.
10. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139(6): 761-763.
11. Christensen GJ (2009) Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140(10): 1301-1304.
12. Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14(1): 11-21.
13. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S (2005) Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 8(4): 283-294.
14. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7(8): e43312. doi: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0043312.
15. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 109(2): 121-128. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1.
16. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12(1): 11-28.
17. Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2012) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10. 1007/s00784-012-0795-0.
18. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B (2012) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig. doi: 10. 1007/s00784-012-0864-4.
19. Babayoff N, Glaser-Inbari I (2000) Imaging a three-dimensional structure by confocal focussing an array of light beams. International Publication WO 00/08415.
20. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, Cohen B (2009) 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Insid Dent 5: 70-74.
21. Wachman ES, Niu W, Farkas DL (1997) AOTF microscope for imaging with increased speed and spectral versatility. Biophys J 73(3): 1215-1222.
22. Brandestini M, Moermann WH (1989) Method of and apparatus for making a prosthesis, especially a dental prosthesis. US Patent 4663720.
23. Schwotzer A (2007) Measuring device and method that operates according to the basic principles of confocal microscopy. US Patent 2007/0296959.
24. Thiel F, Pfeiffer J, Fornoff P (2008) Apparatus and method for optical 3D measurement. International Publication WO 2008/092791.
25. Schmidt V (2010) 3D dental camera for recording surface structures of a measuring object by means of triangulation. International Publication WO 2010/012838 A1.
26. Seitz G, Tiziani HJ (1996) Resolution limits of active triangulation systems by defocusing. Opt Eng 32(6): 1374-1383.
27. Kovács T (2004) Active triangulation scanner development focusing on the accuracy of the detection. In: 5th International Symposium of Hungarian Researchers: Sponsored by IEEE Computational Intelligence Chapter, Budapest, Magyarország, 2004. 11. 11-2004. 11. 12. pp 183-194.
28. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L (2011) A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet J Med Technol 5(1). http://ispub. com/IJMT/5/1/10082.
29. Berner M (2010) Optical system for a confocal microscope. US Patent 2010/0085636.
30. Figerio F (2006) 3-dimensional surface imaging using active wavefront sampling (PhD Thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA. http://dspace. mit. edu/handle/1721. 1/38258.
31. Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992) A method for registration of 3-D shapes. In: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 14(2): 239-256.
32. Yang C, Medioni G (1992) Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vis Comput 10(3): 145-155.
33. Mada SK, Smith ML, Smith LN, Midha PS (2003) Overview of passive and active vision techniques for hand-held 3D data acquisition. In: Shearer A, Murtagh FD, Mahon J, Whelan PF (eds) Opto-Ireland 2002: Optical metrology, imaging, and machine vision, Galway, Ireland, 2002. SPIE Digital Library. http://proceedings. spiedigitallibrary. org/proceeding. aspx?articleid=879224.