Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 283-289

  Ueda, Kazuhiko ^a,c   Beuer, Florian ^b   Stimmelmayr, Michael ^c   Erdelt, Kurt ^c   Keul, Christine ^c   Güth, Jan Frederik ^c  

^a NIPPON DENTAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Cobalt chromium alloy; Digital impression; Fixed dental prostheses; Intraoral scanner; Marginal fit; Zirconia

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTURE DESIGN; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; YOUNG MODULUS;

CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ELASTIC MODULUS; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84959131549     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Hondrum SO (2001) Changes in properties of non-aqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components. J Prosthet Dent 85:73-81.
2. Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT 2nd, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ (2002) Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 11:98-108.
3. Wassell RW, Barker D, Walls AW (2002) Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: impression materials and technique. Br Dent J 192:679–84, 687-690.
4. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W (2009) Precision of fit: zirconiathree-unit fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Invest 13:343-349.
5. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174-179.
6. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schimitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116:579-584.
7. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Li J, Borchers L, Stiesch M (2009) Marginal accuracy of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different computer-aided manufacturing systems. Eur J Oral Sci 117:319-325.
8. Rekow D, Thompson VP (2005) Near-surface damage—a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng 219:233-243.
9. Beschinidt SM, Strub JR (1999) Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehab 26:582-593.
10. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT (1997) A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10:478-484.
11. Bader JD, Rozier RG, McFall WT Jr, Ramsey DL (1991) Effect of crowns margins on periodontal conditions in regularly attending patients. J Prosthet Dent 65:75-79.
12. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalisation-a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30:400-407.
13. Tamim H, Skjerven H, Ekfeldt A, Rønold HJ (2014) Clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM metal-ceramic posterior crowns fabricated from digital impressions. Int J Prothodont 27:331-337.
14. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17:1201-1208.
15. 3M Espe; Lava™ Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S. Technical Datasheet. 3M ESPE (2009). Accessed 8 August 2014 from: http://multimedia.3m.com/mws/media/632323O/lava-cos-technical-data-sheet.pdf
16. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553-559.
17. Almeida E, Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Güth JF (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Invest 18:515-523.
18. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204:505-511.
19. Molin M, Karlsson S. (1993) The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 51:201-206.
20. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera All-Ceram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424.
21. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T (2007) Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 26:820-826.
22. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174-179.
23. Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, Eliasson A, Karlsson S, Ortorp A (2014) Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent 2014:1-9. doi: 10.1155/2014/534382
24. van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7:e43312.