Evaluation of 3-dimensional superimposition techniques on various skeletal structures of the head using surface models

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2015, Pages

  Gkantidis, Nikolaos ^a   Schauseil, Michael ^b   Pazera, Pawel ^a   Zorkun, Berna ^c   Katsaros, Christos ^a   Ludwig, Björn ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d Private Orthodontic Office   (Germany)

^e SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3 DIMENSIONAL SUPERIMPOSITION TECHNIQUE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BONE STRUCTURE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORAMEN MAGNUM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; RADIOLOGICAL PROCEDURES; RANDOM ERROR; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SKULL BASE; SKULL SCINTISCANNING; ZYGOMA; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMIC MODEL; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION STUDY; HEAD; IMAGE PROCESSING; PROCEDURES; RADIATION RESPONSE; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FORAMEN MAGNUM; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL BASE; TOMOGRAPHY SCANNERS, X-RAY COMPUTED; YOUNG ADULT; ZYGOMA;

EID: 84923324237     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118810     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Bjork A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod. 1977; 4: 53-64. PMID: 273440
2. Bjork A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible - a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5: 1-46. PMID: 6572593
3. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127: 627-637. PMID: 15877045
4. Halazonetis DJ. Morphometrics for cephalometric diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125: 571-581. PMID: 15127026
5. Crum WR, Griffin LD, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. Zen and the art of medical image registration: correspondence, homology, and quality. Neuroimage. 2003; 20: 1425-1437. PMID: 14642457
6. Eggers G, Kress B, Muhling J. Automated registration of intraoperative CT image data for navigated skull base surgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008; 51: 15-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004559 PMID: 18306126
7. Rodt T, Bartling SO, Zajaczek JE, Vafa MA, Kapapa T, Majdani O, et al. Evaluation of surface and volume rendering in 3D-CT of facial fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006; 35: 227-231. PMID: 16798916
8. Lee JH, Kim MJ, Kim SM, Kwon OH, Kim YK. The 3D CT superimposition method using image fusion based on the maximum mutual information algorithm for the assessment of oral and maxillofacial surgery treatment results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2012; 114: 167-174.
9. AlSamak S, Gkantidis N, Bitsanis E, Christou P. Assessment of potential orthodontic mini-implant insertion sites based on anatomical hard tissue parameters: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 875-887. PMID: 22848890
10. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 38: 609-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028 PMID: 19464146
11. Grauer D, Cevidanes LS, Proffit WR. Working with DICOM craniofacial images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136: 460-470. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.016 PMID: 19732681
12. AlHadidi A, Cevidanes LH, Mol A, Ludlow J, Styner M. Comparison of two methods for quantitative assessment of mandibular asymmetry using cone beam computed tomography image volumes. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40: 351-357. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/13993523 PMID: 21831974
13. Almeida RC, Cevidanes LH, Carvalho FA, Motta AT, Almeida MA, Styner M, et al. Soft tissue response to mandibular advancement using 3D CBCT scanning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40: 353-359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.11.018 PMID: 21208782
14. Cevidanes LH, Motta A, Proffit WR, Ackerman JL, Styner M. Cranial base superimposition for 3- dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: S120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.04.021 PMID: 20381752
15. Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129: 611-618. PMID: 16679201
16. Nada RM, Maal TJ, Breuning KH, Berge SJ, Mostafa YA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Accuracy and reproducibility of voxel based superimposition of cone beam computed tomography models on the anterior cranial base and the zygomatic arches. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e16520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016520 PMID: 21347419
17. Tai K, Park JH, Mishima K, Hotokezaka H. Using superimposition of 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images with surface-based registration in growing patients. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010; 34: 361-367. PMID: 20831142
18. van Vlijmen OJ, Rangel FA, Berge SJ, Bronkhorst EM, Becking AG, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners. Clin Oral Investig. 2011; 15: 721-727. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0440-8 PMID: 20640463
19. Lagravere MO, Major PW, Carey J. Sensitivity analysis for plane orientation in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis based on superimposition of serial cone beam computed tomography images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39: 400-408. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/17319459 PMID: 20841457
20. Danz JC, Katsaros C. Three-dimensional portable document format: a simple way to present 3-dimensional data in an electronic publication. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140: 274-276. doi: 10. 1016/j.ajodo.2011.04.010 PMID: 21803267
21. Buschang PH, LaPalme L, Tanguay R, Demirjian A. The technical reliability of superimposition on cranial base and mandibular structures. Eur J Orthod. 1986; 8: 152-156. PMID: 3464439
22. Frankel R. The applicability of the occipital reference base in cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 1980; 77: 379-395. PMID: 6928740
23. Tamm EP, Rong XJ, Cody DD, Ernst RD, Fitzgerald NE, Kundra V. Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. Radiographics. 2011; 31: 1823-1832. doi: 10.1148/rg.317115027 PMID: 21969662
24. Halazonetis DJ. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012; 141: 403, 405, 407 passim. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.010 PMID: 22464521
25. Ludwig B, Glasl B, Zorkun B, Wilmes B, Kinzinger G, Lisson J. Rapid maxillary expansion with skeletal force: The Hybrid RPE. kieferorthopädie. 2009; 23: 267-274.
26. Geomagic GmbH SC, 70597 Stuttgart, Germany. Available: http://www.geomagic.com/de/products/qualify/overview. Accessed 11 March 2013.
27. Popat H, Richmond S, Playle R, Marshall D, Rosin P, Cosker D. Three-dimensional motion analysis - an exploratory study. Part 1: assessment of facial movement. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008; 11: 216-223. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00433.x PMID: 18950318
28. Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. Proc 3DIM; 2001. pp. 145-152.
29. Trucco E, Fusiello A, Roberto V. Robust motion and correspondence of noisy 3-D point sets with missing data. Pattern Recogn Lett. 1999; 20: 889-898.
30. Pixmeo SARL RdB, CH-1233 Bernex, Switzerland. Available: http://www.osirix-viewer.com/. Accessed 12 March 2013.
31. Technology of Information Renato Archer Centre MoSaT, Campinas, Brazil. Available: http://svn.softwarepublico.gov.br/trac/invesalius. Accessed 12 March 2013.
32. Fortin M, Battie MC. Quantitative paraspinal muscle measurements: inter-software reliability and agreement using OsiriX and ImageJ. Phys Ther. 2012; 92: 853-864. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110380 PMID: 22403091
33. Kim G, Jung HJ, Lee HJ, Lee JS, Koo S, Chang SH. Accuracy and reliability of length measurements on three-dimensional computed tomography using open-source OsiriX software. J Digit Imaging. 2012; 25: 486-491. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9458-6 PMID: 22270788
34. Rahmah NN, Murata T, Yako T, Horiuchi T, Hongo K. Correlation between squamous suture and sylvian fissure: OSIRIX DICOM viewer study. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e18199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018199 PMID: 21483821
35. Yamauchi T, Yamazaki M, Okawa A, Furuya T, Hayashi K, Sakuma T. Efficacy and reliability of highly functional open source DICOM software (OsiriX) in spine surgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2010; 17: 756-759. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.037 PMID: 20359897
36. Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph. 1987; 21: 163-169.
37. Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modeling by registration of multiple range images. Proc IEEE Int Conf Robot Autom; 1991. pp. 2724-2729.
38. Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001; 26: 32-46. PMID: 11469182
39. Anderson MJ. PERMANOVA: a FORTRAN computer program for permutational multivariate analysis of variance. New Zeland: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland; 2005.
40. Anderson MJ. PERMDISP: a FORTRAN computer program for permutatinoal analysis of multivariate dispersions (for any two-factor ANOVA design) using permutation tests. New Zealand: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland; 2004.
41. Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995; 346: 1085-1087. PMID: 7564793
42. Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual. J Biopharm Stat. 2007; 17: 571-582. PMID: 17613642
43. Bastir M, Rosas A, O'Higgins P. Craniofacial levels and the morphological maturation of the human skull. J Anat. 2006; 209: 637-654. PMID: 17062021
44. Melsen B. Palatal growth studied on human autopsy material. A histologic microradiographic study. Am J Orthod. 1975; 68: 42-54. PMID: 1056143
45. Houston WJ, Lee RT. Accuracy of different methods of radiographic superimposition on cranial base structures. Eur J Orthod. 1985; 7: 127-135. PMID: 3894040
46. Arat ZM, Turkkahraman H, English JD, Gallerano RL, Boley JC. Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80: 537-544. doi: 10.2319/080709-447.1 PMID: 20482360
47. Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, Denis K, Hassan B, Li L. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT). Part II: On 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 75: 270-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.016 PMID: 19423257
48. Santler G, Kärcher H, Gaggl A, Kern R. Stereolithography versus milled three-dimensional models: comparison of production method, indication, and accuracy. Comput Aided Surg. 1998; 3: 248-256. PMID: 10207649
49. Bailey L', Cevidanes LH, Proffit WR. Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126: 273-277. PMID: 15356484
50. Shelly AD, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Fridrich KL, et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117: 630-637. PMID: 10842105
51. Tsang ST, McFadden LR, Wiltshire WA, Pershad N, Baker AB. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.033 PMID: 19121503
52. Heymann GC, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137: 274-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.009 PMID: 20152686
53. De Clerck H, Cevidanes L, Baccetti T. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: a controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 138: 577-581. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.037 PMID: 21055597
54. Rodriguez JM, Austin RS, Bartlett DW. In vivo measurements of tooth wear over 12 months. Caries Res. 2011; 46: 9-15. doi: 10.1159/000334786 PMID: 22156738
55. Benazzi S, Senck S. Comparing 3-dimensional virtual methods for reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 69: 1184-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.028 PMID: 20674130
56. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schon R, Teschner M, Gellrich NC, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 104: E1-E10. PMID: 17964468
57. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. Advances in Geometric Morphometrics. Evol Biol. 2009; 36: 235-247.
58. Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ, Alexandropoulos E, Haralabakis NB. Treatment strategies for patients with hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 malocclusion: is vertical dimension affected? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140: 346-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.015 PMID: 21889079
59. Gkantidis N, Halazonetis DJ. Morphological integration between the cranial base and the face in children and adults. J Anat. 2011; 218: 426-438. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01346.x PMID: 21323666
60. Hill DL, Hawkes DJ, Crossman JE, Gleeson MJ, Cox TC, Bracey EE, et al. Registration of MR and CT images for skull base surgery using point-like anatomical features. Br J Radiol. 1991; 64: 1030-1035. PMID: 1742584
61. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 106: 106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018 PMID: 18504152