Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 799-806

  Zarauz, Cristina ^a,b   Valverde, Arelhys ^a   Martinez Rus, Francisco ^a   Hassan, Bassam ^b   Pradies, Guillermo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

All ceramic crowns; CAD CAM; Dental impression materials: silicone; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner; Marginal fit; Replica technique

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; SILICONE DERIVATIVE;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; HUMAN; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; HUMANS; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84941361665     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1590-5     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Zarone F, Russo S, Sorrentino R (2011) From porcelain-fused-to-metal to zirconia: clinical and experimental considerations. Dent Mater 27:83–96
2. Luthardt R, Weber A, Rudolph H, Schöne C, Quaas S, Walter M (2002) Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 5:165–176
3. Vlaar ST, Van der Zel JM (2006) Accuracy of dental digitizers. Int Dent J 56:301–309
4. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y (2009) A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28:44–56
5. Mörmann WH (2006) The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 137:7–13
6. Suarez MJ, Gonzalez P, Pradíes G, Salido MP (2003) Comparison of the marginal fit of Procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 16:229–232
7. Conrad HJ, Seong W-J, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98:389–404
8. Raigrodski AJ (2004) Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 92:557–562
9. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D et al (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38:553–559
10. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16:11–21
11. Pak H-S, Han J-S, Lee J-B et al (2010) Influence of porcelain veneering on the marginal fit of Digident and Lava CAD/CAM zirconia ceramic crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2:33–38
12. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS (1991) An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 65:436–442
13. Martinez-Rus F, Suarez MJ, Rivera B, Pradíes G (2011) Evaluation of the absolute marginal discrepancy of zirconia-based ceramic copings. J Prosthet Dent 105:108–114
14. Björn AL, Björn H, Grkovic B (1970) Marginal fit of restorations and its relation to periodontal bone level. II. Crowns. Odontol Revy 21:337–346
15. McLean JW, Von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131:107–111
16. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B (2012) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17:1759–1764
17. Güth J-F, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17:1201–1208
18. Almeida E, Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D et al (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18:515–523
19. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kristen A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17:2119–2125
20. Boening KW (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84:419–424
21. Martins LM, Lorenzoni FC, De Melo AO et al (2012) Internal fit of two all ceramic systems and metal ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 20:235–240
22. Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, Van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35:68–73
23. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CHF (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116:272–279
24. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408
25. Hung SH, Purk JH, Tira DE, Eick JD (1992) Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique. J Prosthet Dent 67:583–589
26. Carrotte PV, Johnson A, Winstanley RB (1998) The influence of the impression tray on the accuracy of impressions for crown and bridge work—an investigation and review. Br Dent J 185:580–585
27. Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT et al (2002) Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont 11:98–108
28. Souza ROA, Ozcan M, Pavanelli CA et al (2012) Marginal and internal discrepancies related to margin design of ceramic crowns fabricated by a CAD/CAM system. J Prosthodont 21:94–10034
29. Suárez MJ (2003) Comparison of the marginal fit of procera AllCeram crowns with two finish lines. Int J Prosthodont 16:229–232