Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 291-300

  Ahrberg, Danush ^a   Lauer, Hans Christoph ^a   Ahrberg, Martin ^b   Weigl, Paul ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Private Practice for Nuclear Medicine   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer aided design computer aided manufacturing (CAD CAM); Conventional impression; Digital impression; Intraoral scanner; Marginal gap; Zirconia ceramic

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; HUMAN; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CROWN;

CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84959130155     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Christensen GJ (2008) Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139(6):761–763
2. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D (2008) Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204(9):505–511
3. Christensen GJ (2008) The challenge to conventional impressions. J Am Dent Assoc 139(3):347–349
4. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H (2014) Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health. doi:10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
5. Breeding LC, Dixon DL (2000) Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions. J Prosthet Dent 84(4):403–407
6. Cho GC, Chee WW (2004) Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysi- loxane impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 92(4):354–358
7. Luthardt RG et al (2006) Qualitative computer aided evaluation of dental impressions in vivo. Dent Mater 22(1):69–76
8. Luthardt RG, Walter MH, Weber A, Koch R, Rudolph H (2008) Clinical parameters influencing the accuracy of 1- and 2-stage impressions: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont 21(4):322–327
9. Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B (2007) Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Int J Prosthodont 20(6):573–575
10. Di Felice R, Scotti R, Belser UC (2002) The influence of the mixing technique on the content of voids in two polyether impression materials. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 112(1):12–16
11. Persson AS, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G (2008) Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent Mater 24(8):1123–1130
12. Belser UC, MacEntee MI, Richter WA (1985) Fit of three porcelain-fused-to-metal marginal designs in vivo: a scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 53(1):24–29
13. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA (1971) The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131(3):107–111
14. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Gauckler LJ, Lüthy H, Hämmerle CH (2007) Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 20(4):383–388
15. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL (2003) Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol 30(5):379–385
16. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K (1983) Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 10(6):563–578
17. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hämmerle CH (2008) Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116(3):272–279
18. Thompson VP, Rekow DE (2004) Dental ceramics and the molar crown testing ground. J Appl Oral Sci 12(spe):26–36
19. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ (2007) Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 98(5):389–404
20. Mörmann W, Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Sener B, Attin T, Mehl A (2013) Wear characteristics of current aesthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM materials: two-body wear, gloss retention, roughness and martens hardness. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 20:113–125. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.003 Epub 2013 Jan 23
21. Koller M, Arnetzl GV, Holly L, Arnetzl G (2012) Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/ CAM: customization case study. Int J Comput Dent 15(2):159–164
22. Rinke S, Schäfer S, Schmidt AK (2014) Einsatzmöglichkeiten zirkonverstärkter Lithiumsilikat- Keramiken. Quintessenz Zahntech 40(5):536–546
23. Rosentritt M (2013) Verschleißuntersuchung an keramischen Werkstoffen, Report Number: 219_3; 02/2013. Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Poliklinik für Zahnärztliche Prothetik, Regensburg
24. Stawarczyk B, Eichberger M, Hoffmann R, Noack F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Beuer F (2014) A novel CAD/ CAM base metal compared to conventional CoCrMo alloys: an in-vitro study of the long-term metal-ceramic bond strength. Oral Health Dent Manag 13(2):446–452
25. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S (2013) The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow-the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 17(9):2119–2125
26. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D (2009) High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings—a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 25(1):121–128
27. Mehl A, Koch R, Zaruba M, Ender A (2013) 3D monitoring and quality control using intraoral optical camera systems. Int J Comput Dent 16(1):23–36
28. Rekow ED (2006) Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc 137(Suppl):5S–6S
29. Mörmann WH, Bindl A (1996) The new creativity in ceramic restorations: dental CAD-CIM. Quintessence Int 27(12):821–828
30. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T (2009) Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 12(1):11–28
31. Ziegler M (2009) Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision. Int J Comput Dent 12(2):159–163
32. Rohaly J (2009) The development of the Lava chairside oral scanner C.O.S. technology—masterstroke of a legion of talented and committed people. Int J Comput Dent 12(2):165–169
33. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 17(4):1201–1208, PMID: 22847854
34. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ (2010) Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 38(5):323–330
35. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 38(7):553–559
36. Cardelli P, Scotti R, Monaco C (2011) Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2011.10.005
37. Reich S et al (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113(2):174–179
38. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J (2008) Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116(6):579–584
39. Beuer F, Naumann M, Gernet W (2009) Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed denta prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 13:343–349
40. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Güth JF (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 18(2):515–523. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
41. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B (2013) Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 17(7):1759–1764
42. Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Güth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization—a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30(4):400–407
43. Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, Eliasson A, Karlsson S, Ortorp A (2014) Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent. doi:10.1155/2014/534382 Epub 2014 Mar 3
44. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO (2014) Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants 24(1):111–115
45. Gozdowski S, Reich S (2009) A comparison of the fabrication times of all-ceramic partial crowns: Cerec 3D vs IPS Empress. Int J Comput Dent 12(3):279–289
46. Patzelt SB, Lamprinos C, Stampf S, Att W (2014) The time efficiency of intraoral scanner: an in vitro com-parative study. J Am Dent Assoc 145(6):542–551
47. Boening KW, Wolf BH, Schmidt AE, Kästner K, Walter MH (2000) Clinical fit of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 84(4):419–424
48. Holmes JE, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC (1992) Marginal fit of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 67(5):594–599
49. Jacobs MS, Windeler AS (1991) An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent 65(3):436–442
50. Hmaidouch R, Neumann R, Mueller WD (2011) Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent 14(3):219–226
51. Schweiger J, Beuer F, Edelhoff D (2011) Digital workflow teil 3. Quintessenz Zahntech 37:60–72
52. Rudolph H, Quaas S, Luthardt RG (2002) Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities. Int J Comput Dent 5(2–3):155–164
53. Ender A, Mehl A (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions—an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 14(1):11–21
54. Quaas S, Loos R, Sporbeck H, Luthardt RG (2005) Analyse des Einflusses der Puderapplikation auf die Genauigkeit optischer Digitalisierungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 60:96–99
55. Ender A, Mehl A (2013) Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 16(1):11–21
56. Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental im- pressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 144(3):471–478
57. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G (2008) Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns—validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 35(2):116–122
58. Kohorst P, Brinkmann H, Dittmer MP, Borchers L, Stiesch M (2010) Influence of the veneering process on the marginal fit of zirconia fixed dental prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 37(4):283–291
59. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H (2000) Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 83(1):p40–p49