Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 186-194

  Andriessen, Frank S ^a   Rijkens, David R ^a   Van Der Meer, Wicher J ^b   Wismeijer, Daniel W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPLETE LOWER DENTURE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DEVICES; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MANDIBLE; OVERLAY DENTURE; PATHOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; PILOT PROJECTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84894804838     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. L. Silvia, F. Giordano, K. Ari, C. Michele, G. Lapo, and B. Luciano A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry Internet Journal of Medical Technology 5 2008 1
2. S.J. Lee, and G.O. Gallucci Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes Clin Oral Implants Res 24 2013 111 115
3. G.J. Christensen The challenge to conventional impressions JADA 139 2008 347 349
4. G.J. Christensen Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 139 2008 761 763
5. J.M. Stein Stand-alone scanning systems simplify intraoral digital impressioning Compend Contin Educ Dent 56 2011 58 59
6. W.J. van der Meer, F.S. Andriessen, D. Wismeijer, and Y. Ren Application of intraoral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology PLoS One 7 2012 e43312 [e-pub August 22, 2012]
7. A. Ender, and A. Mehl Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in vitro study Int J Comp Dent 14 2011 11 21
8. G.O. Gallucci, P. Papaspyridakos, L.M. Ashy, G.E. Kim, N.J. Brady, and H.P. Weber Clinical accuracy outcomes of closed-tray and open-tray implant impression techniques for partially edentulous patients Int J Prosthodont 24 2011 469 472
9. H. Lee, J.S. So, J.L. Hochstedler, and C. Ercoli The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review J Prosthet Dent 100 2008 285 291
10. D.R. Prithviraj, M.L. Pujari, P. Garg, and D.P. Shruthi Accuracy of the implant impression obtained from different impression materials and techniques: review J Clin Exp Dent 3 2011 106 111
11. J.H. Kwon, Y.H. Son, C.H. Han, and S. Kim Accuracy of implant impressions without impression copings: a three-dimensional analysis J Prosthet Dent 105 2011 367 373
12. G.H. Johnson, and R.G. Craig Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models J Prosthet Dent 53 1985 484 490
13. P.L. Millstein Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone J Oral Rehabil 19 1992 239 243
14. A.C. Faria, R.C. Rodrigues, A.P. Macedo, G. Mattos Mda, and R.F. Ribeiro Accuracy of stone casts obtained by different impression materials Braz Oral Res 22 2008 293 298
15. X. Konstantinos, K.X. Michalakis, A. Stratos, H. Hirayama, A.L. Pissiotis, and F. Touloumi Delayed setting and hygroscopic linear expansion of 3 gypsum products used for cast articulation J Prosthet Dent 102 2009 313 318
16. T.A. Imbery, J. Nehring, C. Janus, and P.C. Moon Accuracy and dimensional stability of extended-pour and conventional alginate impression materials J Am Dent Assoc 141 2010 32 39
17. S. Sahin, M. Cehreli, and E. Yalcin The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses - a review J Dent 30 2002 271 282
18. T. Wang, L. Leu, J. Wang, and L. Lin Effects of prosthesis materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 2002 231 237
19. C. Kunavisarut, L. Lang, B. Stoner, and D. Felton Finite element analysis on dental-implant supported prostheses without passive fit J Prosthodont 11 2002 30 40
20. A.D. Sones Complications with osseointegrated implants J Prosthet Dent 62 1989 581 585
21. J.Y. Kan, K. Rungcharassaeng, K. Bohsali, C.J. Goodacre, and B.R. Lang Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit Impl Dent 10 2001 85 92
22. S. Sahin, and M.C. Cehreli The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: current status Implant Dent 10 2001 85 92
23. S.A. de Sousa, M.A. de Arruda Nobilo, G.E. Henriques, and M.F. Mesquita Passive fit of frameworks in titanium and palladium-silver alloy submitted the laser welding J Oral Rehabil 35 2008 123 127
24. S.T. Swallow Technique for achieving a passive framework fit: a clinical case report J Prosthet Dent 81 1999 7 13
25. A. Tahmaseb, R. De Clerck, I. Aartman, and D. Wismeijer Digital protocol for reference-based guided surgery and immediate loading: a prospective clinical study Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27 2012 1258 1270
26. A.B. Carr, D.A. Gerard, and P.E. Larsen The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit J Prosthet Dent 76 1996 500 509
27. T. Jemt, and K. Book Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous patients Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11 1996 620 625
28. Y. Kim, T.J. Oh, C.E. Misch, and H.L. Wang Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale Clin Oral Impl 16 2005 25 35
29. P.R. Kachalia, and M.J. Geissberger Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology J Calif Dent Assoc 38 2010 323 330
30. D.J. Fasbinder Digital dentistry: innovation for restorative treatment Compend Contin Educ Dent 31 2010 2 11
31. S. Szmukler-Moncler, H. Salama, Y. Reingewirtz, and J. Dubruille Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature J Biomed Mat Res 43 1998 192 203
32. J. Duyck, L. Vrielinck, I. Lambrechts, Y. Abe, S. Schepers, and S. Politis et al. Biologic response of immediately versus delayed loaded implants supporting ill-fitting prosthesis: an animal study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 2005 150 158