Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 648-653

  Vandeweghe, Stefan ^a   Vervack, Valentin ^a   Dierens, Melissa ^b   De Bruyn, Hugo ^a,c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^c MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

dental implant; digital impression; edentulous; intra oral scan

Indexed keywords

PLASTIC;

ANATOMIC MODEL; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANT;

DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PLASTICS;

EID: 84966430692     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: 16000501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/clr.12853     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abdel-Azim, T., Zandinejad, A., Elathamna, E., Lin, W. & Morton, D. (2014) The influence of digital fabrication options on the accuracy of dental implant-based single units and complete-arch frameworks. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 29: 1281–1288.
2. Almeida e Silva, J.S., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D., Araujo, E., Stimmelmayr, M., Vieira, L.C. & Guth, J.F. (2014) Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clinical Oral Investigations 18: 515–523.
3. Andriessen, F.S., Rijkens, D.R., van der Meer, W.J. & Wismeijer, D.W. (2014) Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: a pilot study. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 111: 186–194.
4. Bacchi, A., Consani, R.L., Mesquita, M.F. & Dos Santos, M.B. (2013) Effect of framework material and vertical misfit on stress distribution in implant-supported partial prosthesis under load application: 3-d finite element analysis. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 71: 1243–1249.
5. Denissen, H., Dozic, A., van der Zel, J. & van Waas, M. (2000) Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered cicero, cerec, and procera onlays. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84: 506–513.
6. Ender, A. & Mehl, A. (2011) Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions–an in-vitro study. International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 14: 11–21.
7. Ender, A. & Mehl, A. (2015) In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence International 46: 9–17.
8. Fluegge, T., Att, W., Metzger, M. & Nelson, K. (2015) A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies-an experimental approach. Journal of Prosthodontics 26: 34–41.
9. Flugge, T.V., Schlager, S., Nelson, K., Nahles, S. & Metzger, M.C. (2013) Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with itero and extraoral digitization with the itero and a model scanner. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 144: 471–478.
10. de Franca, D.G., Morais, M.H., das Neves, F.D. & Barbosa, G.A. (2015) Influence of cad/cam on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 113: 22–28.
11. Gimenez, B., Ozcan, M., Martinez-Rus, F. & Pradies, G. (2014) Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 29: 853–862.
12. Gimenez, B., Ozcan, M., Martinez-Rus, F. & Pradies, G. (2015) Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active triangulation technology with blue light for implants: effect of clinically relevant parameters. Implant Dentistry 24: 498–504.
13. Goodacre, C.J., Bernal, G., Rungcharassaeng, K. & Kan, J.Y. (2003) Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 90: 121–132.
14. Guth, J.F., Keul, C., Stimmelmayr, M., Beuer, F. & Edelhoff, D. (2013) Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clinical Oral Investigations 17: 1201–1208.
15. Hammerle, C.H., Wagner, D., Bragger, U., Lussi, A., Karayiannis, A., Joss, A. & Lang, N.P. (1995) Threshold of tactile sensitivity perceived with dental endosseous implants and natural teeth. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 83–90.
16. Heckmann, S.M., Karl, M., Wichmann, M.G., Winter, W., Graef, F. & Taylor, T.D. (2004) Cement fixation and screw retention: parameters of passive fit. An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 466–473.
17. Jemt, T. & Lie, A. (1995) Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 172–180.
18. Joda, T. & Bragger, U. (2014) Complete digital workflow for the production of implant-supported single-unit monolithic crowns. Clinical Oral Implants Research 25: 1304–1306.
19. Joda, T., Wittneben, J.G. & Bragger, U. (2014) Digital implant impressions with the “individualized scanbody technique” for emergence profile support. Clinical Oral Implants Research 25: 395–397.
20. Johnson, G.H. & Craig, R.G. (1985) Accuracy of four types of rubber impression materials compared with time of pour and a repeat pour of models. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 53: 484–490.
21. Karl, M. & Holst, S. (2012) Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations. The International Journal of Prosthodontics 25: 166–169.
22. Katsoulis, J., Muller, P., Mericske-Stern, R. & Blatz, M.B. (2015) Cad/cam fabrication accuracy of long- vs. Short-span implant-supported fdps. Clinical Oral Implants Research 26: 245–249.
23. Kim, Y., Oh, T.J., Misch, C.E. & Wang, H.L. (2005) Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 26–35.
24. Lee, S.J. & Gallucci, G.O. (2013) Digital vs. Conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research 24: 111–115.
25. Lin, W.S., Harris, B.T. & Morton, D. (2013) The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 109: 187–191.
26. van der Meer, W.J., Andriessen, F.S., Wismeijer, D. & Ren, Y. (2012) Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS One 7: e43312.
27. Millstein, P.L. (1992) Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type iv dental stone. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 19: 239–243.
28. Mormann, W., Brandestini, M., Ferru, A., Lutz, F. & Krejci, I. (1985) [marginal adaptation of adhesive porcelain inlays in vitro]. Schweizerische Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin (1984) 95: 1118–1129.
29. Nedelcu, R.G. & Persson, A.S. (2014) Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 112: 1461–1471.
30. Ng, J., Ruse, D. & Wyatt, C. (2014) A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 112: 555–560.
31. Papaspyridakos, P., Gallucci, G.O., Chen, C.J., Hanssen, S., Naert, I. & Vandenberghe, B. (2015) Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research 27: 465–472.
32. Patzelt, S.B., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R. & Att, W. (2014) Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clinical Oral Investigations 18: 1687–1694.
33. Schneider, A., Kurtzman, G.M. & Silverstein, L.H. (2001) Improving implant framework passive fit and accuracy through the use of verification stents and casts. Journal of Dental Technology 18: 23–25.
34. Stimmelmayr, M., Guth, J.F., Erdelt, K., Edelhoff, D. & Beuer, F. (2012) Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit–an in vitro study. Clinical Oral Investigations 16: 851–856.
35. Su, T.S. & Sun, J. (2016) Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in-vitro study. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 59: 236–242.
36. Svanborg, P., Skjerven, H., Carlsson, P., Eliasson, A., Karlsson, S. & Ortorp, A. (2014) Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. International Journal of Dentistry 2014: 534382.
37. Syrek, A., Reich, G., Ranftl, D., Klein, C., Cerny, B. & Brodesser, J. (2010) Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of Dentistry 38: 553–559.
38. van der Zel, J.M., Vlaar, S., de Ruiter, W.J. & Davidson, C. (2001) The cicero system for cad/cam fabrication of full-ceramic crowns. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 85: 261–267.