Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 313-321

  Ting shu, Su ^a   Jian, Sun ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Conventional impression; Intraoral digital impression

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION; HUMAN;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; HUMANS;

EID: 84933678682     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12218     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mormann WH: The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7S-13S
2. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al: Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559
3. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al: Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:515-523
4. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B: Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-1764
5. Luthardt R, Weber A, Rudolph H, et al: Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:165-176
6. Galhano GÁ, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JV: Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:e575-e579
7. Correia ARM, Sampaio Fernandes JCA, Cardoso JAP, et al: CAD-CAM: informatics applied to fixed prosthodontics. Rev Odontol UNESP 2006;35:183-189
8. Rekov ED: Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(Suppl):5S-6S
9. CEREC 3: Operating instructions for the acquisition unit. Sirona The Dental Company, Bensheim, Germany, 2004
10. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB, Stevens C, et al: 3D digital scanners: a high-tech approach to more accurate dental impressions. Inside Dent 2009;5:70-74
11. Poticny DJ, Klim J: CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:5S-9S
12. Patel N: Technologies for comprehensive implant integrating three-dimensional digital. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:20S-24S
13. Rohaly J: Three-channel camera systems with non-collinear apertures. United States Patent 2006;7:372-642
14. Lava Chairside Oral Scanner C.O.S: 3M ESPE Technical Datasheet, St. Paul, MN, 2009
15. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB: Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:494, 496, 498-505
16. Garg AK: Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:1-4
17. Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ: Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. J Calif Dent Assoc 2010;38:323-330
18. Glassman S: Digital impressions for the fabrication of aesthetic ceramic restorations: a case report. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2009;21:60-64
19. Jacobson B: Taking the headache out of impressions. Dentistry Today 2007;26:74-76
20. Cadent debuts "next generation" iTero digital impression system. Implant Tribune, US edition, 2007;1(12):14
21. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, et al: A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Int J Med Tech 2011;5. http://ispub.com/IJMT/5/1/10082#
22. Tsitrou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, van Noort R: A preliminary evaluation of the structural integrity and fracture mode of minimally prepared resin bonded CAD/CAM crowns. J Dent 2010;38:16-22
23. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO: Digital vs conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:111-115
24. Persson AS, Oden A, Andersson M, et al: Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness. Dent Mater 2009;25:929-936
25. Quaas S, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG: Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. J Dent 2007;35:903-908
26. Ender A, Mehl A: Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21
27. da Costa JB, Pelogia F, Hagedorn B, et al: Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlay created with CEREC 3D. Oper Dent 2010;35:324-329
28. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, et al: Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:851-856
29. Del Corso M, Aba G, Vazquez L, et al: Optical three-dimensional scanning acquisition of the position osseointegrated implants: an in vitro study to determine method accuracy and operational feasibility. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:214-221
30. Mehl A, Ender A, Mormann W, et al: Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28
31. Christensen GJ: Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:761-763