The model of instructional quality in COACTIV: A multicriteria analysis

Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV Project

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 97-124

  Kunter, Mareike ^a   Voss, Thamar ^b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991444022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5149-5_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (107)

1. Anders Y, Kunter M, Brunner M, Krauss S, Baumert J (2010) Diagnostische Fähigkeiten von Mathematiklehrkräften und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Leistungen ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler [Mathematics teachers' diagnostic skills and their impact on students' achievements]. Psychologie Erziehung Unterricht 57(3):175-193. doi:10.2378/peu2010.art13d
2. Baumert J, Koller O (2000) Unterrichtsgestaltung, verständnisvolles Lernen und multiple Zielerreichung im Mathematik- und Physikunterricht der gymnasialen Oberstufe [Instructional quality, insightful learning, and achieving multiple goals in upper secondary mathematics and physics instruction]. In: Baumert J, Bos W, Lehmann R (eds) TIMSS/III: Dritte Internationale Mathematik- und Naturwissenschaftsstudie: Mathematische und naturwissenschaftliche Bildung am Ende der Schullaufbahn, vol 2, Mathematische und physikalische Kompetenzen in der Oberstufe. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 271-315
3. Baumert J, Kunter M (2006) Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften [Teachers' professional competence]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 9(4):469-520. doi:10.1007/ s11618-006-0165-2
4. Baumert J, Gruehn S, Heyn S, Koller O, Schnabel KU (1997) Bildungsverläufe und psychosoziale Entwicklung im Jugendalter (BIJU). Dokumentation, Band 1. Skalen Längsschnitt I, Welle 1-4 [Learning processes, educational careers, and psychosocial development in adolescence and young adulthood (BIJU). Documentation, Vol 1. Scales Longitudinal Sample I, Waves 1-4]. Max Planck Institute for Educational Research, Berlin
5. Baumert J, Lehmann R, Lehrke M, Schmitz B, Clausen M, Hosenfeld I, ... Neubrand M (1997b) TIMSS - Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht im internationalen Vergleich: Deskriptive Befunde [TIMSS-Mathematics and science instruction in international comparison: descriptive findings]. Leske + Budrich, Opladen
6. Baumert J, Kunter M, Brunner M, Krauss S, Blum W, Neubrand M (2004) Mathematikunterricht aus Sicht der PISA-Schülerinnen und -Schüler und ihrer Lehrkräfte [Mathematics instruction from the perspective of the PISA students and their teachers]. In: Prenzel M, Baumert J, Blum W, Lehmann R, Leutner D, Neubrand M, Pekrun R, Rolff H-G, Rost J, Schiefele U (eds) PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Waxman, Münster, pp 314-354
7. Baumert J, Kunter M, Blum W, Brunner M, Voss T, Jordan A, ... Tsai Y-M (2010) Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. Am Educ Res J 47(1):133-180. doi:10.3102/0002831209345157
8. Berliner DC (2005) The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. J Teach Educ 56(3):205-213. doi:10.1177/0022487105275904 DOI:10.1177%2F0022487105275904
9. Blum W (2001) Was folgt aus TIMSS für Mathematikunterricht und Mathematiklehrerausbildung? [What are the implications of TIMSS for mathematics instruction and teacher education?]. In: BMBF (ed) TIMSS: Impulse für Schule und Unterricht. BMBF, Bonn, pp 75-87
10. Blum W, Leiß D (2007) Investigating quality mathematics teaching: the DISUM project. In: Bergsten C, Grevholm B (eds) Developing and researching quality in mathematics teaching and learning: proceedings of the fifth mathematics education research conference, Madfi5, Malmö. SMDF, Linköping, pp 3-16
11. Blum W, Neubrand M (1998) TIMSS und der Mathematikunterricht: Informationen, Analysen, Konsequenzen [TIMSS and mathematics instruction: information, analyses, implications]. Schroedel, Hanover
12. Blum W, Neubrand M, Ehmke T, Senkbeil M, Jordan A, Ulfig F, Carstensen CC (2004) Mathematische Kompetenz [Mathematical literacy]. In: Prenzel M, Baumert J, Blum W, Lehmann R, Leutner D, Neubrand M. Schiefele U (eds) PISA 2003 Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs. Waxmann, Münster, pp 47-92
13. Brophy J (1999) Teaching. International Academy of Education, Brussels
14. Clausen M (2002) Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? [Instructional quality - a question of perspective?]. Waxmann, Münster
15. Cobb P (1994) Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educ Res 23(7):13-20
16. Cobb P, Bowers J (1999) Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educ Res 28(2):4-15. doi:10.2307/1177185 DOI:10.2307%2F1177185
17. Collins AM, Greeno JG, Resnick LB (2001) Educational learning theory. In: Smelster N, Baltes PB (eds) International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 4276-4279
18. Cornelius-White J (2007) Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: a metaanalysis. Rev Educ Res 77(1):113-143. doi:10.3102/003465430298563
19. Davis HA (2003) Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educ Psychol 38(4):207-234. doi: 10.1207/ S15326985EP3804_2
20. De Jong R, Westerhof KJ (2001) The quality of student ratings of teacher behaviour. Learn Environ Res 4(1):51-85. doi:10.1023/A:1011402608575
21. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychol Inq 11(4):227-268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
22. Den Brok P, Brekelmans M, Wubbels T (2004) Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Eff School Improv 15(3):407-442. doi:10.1080/09243450512331383262
23. Desimone LM (2009) Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ Res 38(3):181-199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140
24. Doyle W (1986) Classroom organization and management. In: Wittrock MC (ed) Handbook of research on teaching: a project of the American Educational Research Association, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York, pp 392-431
25. Doyle W (2006) Ecological approaches to classroom management. In: Evertson CM, Weinstein CS (eds) Handbook of classroom management: research, practice and contemporary issues. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 97-125
26. Dubberke T, Kunter M, McElvany N, Brunner M, Baumert J (2008) Lerntheoretische Überzeugungen von Mathematiklehrkräften: Einflüsse auf die Unterrichtsgestaltung und den Lernerfolg von Schülerinnen und Schülern [Mathematics teachers' beliefs and their impact on instructional quality and student achievement]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 22(3-4):193-206. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.22.34.193
27. Ehmke T, Blum W, Neubrand M, Jordan A, Ulfig F (2006) Wie verändert sich die mathematische Kompetenz von der neunten zur zehnten Klassenstufe? [How does mathematical literacy change from grade 9 to 10?]. In: Prenzel M, Baumert J, Blum W, Lehmann R, Leutner D, Neubrand M, Pekrun R, Rost J, Schiefele U (eds) PISA 2003: Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlaufe eines Schuljahres. Waxmann, Münster, pp 63-85
28. Emmer ET, Stough LM (2001) Classroom management: a critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educ Psychol 36(2): 103-112. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3602_5
29. Emmer ET, Evertson CM, Worsham ME (2003) Classroom management for secondary teachers, 6th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
30. Evertson CM, Weinstein CS (eds) (2006) Handbook of classroom management: research, practice and contemporary issues. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah
31. Evertson CM, Emmer ET, Worsham ME (2006) Classroom management for elementary teachers, 7th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
32. Fend H (1981) Theorie der Schule [Theory of school]. Urban und Schwarzenbeck, Munich
33. Fraser BJ (1991) Two decades of classroom environment research. In: Walberg HJ (ed) Educational environments: evaluation, antecedents and consequences. Pergamon, Elmsford, pp 3-27
34. Freudenthal H (1983) Didactical phenomenology of mathematical structures. Reidel, Dordrecht
35. Greeno JG, Collins AM, Resnick LB (1996) Cognition and learning. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. Macmillan Library, New York, pp 15-46
36. Gruehn S (2000) Unterricht und schulisches Lernen: Schüler als Quellen der Unterrichtsbeschreibung [Instruction and learning in school: students as sources of information]. Waxmann, Münster
37. Hage K, Bischoff H, Dichanz H, Eubel K-D, Oehlschläger H-J, Schwittmann D (1985) Das Methoden-Repertoire von Lehrern: Eine Untersuchung zum Unterrichtsalltag in der Sekundarstufe I [Teachers' repertoire of methods: a study of instructional practice at lower secondary level]. Leske + Budrich, Leverkusen
38. Hattie JA (2009) Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge, New York
39. Heller KA, Perleth C (2000) Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4.-12. Klassen: Revision (KFT 4-12 + R) [Cognitive abilities test for grades 4-12: revision (KFT 4-12 + R)]. Hogrefe, Göttingen
40. Helmke A (2009) Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts [Instructional quality and teacher professionality: diagnosis, evaluation, and enhancement of instruction]. Klett-Kallmeyer, Seelze
41. Hiebert J, Gallimore R, Garnier H, Givvin KB, Hollingsworth H, Jacobs J, ... Stigler J (2003) Teaching mathematics in seven countries: results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC
42. Hugener I, Pauli C, Reusser K, Lipowksy F, Rakoczy K, Klieme E (2009) Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons. Learn Instr 19(1):66-78. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.02.001
43. Jones KK, Byrnes JP (2006) Characteristics of students who benefit from high-quality mathematics instruction. Contemp Educ Psychol 31(3):328-343. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.10.002
44. Jordan A, Ross N, Krauss S, Baumert J, Blum W, Neubrand M, ... Kunter M (2006) Klassifikationsschema für Mathematikaufgaben: Dokumentation der Aufgabenkategorisierung im COACTIV-Projekt [Classification scheme for mathematics tasks: documentation of task categorization in the COACTIV project]. Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin
45. Jordan A, Krauss S, Löwen K, Blum W, Neubrand M, Brunner M, ... Baumert J (2008) Aufgaben im COACTIV-Projekt: Zeugnisse des kognitiven Aktivierungspotentials im deutschen Mathematikunterricht [Tasks in the COACTIV project: evidence of the potential for cognitive activation in German mathematics instruction]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik 29(2):83-107
46. Klieme E, Rakoczy K (2008) Empirische Unterrichtsforschung und Fachdidaktik. Outcome- orientierte Messung und Prozessqualität des Unterrichts [Empirical instructional research and domain-specific didactics. Outcome-oriented measurement and process quality of instruction]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 54(2):222-237
47. Klieme E, Neubrand M, Lüdtke O (2001a) Mathematische Grundbildung: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse [Mathematical literacy: test conception and results]. In: Baumert J, Klieme E, Neubrand M, Prenzel M, Schiefele U, Schneider W, Stanat P, Tillmann K-J, Weiß M (eds) PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 138-190
48. Klieme E, Schümer G, Knoll S (2001b) Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: "Aufgabenkultur" und Unterrichtsgestaltung [Mathematics instruction at lower secondary level: "task culture" and quality of instruction]. In: Klieme E, Baumert J (eds) TIMSS: Impulse für Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte und VideoDokumente. BMBF, Bonn, pp 43-57
49. Klieme E, Pauli C, Reusser K (2005) Dokumentation der Erhebungs- und Auswertungsinstrumente zur schweizerisch-deutschen Videostudie "Unterrichtsqualität, Lernverhalten und mathematisches Verständnis" [Documentation of assessment and analysis instruments in the Swiss- German video study "Instructional quality, learning behavior, and mathematical understanding"]. Gesellschaft zur Förderung Pädagogischer Forschung (GFPF)/Institut für Internationale Pädagogische Forschung (DIPF), Frankurt am Main/Deutsches
50. Klieme E, Pauli C, Reusser K (2009) The Pythagoras Study: investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In: Janik T, Seidel T (eds) The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom. Waxmann, Münster, pp 137-160
51. Klusmann U, Kunter M, Trautwein U, Baumert J (2006) Lehrerbelastung und Unterrichtsqualität aus der Perspektive von Lehrenden und Lernenden [Teachers' stress and the quality of instruction: linking teachers' and students' perception]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 20(3):161-173. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.20.3.161
52. Klusmann U, Kunter M, Trautwein U, Lüdtke O, Baumert J (2008) Teachers' occupational wellbeing and quality of instruction: the important role of self-regulatory patterns. J Educ Psychol 100(3):702-715. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.702
53. Knoll S (2003) Verwendung von Aufgaben in Einführungsphasen des Mathematikunterrichts [The use of tasks in introductory phases of mathematics instruction]. Tectum Verlag, Marburg
54. Kounin JS (1970) Discipline and group management in classrooms. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York
55. Kunter M, Baumert J (2006a) Linking TIMSS to research on learning and instruction: a re-analysis of the German TIMSS and TIMSS video data. In: Howie SJ, Plomp T (eds) Learning mathematics and science: lessons learned from TIMSS. Routledge, London, pp 335-351
56. Kunter M, Baumert J (2006b) Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learn Environ Res 9(3):231-251. doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
57. Kunter M, Brunner M, Baumert J, Klusmann U, Krauss S, Blum W, ... Neubrand, M (2005) Der Mathematikunterricht der PISA-Schülerinnen und -Schüler: Schulformunterschiede in der Unterrichtsqualität [Quality of mathematics instruction across school types: findings from PISA 2003]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 8(4):502-520. doi:10.1007/ s11618-005-0156-8
58. Kunter M, Dubberke T, Baumert J, Blum W, Brunner M, Jordan A, ... Tsai Y-M (2006) Mathematikunterricht in den PISA-Klassen 2004: Rahmenbedingungen, Formen und LehrLernprozesse [Mathematics instruction in the PISA 2004 classes: conditions, forms, and teaching and learning processes]. In: Prenzel M, Baumert J, Blum W, Lehmann R, Leutner D, Neubrand M, Pekrun R, Rolff H-G, Rost J, Schiefele U (eds) PISA 2003 Untersuchungen zur Kompetenzentwicklung im Verlauf eines Schuljahres. Waxmann, Münster, pp 161-194
59. Kunter M, Klusmann U, Dubberke T, Baumert J, Blum W, Brunner M, ... Tsai Y-M (2007) Linking aspects of teacher competence to their instruction: results from the COACTIV project. In: Prenzel M (ed) Studies on the educational quality of schools: the final report on the DFG Priority Programme. Waxmann, Münster, pp 39-59
60. Kunter M, Tsai Y-M, Klusmann U, Brunner M, Krauss S, Baumert J (2008) Students' and mathematics teachers' perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learn Instr 18(5):468-482. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.06.008
61. Lipowsky F, Rakoczy K, Pauli C, Drollinger-Vetter B, Klieme E, Reusser K (2009) Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem. Learn Instr 19(6):527-537. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.11.001
62. Ma X (1999) A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. J Res Math Educ 30(5):520-540. doi: 10.2307/749772 DOI:10.2307%2F749772
63. Maehr ML (1976) Continuing motivation: an analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome. Rev Educ Res 46(3):443-462. doi:10.3102/00346543046003443
64. Marzano RJ, Marzano JS, Pickering DJ (2003) Classroom management that works. ASCD, Alexandria
65. Mayer DP (1999) Measuring instructional practice: can policy makers trust survey data? Educ Eval Policy Anal 21(1):29-45
66. Mayer RE (2003) Memory and information processes. In: Reynolds WM, Miller GE (eds) Handbook of psychology: educational psychology, vol 7. Wiley, New York, pp 47-57
67. Mayer RE (2004) Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Am Psychol 59(1):14-19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14 D0I:10.1037%2F0003-066X.59.1.14
68. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2007) Mplus user's guide, 5th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles
69. Neubrand J (2002) Eine Klassifikation mathematischer Aufgaben zur Analyse von Unterrichtssituationen: Selbsttätiges Arbeiten in Schülerarbeitsphasen in den Stunden der TIMSS-Video-Studie [A classification of mathematics tasks for the analysis of instructional situations: Independent work during phases of student work in the TIMSS Video Study lessons]. Franzbecker, Hildesheim
70. Oser FK, Baeriswyl FJ (2001) Choreographies of teaching: bridging instruction to learning. In: Richardson V (ed) Handbook of research on teaching, 4th edn. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, pp 1031-1065
71. Oser FK, Dick A, Patry J-L (eds) (1992) Effective and responsible teaching. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
72. Palincsar AS (1998) Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annu Rev Psychol 49:345-375. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
73. Pauli C, Reusser K (2003) Unterrichtsskripts im schweizerischen und im deutschen Mathematikunterricht [Instructional scripts in Swiss and German mathematics instruction]. Unterrichtswissenschaft 31(3):238-272
74. Pea R (2004) The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. J Learn Sci 13:423-451. doi: 10.1207/ s15327809jls1303_6 DOI:10.1207%2Fs15327809jls1303_6
75. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Titz W, Perry RP (2002) Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ Psychol 37(2):91-105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4 DOI:10.1207%2FS15326985EP3702_4
76. Pekrun R, Goetz T, Frenzel AC (2005) Academic Emotions Questionnaire-Mathematics (AEC-M)-user's manual. Department of Psychology, University of Munich, Munich
77. Pianta RC, Hamre BK (2009) Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educ Res 38(2): 109-119. doi:10.3102/0013189X09332374 DOI:10.3102%2F0013189X09332374
78. Pintrich PR (2003) Motivation and classroom learning. In: Reynolds WM, Miller GE (eds) Handbook of psychology, vol 7, Educational psychology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 103-122
79. Pintrich PR, Marx RW, Boyle RA (1993) Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev Educ Res 63(2):167-199. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167
80. Pol J, Volman M, Beishuizen J (2010) Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: a decade of research. Educ Psychol Rev 22(3):271-296. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 DOI:10.1007% 2Fs10648-010-9127-6
81. Porter AC (1994) Defining and measuring opportunity to learn. In: Traiman SL (ed) The debate on opportunity-to-learn standards. National Governors' Association, Washington, DC
82. Porter AC (2002) Measuring the content of instruction: uses in research and practice. Educ Res 31(7):3-14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031007003
83. Posner GJ, Strike KA, Hewson PW, Gertzog WA (1982) Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Sci Educ 66(2):211-227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207
84. Prenzel M, Ostermeier C (2003) Steigerung der Effizienz des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Unterrichts: Ein unterrichtsbezogenes Qualitätsentwicklungsprogramm [Enhancing the efficiency of mathematics and science instruction: an instruction-based quality development program]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung 21(2):265-276
85. Rakoczy K, Klieme E, Drollinger-Vetter B, Lipowsky F, Pauli C, Reusser K (2007) Structure as a quality feature in mathematics instruction of the learning environment vs. a structured presentation of learning content. In: Prenzel M (ed) Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report of the DFG Priority Programme. Waxmann, Münster, pp 101-120
86. Reiser BJ (2004) Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci 13(3):273-304. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 DOI:10.1207%2F s15327809jls1303_2
87. Rosenshine B, Meister C (1994) Direct instruction. In: Husén T, Postlethwaite TN (eds) The international encyclopedia of education. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 1524-1530
88. Schneider B, Carnoy M, Kilpatrick J, Raudenbush S, Schmidt W, Shavelson R (2005) Estimating causal effects in experiments and secondary analyses of large-scale datasets in education: a think tank white paper. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC
89. Seidel T, Shavelson RJ (2007) Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Rev Educ Res 77(4):454-499. doi:10.3102/0034654307310317
90. Sfard A (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the danger of choosing just one. Educ Res 27(2):4-13
91. Shuell TJ (1996) Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, pp 726-764
92. Skinner EA, Belmont MJ (1993) Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J Educ Psychol 85(4):571-581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.571
93. Snow RE, Corno L, Jackson D III (1996) Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In: Berliner DC, Calfee RC (eds) Handbook of educational psychology. Macmillan Library Reference, New York, pp 243-310
94. Stefanou CR, Perencevich KC, DiCintio M, Turner JC (2004) Supporting autonomy in the classroom: ways teachers encourage student decision making and ownership. Educ Psychol 39(2):97-110. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_2
95. Stigler JW, Gonzales P, Kawanaka T, Knoll S, Serrano A (1999) The TIMSS Video-tape classroom study: methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grade mathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Los Angeles
96. Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognit Sci 12(2):257-285
97. Thorndike RL, Hagen E (1971) Cognitive abilities test (CAT). Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
98. Turner JC, Meyer DK, Cox KE, Logan C, DiCintio M, Thomas CT (1998) Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. J Educ Psychol 90(4):730-745
99. Tymms P (2004) Effect sizes in multilevel models. In: Schagen I, Elliot K (eds) But what does it mean? The use of effect sizes in educational research. National Foundation for Educational Research, London, pp 55-66
100. Veenman S, Kenter B, Post K (2000) Cooperative learning in Dutch primary classrooms. Educ Stud 26(3):281-302. doi:10.1080/03055690050137114
101. Vosniadou S, Baltas A, Vamvakoussi X (eds) (2007) Reframing the conceptual change approach in learning and instruction. Elsevier, Amsterdam
102. Wagenschein M (1989) Verstehen lehren: Genetisch, sokratisch, exemplarisch [Teaching understanding: genetic, socratic, exemplary], 8th edn. Beltz, Weinheim
103. Wang MC, Haertel GD, Walberg HJ (1993) Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Rev Educ Res 63(3):249-294. doi:10.3102/00346543063003249
104. Weinert FE, Helmke A (1995) Learning from wise mother nature or big brother instructor: the wrong choice as seen from an educational perspective. Educ Psychol 30(3):135-142. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3003_4
105. Wentzel KR (1993) Motivation and achievement in early adolescence: the role of multiple classroom goals. J Early Adolesc 13(1):4-20. doi:10.1177/0272431693013001001
106. Wittmann EC (1995) Aktiv-entdeckendes und soziales Lernen im Rechenunterricht-vom Kind und vom Fach aus [Active discovery learning and social learning in arithmetic lessons]. In: Müller GN, Wittmann EC (eds) Mit Kindern rechnen. Arbeitskreis Grundschule, Frankfurt am Main, pp 10-41
107. Wood D, Bruner J, Ross G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 17(2):89-100