Uridylation Earmarks mRNAs for Degradation… and More

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 607-619

  Scheer, Hélène ^a   Zuber, Hélène ^a   De Almeida, Caroline ^a   Gagliardi, Dominique ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

deadenylation; degradation; mRNA; translation; uridylation

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PLANT RNA; POLYADENYLATED RNA; TRANSCRIPTOME; URIDINE DERIVATIVE; URIDINE;

HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RNA CLEAVAGE; RNA DEGRADATION; TRANSCRIPTOMICS; TURNOVER TIME; 3' UNTRANSLATED REGION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; RNA STABILITY;

3' UNTRANSLATED REGIONS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; RNA STABILITY; RNA, MESSENGER; URIDINE;

EID: 84991093296     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: 13624555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2016.08.003     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. 1 Wang, X., He, C., Dynamic RNA modifications in posttranscriptional Regulation. Mol. Cell 56 (2014), 5–12.
2. 2 Roundtree, I.A., He, C., RNA epigenetics–chemical messages for posttranscriptional gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 30 (2016), 46–51.
3. 3 Dominissini, D., et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485 (2012), 201–206.
4. 4 Edelheit, S., et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of 5-methylcytidine RNA modifications in bacteria, archaea, and yeast reveals m5 C within archaeal mRNAs. PLoS Genet., 9, 2013, e1003602.
5. 5 Luo, G-Z., et al. Unique features of the m6A methylome in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun., 5, 2014, 5630.
6. 6 Deng, X., et al. Widespread occurrence of N6-methyladenosine in bacterial mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (2015), 6557–6567.
7. 7 Dominissini, D., et al. The dynamic N1-methyladenosine methylome in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature 530 (2016), 441–446.
8. 6A RNA methylation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15 (2014), 293–306.
9. 9 Chen, K., et al. Nucleic acid modifications in regulation of gene expression. Cell Chem. Biol. 23 (2016), 74–85.
10. 10 Licht, K., Jantsch, M.F., Rapid and dynamic transcriptome regulation by RNA editing and RNA modifications. J. Cell Biol. 213 (2016), 15–22.
11. 11 Meyer, K.D., Jaffrey, S.R., The dynamic epitranscriptome: N6-methyladenosine and gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (2014), 313–326.
12. 12 Delatte, B., et al. Transcriptome-wide distribution and function of RNA hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 351 (2016), 282–285.
13. 13 Li, X., et al. Pseudouridine: the fifth RNA nucleotide with renewed interests. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 33 (2016), 108–116.
14. 14 Li, X., et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping reveals reversible and dynamic N1-methyladenosine methylome. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12 (2016), 311–316.
15. 15 Lange, H., et al. Polyadenylation-assisted RNA degradation processes in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 14 (2009), 497–504.
16. 16 Chang, J.H., Tong, L., Mitochondrial poly(A) polymerase and polyadenylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819 (2012), 992–997.
17. 17 Song, J., et al. Uridylation and adenylation of RNAs. Sci. China Life Sci. 58 (2015), 1057–1066.
18. 18 Charlesworth, A., et al. Specificity factors in cytoplasmic polyadenylation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 4 (2013), 437–461.
19. 19 Norbury, C.J., Cytoplasmic RNA: a case of the tail wagging the dog. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14 (2013), 643–653.
20. 20 Morozov, I.Y., et al. CUCU modification of mRNA promotes decapping and transcript degradation in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30 (2010), 460–469.
21. 21 Morozov, I.Y., et al. mRNA 3′ tagging is induced by nonsense-mediated decay and promotes ribosome dissociation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32 (2012), 2585–2595.
22. 22 Chang, H., et al. TAIL-seq: genome-wide determination of poly(A) tail length and 3′ end modifications. Mol. Cell 53 (2014), 1044–1052.
23. 23 Zuber, H., et al. Uridylation and PABP cooperate to repair mRNA deadenylated ends in Arabidopsis. Cell Rep. 14 (2016), 2707–2717.
24. 24 Martin, G., Keller, W., RNA-specific ribonucleotidyl transferases. RNA 13 (2007), 1834–1849.
25. 25 Kwak, J.E., Wickens, M., A family of poly(U) polymerases. RNA 13 (2007), 860–867.
26. 26 Aphasizhev, R., Aphasizheva, I., Mitochondrial RNA processing in trypanosomes. Res. Microbiol. 162 (2011), 655–663.
27. 27 Aphasizheva, I., et al. Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins stimulate mRNA adenylation/uridylation to activate mitochondrial translation in trypanosomes. Mol. Cell 42 (2011), 106–117.
28. 28 Suematsu, T., et al. Antisense transcripts delimit exonucleolytic activity of the mitochondrial 3′ processome to generate guide RNAs. Mol. Cell 61 (2016), 364–378.
29. 29 Lee, M., et al. Emerging roles of RNA modification: m6A and U-Tail. Cell 158 (2014), 980–987.
30. 30 Viegas, S.C., et al. Surprises in the 3′-end: “U” can decide too! FEBS J. 282 (2015), 3489–3499.
31. 31 Munoz-Tello, P., et al. Polyuridylation in eukaryotes: a 3′-end modification regulating RNA Life. BioMed Res. Int., 2015, 2015, 968127.
32. 32 Huo, Y., et al. Widespread 3′-end uridylation in eukaryotic RNA viruses. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 25454.
33. 33 Rissland, O.S., et al. Efficient RNA polyuridylation by noncanonical poly(A) polymerases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27 (2007), 3612–3624.
34. 34 Rissland, O.S., Norbury, C.J., Decapping is preceded by 3′ uridylation in a novel pathway of bulk mRNA turnover. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16 (2009), 616–623.
35. 35 Sement, F.M., et al. Uridylation prevents 3′ trimming of oligoadenylated mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (2013), 7115–7127.
36. 36 Aphasizheva, I., Aphasizhev, R., RET1-catalyzed uridylylation shapes the mitochondrial transcriptome in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30 (2010), 1555–1567.
37. 37 Lim, J., et al. Uridylation by TUT4 and TUT7 marks mRNA for degradation. Cell 159 (2014), 1365–1376.
38. 38 Etheridge, R.D., et al. 3′ Adenylation determines mRNA abundance and monitors completion of RNA editing in T. brucei mitochondria. EMBO J. 27 (2008), 1596–1608.
39. 39 Shen, B., Goodman, H.M., Uridine addition after microRNA-directed cleavage. Science, 306, 2004, 997.
40. 40 Xu, K., et al. MicroRNA-mediated target mRNA cleavage and 3′-uridylation in human cells. Sci. Rep., 6, 2016, 30242.
41. 41 Song, M-G., Kiledjian, M., 3′ Terminal oligo U-tract-mediated stimulation of decapping. RNA 13 (2007), 2356–2365.
42. 42 Ren, G., et al. Methylation protects microRNAs from an AGO1-associated activity that uridylates 5′ RNA fragments generated by AGO1 cleavage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 6365–6370.
43. 43 Marzluff, W.F., et al. Metabolism and regulation of canonical histone mRNAs: life without a poly(A) tail. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9 (2008), 843–854.
44. 44 Mullen, T.E., Marzluff, W.F., Degradation of histone mRNA requires oligouridylation followed by decapping and simultaneous degradation of the mRNA both 5′ to 3′ and 3′ to 5′. Genes Dev. 22 (2008), 50–65.
45. 45 Tan, D., et al. Structure of histone mRNA stem-loop, human stem-loop binding protein, and 3′hExo ternary complex. Science 339 (2013), 318–321.
46. 46 Choe, J., et al. The mRNP remodeling mediated by UPF1 promotes rapid degradation of replication-dependent histone mRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 42 (2014), 9334–9349.
47. 47 Hoefig, K.P., et al. Eri1 degrades the stem-loop of oligouridylated histone mRNAs to induce replication-dependent decay. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20 (2013), 73–81.
48. 48 Slevin, M.K., et al. Deep sequencing shows multiple oligouridylations are required for 3′ to 5′ degradation of histone mRNAs on polyribosomes. Mol. Cell 53 (2014), 1020–1030.
49. 49 Su, W., et al. mRNAs containing the histone 3′ stem-loop are degraded primarily by decapping mediated by oligouridylation of the 3′ end. RNA 19 (2013), 1–16.
50. 50 Schmidt, M-J., et al. The human cytoplasmic RNA terminal U-transferase ZCCHC11 targets histone mRNAs for degradation. RNA 17 (2010), 39–44.
51. 51 Lackey, P.E., et al. TUT7 catalyzes the uridylation of the 3′ end for rapid degradation of histone mRNA. RNA., 2016, 10.1261/rna.058107.116 (in press).
52. 52 Subtelny, A.O., et al. Poly(A)-tail profiling reveals an embryonic switch in translational control. Nature 508 (2014), 66–71.
53. 53 Malecki, M., et al. The exoribonuclease Dis3L2 defines a novel eukaryotic RNA degradation pathway. EMBO J. 32 (2013), 1842–1854.
54. 54 Lubas, M., et al. Exonuclease hDIS3L2 specifies an exosome-independent 3′-5′ degradation pathway of human cytoplasmic mRNA. EMBO J. 32 (2013), 1855–1868.
55. 55 Kim, B., et al. TUT7 controls the fate of precursor microRNAs by using three different uridylation mechanisms. EMBO J. 34 (2015), 1801–1815.
56. 56 Ustianenko, D., et al. Mammalian DIS3L2 exoribonuclease targets the uridylated precursors of let-7 miRNAs. RNA 19 (2013), 1632–1638.
57. 57 Łabno, A., et al. Perlman syndrome nuclease DIS3L2 controls cytoplasmic non-coding RNAs and provides surveillance pathway for maturing snRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res., 2016, 10.1093/nar/gkw649 (in press).
58. 58 Faehnle, C.R., et al. Mechanism of Dis3l2 substrate recognition in the Lin28-let-7 pathway. Nature 514 (2014), 252–256.
59. 59 Thomas, M.P., et al. Apoptosis triggers specific, rapid, and global mRNA decay with 3′ uridylated intermediates degraded by DIS3L2. Cell Rep. 11 (2015), 1079–1089.
60. 60 Baejen, C., et al. Transcriptome maps of mRNP biogenesis factors define pre-mRNA recognition. Mol. Cell 55 (2014), 745–757.
61. 61 Eliseeva, I.A., et al. Poly(A)-binding proteins: structure, domain organization, and activity regulation. Biochem. Mosc. 78 (2013), 1377–1391.
62. 62 Kini, H.K., et al. Cytoplasmic poly(A) binding protein-1 binds to genomically encoded sequences within mammalian mRNAs. RNA 22 (2016), 61–74.
63. 63 Sladic, R.T., et al. Human PABP binds AU-rich RNA via RNA-binding domains 3 and 4. Eur. J. Biochem. 271 (2004), 450–457.
64. 64 Khanam, T., et al. Poly(A)-binding protein binds to A-rich sequences via RNA-binding domains 1 + 2 and 3 + 4. RNA Biol. 3 (2006), 170–177.
65. 65 Kühn, U., Pieler, T., Xenopus poly(A) binding protein: functional domains in RNA binding and protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 256 (1996), 20–30.
66. 66 Patel, G.P., Bag, J., IMP1 interacts with poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) and the autoregulatory translational control element of PABP-mRNA through the KH III-IV domain. FEBS J. 273 (2006), 5678–5690.
67. 67 Mullin, C., et al. Interaction of rat poly(A)-binding protein with poly(A)- and non-poly(A) sequences is preferentially mediated by RNA recognition motifs 3 + 4. FEBS Lett. 576 (2004), 437–441.
68. 68 Ren, G., et al. Uridylation of miRNAs by HEN1 SUPPRESSOR1 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 22 (2012), 695–700.
69. 69 Zhao, Y., et al. The Arabidopsis nucleotidyl transferase HESO1 uridylates unmethylated small RNAs to trigger their degradation. Curr. Biol. 22 (2012), 689–694.
70. 70 Wang, X., et al. Synergistic and independent actions of multiple terminal nucleotidyl transferases in the 3′ tailing of small RNAs in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005091.
71. 71 Tu, B., et al. Distinct and cooperative activities of HESO1 and URT1 nucleotidyl transferases in microRNA turnover in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet., 11, 2015, e1005119.
72. 72 Welch, J.D., et al. EnD-Seq and AppEnD: sequencing 3′ ends to identify nontemplated tails and degradation intermediates. RNA 21 (2015), 1375–1389.
73. 73 Read, L.K., et al. Marked for translation: long A/U tails as an interface between completion of RNA editing and ribosome recruitment. Mol. Cell 42 (2011), 6–8.
74. 74 Heo, I., et al. TUT4 in concert with Lin28 suppresses microRNA biogenesis through pre-microRNA uridylation. Cell 138 (2009), 696–708.
75. 75 Heo, I., et al. Lin28 mediates the terminal uridylation of let-7 precursor microRNA. Mol. Cell 32 (2008), 276–284.
76. 76 Heo, I., et al. Mono-uridylation of pre-microRNA as a key step in the biogenesis of group II let-7 microRNAs. Cell 151 (2012), 521–532.
77. 77 Choudhury, N.R., et al. Trim25 is an RNA-specific activator of Lin28a/TuT4-mediated uridylation. Cell Rep. 9 (2014), 1265–1272.
78. 78 Hagan, J.P., et al. Lin28 recruits the TUTase Zcchc11 to inhibit let-7 maturation in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16 (2009), 1021–1025.
79. 79 Mukherjee, C., et al. Identification of cytoplasmic capping targets reveals a role for Cap homeostasis in translation and mRNA stability. Cell Rep. 2 (2012), 674–684.
80. 80 Kiss, D.L., et al. Cap homeostasis is independent of poly(A) tail length. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), 304–314.
81. 81 Lapointe, C.P., Wickens, M., The nucleic acid-binding domain and translational repression activity of a Xenopus terminal uridylyl transferase. J. Biol. Chem. 288 (2013), 20723–20733.
82. 82 Ochi, H., Chiba, K., Hormonal stimulation of starfish oocytes induces partial degradation of the 3′ termini of cyclin B mRNAs with oligo(U) tails, followed by poly(A) elongation. RNA 22 (2016), 822–829.
83. 83 Wahle, E., Winkler, G.S., RNA decay machines: deadenylation by the Ccr4-not and Pan2-Pan3 complexes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1829 (2013), 561–570.
84. 84 Lunde, B.M., et al. Crystal structures of the Cid1 poly (U) polymerase reveal the mechanism for UTP selectivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40 (2012), 9815–9824.
85. 85 Yates, L.A., et al. Structural basis for the activity of a cytoplasmic RNA terminal U-transferase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19 (2012), 782–787.
86. 86 Blahna, M.T., et al. Terminal uridyltransferase enzyme Zcchc11 promotes cell proliferation independent of its uridyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (2011), 42381–42389.
87. 87 Brown, R.S., Zinc finger proteins: getting a grip on RNA. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 15 (2005), 94–98.
88. 88 Loughlin, F.E., Mackay, J.P., Zinc fingers are known as domains for binding DNA and RNA. Do they also mediate protein-protein interactions?. IUBMB Life 58 (2006), 731–733.
89. 89 Loughlin, F.E., et al. Structural basis of pre-let-7 miRNA recognition by the zinc knuckles of pluripotency factor Lin28. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19 (2012), 84–89.
90. 90 Järvelin, A.I., et al. The new (dis)order in RNA regulation. Cell Commun. Signal., 14, 2016, 9.
91. 91 Jones, D.T., Cozzetto, D., DISOPRED3: precise disordered region predictions with annotated protein-binding activity. Bioinformatics 31 (2015), 857–863.
92. 92 Calabretta, S., Richard, S., Emerging roles of disordered sequences in RNA-binding proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40 (2015), 662–672.
93. 93 Castello, A., et al. Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins. Cell 149 (2012), 1393–1406.
94. 94 Castello, A., et al. Comprehensive identification of RNA-binding domains in human cells. Mol. Cell, 2016, 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.029 Published online July 19.
95. 95 Jonas, S., Izaurralde, E., The role of disordered protein regions in the assembly of decapping complexes and RNP granules. Genes Dev. 27 (2013), 2628–2641.
96. 96 Morozov, I.Y., et al. Distinct roles for Caf1, Ccr4, Edc3 and CutA in the co-ordination of transcript deadenylation, decapping and P-body formation in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol. Microbiol. 76 (2010), 503–516.
97. 97 Haas, G., et al. Identification of factors involved in target RNA-directed microRNA degradation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (2016), 2873–2887.
98. 98 Li, J., et al. Methylation protects miRNAs and siRNAs from a 3′-end uridylation activity in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005), 1501–1507.
99. 99 Yu, B., et al. Methylation as a crucial step in plant microRNA biogenesis. Science 307 (2005), 932–935.
100. 100 Saito, K., et al. Pimet, the Drosophila homolog of HEN1, mediates 2′-O-methylation of Piwi-interacting RNAs at their 3′ ends. Genes Dev. 21 (2007), 1603–1608.
101. 101 Horwich, M.D., et al. The Drosophila RNA methyltransferase, DmHen1, modifies germline piRNAs and single-stranded siRNAs in RISC. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007), 1265–1272.
102. 102 Reimão-Pinto, M.M., et al. Uridylation of RNA hairpins by tailor confines the emergence of microRNAs in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 59 (2015), 203–216.
103. 103 Liu, X., et al. A microRNA precursor surveillance system in quality control of MicroRNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 55 (2014), 868–879.
104. 104 Ha, M., Kim, V.N., Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15 (2014), 509–524.
105. 105 McManus, M.T., et al. Trypanosoma brucei guide RNA poly(U) tail formation is stabilized by cognate mRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000), 883–891.
106. 106 Trippe, R., et al. Identification, cloning, and functional analysis of the human U6 snRNA-specific terminal uridylyl transferase. RNA 12 (2006), 1494–1504.
107. 107 Preti, M., et al. Gradual processing of the ITS1 from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm during synthesis of the human 18S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (2013), 4709–4723.
108. 108 Sikorski, P.J., et al. Distinct 18S rRNA precursors are targets of the exosome complex, the exoribonuclease RRP6L2 and the terminal nucleotidyltransferase TRL in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 83 (2015), 991–1004.
109. 109 Gazestani, V.H., et al. circTAIL-seq, a targeted method for deep analysis of RNA 3′ tails, reveals transcript-specific differences by multiple metrics. RNA 22 (2016), 477–486.