The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre- and post-mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2338-2361

  Evans, J P ^a   Garcia Gonzalez, F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION BIOLOGY   (Spain)

Author keywords

cryptic female choice; multivariate selection; opportunity for selection; post copulatory sexual selection; precopulatory sexual selection; sperm competition

Indexed keywords

COPULATION; CRYPSIS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLYANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84984684785     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12960     Document Type: Review

References (181)

1. Almbro, M., Dowling, D.K. & Simmons, L.W. 2011. Effects of vitamin E and beta-carotene on sperm competitiveness. Ecol. Lett. 14: 891–895.
2. Andersson, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21: 296–302.
3. Arnold, S.J. & Wade, M.J. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38: 720–734.
4. Arnold, S.J. & Wade, M.J. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38: 709–719.
5. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
6. Bangham, J., Chapman, T. & Partridge, L. 2002. Effects of body size, accessory gland and testis size on pre- and postcopulatory success in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 64: 915–921.
7. Bateman, A.J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349–368.
8. Bierbach, D., Oster, S., Jourdan, J., Arias-Rodriguez, L., Krause, J., Wilson, A.D.M. et al. 2014. Social network analysis resolves temporal dynamics of male dominance relationships. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 68: 935–945.
9. Birkhead, T.R. & Pizzari, T. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 262–273.
10. Blows, M.W. & Brooks, R. 2003. Measuring nonlinear selection. Am. Nat. 162: 815–820.
11. Brawley, S.H., Johnson, L.E., Pearson, G.A., Speransky, V., Li, R. & Serrao, E.A. 1999. Gamete release at low tide in fucoid algae: maladaptive or advantageous? Am. Zool. 39: 218–231.
12. Bussiere, L.F., Hunt, J., Stoelting, K.N., Jennions, M.D. & Brooks, R. 2008. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress. Genetica 134: 69–78.
13. Buzatto, B.A., Roberts, J.D. & Simmons, L.W. 2015. Sperm competition and the evolution of precopulatory weapons: increasing male density promotes sperm competition and reduces selection on arm strength in a chorusing frog. Evolution 69: 2613–2624.
14. Candolin, U. & Vlieger, L. 2013. Estimating the dynamics of sexual selection in changing environments. Evol. Biol. 40: 589–600.
15. Caruso, C.M., Maherali, H. & Benscoter, A.M. 2012. Why are trade-offs between flower size and number infrequently detected? A test of three hypotheses. Int. J. Plant Sci. 173: 26–35.
16. Cattelan, S., Evans, J.P., Pilastro, A. & Gasparini, C. 2016. The effect of sperm production and mate availability on patterns of alternative mating tactics in the guppy. Anim. Behav. 112: 105–110.
17. Cayetano, L., Maklakov, A.A., Brooks, R.C. & Bonduriansky, R. 2011. Evolution of male and female genitalia following release from sexual selection. Evolution 65: 2171–2183.
18. Chaine, A.S. & Lyon, B.E. 2008. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319: 459–462.
19. Chargé, R., Teplitsky, C., Hingrat, Y., Saint Jalme, M., Lacroix, F. & Sorci, G. 2013. Quantitative genetics of sexual display, ejaculate quality and size in a lekking species. J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 399–407.
20. Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J.F., Cote, J., Meylan, S. & Massot, M. 2009. Informed dispersal, heterogeneity in animal dispersal syndromes and the dynamics of spatially structured populations. Ecol. Lett. 12: 197–209.
21. Clutton-Brock, T.H. & Vincent, A.C.J. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351: 58–60.
22. Collet, J., Richardson, D.S., Worley, K. & Pizzari, T. 2012. Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109: 8641–8645.
23. Collet, J.M., Dean, R.F., Worley, K., Richardson, D.S. & Pizzari, T. 2014. The measure and significance of Bateman's principles. Proc. Biol. Sci. 281: 20132973.
24. Cornwallis, C.K. & Uller, T. 2010. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25: 145–152.
25. Cornwallis, C.K., West, S.A., Davis, K.E. & Griffin, A.S. 2010. Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466: 969–974.
26. Cox, R.M. & Calsbeek, R. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173: 176–187.
27. Crudgington, H.S., Fellows, S., Badcock, N.S. & Snook, R.R. 2009. Experimental manipulation of sexual selection promotes greater male mating capacity but does not alter sperm investment. Evolution 63: 926–938.
28. Danielsson, I. 2001. Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris). Proc. Biol. Sci. 268: 77–81.
29. Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
30. Demary, K.C. & Lewis, S.M. 2007. Male courtship attractiveness and paternity success in Photinus greeni fireflies. Evolution 61: 431–439.
31. Devigili, A., Kelley, J.L., Pilastro, A. & Evans, J.P. 2013. Expression of pre- and postcopulatory traits under differential dietary conditions in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 24: 740–749.
32. Devigili, A., Evans, J.P., Di Nisio, A. & Pilastro, A. 2015. Multivariate selection drives concordant patterns of pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection in a livebearing fish. Nat. Commun. 6: 8291.
33. Devost, E. & Turgeon, J. 2016. The combined effects of pre- and post-copulatory processes are masking sexual conflict over mating rate in Gerris buenoi. J. Evol. Biol. 29: 167–177.
34. Dines, J.P., Mesnick, S.L., Ralls, K., May-Collado, L., Agnarsson, I. & Dean, M.D. 2015. A trade-off between precopulatory and postcopulatory trait investment in male cetaceans. Evolution 69: 1560–1572.
35. Dougherty, L.R. & Shuker, D.M. 2016. Variation in pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male genital size in two species of lygaeid bug. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70: 625–637.
36. Droge-Young, E.M., Manier, M.K., Lupold, S., Belote, J.M. & Pitnick, S. 2012. Covariance among premating, post-copulatory and viability fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster and their influence on paternity measurement. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 1555–1563.
37. Dziminski, M.A., Roberts, J.D., Beveridge, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2010. Among-population covariation between sperm competition and ejaculate expenditure in frogs. Behav. Ecol. 21: 322–328.
38. Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
39. Engqvist, L. 2011. Male attractiveness is negatively genetically associated with investment in copulations. Behav. Ecol. 22: 345–349.
40. Evans, J.P. 2010. Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277: 3195–3201.
41. Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 2001. Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268: 719–724.
42. Evans, J.P., Zane, L., Francescato, S. & Pilastro, A. 2003. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421: 360–363.
43. Evans, J.P., García-González, F. & Marshall, D.J. 2007. Sources of genetic and phenotypic variance in fertilization rates and larval traits in a sea urchin. Evolution 61: 2832–2838.
44. Evans, J.P., Rahman, M.M. & Gasparini, C. 2015. Genotype-by-environment interactions underlie the expression of pre- and post-copulatory sexually selected traits in guppies. J. Evol. Biol. 28: 959–972.
45. Fedina, T.Y. & Lewis, S.M. 2007. Female mate choice across mating stages and between sequential mates in flour beetles. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 2138–2143.
46. Ferrandiz-Rovira, M., Lemaitre, J.-F., Lardy, S., Lopez, B.C. & Cohas, A. 2014. Do pre- and post-copulatory sexually selected traits covary in large herbivores?. BMC Evol. Biol. 14: 79.
47. Firman, R.C. 2014. Female social preference for males that have evolved via monogamy: evidence of a trade-off between pre- and post-copulatory sexually selected traits? Biol. Lett. 10: 20140659.
48. Firman, R.C. & Simmons, L.W. 2009. Experimental evolution of sperm quality via postcopulatory sexual selection in house mice. Evolution 64: 1245–1256.
49. Firman, R.C. & Simmons, L.W. 2012. Male house mice evolving with post-copulatory sexual selection sire embryos with increased viability. Ecol. Lett. 15: 42–46.
50. Firman, R.C., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Thyer, E., Wheeler, S., Yamin, Z., Yuan, M. et al. 2015. Evolutionary change in testes tissue composition among experimental populations of house mice. Evolution 69: 848–855.
51. Fisher, D.N., Rodriquez-Munoz, R. & Tregenza, T. 2016. Comparing pre- and post-copulatory mate competition using social network analysis in wild crickets. Behav. Ecol. 27: 912–919.
52. Fitzpatrick, J.L., Almbro, M., Gonzalez-Voyer, A., Kolm, N. & Simmons, L.W. 2012. Male contest competition and coevolution of weaponry and testes in pinnipeds. Evolution 66: 3595–3604.
53. Fortuna, M.A., Garcia, C., Guimaraes, P.R. & Bascompte, J. 2008. Spatial mating networks in insect-pollinated plants. Ecol. Lett. 11: 490–498.
54. Froman, D.P., Pizzari, T., Feltmann, A.J., Castillo-Juarez, H. & Birkhead, T.R. 2002. Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc. Biol. Sci. 269: 607–612.
55. Fry, C.L. 2006. Juvenile hormone mediates a trade-off between primary and secondary sexual traits in stalk-eyed flies. Evol. Dev. 8: 191–201.
56. Galeotti, P., Bernini, G., Locatello, L., Sacchi, R., Fasola, M. & Rubolini, D. 2012. Sperm traits negatively covary with size and asymmetry of a secondary sexual trait in a freshwater crayfish. PLoS One 7: e43771.
57. Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2004. Infertile matings and sperm competition: the effect of “nonsperm representation” on intraspecific variation in sperm precedence patterns. Am. Nat. 164: 457–472.
58. García-González, F. 2008a. Male genetic quality and the inequality between paternity success and fertilization success: consequences for studies of sperm competition and the evolution of polyandry. Evolution 62: 1653–1665.
59. García-González, F. 2008b. The relative nature of fertilization success: implications for the study of post-copulatory sexual selection. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 140.
60. Gay, L., Eady, P.E., Vasudev, R., Hosken, D.J. & Tregenza, T. 2009. Costly sexual harassment in a beetle. Physiol. Entomol. 34: 86–92.
61. Gilchrist, A.S. & Partridge, L. 1997. Heritability of pre-adult viability differences can explain apparent heritability of sperm displacement ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Biol. Sci. 264: 1271–1275.
62. Gillespie, S.R., Tudor, M.S., Moore, A.J. & Miller, C.W. 2014. Sexual selection is influenced by both developmental and adult environments. Evolution 68: 3421–3432.
63. Gwynne, D.T. & Simmons, L.W. 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346: 172–174.
64. Hall, M.D., Bussiere, L.F., Hunt, J. & Brooks, R. 2008. Experimental evidence that sexual conflict influences the opportunity, form and intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 62: 2305–2315.
65. Hauber, M.E. & Lacey, E.A. 2005. Bateman's principle in cooperatively breeding vertebrates: the effects of non-breeding alloparents on variability in female and male reproductive success. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 903–914.
66. Henshaw, J.M., Kahn, A.T. & Fritzsche, K. 2016. A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 113: E300–E308.
67. Hosken, D.J. & Ward, P.I. 2001. Experimental evidence for testis size evolution via sperm competition. Ecol. Lett. 4: 10–13.
68. Hosken, D.J., Garner, T.W.J. & Ward, P.I. 2001. Sexual conflict selects for male and female reproductive characters. Curr. Biol. 11: 489–493.
69. Hosken, D.J., Taylor, M.L., Hoyle, K., Higgins, S. & Wedell, N. 2008. Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18: R553–R554.
70. House, C.M. & Simmons, L.W. 2005. The evolution of male genitalia: patterns of genetic variation and covariation in the genital sclerites of the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus. J. Evol. Biol. 18: 1281–2192.
71. Hunt, J. & Hosken, D.J. (eds) 2014. Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester.
72. Hunt, J., Breuker, C.J., Sadowski, J.A. & Moore, A.J. 2009. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 13–26.
73. Ingleby, F.C., Hunt, J. & Hosken, D.J. 2010. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23: 2031–2045.
74. Ingleby, F.C., Hosken, D.J., Flowers, K., Hawkes, M.F., Lane, S.M., Rapkin, J. et al. 2014. Environmental heterogeneity, multivariate sexual selection and genetic constraints on cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 27: 700–713.
75. Janicke, T., David, P. & Chapuis, E. 2015. Environment-dependent sexual selection: Bateman's parameters under varying levels of food availability. Am. Nat. 185: 756–768.
76. Janicke, T., Haderer, I.K., Lajeunesse, M.J. & Anthes, N. 2016. Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Sci. Adv. 2: e1500983.
77. Jennions, M.D. & Kokko, H. 2010. Sexual selection. In: Evolutionary Behavioral Ecology (D.F. Westneat & C.W. Fox, eds), pp. 343–364. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
78. Jones, A.G. 2009. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63: 1673–1684.
79. Jones, A.G., Walker, D., Kvarnemo, C., Lindstrom, K. & Avise, J.C. 2001. How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98: 9151–9156.
80. de Jong, G. 1993. Covariances between traits deriving from successive allocations of a resource. Funct. Ecol. 7: 75–83.
81. Kasumovic, M.M. & Andrade, M.C.B. 2009. A change in competitive context reverses sexual selection on male size. J. Evol. Biol. 22: 324–333.
82. Kasumovic, M.M. & Brooks, R.C. 2011. It's all who you know: the evolution of socially cued anticipatory plasticity as a mating strategy. Q. Rev. Biol. 86: 181–197.
83. Kasumovic, M.M., Bruce, M.J., Andrade, M.C.B. & Herberstein, M.E. 2008. Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctuations in sexual selection. Evolution 62: 2316–2325.
84. Keogh, J.S., Umbers, K.D.L., Wilson, E., Stapley, J. & Whiting, M.J. 2013. Influence of alternate reproductive tactics and pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection on paternity and offspring performance in a lizard. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67: 629–638.
85. King, E.G., Roff, D.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2011a. The evolutionary genetics of acquisition and allocation in the wing dimorphic cricket, Gryllus firmus. Evolution 65: 2273–2285.
86. King, E.G., Roff, D.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2011b. Trade-off acquisition and allocation in Gryllus firmus: a test of the Y model. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 256–264.
87. Kokko, H. & Jennions, M. 2003. It takes two to tango. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 103–104.
88. Krakauer, A.H., Webster, M.S., Duval, E.H., Jones, A.G. & Shuster, S.M. 2011. The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 2064–2071.
89. Kraus, C., Heistermann, M. & Kappeler, P.M. 1999. Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: a subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)? Physiol. Behav. 66: 855–861.
90. Kvarnemo, K. & Simmons, L.W. 2013. Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120042.
91. de Laguerie, P., Olivieri, I., Atlan, A. & Gouyon, P.H. 1991. Analytic and simulation models predicting positive genetic correlations between traits linked by tradeoffs. Evol. Ecol. 5: 361–369.
92. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402–416.
93. Lande, R. 1980. Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292–305.
94. Lande, R. 1982. A quantitative genetic theory of life-history evolution. Ecology 63: 607–615.
95. Lande, R. & Arnold, S.J. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210–1226.
96. Lebigre, C., Arcese, P. & Reid, J.M. 2013. Decomposing variation in male reproductive success: age-specific variances and covariances through extra-pair and within-pair reproduction. J. Anim. Ecol. 82: 872–883.
97. Lewis, S.M. & Austad, S.N. 1994. Sexual selection in flour beetles: the relationship between sperm precedence and male olfactory attractiveness. Behav. Ecol. 5: 219–224.
98. Lewis, Z., Lize, A. & Wedell, N. 2013. The interplay between different stages of reproduction in males of the moth Plodia interpunctella. Anim. Behav. 86: 917–922.
99. Locatello, L., Rasotto, M.B., Evans, J.P. & Pilastro, A. 2006. Colourful male guppies produce faster and more viable sperm. J. Evol. Biol. 19: 1595–1602.
100. Lupold, S., Simmons, L.W., Tomkins, J.L. & Fitzpatrick, J.L. 2015. No evidence for a trade-off between sperm length and male premating weaponry. J. Evol. Biol. 28: 2187–2195.
101. Lüpold, S., Tomkins, J.L., Simmons, L.W. & Fitzpatrick, J.L. 2014. Female monopolization mediates the relationship between pre- and postcopulatory sexual traits. Nat. Commun. 5: 3184.
102. Magurran, A.E. 2005. Evolutionary Ecology: The Trinidadian Guppy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
103. Malo, A.F., Roldan, E.R.S., Garde, J., Soler, A.J. & Gomendio, M. 2005. Antlers honestly advertise sperm production and quality. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272: 149–157.
104. Marie-Orleach, L., Janicke, T., Vizoso, D.B., David, P. & Scharer, L. 2016. Quantifying episodes of sexual selection: insights from a transparent worm with fluorescent sperm. Evolution 70: 314–328.
105. Matthews, I.M., Evans, J.P. & Magurran, A.E. 1997. Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Proc. Biol. Sci. 264: 695–700.
106. Mautz, B.S., Moller, A.P. & Jennions, M.D. 2013. Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 88: 669–682.
107. McDonald, G.C., James, R., Krause, J. & Pizzari, T. 2013. Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120356.
108. Mehlis, M., Hilke, L.K. & Bakker, T.C.M. 2013. Attractive males have faster sperm in three-spined sticklebacks Gasterosteus aculeatus. Curr. Zool. 59: 761–768.
109. Mehlis, M., Rick, I.P. & Bakker, T.C.M. 2015. Dynamic resource allocation between pre- and postcopulatory episodes of sexual selection determines competitive fertilization success. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282: 20151279.
110. Miller, C.W. & Svensson, E.I. 2014. Sexual selection in complex environments. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 59: 427–445.
111. Mobley, K.B. 2014. Mating systems and the measurement of sexual selection. In: Animal Behavior: How and Why Animals Do the Things They Do, vol. 2 (K. Yasukawa, ed.), pp. 99–144. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA.
112. Mobley, K.B. & Jones, A.G. 2009. Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations. Mol. Ecol. 18: 1476–1490.
113. Moczek, A.P. & Nijhout, H.F. 2004. Trade-offs during the development of primary and secondary sexual traits in a horned beetle. Am. Nat. 163: 184–191.
114. Møller, A.P. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T.R. Birkhead & A.P. Møller, eds), pp. 55–90. Academic Press, San Diego.
115. Morimoto, J., Pizzari, T. & Wigby, S. 2016. Developmental environment effects on sexual selection in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 11: e0154468.
116. Muniz, D.G., Guimaraes, P.R. Jr, Buzatto, B.A. & Machado, G. 2015. A sexual network approach to sperm competition in a species with alternative mating tactics. Behav. Ecol. 26: 121–129.
117. Noguera, J.C., Dean, R., Isaksson, C., Velando, A. & Pizzari, T. 2012. Age-specific oxidative status and the expression of pre- and postcopulatory sexually selected traits in male red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Ecol. Evol. 2: 2155–2167.
118. van Noordwijk, A.J. & de Jong, G. 1986. Acquisition of allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 128: 137–142.
119. Parker, G.A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525–567.
120. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M.S. Blum & N.A. Blum, eds), pp. 123–166. Academic Press, New York.
121. Parker, G.A. 1998. Sperm competition and the evolution of ejaculates: towards a theory base. In: Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (T.R. Birkhead & A.P. Møller, eds), pp. 3–54. Academic Press, San Diego.
122. Parker, G.A. & Pizzari, T. 2015. Sexual selection: the logical imperative. In: Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection: What's Left After Darwin? (T. Horquet, ed.), pp. 119–163. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
123. Parker, G.A., Lessells, C.M. & Simmons, L.W. 2013. Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition. Evolution 67: 95–109.
124. Pélissié, B., Jarne, P. & David, P. 2012. Sexual selection without sexual dimorphism: Bateman gradients in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 66: 66–81.
125. Pélissié, B., Jarne, P., Sarda, V. & David, P. 2014. Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species. Evolution 68: 1320–1331.
126. Perry, J.C., Sirot, L. & Wigby, S. 2013. The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 414–422.
127. Phillips, P. & Arnold, S. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43: 1209–1222.
128. Pischedda, A. & Rice, W.R. 2012. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109: 2049–2053.
129. Pitcher, T.E. & Evans, J.P. 2001. Male phenotype and sperm number in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Can. J. Zool. 79: 1891–1896.
130. Pitcher, T.E., Neff, B.D., Rodd, F.H. & Rowe, L. 2003. Multiple mating and sequential mate choice in guppies: females trade up. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 1623–1629.
131. Pitnick, S. & Miller, G.T. 2000. Correlated response in reproductive and life history traits to selection on testis length in Drosophila hydei. Heredity 84: 416–426.
132. Pizzari, T. & Wedell, N. 2013. The polyandry revolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120041.
133. Pizzari, T., Cornwallis, C.K. & Froman, D.P. 2007. Social competitiveness associated with rapid fluctuations in sperm quality in male fowl. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274: 853–860.
134. Pizzari, T., Biernaskie, J.M. & Carazo, P. 2015. Inclusive fitness and sexual conflict: how population structure can modulate the battle of the sexes. Bioessays 37: 155–166.
135. Polak, M. & Simmons, L.W. 2009. Secondary sexual trait size reveals competitive fertilization success in Drosophila bipectinata. Behav. Ecol. 20: 753–760.
136. Preston, B.T., Stevenson, I.R., Pemberton, J.M. & Wilson, K. 2001. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409: 681–682.
137. Preston, B.T., Stevenson, I.R., Pemberton, J.M., Coltman, D.W. & Wilson, K. 2003. Overt and covert competition in a promiscuous mammal: the importance of weaponry and testes size to male reproductive success. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 633–640.
138. Preston, B.T., Jalme, M.S., Hingrat, Y., Lacroix, F. & Sorci, G. 2011. Sexually extravagant males age more rapidly. Ecol. Lett. 14: 1017–1024.
139. Procter, D.S., Moore, A.J. & Miller, C.W. 2012. The form of sexual selection arising from male-male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment. J. Evol. Biol. 25: 803–812.
140. Punzalan, D., Rodd, F.H. & Rowe, L. 2010. Temporally variable multivariate sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a wild insect population. Am. Nat. 175: 401–414.
141. Rahman, M., Kelley, J.L. & Evans, J.P. 2013. Condition-dependent expression of pre- and postcopulatory sexual traits in guppies. Ecol. Evol. 3: 2197–2213.
142. Rahman, M.M., Turchini, G.M., Gasparini, C., Norambuena, F. & Evans, J.P. 2014. The expression of pre- and postcopulatory sexually selected traits reflects levels of dietary stress in guppies. PLoS One 9: e105856.
143. Rasotto, M.B., de Mitcheson, Y.S. & Mitcheson, G. 2010. Male body size predicts sperm number in the mandarinfish. J. Zool. 281: 161–167.
144. Rebar, D., Zuk, M. & Bailey, N.W. 2011. Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and postcopulatory female choice in parallel. Behav. Ecol. 22: 303–309.
145. Robinson, M.R., Wilson, A.J., Pilkington, J.G., Clutton-Brock, T.H., Pemberton, J.M. & Kruuk, L.E.B. 2009. The impact of environmental heterogeneity on genetic architecture in a wild population of soay sheep. Genetics 181: 1639–1648.
146. Robinson, M.R., van Doom, G.S., Gustafsson, L. & Qvarnstrom, A. 2012. Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds. Ecol. Lett. 15: 611–618.
147. Roff, D.A. & Fairbairn, D.J. 2007. The evolution of trade-offs: where are we? J. Evol. Biol. 20: 433–447.
148. Rogers, D.W., Denniff, M., Chapman, T., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. 2008. Male sexual ornament size is positively associated with reproductive morphology and enhanced fertility in the stalk-eyed fly Teleopsis dalmanni. BMC Evol. Biol. 8: 236.
149. Rose, E., Paczolt, K.A. & Jones, A.G. 2013. The contributions of premating and postmating selection episodes to total selection in sex-role-reversed gulf pipefish. Am. Nat. 182: 410–420.
150. Rudolfsen, G., Figenschou, L., Folstad, I., Tveiten, H. & Figenschou, M. 2006. Rapid adjustments of sperm characteristics in relation to social status. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 325–332.
151. von Schantz, T., Tufvesson, M., Goransson, G., Grahn, M., Wilhelmson, M. & Wittzell, H. 1995. Artificial selection for increased comb size and its effects on other sexual characters and viability in Gallus domesticus (the domestic chicken). Heredity 75: 518–529.
152. Serbezov, D., Bernatchez, L., Olsen, E.M. & Vollestad, L.A. 2010. Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population. Mol. Ecol. 19: 3193–3205.
153. Sgro, C.M. & Hoffmann, A.A. 2004. Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93: 241–248.
154. Sheldon, B.C. 1994. Male phenotype, fertility, and the pursuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 257: 25–30.
155. Shuker, D.M. 2014. Sexual selection theory. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems (D.M. Shuker & L.W. Simmons, eds), pp. 20–41. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
156. Shuster, S.M., Briggs, W.R. & Dennis, P.A. 2013. How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368: 20120046.
157. Siegel, P.B. 1972. Genetic analysis of male mating behavior in chickens (Gallus domesticus) 1. Artificial selection. Anim. Behav. 20: 564–570.
158. Simmons, L.W. & Beveridge, M. 2010. The strength of postcopulatory sexual selection within natural populations of field crickets. Behav. Ecol. 21: 1179–1185.
159. Simmons, L.W. & Emlen, D.J. 2006. Evolutionary trade-off between weapons and testes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103: 16346–16351.
160. Simmons, L.W. & García-González, F. 2008. Evolutionary reduction in testes size and competitive fertilization success in response to the experimental removal of sexual selection in dung beetles. Evolution 62: 2580–2591.
161. Simmons, L.W. & Kotiaho, J.S. 2002. Evolution of ejaculates: patterns of phenotypic and genotypic variation and condition dependence in sperm competition traits. Evolution 56: 1622–1631.
162. Simmons, L.W., Emlen, D.J. & Tomkins, J.L. 2007. Sperm competition games between sneaks and guards: a comparative analysis using dimorphic male beetles. Evolution 61: 2684–2692.
163. Simmons, L.W., House, C.M., Hunt, J. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2009. Evolutionary response to sexual selection in male genital morphology. Curr. Biol. 19: 1442–1446.
164. Simmons, L.W., Tinghitella, R.M. & Zuk, M. 2010. Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav. Ecol. 21: 1330–1336.
165. Sirot, L.K., Wolfner, M.F. & Wigby, S. 2011. Protein-specific manipulation of ejaculate composition in response to female mating status in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108: 9922–9926.
166. Skinner, A.M.J. & Watt, P.J. 2007. Phenotypic correlates of spermatozoon quality in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. 18: 47–52.
167. Somjee, U., Allen, P.E. & Miller, C.W. 2015. Different environments lead to a reversal in the expression of weapons and testes in the heliconia bug, Leptoscelis tricolor (Hemiptera: Coreidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115: 802–809.
168. Thomas, M.L. & Simmons, L.W. 2009. Male dominance influences pheromone expression, ejaculate quality, and fertilization success in the Australian field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav. Ecol. 20: 1118–1124.
169. Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigricepts. Am. Nat. 122: 765–788.
170. Travers, L.M., Garcia-Gonzalez, F. & Simmons, L.W. 2016. Genetic variation but weak genetic covariation between pre- and post-copulatory episodes of sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 29: 1535–1552.
171. Turnell, B.R. & Shaw, K.L. 2015. High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions. Evolution 69: 2094–2104.
172. Wade, M.J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114: 742–747.
173. Wade, M.J. & Arnold, S.J. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28: 446–461.
174. Wagner, W.E., Beckers, O.M., Tolle, A.E. & Basolo, A.L. 2012. Tradeoffs limit the evolution of male traits that are attractive to females. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279: 2899–2906.
175. Webster, M.S., PruettJones, S., Westneat, D.F. & Arnold, S.J. 1995. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49: 1147–1157.
176. Wigby, S. & Chapman, T. 2004. Female resistance to male harm evolves in response to manipulation of sexual conflict. Evolution 58: 1028–1037.
177. Wong, B.B.M. & Candolin, U. 2005. How is female mate choice affected by male competition? Biol. Rev. 80: 559–571.
178. Wood, C.W. & Brodie, E.D. III 2015. Environmental effects on the structure of the G-matrix. Evolution 69: 2927–2940.
179. Worley, A.C., Houle, D. & Barrett, S.C.H. 2003. Consequences of hierarchical allocation for the evolution of life-history traits. Am. Nat. 161: 153–167.
180. Yamane, T., Okada, K., Nakayama, S. & Miyatake, T. 2010. Dispersal and ejaculatory strategies associated with exaggeration of weapon in an armed beetle. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277: 1705–1710.
181. Young, M.J., Simmons, L.W. & Evans, J.P. 2010. Pre- and post-mating sexual selection both favor large males in a rainbowfish. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64: 915–925.