Inclusive fitness and sexual conflict: How population structure can modulate the battle of the sexes

BioEssays

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 155-166

  Pizzari, Tommaso ^a   Biernaskie, Jay M ^a   Carazo, Pau ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cooperation; Kin selection; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection; Social evolution; Tragedy of the commons

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; COOPERATION; COPULATION; EMPIRICISM; FEMALE; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MALE; NONHUMAN; POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL EVOLUTION; ANIMAL; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84921488412     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400130     Document Type: Review

References (113)

1. Darwin C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
2. Parker GA. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA, eds; Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. New York, NY: Academic Press. p. 123-66.
3. Pizzari T, Gardner A. 2012. The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions. Phil Trans R Soc B 367: 2314-23.
4. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Dawkins R. 1976. The Selfish Gene. London: Oxford University Press.
6. Parker GA. 2006. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 361: 235-59.
7. Arnqvist A, Rowe L. 2005. Sexual Conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8. Johnstone RA, Keller L. 2000. How males can gain by harming their mates: sexual conflict, seminal toxins, and the cost of mating. Am Nat 156: 368-77.
9. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA. 1995. Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim Behav 49: 1345-65.
10. Valera F, Hoi H, Kristin A. 2003. Male shrikes punish unfaithful females. Behav Ecol 14: 403-8.
11. Lessells CM. 2005. Why are males bad for females? Models for the evolution of damaging male mating behaviour. Am Nat 165: S46-63.
12. Wigby S, Chapman T. 2005. Sex peptide causes mating costs in female Drosophila melanogaster. Curr Biol 15: 316-21.
13. Barash DP. 1977. Sociobiology of rape in mallards (Anas platyrhynchos): responses of the mated male. Science 197: 788-9.
14. Snook RR, Hosken DJ, Karr TL. 2011. The biology and evolution of polyspermy: insights from cellular and functional studies of sperm and centrosomal behavior in the fertilized egg. Reproduction 142: 779-92.
15. Rousset F. 2004. Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Hamilton WD. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. J Theor Biol 7: 1-52.
17. Grafen A. 1985. A geometric view of relatedness. Oxford Surv Evol Biol 2: 28-89.
18. Queller DC. 1994. Genetic relatedness in viscous populations. Evol Ecol 8: 70-3.
19. Frank SA. 1998. Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Wallace B. 1968. Polymorphism, population size, and genetic load. In: Lewontin RC ed; Population Biology and Evolution. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. p. 87-108.
21. Taylor PD. 1992. Inclusive fitness in a homogeneous environment. Proc R Lond B 249: 299-302.
22. West SA, Murray MG, Machado CA, Griffin AS, et al. 2001. Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives. Nature 409: 510-3.
23. Boomsma JJ. 2007. Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet. Curr Biol 17: R673-83.
24. Pizzari T, Foster KR. 2008. Sperm sociality: cooperation, altruism, and spite. PLoS Biol 6: e130.
25. Rankin DJ. 2011. Kin selection and the evolution of sexual conflict. J Evol Biol 24: 71-81.
26. Wild G, Pizzari T, West SA. 2011. Sexual conflict in viscous populations: the effect of the timing of dispersal. Theor Popul Biol 80: 298-316.
27. Queller DC. 1992. Does population viscosity promote kin selection? Trends Ecol Evol 7: 322-4.
28. West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS. 2002. Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296: 72-5.
29. Platt T, Bever J. 2009. Kin competition and the evolution of cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 370-7.
30. Hamilton WD. 1979. Wingless and fighting males in fig wasps and other insects. In: Blum MS, Blum NS, eds; Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. London: Academic Press. p. 167-220.
31. Taylor PD, Frank SA. 1996. How to make a kin selection model. J Theor Biol 180: 27-37.
32. Gardner A, West SA. 2006. Demography, altruism, and the benefits of budding. J Evol Biol 19: 1707-16.
33. Lehmann L, Rousset F. 2010. How life history and demography promote or inhibit the evolution of helping behaviours. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 365: 2599-617.
34. Rankin DJ, Dieckmann U, Kokko H. 2011. Sexual conflict and the tragedy of the commons. Am Nat 177: 780-91.
35. Eldakar OT, Dlugos MJ, Pepper JW, Wilson DS. 2009. Population structure mediates sexual conflict in water striders. Science 326: 816.
36. Reinhold K. 2003. Influence of male relatedness on lethal combat in fig wasps: a theoretical analysis. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 1171-5.
37. Bissonnette A, Bischofberger N, van Schaik CP. 2011. Mating skew in Barbary macaque males: the role of female mating synchrony, female behavior, and male-male coalitions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65: 167-82.
38. Widdig A, Streich WJ, Tembrocl G. 2000. Coalition formation among male Barbary Macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Am J Primatol 50: 37-51.
39. Patzelt A, Kopp GH, Ndaod I, Kalbitzera U, et al. 2014. Male tolerance and male-male bonds in a multilevel primate society. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 14740-5.
40. Pope T. 1990. The reproductive consequences of male cooperation in the red howler monkey: paternity exclusion in multi-male and single-male troops using genetic markers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27: 439-46.
41. Díaz-Muñoz SL. 2011. Paternity and relatedness in a polyandrous nonhuman primate: testing adaptive hypotheses of male reproductive cooperation. Anim Behav 82: 563-71.
42. Bygott JD, Bertram BCR, Hanby JP. 1979. Male lions in large coalitions gain reproductive advantages. Nature 282: 839-41.
43. Packer C, Gilbert DA, Pusey AE, O'Brien SJ. 1991. A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature 351: 562-5.
44. Caro TM, Collins DA. 1987. Male cheetah social organisation and territoriality. Ethology 74: 52-64.
45. Kays RW, Gittleman JL, Wayne RK. 2000. Microsatellite analysis of kinkajou social organization. Mol Ecol 9: 743-51.
46. Kays RW, Gittleman JL. 2001. The social organization of the kinkajou Potos flavus (Procyonidae). J Zool 253: 491-504.
47. Waser PM, Keane B, Creel SR, Elliott LF, et al. 1994. Possible male coalitions in a solitary mongoose. Anim Behav 47: 289-94.
48. Krützen M, Sherwin WB, Connor RC, Barré LM, et al. 2003. Contrasting relatedness patterns in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) with different alliance strategies. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 497-502.
49. Parsons KM, Durban JW, Claridge DE, Balcomb KC, et al. 2003. Kinship as a basis for alliance formation between male bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, in the Bahamas. Anim Behav 66: 185-94.
50. Arcese P. 1999. Effect of auxiliary males on territory ownership in the oribi and the attributes of multimale groups. Anim Behav 57: 61-71.
51. Ortega J, Maldonado JE, Wilkinson GS, Arita HT, et al. 2003. Male dominance, paternity, and relatedness in the Jamaican fruit-eating bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Mol Ecol 12: 2409-15.
52. Krakauer AH. 2005. Kin selection and cooperative courtship in wild turkeys. Nature 434: 69-72.
53. Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T. 1999. Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401: 155-7.
54. Piertney SB, Lambin X, MacColl ADC, Lock K, et al. 2008. Temporal changes in kin structure through a population cycle in a territorial bird, the red grouse Lagopus lagopus scoticus. Mol Ecol 17: 2544-51.
55. Höglund J, Alatalo RV, Lundberg A, Rintamäki PT, et al. 1999. Microsatellite markers reveal the potential for kin selection on black grouse leks. Proc R Soc Lond B 266: 813-6.
56. Eason PK, Sherman PT. 1995. Dominance status, mating strategies and copulation success in cooperatively polyandrous white-winged trumpeters, Psophia leucoptera (Aves, Psophiidae). Anim Behav 49: 725-36.
57. Goldizen AW, Putland DA, Goldizen AR. 1998. Variable mating patterns in Tasmanian native hens (Gallinula mortierii): correlates of reproductive success. J Anim Ecol 67: 307-17.
58. Goldizen A, Buchan JC, Putland DA, Goldizen AR, et al. 2000. Patterns of mate-sharing in a population of Tasmanian native hens Gallinula mortierii. Ibis 142: 40-7.
59. Lambert DM, Millar CD, Jack K, Anderson S, et al. 1994. Single- and multilocus DNA fingerprinting of communally breeding pukeko: do copulations or dominance ensure reproductive success? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 9641-5.
60. DeLay LS, Faaborg J, Naranjo J, Paz SM, et al. 1996. Paternal care in the cooperatively polyandrous Galapagos hawk. Condor 98: 300-11.
61. Haydock J, Koenig WD. 2003. Patterns of reproductive skew in the polygynandrous acorn woodpecker. Am Nat 162: 277-89.
62. Concannon MR, Stein AC, Uy JAC. 2012. Kin selection may contribute to lek evolution and trait introgression across an avian hybrid zone. Mol Ecol 21: 1477-86.
63. Shorey L, Piertney S, Stone J, Höglund J. 2000. Fine-scale genetic structuring on Manacus manacus leks. Nature 408: 352-3.
64. Francisco MR, Gibbs HL, Galetti PM. 2009. Patterns of individual relatedness at Blue manakin (Chiroxiphia caudata) leks. Auk 126: 47-53.
65. DuVal EH. 2007. Adaptive advantages of cooperative courtship for subordinate male Lance-tailed manakins. Am Nat 169: 423-32.
66. McDonald DB, Potts WK. 1994. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science 266: 1030-2.
67. Loiselle BA, Ryder TB, Duraes R, Tori W, et al. 2006. Kin selection does not explain male aggregation at leks of 4 manakin species. Behav Ecol 18: 287-91.
68. Ryder TB, Blake JG, Parker PG, Loiselle BA. 2011. The composition, stability, and kinship of reproductive coalitions in a lekking bird. Behav Ecol 22: 282-90.
69. Hartley IR, Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ, Desrochers A, et al. 1995. The polygynadrous mating system of the Alpine accentor Prunella collaris. 2. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Anim Behav 49: 789-803.
70. Davies NB. 1992. Dunnock Behaviour and Social Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
71. Townsend AK, Clark AB, McGowan KJ, Lovette IJ. 2009. Reproductive partitioning and the assumptions of reproductive skew models in the cooperatively breeding American crow. Anim Behav 77: 503-12.
72. Baglione V, Canestrari D, Marcos JM, Ekman J. 2003. Kin selection in cooperative alliances of carrion crows. Science 300: 1947-9.
73. Dierkes P, Heg D, Taborsky M, Skubic E, et al. 2005. Genetic relatedness in groups is sex-specific and declines with age of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid. Ecol Lett 8: 968-75.
74. Awata S, Munehara H, Kohda M. 2005. Social system and reproduction of helpers in a cooperatively breeding cichlid fish (Julidochromis ornatus) in Lake Tanganyika: field observations and parentage analyses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 58: 506-16.
75. Stiver KA, Dierkes P, Taborsky M, Gibbs HL, et al. 2005. Relatedness and helping in fish: examining the theoretical predictions. Proc Biol Sci 272: 1593-9.
76. Suleman N, Raja S, Compton SG. 2012. Only pollinator fig wasps have males that collaborate to release their females from figs of an Asian fig tree. Biol Lett 8: 344-6.
77. Zammit J, Schwarz MP. 2000. Intersexual sibling interactions and male benevolence in a fig wasp. Anim Behav 60: 695-701.
78. Carazo P, Tan CKW, Allen F, Wigby S, et al. 2014. Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila. Nature 505: 672-5.
79. Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2010. Competition drives cooperation among closely related sperm of deer mice. Nature 463: 801-3.
80. Ramm SA, Stockley P. 2009. Male house mice do not adjust sperm allocation in response to odours from related or unrelated rivals. Anim Behav 78: 685-90.
81. den Boer SPA, Baer B, Boomsma JJ. 2010. Seminal fluid mediates ejaculate competition in social insects. Science 327: 1506-9.
82. Thomas ML, Simmons LW. 2008. Rival male relatedness does not affect ejaculate allocation as predicted by sperm competition theory. PLoS One 3: e2151.
83. Ala-Honkola O, Friman E, Lindstrom K. 2011. Costs and benefits of polyandry in a placental poeciliid fish Heterandria formosa are in accordance with the parent-offspring conflict theory of placentation. J Evol Biol 24: 2600-10.
84. Xiang Z-F, Yang B-H, Yu Y, Yao H, et al. 2014. Males collectively defend their one-male units against bachelor males in a multi-level primate society. Am J Primatol 76: 609-61.
85. Temeles EJ. 1994. The role of neighbours in territorial systems: when are they 'dear enemies'? Anim Behav 47: 339-50.
86. Díaz-Muñoz SL, DuVal EH, Krakauer AH, Lacey EA. 2014. Cooperating to compete: altruism, sexual selection and causes of male reproductive cooperation. Anim Behav 88: 67-78.
87. Parker GA. 2000. Sperm competition games between related males. Proc R Soc Lond B 267: 1027-32.
88. Moore H, Dvoráková K, Jenkins N, Breed W. 2002. Exceptional sperm cooperation in the wood mouse. Nature 418: 174-7.
89. Immler S, Moore HDM, Breed WG, Birkhead TR. 2007. By hook or by crook? Morphometry, competition and cooperation in rodent sperm. PLoS One 2: e170.
90. Foster KR, Pizzari T. 2010. Cooperation - the secret society of sperm. Curr Biol 20: R314-R316.
91. Johnston SD, Smith B, Pyne M, Stenzel D, et al. 2007. One-sided ejaculation of echidna sperm bundles. Am Nat 170: E162-4.
92. Higginson DM, Miller KB, Segraves KA, Pitnick S. 2012. Female reproductive tract form drives the evolution of complex sperm morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 4538-43.
93. Pearcy M, Delescaille N, Lybaert P, Aron S. 2014. Team swimming in ant spermatozoa. Biol Lett 10: 20140308.
94. Fisher HS, Giomi L, Hoekstra HE, Mahadevan L. 2014. The dynamics of sperm cooperation in a competitive environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 281: 40296.
95. Rousset F, Roze D. 2007. Constraints on the origin and maintenance of genetic kin recognition. Evolution 61: 2320-30.
96. Blaustein AR. 1983. Kin recognition mechanisms: phenotype matching or recognition alleles. Am Nat 121: 749-54.
97. Penn DJ, Frommen JG. 2010. Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory. In: Kappeler P, ed; Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Springer: Heidelberg. p. 55-85.
98. Lize A, Mckay R, Lewis Z. 2013. Gut microbiota and kin recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 325-6.
99. Lize A, McKay R, Lewis Z. 2014. Kin recognition in Drosophila: the importance of ecology and gut microbiota. ISME J 8: 469-77.
100. Shettleworth SJ. 2010. Cognition, Evolution and Behaviour. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.
101. Tan CKW, Løvlie H, Greenway E, Goodwin SF, et al. 2013. Sex-specific responses to sexual familiarity, and the role of olfaction in Drosophila. Proc R Soc Lond B 280: 20131691.
102. Dewsbury DA. 1981. An exercise in the prediction of monogamy in the field from laboratory data on 42 species of muroid rodents. The Biologist 63: 138-62.
103. Parker GA, Pizzari T. 2010. Sperm competition and ejaculate economics. Biol Rev 85: 897-934.
104. Carazo P, Font E, Alfthan B. 2007. Chemosensory assessment of sperm competition levels and the evolution of internal spermatophore guarding. Proc R Soc Lond B 274: 261-7.
105. Fedorka KM, Zuk M. 2005. Sexual conflict and female immune suppression in the cricket, Allonemobious socius. J Evol Biol 18: 1515-22.
106. Zeh DW, Zeh JA. 2000. Reproductive mode and speciation: the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis. BioEssays 22: 938-46.
107. Gagneux P, Boesch C, Woodruff DS. 1999. Female reproductive strategies, paternity and community structure in wild West African chimpanzees. Anim Behav 57: 19-32.
108. McDonald GC, James R, Krause J, Pizzari T. 2013. Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations. Phil Trans R Soc B 368: 20120356.
109. Parker GA, Lessells CM, Simmons LW. 2013. Sperm competition games: a general model for precopulatory male-male competition. Evolution 67: 95-109.
110. Caswell H. 1989. Matrix Population Models. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
111. Gapp K, von Ziegler L, Tweedie-Cullen RY, Mansuy IM. 2014. Early life epigenetic programming and transmission of stress-induced traits in mammals. BioEssays 36: 491-502.
112. Dowling DK, Williams BR, Garcia-Gonzalez F. 2014. Maternal sexual interactions affect offspring survival and ageing. J Evol Biol 27: 88-97.
113. Pitnick S, Pfennig DW. 2014. Evolutionary biology: Brotherly love benefits females. Nature 505: 626-7.