Environment-dependent sexual selection: Bateman’s parameters under varying levels of food availability

American Naturalist

Volumn 185, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 756-768

  Janicke, Tim ^a   David, Patrice ^a   Chapuis, Elodie ^a,b  

^a UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^b CIRAD   (France)

Author keywords

Bateman s principles; Body size; Mating success; Nutrition; Opportunity for selection; Physa acuta; Selection gradients

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FECUNDITY; FOOD AVAILABILITY; MATING SUCCESS; NUTRITION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEX RATIO; SEX ROLE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SNAIL;

BASOMMATOPHORA; GASTROPODA; PHYSA ACUTA;

ANIMAL; FERTILITY; FOOD DEPRIVATION; HERMAPHRODITE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SNAIL;

ANIMALS; FERTILITY; FOOD DEPRIVATION; HERMAPHRODITIC ORGANISMS; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; REPRODUCTION; SNAILS;

EID: 84981736062     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/681128     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Agrawal, A. F. 2001. Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 411:692-695
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection: monographs in behavior and ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist 144:S126-S149
4. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719
5. Arnqvist, G. 2013. Comment on “Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection.” Science 340:2
6. Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145-164
7. Aronsen, T., A. Berglund, K. B. Mobley, I. I. Ratikainen, and G. Rosenqvist. 2013. Sex ratio and density affect sexual selection in a sex-role reversed fish. Evolution 67:3243-3257
8. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368
9. Brauer, V. S., L. Schärer, and N. K. Michiels. 2007. Phenotypically flexible sex allocation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 61:216-222
10. Byers, J., and S. Dunn. 2012. Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection. Science 338:802-804
11. Canty, A., and B. Ripley. 2014. boot: bootstrap R (S-Plus) functions. R package. Version 1.3-10. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages /boot/index.html.
12. Chaine, A. S., and B. E. Lyon. 2008. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319:459-462
13. Chapman, T., L. F. Liddle, J.M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory-gland products. Nature 373:241-244
14. Charnov, E. L. 1979. Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 76:2480-2484
15. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and G. A. Parker. 1992. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology 67:437-456
16. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and A. C. J. Vincent. 1991. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351:58-60
17. Cornwallis, C. K., and T. Uller. 2010. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:145-152
18. Cotton, S., J. Small, and A. Pomiankowski. 2006. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Current Biology 16: R755-R765
19. David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406:186-188
20. Draparnaud, J.-P.-R. 1805. Historie naturelle des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de la France. Louis Colas, Paris.
21. Fitze, P. S., and J. F. Le Galliard. 2008. Operational sex ratio, sexual conflict and the intensity of sexual selection. Ecology Letters 11:432-439
22. Gwynne, D. T., and L. W. Simmons. 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346:172-174
23. Henry, P. Y., and P. Jarne. 2007. Marking hard-shelled gastropods: tag loss, impact on life-history traits, and perspectives in biology. Invertebrate Biology 126:138-153
24. Hoffmann, A. A., and J. Merila. 1999. Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14:96-101
25. Janicke, T., P. David, and E. Chapuis. 2015. Data from: Environmentdependent sexual selection: Bateman’s parameters under varying levels of food availability. American Naturalist, Dryad Digital Repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m01qr.
26. Janicke, T., N. Vellnow, T. Lamy, E. Chapuis, and P. David. 2014. Inbreeding depression of mating behavior and its reproductive consequences in a freshwater snail. Behavioral Ecology 25:288-299
27. Janicke, T., N. Vellnow, V. Sarda, and P. David. 2013. Sex-specific inbreeding depression depends on the strength of male-male competition. Evolution 67:2861-2875
28. Jarne, P., P. David, J.-P. Pointier, and J. M. Koene. 2010. Basommatophoran gastropods. Pages 173-196 in J. L. Leonard and A. Córdoba-Aguilar, eds. The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, New York.
29. Jarne, P., M. A. Perdieu, A. F. Pernot, B. Delay, and P. David. 2000. The influence of self-fertilization and grouping on fitness attributes in the freshwater snail Physa acuta: population and individual inbreeding depression. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 13: 645-655
30. Jones, A. G. 2009. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63:1673-1684
31. Ketterson, E. D., P. G. Parker, S. A. Raouf, V. Nolan Jr., C. Ziegenfus, and C. R. Chandler. 1997. The relative impact of extra-pair fertilizations on variation in male and female reproductive success in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Ornithological Monographs 49:81-101
32. Klug, H., J. Heuschele, M. D. Jennions, and H. Kokko. 2010. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:447-462
33. Koene, J. M., W. Sloot, K. Montagne-Wajer, S. F. Cummins, B. M. Degnan, J. S. Smith, G. T. Nagle, et al. 2010. Male accessory gland protein reduces egg laying in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. PLoS ONE 5:e10117
34. Kvarnemo, C. 1997. Food affects the potential reproductive rates of sand goby females but not of males. Behavioral Ecology 8:605-611
35. Miller, C. W., and E. I. Svensson. 2014. Sexual selection in complex environments. Annual Review of Entomology 59:427-445
36. Mills, S. C., A. Grapputo, E. Koskela, and T. Mappes. 2007. Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274:143-150
37. Mobley, K. B. 2014. Mating systems and the measurement of sexual selection. Pages 99-144 in K. Yasukawa, ed. Animal behaviour: how and why animals do the things they do. Praeger, Santa Barbara, CA.
38. Mobley, K. B., and A. G. Jones. 2009. Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations. Molecular Ecology 18:1476-1490.
39. Mobley, K. B., and A. G. Jones. 2013. Overcoming statistical bias to estimate genetic mating systems in open populations: a comparison of Bateman’s principles between the sexes in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Evolution 67:646-660
40. Moura, R. R., and P. E. C. Peixoto. 2013. The effect of operational sex ratio on the opportunity for sexual selection: a meta-analysis. Animal Behaviour 86:675-683
41. Ohbayashi-Hodoki, K., F. Ishihama, and M. Shimada. 2004. Body size-dependent gender role in a simultaneous hermaphrodite freshwater snail, Physa acuta. Behavioral Ecology 15:976-981
42. Olsson, M., E. Wapstra, T. Schwartz, T. Madsen, B. Ujvari, and T. Uller. 2011. In hot pursuit: fluctuating mating system and sexual selection in sand lizards. Evolution 65:574-583
43. Parker, G. A., and L. W. Simmons. 1996. Parental investment and the control of sexual selection: predicting the direction of sexual competition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:315-321
44. Pélissié, B., P. Jarne, and P. David. 2012. Sexual selection without sexual dimorphism: Bateman gradients in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 66:66-81. ———. 2014. Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species. Evolution 68:1320-1331
45. Pischedda, A., and W. R. Rice. 2012. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109:2049-2053
46. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Version 3.1.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
47. Ritchie, M. G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38:79-102
48. Robinson, M. R., G. S. van Doorn, L. Gustafsson, and A. Qvarnstrom. 2012. Environment-dependent selection on mate choice in a natural population of birds. Ecology Letters 15:611-618
49. Rockwood, L. L. 2006. Introduction to population ecology. Blackwell, Oxford.
50. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1415-1421
51. Schärer, L. 2009. Tests of sex allocation theory in simultaneously hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 63:1377-1405
52. Schärer, L., T. Janicke, and S. A. Ramm. 2014. Sexual conflict inhermaphrodites. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7:a017673
53. Serbezov, D., L. Bernatchez, E. M. Olsen, and L. A. Vollestad. 2010. Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population. Molecular Ecology 19:3193-3205
54. Sheldon, B. C. 2000. Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:397-402
55. Wacker, S., T. Amundsen, E. Forsgren, and K. B. Mobley. 2014. Within-season variation in sexual selection in a fish with dynamic sex roles. Molecular Ecology 23:3587-3599
56. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. American Naturalist 114:742-747
57. Wethington, A. R., and R. T. Dillon. 1996. Gender choice and gender conflict in a non-reciprocally mating simultaneous hermaphrodite, the freshwater snail, Physa. Animal Behaviour 51:1107-1118.