Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1476-1490

  Mobley, Kenyon B ^a,b   Jones, Adam G ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bateman's principles; Ecology; Geographical variation; Mating system; Morphology; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTION; SMEGMAMORPHA;

ANIMALS; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; SMEGMAMORPHA;

SYNGNATHUS FLORIDAE;

EID: 62849097966     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04104.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Aguilar R, Galetto L (2004) Effects of forest fragmentation on male and female reproductive success in Cestrum parqui (Solanaceae). Oecologia, 138, 513 520.
2. Ahnesjö I (1995) Temperature affects male and female potential reproductive rates differently in the sex-role reversed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle. Behavioral Ecology, 6, 229 233.
3. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
4. Arnold SJ (1994) Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. American Naturalist, 144, S126 S149.
5. Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. American Naturalist, 143, 317 348.
6. Avise JC, Jones AG, Walker D, DeWoody JA (2002) Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics, 36, 19 45.
7. Bell SS, Walters K, Kern JC (1984) Meiofauna from seagrass habitats: a review and prospectus for future research. Estuaries, 7, 331 338.
8. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (2001a) Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females. Behavioral Ecology, 12, 402 406.
9. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G (2001b) Male pipefish prefer ornamented females. Animal Behaviour, 61, 345 350.
10. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Svensson I (1988) Multiple matings and paternal brood care in the pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Oikos, 51, 184 188.
11. Berglund A, Rosenqvist G, Bernet P (1997) Ornamentation predicts reproductive success in female pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 145 150.
12. Bronikowski AM, Clark ME, Rodd FH, Reznick DN (2002) Population-dynamic consequences of predator-induced life history variation in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Ecology, 83, 2194 2204.
13. Brown J (1972) A comparative life history study of four species of pipefishes (family Syngnathidae) in Florida. PhD Dissertation University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
14. Candolin U, Salesto T, Evers M (2007) Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 20, 233 239.
15. Clutton-Brock TH (2007) Sexual selection in males and females. Science, 318, 1882 1885.
16. Clutton-Brock TH, Vincent AJC (1991) Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature, 351, 58 60.
17. Clutton-Brock TH, Harvey PH, Rudder B (1977) Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature, 269, 797 800.
18. Darwin C (1859) The Origin of Species. Random House, New York.
19. Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.
20. Dawson CE (1982) Fishes of the Western North Atlantic, Part 8, Order Gasterosteiformes, Suborder Syngnathoidei. Sears Foundation for Marine Research, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
21. Emlen ST (1976) Lek organization and mating strategies in bullfrog. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 1, 283 313.
22. Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215 223.
23. Eshel I (1979) Sexual selection, population density, and availability of mates. Theoretical Population Biology, 16, 301 314.
24. Fischer K, Brakefield PM, Zwaan BJ (2003) Plasticity in butterfly egg size: why larger offspring at lower temperatures? Ecology, 84, 3138 3147.
25. Fitze PS, Tschirren B, Richner H (2004) Life history and fitness consequences of ectoparasites. Journal of Animal Ecology, 73, 216 226.
26. Goodisman MAD, Matthews RW, Crozier RH (2002) Mating and reproduction in the wasp Vespula germanica. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 51, 497 502.
27. Gosselin T, Saint-Marie B, Bernatchez L (2005) Geographic variation of multiple paternity in the Amerian lobster, Homarus americanus. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1517 1525.
28. Griffith SC, Stewart IRK, Dawson DA, Owens IPF, Burke T (1999) Contrasting levels of extra-pair paternity in mainland and island populations of the house sparrow (Passer domesticus): is there an 'island effect'? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 68, 303 316.
29. Griffith SC, Owens IPF, Thuman KA (2002) Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2195 2212.
30. Hicks GRF (1986) Distribution and behaviour of meiofaunal copepods inside and outside seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 31, 159 170.
31. Hoyle SD, Peel D, Ovenden JR, Broderick D, Buckworth RC (2005) LocusEater and ShadowBoxer: programs to optimize experimental design and multiplexing strategies for genetic mark-recapture. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 974 976.
32. Järvenpää M, Lindström K (2004) Water turbidity by algal blooms causes mating system breakdown in a shallow-water fish, the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, 2361 2365.
33. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19, 2004.
34. Jones AG (2001) Gerud 1.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from progeny arrays using multilocus DNA data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 215 218.
35. Jones AG (2005) Gerud 2.0: a computer program for the reconstruction of parental genotypes from half-sib progeny arrays with known or unknown parents. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 708 711.
36. Jones AG, Avise JC (1997) Polygynandry in the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae revealed by microsatellite DNA markers. Evolution, 51, 1611 1622.
37. Jones AG, Avise JC (2001) Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. Journal of Heredity, 92, 150 158.
38. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Avise JC (1999) The genetic mating system of a sex-role-reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): a molecular inquiry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 357 365.
39. Jones AG, Walker D, Lindstrom K, Kvarnemo C, Avise JC (2001) Surprising similarity of sneaking rates and genetic mating patterns in two populations of sand goby experiencing disparate sexual selection regimes. Molecular Ecology, 10, 461 469.
40. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Avise JC (2005) The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: an experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 874 884.
41. Kelly CD, Godin JGJ, Wright JM (1999) Geographical variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 266, 2403 2408.
42. Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 361, 319 334.
43. Kvarnemo C (1996) Temperature affects operational sex ratio and intensity of male-male competition: experimental study of sand gobies, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behavioral Ecology, 7, 208 212.
44. Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11, 404 408.
45. Lewis FG (1984) Distribution of macrobenthic crustaceans associated with Thalassia, Halodule and bare sand substrata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 19, 101 113.
46. Livingstone RJ (1982) Trophic organization of fishes in a coastal seagrass system. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 7, 1 12.
47. Lloyd M (1967) Mean crowding. Journal of Animal Ecology, 36, 1030.
48. Lodé T, Holveck MJ, Lesbarreres D, Pagano A (2004) Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, S399 S401.
49. Magnhagen C (1991) Predation risk as a cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 183 185.
50. Magurran AE, Garcia M (2000) Sex differences in behavior as an indirect consequence of mating system. Journal of Fish Biology, 57, 839 857.
51. Martin PR, Martin TE (2001) Ecological and fitness consequences of species coexistence: a removal experiment with wood warblers. Ecology, 82, 189 206.
52. Mercer LP (1973) The comparative ecology of two species of pipefish (Syngnathidae) in the York River, Virginia. Master's Thesis, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
53. Mills SC, Grapputo A, Koskela E, Mappes T (2007) Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 143 150.
54. Mobley KB, Jones AG (2007) Geographical variation in the mating system of the dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae). Molecular Ecology, 16, 2596 2606.
55. Orians G (1969) On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. American Naturalist, 103, 589 603.
56. Park SDE (2001) Trypanotolerance in West African Cattle and the Population Genetic Effects of Selection. PhD Thesis, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
57. Payne RB (1984) Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithological Monographs, 33, 1 53.
58. Pihl L, Baden S, Kautsky N et al 2006) Shift in fish assemblage structure due to loss of seagrass Zostera marina habitats in Sweden. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 67, 123 132.
59. Prohl H (2002) Population differences in female resource abundance adult sex ratio, and mating success in Dendrobates pumilio. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 175 181.
60. Ratterman NL, Rosenthal GG, Jones AG (in press) Sex recognition via chemical cues in the sex-role-reversed gulf pipefish (Syngnathus scovelli). Ethology.
61. Ripley JL, Foran CM (2006a) The all-clear call: utilization of sound production by two sympatric pipefish species as an indicator of feeding activity and ecosystem health. Marine Environmental Research, 62, S405 S406.
62. Ripley JL, Foran CM (2006b) Population structure, growth rates, and seasonal abundance of two Syngnathus pipefish species. Estuaries and Coasts, 29, 1161 1171.
63. Rispoli VF, Wilson AB (2008) Sexual size dimorphism predicts the frequency of multiple mating in the sex-role reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 30 38.
64. Seehausen O, vanAlphen JJM, Witte F (1997) Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science, 277, 1808 1811.
65. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating Systems and Strategies. Princeton University Press, Princton, New Jersey.
66. Sinervo B, Lively CM (1996) The rock-paper-scissors game and the evolution of alternative male strategies. Nature, 380, 240 243.
67. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometery, 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman Co, New York.
68. Spottiswoode C, Møller AP (2004) Extrapair paternity, migration and breeding synchrony in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15, 41 57.
69. Trexler JC, Travis J, Dinep A (1997) Variation among populations of the sailfin molly in the rate of concurrent multiple paternity and its implications for mating-system evolution. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 40, 297 305.
70. Turner AM, McCarty JP (1998) Resource availability, breeding site selection, and reproductive success of red-winged blackbirds. Oecologia, 113, 140 146.
71. Vincent AJC, Ahnesjö I, Berglund A (1994) Operation sex ratios and behavioural sex differences in a pipefish population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 34, 435 442.
72. Vincent ACJ, Berglund A, Ahnesjö I (1995) Reproductive ecology of five pipefish species in one eelgrass meadow. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 44, 347 361.
73. Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. American Naturalist, 114, 742 747.
74. Weatherhead PJ, Boag PT (1997) Genetic estimates of annual and lifetime reproductive success in male red-winged blackbirds. Ecology, 78, 884 896.
75. Whittingham MJ, Stephens PA, Bradbury RB, Freckleton RP (2006) Why do we still use stepwise modelling in ecology and behaviour? Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 1182 1189.