High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions

Evolution

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 2094-2104

  Turnell, Biz R ^a   Shaw, Kerry L ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Cryptic mate choice; Nuptial gifts; Opportunity for selection; Selection gradients; Sperm competition; Variance decomposition

Indexed keywords

CRICKET; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); FIELD METHOD; MATE CHOICE; MATING SUCCESS; NUPTIAL GIFT; POLYANDRY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

GRYLLIDAE; LAUPALA CERASINA;

ANIMAL; COPULATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENETICS; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VOCALIZATION;

ANIMALS; COPULATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GRYLLIDAE; MALE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84940459353     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12721     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Anthes, N., P. David, J. R. Auld, J. N. A. Hoffer, P. Jarne, J. M. Koene, H. Kokko, M. C. Lorenzi, B. Pélissié, D. Sprenger, et al. 2010. Bateman gradients in hermaphrodites: an extended approach to quantify sexual selection. Am. Nat. 176:249-263.
3. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
4. Avila, F. W., L. K. Sirot, B. A. LaFlamme, C. D. Rubinstein, and M. F. Wolfner. 2011. Insect seminal fluid proteins: identification and function. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56:21-40.
5. Birkhead, T. R. 2010. How stupid not to have thought of that: post-copulatory sexual selection. J. Zool. 281:78-93.
6. Birkhead, T. R., and A. P. Møller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
7. Birkhead, T. R., and T. Pizzari. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3:262-273.
8. Bohrnstedt, G., and A. Goldberger. 1969. On the exact covariance of products of random variables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64:1439-1442.
9. Bretman, A., C. Fricke, and T. Chapman. 2009. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proc. R. Soc. B 276:1705-1711.
10. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
11. Cade, W., and E. Cade. 1992. Male mating success, calling and searching behaviour at high and low densities in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Anim. Behav. 43:49-56.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. 1988. Reproductive success. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. Collet, J. M., R. F. Dean, K. Worley, D. S. Richardson, and T. Pizzari. 2014. The measure and significance of Bateman's principles. Proc. R. Soc. B 281:20132973.
14. Collet, J., D. S. Richardson, K. Worley, and T. Pizzari. 2012. Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:8641-8645.
15. Cotton, S., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2004. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. B 271:771-783.
16. Davidson, A., and D. Hinkley. 1997. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
17. deCarvalho, T. N., D. J. Fergus, R. C. Bell, and K. L. Shaw. 2012. Rhythmic male reproductive behavior controls timing of courtship and mating in Laupala cerasina. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66:1333-1340.
18. deCarvalho, T., and K. Shaw. 2010. Elaborate courtship enhances sperm transfer in the Hawaiian swordtail cricket, Laupala cerasina. Anim. Behav. 79:819-826.
19. Devigili, A., J. L. Kelley, A. Pilastro, and J. P. Evans. 2012. Expression of pre- and postcopulatory traits under different dietary conditions in guppies. Behav. Ecol. 24:740-749.
20. Do, C. B., and S. Batzoglou. 2008. What is the expectation maximization algorithm? Comput. Biol. 26:897-899.
21. Eberhard, W. 2009. Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:10025-10032.
22. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Prin ceton, NJ.
23. Edvardsson, M., and G. Arnqvist. 2000. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum. Proc. R. Soc. B 267:559-563.
24. Ellison, C. K., and K. L. Shaw. 2010. Mining non-model genomic libraries for microsatellites: BAC versus EST libraries and the generation of allelic richness. BMC Genomics 11:428.
25. Engqvist, L. 2011. Male attractiveness is negatively genetically associated with investment in copulations. Behav. Ecol. 22:345-349.
26. Evans, J. P. 2010. Quantitative genetic evidence that males trade attractiveness for ejaculate quality in guppies. Proc. Biol. Sci. 277:3195-3201.
27. Gage, M. J. G., and P. A. Cook. 1994. Sperm size or numbers? Effects of nutritional stress upon eupyrene and apyrene sperm production strategies in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Funct. Ecol. 8:594-599.
28. Gwynne, D. T. 2008. Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53:83-101.
29. Hack, M. A. 1998. The energetics of male mating strategies in field crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllinae: Gryllidae). J. Insect Behav. 11:853-867.
30. Helfenstein, F., S. Losdat, A. P. Møller, J. D. Blount, and H. Richner. 2010. Sperm of colourful males are better protected against oxidative stress. Ecol. Lett. 13:213-222.
31. Hoback, W., and W. Wagner. 1997. The energetic cost of calling in the variable field cricket, Gryllus lineaticeps. Physiol. Entomol. 22:286-290.
32. Hosken, D. J., and C. M. House. 2011. Sexual selection. Curr. Biol. 21:R62-5.
33. Hosken, D. J., M. L. Taylor, K. Hoyle, S. Higgins, and N. Wedell. 2008. Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18:R553-R554.
34. Kalinowski, S. T., M. L. Taper, and T. C. Marshall. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol. Ecol. 16:1099-1106.
35. Kingsolver, J., H. Hoekstra, J. Hoekstra, D. Berrigan, S. Vignieri, C. Hill, P. Hoang, P. Gilbert, and P. Beerli. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157:245-261.
36. Legendre, P., and L. Legendre. 2012. Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
37. Ligout, S., D. Munier, L. Marquereau, and M. D. Greenfield. 2012. Chronological vs. physiological age as determinants of mating decisions: studies on female choice over lifespan in an acoustic moth. Ethology 118:740-751.
38. Manier, M., S. Lüpold, J. Belote, W. T. Starmer, K. S. Berben, O. Ala-honkola, W. F. Collins, and S. Pitnick. 2013. Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 23:1853-1862.
39. Mautz, B. S., A. P. Møller, and M. D. Jennions. 2013. Do male secondary sexual characters signal ejaculate quality? A meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 88:669-682.
40. Mowles, S. L. 2014. The physiological cost of courtship: field cricket song results in anaerobic metabolism. Anim. Behav. 89:39-43.
41. Olsson, M. 1997. Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proc. R. Soc. B 264:455-459.
42. Parker, G. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45:525-567.
43. Pélissié, B., P. Jarne, and P. David. 2012. Sexual selection without sexual dimorphism: Bateman gradients in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. Evolution 66:66-81.
44. Pélissié, B., P. Jarne, V. Sarda, and P. David. 2014. Disentangling precopulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in polyandrous species. Evolution 68:1320-1331.
45. Peretti, A. V., and W. G. Eberhard. 2010. Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider. J. Evol. Biol. 23:271-281.
46. Pischedda, A., and W. R. Rice. 2012. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109:2049-2053.
47. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vie nna, Austria.
48. Rodríguez-Muñoz, R., A. Bretman, J. Slate, C. A. Walling, and T. Tregenza. 2010. Natural and sexual selection in a wild insect population. Science 328:1269-1272.
49. Roff, D. A. 2002. Life history evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
50. Rose, E., K. A. Paczolt, and A. G. Jones. 2013. The contributions of premating and postmating selection episodes to total selection in sex-role-reversed Gulf pipefish. Am. Nat. 182:410-420.
51. Sakaluk, S. K. 1984. Male crickets feed females to ensure complete sperm transfer. Science 223:609-610.
52. Shaw, K., and A. Khine. 2004. Courtship behavior in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala cerasina: males provide spermless spermatophores as nuptial gifts. Ethology 95:81-95.
53. Shuster, S. M., W. R. Briggs, and P. A. Dennis. 2013. How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 368:20120046.
54. Siepielski, A. M., J. D. DiBattista, J. A. Evans, and S. M. Carlson. 2011. Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. B 278:1572-1580.
55. Simmons, L. 1986a. Inter-male competition and mating success in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer). Anim. Behav. 34:567-579.
56. Simmons, L. W. 1986b. Female choice in the field cricket Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim. Behav. 34:1463-1470.
57. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princet on, NJ.
58. Simmons, L. W. 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:125-146.
59. Simmons, L. W., R. M. Tinghitella, and M. Zuk. 2010. Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Behav. Ecol. 21:1330-1336.
60. Tallamy, D. W., B. E. Powell, and J. A. McClafferty. 2002. Male traits under cryptic female choice in the spotted cucumber beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Behav. Ecol. 13:511-518.
61. Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am. Nat. 122:765-788.
62. Vahed, K. 1998. The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol. Rev. 73:43-78.
63. Van Noordwijk, A., and G. deJong. 1986. Acquisition and allocation of resources: their influence on variation in life history tactics. Am. Nat. 128:137-142.
64. Voorhies, W. Van. 1992. Production of sperm reduces nematode lifespan. Nature 360:456-458.
65. Webster, M., S. Pruett-Jones, D. Westneat, and S. Arnold. 1995. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49:1147-1157.
66. Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313-320.