The interplay between different stages of reproduction in males of the moth Plodia interpunctella

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 917-922

  Lewis, Zenobia ^a,b   Lizé, Anne ^b   Wedell, Nina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Indian meal moth; Lepidoptera; Plodia interpunctella; Sexual selection; Sperm polymorphism

Indexed keywords

COPULATION; FEMALE; MOTH; POLYMORPHISM; REPRODUCTION; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPERM COMPETITION;

LEPIDOPTERA; PLODIA INTERPUNCTELLA;

EID: 84886306251     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
2. Beeman R.W. Linkage analysis of genes affecting scale colour, eye colour and resistance to malathion in the Indian meal moth. Heredity 1983, 7:301-302.
3. Beeman R.W., Schmidt B.A. Biochemical and genetic aspects of malathion-specific resistance in the Indian meal moth. Journal of Economic Entomology 1982, 75:945-949.
4. Birkhead T.R., Møller A.P. Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection 1998, Academic Press, New York.
5. Boorman E., Parker G.A. Sperm ejaculate competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecological Entomology 1976, 1:145-155.
6. Bretman A., Fricke C., Chapman T. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2009, 276:1705-1711.
7. van Buuren S., Groothuis-Oudshoorn K. mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software 2011, 45:1-67.
8. Champion de Crespigny F.E., Wedell N. Wolbachia infection reduces sperm competitive ability in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2006, 273:1455-1458.
9. Civetta A., Clark A.G. Chromosomal effects on male and female components of sperm precedence. Genetical Research 2000, 75:143-151.
10. Clark A.G., Aguadé M., Prout T., Harshman L.G., Langley C.H. Variation in sperm displacement and its association with accessory gland protein loci in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 1995, 139:189-201.
11. Cook P.A. Sperm numbers and female fertility in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Hubner) (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 1999, 12:767-779.
12. Cook P.A., Gage M.J.G. Effects of risks of sperm competition on numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella Lepidoptera: Pyralidae. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1995, 36:261-268.
13. Cook P.A., Wedell N. Ejaculate dynamics in butterflies: a strategy for maximizing fertilization success?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 1996, 263:1047-1051.
14. Cook P.A., Wedell N. Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 1999, 397:486.
15. Cook P.A., Harvey I.F., Parker G.A. Predicting variation in sperm precedence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1997, 352:771-780.
16. Danielsson I. Antagonistic pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider Gerris lacustris. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2001, 268:77-81.
17. Demary K.C., Lewis S.M. Male courtship attractiveness and paternity success in Photinus greeni fireflies. Evolution 2007, 61:431-439.
18. Droge-Young E.M., Manier M.K., Lüpold S., Belote J.M., Pitnick S. Covariance among pre-mating, post-copulatory and viability fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster and their influence on paternity measurement. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012, 25:1555-1563.
19. Engqvist L. Male attractiveness is negatively genetically associated with investment in copulations. Behavioral Ecology 2011, 22:345-349.
20. Evans J.P., Rutstein A.N. Postcopulatory sexual selection favours intrinsically good sperm competitors. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2008, 62:1167-1173.
21. Evans J.P., Zane L., Francescato S., Pilastro A. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 2003, 421:360-363.
22. Fiumera A.C., Dumont B.L., Clark A.G. Sperm competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster associated with variation in male reproductive proteins. Genetics 2005, 169:243-257.
23. Fiumera A.C., Dumont B.L., Clark A.G. Associations between sperm competition and natural variation in male reproductive genes on the third chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2007, 176:1245-1260.
24. Friberg U., Lew T.A., Byrne P.G., Rice W.R. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution 2005, 59:1540-1551.
25. Fricke C., Martin O.Y., Bretman A., Bussiére L.F., Chapman T. Sperm competition ability and indices of lifetime reproductive success. Evolution 2010, 64:2746-2757.
26. Gage M.J.G., Cook P.A. Sperm size or numbers? Effects of nutritional stress upon eupyrene and apyrene sperm production strategies in the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Functional Ecology 1994, 8:594-599.
27. Hosken D.J., Garner T.W.J., Tregenza T., Wedell N., Ward P.I. Superior sperm competitors sire higher quality young. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2003, 270:1933-1938.
28. Hosken D.J., Taylor M.L., Hoyle K., Higgins S., Wedell N. Attractive males have more success in sperm competition. Current Biology 2008, 18:R553-R554.
29. Hunt J., Breuker C.J., Sadowski J.A., Moore A.J. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2009, 22:13-26.
30. Ihaka R., Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996, 5:299-314.
31. Ingleby F., Lewis Z., Wedell N. Level of sperm competition promotes evolution of male ejaculation allocation patterns in a moth. Animal Behaviour 2010, 80:37-43.
32. Lewis Z., Wedell N., Hunt J. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Evolution 2011, 65:2085-2097.
33. Maklakov A.A., Bilde T., Lubin Y. Sexual selection for increased male body size and protandry in a spider. Animal Behaviour 2004, 68:1041-1048.
34. Meves F. Oligopyrene and apyrene sperm cells and their formation, from observations on Palundina and Pygaera. Archiv fur Mikroskopische Anatomie 1902, 61:1-84.
35. Neems R.M., Lazarus J., McLachlan A.J. Lifetime reproductive success in a swarming midge: trade-offs and stabilizing selection for male body size. Behavioral Ecology 1998, 9:279-286.
36. Partridge L., Farquhar M. Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Animal Behaviour 1983, 31:871-877.
37. Petrie M., Halliday T. Experimental and natural changes in the peacock's (Pavo cristatus) train can affect mating success. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1994, 35:213-217.
38. Pischedda A., Rice W.R. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2012, 109:2049-2053.
39. Reid J. Techniques. The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland 1976, Vol. 1:117-132. Curwen Press, London. J. Heath (Ed.).
40. Ryne C., Zhu J., van Dongen S., Löfstedt C. Spermatophore size and multiple mating: effects on reproductive success and post-mating behaviour in the Indian meal moth. Behaviour 2001, 138:947-963.
41. Savalli U.M., Fox C.W. The effect of male size, age, and mating behavior on sexual selection in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 1999, 11:49-60.
42. Schneider J.M., Elgar M.A. The combined effects of pre- and post-insemination sexual selection on extreme variation in male body size. Evolutionary Ecology 2005, 19:419-433.
43. Simmons L.W. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects 2001, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
44. South A., Lewis S.M. Determinants of reproductive success across sequential episodes of sexual selection in a firefly. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2012, 279:3201-3208.
45. Wedell N. Female remating in butterflies: interaction between female genotype and nonfertile sperm. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2001, 14:746-754.
46. Wedell N. Female receptivity in butterflies and moths. Journal of Experimental Biology 2005, 208:3433-3440.