The contributions of premating and postmating selection episodes to total selection in sex-role-reversed gulf pipefish

American Naturalist

Volumn 182, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 410-420

  Rose, Emily ^a   Paczolt, Kimberly A ^a,b   Jones, Adam G ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Bldg 142   (United States)

Author keywords

Cryptic mate choice; Opportunity for selection; Parentage; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

BODY SIZE; COPULATION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FISH; FITNESS; MATING BEHAVIOR; SEX ROLE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FISH; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; MATE CHOICE;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; FISHES; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

GULF; PAPUA NEW GUINEA;

EID: 84881500506     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/671233     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Ahnesjo, I. 1992. Consequences of male brood care: weight and number of newborn in a sex-role reversed pipefish. Functional Ecology 6:274-281.
2. Ahnesjo, I. 1996. Apparent resource competition among embryos in the brood pouch of a male pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 38:167-172.
3. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Andersson, M., and L. W. Simmons. 2006. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21:296-302.
5. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720-734.
6. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709-719.
7. Begovac, P. C., and R. A. Wallace. 1987. Ovary of the pipefish, Syngnathus scovelli. Journal of Morphology 193:117-133.
8. Berglund, A., and G. Rosenqvist. 1990. Male limitation of female reproductive success in a pipefish: effects of body-size differences. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 27:129-133.
9. Berglund, A., G. Rosenqvist, and I. Svensson. 1986a. Mate choice, fecundity and sexual dimorphism in 2 pipefish species (Syngnathidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 19:301-307.
10. Berglund, A., G. Rosenqvist, and I. Svensson. 1986b. Reversed sex-roles and parental energy investment in zygotes of 2 pipefish (Syngnathidae) species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 29:209-215.
11. Berglund, A., G. Rosenqvist, and I. Svensson. 1989. Reproductive success of females limited by males in 2 pipefish species. American Naturalist 133:506-516.
12. Birkhead, T. R. and T. Pizzari. 2002. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Reviews Genetics 3:262-273.
13. Braga Goncalves, I., I. Ahnesjö, and C. Kvarnemo. 2011. The relationship between female body size and egg size in pipefishes. Journal of Fish Biology 78:1847-1854.
14. Braga Goncalves, I., K. B. Mobley, I. Ahnesjö, G. Sagebakken, A. G. Jones, and C. Kvarnemo. 2010. Reproductive compensation in broad-nosed pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biolog-ical Sciences 277:1581-1587.
15. Collet, J., D. S. Richardson, K. Worley, and T. Pizzari. 2012. Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109:8641-8645.
16. Danielsson, I. 2001. Antagonistic preand post-copulatory sexual selection on male body size in a water strider (Gerris lacustris). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268:77-81.
17. Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection. J. Murray, London.
18. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London.
19. Dawson, C. E. 1985. Indo-Pacific pipefishes. Gulf Coast Research Lab, Ocean Springs, MS.
20. Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist 119:601-610.
21. Droge-Young, E. M., M. K. Manier, S. Lupold, J. M. Belote, and S. Pitnick. 2012. Covariance among premating, post-copulatory and viability fitness components in Drosophila melanogaster and their influence on paternity measurement. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25:1555-1563.
22. Eberhard, W. G. 2009. Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:10025-10032.
23. Fabiani, A., F. Galimberti, S. Sanvito, and A. R. Hoelzel. 2004. Extreme polygyny among southern elephant seals on Sea Lion Island, Falkland Islands. Behavioral Ecology 15:961-969.
24. Fitzpatrick, S., A. Berglund, and G. Rosenqvist. 1995. Ornaments or offspring: costs to reproductive success restrict sexual selection processes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 55:251-260.
25. Hamon, T. R. 2005. Measurement of concurrent selection episodes. Evolution 59:1096-1103.
26. Hunt, J., C. J. Breuker, J. A. Sadowski, and A. J. Moore. 2009. Malemale competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22:13-26.
27. Jones, A. G., and J. C. Avise. 1997. Microsatellite analysis of maternity and the mating system in the Gulf pipefish Syngnathus scovelli, a species with male pregnancy and sex-role reversal. Molecular Ecology 6:203-213.
28. Jones, A. G., and J. C. Avise. 2001. Mating systems and sexual selection in male-pregnant pipefishes and seahorses: insights from microsatellite-based studies of maternity. Journal of Heredity 92:150-158.
29. Jones, A. G., and N. L. Ratterman. 2009. Mate choice and sexual selection: what have we learned since Darwin? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:10001-10008.
30. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 1999. The genetic mating system of a sex-role-reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle): a molecular inquiry. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 46:357-365.
31. Jones, A. G., D. Walker and J. C. Avise. 2001. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268: 2531-2535.
32. Kvarnemo, C., K. B. Mobley, C. Partridge, A. G. Jones, and I. Ahnesjo. 2011. Evidence of paternal nutrient provisioning to embryos in broad-nosed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Journal of Fish Biology 78:1725-1737.
33. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
34. Le Boeuf, B. J. 1974. Male-male competition and reproductive success in elephant seals. American Zoologist 14:163-176.
35. Mobley, K. B., C. Kvarnemo, I. Ahnesjö, C. Partridge, A. Berglund, and A. G. Jones. 2011. The effect of maternal body size on embryo survivorship in the broods of pregnant male pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:1169-1177.
36. Paczolt, K. A., and A. G. Jones. 2010. Post-copulatory sexual selection and sexual conflict in the evolution of male pregnancy. Nature 464:401-404.
37. Parker, G. A. 1970. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Biological Reviews 45:525-567.
38. Partridge, C., I. Ahnesjö, C. Kvarnemo, K. B. Mobley, A. Berglund, and A. G. Jones. 2009. The effect of perceived female parasite load on post-copulatory male choice in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:345-354.
39. Pischedda, A., and W. R. Rice. 2012. Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 109: 2049-2053.
40. Rose, E., K. A. Paczolt, and A. G. Jones. 2013. Data from: The contributions of premating and postmating selection episodes to total selection in sex-role-reversed Gulf pipefish. American Naturalist, Dryad Digital Repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bk03m.
41. Sagebakken, G., I. Ahnesjo, I. Braga Goncalves, and C. Kvarnemo. 2011. Multiply mated males show higher embryo survival in a paternally caring fish. Behavioral Ecology 22:625-629.
42. Scobell, S. K., A. M. Fudickar, and R. Knapp. 2009. Potential reproductive rate of a sex-role reversed pipefish over several bouts of mating. Animal Behavior 78:747-753.
43. Shuster, S. M. 2009. Sexual selection and mating systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106:10009-10016.
44. Silva, K., V. C. Almada, M. N. Vieira, and N. M. Monteiro. 2009. Female reproductive tactics in a sex-role reversed pipefish: scan-ning for male quality and number. Behavioral Ecology 20:768-772.
45. Thornhill, R. 1983. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. American Naturalist 122:765-788.
46. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. American Naturalist 114:742-747.
47. Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual-behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Animal Behavior 28:446-461.
48. Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:313-320.
49. Woods, C. M. C., and K. M. Martin-Smith. 2004. Visible implant fluorescent elastomer tagging of the big-bellied seahorse, Hippocampus abdominalis. Fisheries Research 66:363-371.
50. Young, M. J., L. W. Simmons, and J. P. Evans. 2010. Pre-and post-mating sexual selection both favor large males in a rainbowfish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:915-925.
51. Zeh, J. A., and D. W. Zeh. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:1711-1717.