Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 8641-8645

  Collet, Julie ^a,c   Richardson, David S ^b   Worley, Kirsty ^a,b   Pizzari, Tommaso ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cryptic female choice; Opportunity of selection; Selection gradient; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COPULATION; GALLUS GALLUS; MATING; NONHUMAN; PATERNITY; POLYANDRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION; SOCIAL STATUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CHICKENS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

GALLUS GALLUS;

EID: 84861893788     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1200219109     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Birkhead TR, Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat Rev Genet 3: 262-273. (Pubitemid 34279795)
2. Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213-1216. (Pubitemid 351929509)
3. Cornwallis CK, West SA, Davis KE, Griffin AS (2010) Promiscuity and the evolutionary transition to complex societies. Nature 466:969-972.
4. West SA (2009) Sex Allocation (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
5. Price TAR, Hodgson DJ, Lewis Z, Hurst GDD, Wedell N (2008) Selfish genetic elements promote polyandry in a fly. Science 322:1241-1243.
6. Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2003) The evolution of reproductive isolation through sexual conflict. Nature 423:979-982. (Pubitemid 36806911)
7. Michalczyk L, et al. (2011) Inbreeding promotes female promiscuity. Science 333: 1739-1742.
8. Pizzari T, Foster KR (2008) Sperm sociality: Cooperation, altruism, and spite. PLoS Biol 6:e130.
9. Spencer HG, Feldman MW, Clark AG (1998) Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 148:893-904. (Pubitemid 28087637)
10. Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: An overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:235-259.
11. Eberhard WG (2009) Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(Suppl 1):10025-10032.
12. Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, London).
13. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
14. Arnold SJ (1983) Mate Choice, ed Bateson PPG (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 67-107.
15. Kokko H, Jennions MD, Brooks R (2006) Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:43-66. (Pubitemid 44907612)
16. Webster MS, Pruett-Jones S, Westneat DF, Arnold SJ (1995) Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49:1147-1157. (Pubitemid 3025831)
17. Møller AP, Ninni P (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection: A meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:345-358. (Pubitemid 28466028)
18. Webster MS, Tarvin KA, Tuttle EM, Pruett-Jones S (2007) Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61:2205-2211. (Pubitemid 47340769)
19. Albrecht T, et al. (2009) Extra-pair fertilizations contribute to selection on secondary male ornamentation in a socially monogamous passerine. J Evol Biol 22:2020-2030.
20. Jones AG, Walker DE, Kvarnemo C, Lindström K, Avise JC (2001) How cuckoldry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: Data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 9151-9156. (Pubitemid 32743884)
21. Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating Systems and Strategies (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).
22. Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2005) Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds. Behav Ecol 16:138-144. (Pubitemid 40112954)
23. Lesobre L, et al. (2010) Absence of male reproductive skew, along with high frequency of polyandry and conspecific brood parasitism in the lekking Houbara bustard Chlamydotis undulata undulata. J Avian Biol 41:117-127.
24. Andersson M, Simmons LW (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21:296-302. (Pubitemid 43850058)
25. Jones AG (2009) On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63:1673-1684.
26. Lorch PD, Bussière L, Gwynne DT (2008) Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper the limits on Bateman slopes. Behaviour 145:1-24. (Pubitemid 350172844)
27. Sullivan MS (1991) Flock structure in red junglefowl. Appl Anim Behav Sci 30:381-386.
28. Lill A (1966) Some observations on social organisation and non-random mating in captive Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour 26:228-241.
29. Pizzari T, Froman DP, Birkhead TR (2002) Pre- and post-insemination episodes of sexual selection in the fowl, Gallus g. domesticus. Heredity (Edinb) 88:112-116. (Pubitemid 34196703)
30. Etches RJ (1996) Reproduction in Poultry (CABI International, Wallingford, UK).
31. Gwynne DT, Simmons LW (1990) Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346:172-174.
32. Jirotkul M (1999) Operational sex ratio influences female preference and male-male competition in guppies. Anim Behav 58:287-294.
33. Jones AG, Rosenqvist G, Berglund A, Arnold SJ, Avise JC (2000) The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc Biol Sci 267: 677-680. (Pubitemid 30197838)
34. Bjork A, Pitnick S (2006) Intensity of sexual selection along the anisogamy-isogamy continuum. Nature 441:742-745. (Pubitemid 43865218)
35. Lorenzi MC, Sella G (2008) A measure of sexual selection in hermaphroditic animals: Parentage skew and the opportunity for selection. J Evol Biol 21:827-833. (Pubitemid 351521541)
36. Collias NE, Collias EC (1967) A field study of the red jungle fowl in north-central India. Condor 69:360-386.
37. Bohrnstedt GW, Goldberger AS (1969) On the exact covariance of products of random variables. J Am Stat Assoc 64:1439-1442.
38. Arnold S, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38:709-719. (Pubitemid 16277744)
39. Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennions MD, Kokko H (2010) The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23:447-462.
40. Fitze PS, Le Galliard JF (2011) Inconsistency between different measures of sexual selection. Am Nat 178:256-268.
41. Krakauer AH, Webster MS, Duval EH, Jones AG, Shuster SM (2011) The opportunity for sexual selection: Not mismeasured, just misunderstood. J Evol Biol 24:2064-2071.
42. Mills SC, Grapputo A, Koskela E, Mappes T (2007) Quantitative measure of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: A comparison of selection indices. Proc Biol Sci 274:143-150. (Pubitemid 47055507)
43. Pizzari T, Birkhead TR (2000) Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature 405:787-789. (Pubitemid 30407849)
44. Dean R, Nakagawa S, Pizzari T (2011) The risk and intensity of sperm ejection in female birds. Am Nat 178:343-354.
45. Martin PA, Reimers TJ, Lodge JR, Dziuk PJ (1974) The effect of ratios and numbers of spermatozoa mixed from two males on proportions of offspring. J Reprod Fertil 39: 251-258.
46. Froman DP, Pizzari T, Feltmann AJ, Castillo-Juarez H, Birkhead TR (2002) Sperm mobility: Mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus. Proc Biol Sci 269:607-612. (Pubitemid 34303996)
47. Cornwallis CK, Birkhead TR (2007) Changes in sperm quality and numbers in response to experimental manipulation of male social status and female attractiveness. Am Nat 170:758-770. (Pubitemid 47580409)
48. Fawcett TW, Kuijper B, Weissing FJ, Pen I (2011) Sex-ratio control erodes sexual selection, revealing evolutionary feedback from adaptive plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:15925-15930.
49. Markow TA (2002) Perspective: Female remating, operational sex ratio, and the arena of sexual selection in Drosophila species. Evolution 56:1725-1734.
50. Løvlie H, Pizzari T (2007) Sex in the morning or in the evening? Females adjust daily mating patterns to the intensity of sexual harassment. Am Nat 170:E1-E13.
51. Løvlie H, Cornwallis CK, Pizzari T (2005) Male mounting alone reduces female promiscuity in the fowl. Curr Biol 15:1222-1227. (Pubitemid 40950521)
52. Cheng HH, Crittenden LB (1994) Microsatellite markers for genetic mapping in the chicken. Poult Sci 73:539-546.
53. Gibbs M, et al. (1997) Chicken microsatellite markers isolated from libraries enriched for simple tandem repeats. Anim Genet 28:401-417. (Pubitemid 28209329)
54. Dawson D, McConnell S, Wardle A, Gibbs M, Burke T (1998) Characterization and mapping of 15 novel chicken microsatellite loci. Anim Genet 29:159-160. (Pubitemid 28336018)
55. McConnell SKJ, Dawson DA, Wardle A, Burke T (1999) The isolation and mapping of 19 tetranucleotide microsatellite markers in the chicken. Anim Genet 30:183-189. (Pubitemid 29355057)
56. Crooijmans RPMA, van Oers PAM, Strijk JA, van der Poel JJ, Groenen MA (1996) Preliminary linkage map of the chicken (Gallus domesticus) genome based on microsatellite markers: 77 new markers mapped. Poult Sci 75:746-754. (Pubitemid 126467525)
57. Crooijmans RPMA, Dijkhof RJM, van der Poel JJ, Groenen MAM (1997) New microsatellite markers in chicken optimized for automated fluorescent genotyping. Anim Genet 28:427-437. (Pubitemid 28209331)
58. Worley K, et al. (2010) MHC heterozygosity and survival in red junglefowl. Mol Ecol 19:3064-3075.
59. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood- based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639-655. (Pubitemid 28235973)
60. Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities - a common mistake. Auk 104:116-121.
61. Crow JF (1958) Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol 30:1-13.
62. Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am Nat 114: 742-764.
63. Arnold SJ, Duvall D (1994) Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am Nat 143:317-348.
64. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
65. Crawley MJ (2007) The R Book (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).