On the opportunity for sexual selection, the bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection

Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1673-1684

  Jones, Adam G ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Mating differential; Mating success; Polyandry; Polygyny; Reproductive success; Selection differential

Indexed keywords

COPULATION; FLY; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; POLYANDRY; POLYGYNY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; SALAMANDER;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SALAMANDRIDAE;

EID: 67649422352     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00664.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Andersson, M., and Y. Iwasa. 1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11 : 53 58.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1986. Limits on stabilizing, disruptive, and correlational selection set by the opportunity for selection. Am. Nat. 128 : 143 146.
4. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection - -theory. Evolution 38 : 709 719. (Pubitemid 16277744)
5. Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection - applications. Evolution 38 : 720 734. (Pubitemid 16277745)
6. Arnold, S. J., and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143 : 317 348.
7. Avise, J. C., A. G. Jones, D. Walker, J. A. DeWoody, and Collaborators. 2002. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36 : 19 45. (Pubitemid 36109182)
8. Becher, S. A., and A. E. Magurran. 2004. Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271 : 1009 1014. (Pubitemid 38657396)
9. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 : 349 368.
10. Bro-Jørgensen, J. 2007. The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution 61 : 1316 1326. (Pubitemid 46848824)
11. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78 : 575 595. (Pubitemid 41200912)
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1983. Selection in relation to sex. Pp. 457 481 in D. S. Bendall, ed. Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
13. Clutton-Brock, T. H., P. H. Harvey, and B. Rudder. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269 : 797 800. (Pubitemid 8208823)
14. Clutton-Brock, T. H., S. D. Albon, and P. H. Harvey. 1980. Antlers, body size and breeding group size in the Cervidae. Nature 285 : 565 566.
15. Coltman, D. W., D. R. Bancroft, J. A. Smith, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and J. M. Pemberton. 1999. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol. Ecol. 8 : 1199 1209. (Pubitemid 29373272)
16. Crow, J. F. 1958. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Human Biol. 30 : 1 13.
17. Crow, J. F. 2002. Perspective: here's to Fisher, additive genetic variance, and the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Evolution 56 : 1313 1316. (Pubitemid 34881585)
18. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London.
19. Dewsbury, D. A. 2005. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 831 837. (Pubitemid 43098215)
20. Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197 : 215 223. (Pubitemid 8130430)
21. Fairbairn, D. J., and A. E. Wilby. 2001. Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3 : 667 686. (Pubitemid 33631418)
22. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Harlow, UK.
23. Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford.
24. Grafen, A. 1987. Measuring sexual selection: why bother? Pp. 221 233 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester.
25. Grafen, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. Pp. 454 471 in T. H. Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
26. Hersch, E. I., and P. C. Phillips. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58 : 479 485. (Pubitemid 38449123)
27. Hubbell, S. P., and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130 : 91 112. (Pubitemid 18289174)
28. Hughes, C. 1998. Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79 : 383 399. (Pubitemid 28378719)
29. Janzen, F. J., and E. D. Brodie. 1989. Tall tails and sexy males - sexual behavior of rough-skinned newts (Taricha granulosa) in a natural breeding pond. Copeia 1989 : 1068 1071.
30. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 75 : 21 64.
31. Johnsen, A., J. T. Lifjeld, A. Andersson, J. Örnborg, and T. Amundsen. 2001. Male characteristics and fertilisation success in bluethroats. Behaviour 138 : 1371 1390. (Pubitemid 33590060)
32. Jones, A. G., and W. R. Ardren. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12 : 2511 2523. (Pubitemid 37195892)
33. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, S. J. Arnold, and J. C. Avise. 2000. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267 : 677 680. (Pubitemid 30197838)
34. Jones, A. G., D. Walker, and J. C. Avise. 2001. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268 : 2531 2535. (Pubitemid 34107129)
35. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of mating patterns and sexual selection in newts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269 : 2533 2539. (Pubitemid 36071833)
36. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 164 : 444 456. (Pubitemid 39385105)
37. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: an experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 874 884. (Pubitemid 43098219)
38. Koenig, W. D., and S. S. Albano. 1986. On the measurement of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 127 : 403 409.
39. Kokko, H., A. Mackenzie, J. D. Reynolds, J. Lindstrom, and W. J. Sutherland. 1999. Measures of inequality are not equal. Am. Nat. 72 : 358 382. (Pubitemid 29530789)
40. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33 : 402 416.
41. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37 : 1210 1226.
42. Lorch, P. D. 2002. Understanding reversals in the relative strength of sexual selection on males and females: a role for sperm competition? Am. Nat. 159 : 645 657. (Pubitemid 34598380)
43. Lorch, P. D. 2005. Using upper limits of "Bateman gradients" to estimate the opportunity for sexual selection. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 924 930. (Pubitemid 43098224)
44. Lorch, P. D., L. F. Bussiere, and D. T. Gwynne. 2008. Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 145 : 1 24. (Pubitemid 350172844)
45. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
46. Mills, S. C., A. Grapputo, E. Koskela, and T. Mappes. 2007. Quantitative measures of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274 : 143 150. (Pubitemid 47055507)
47. Møller, A. P. 1997. Immune defence, extra-pair paternity, and sexual selection in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264 : 561 566.
48. δ, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Res. Pop. Ecol. 4 : 1 7.
49. Nonacs, P. 2000. Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am. Nat. 156 : 577 589. (Pubitemid 32013274)
50. Parker, P. G., and Z. Tang-Martinez. 2005. Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: a cautionary tale. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 895 902. (Pubitemid 43098221)
51. Payne, R. B. 1984. Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 33 : 1 53.
52. Pemberton, J. M., S. D. Albon, F. E. Guinness, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and G. A. Glover. 1992. Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav. Ecol. 3 : 66 75. (Pubitemid 23398883)
53. Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227 : 520 521.
54. Rios-Cardenas, O. 2005. Patterns of parental investment and sexual selection in teleost fishes: do they support Bateman's principles? Integr. Comp. Biol. 45 : 885 894. (Pubitemid 43098220)
55. Robertson, A. 1966. A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 8 : 93 108.
56. Rosenthal, G. G., and C. S. Evans. 1998. Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 4431 4436. (Pubitemid 28207929)
57. Ruzzante, D., D. C. Hamilton, D. L. Kramer, and J. W. A. Grant. 1996. Scaling of the variance and the quantification of resource monopolization. Behav. Ecol. 7 : 199 207.
58. Say, L., F. Naulty, and T. J. Heyden. 2003. Genetic and behavioural estimates of reproductive skew in male fallow deer. Mol. Ecol. 12 : 2793 2800. (Pubitemid 37195914)
59. Sheldon, B. C., and H. Ellegren. 1998. Paternal effort related to experimentally manipulated paternity of male collared flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 : 1737 1742. (Pubitemid 28451345)
60. Sheldon, B. C., and H. Ellegren. 1999. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 57 : 285 298. (Pubitemid 29096767)
61. Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
62. Sutherland, W. J. 1985a. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33 : 1349 1352.
63. Sutherland, W. J. 1985b. Measures of sexual selection. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1 : 90 101.
64. Sutherland, W. J. 1987. Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. Pp. 209 219 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester.
65. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 136 179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Heinemann, London.
66. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114 : 742 747.
67. Wade, M. J. 1987. Measuring sexual selection. Pp. 197 207 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester.
68. Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28 : 446 461.
69. Wade, M. J., and S. M. Shuster. 2004. Sexual selection: Harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. Am. Nat. 164 : E83 E89.
70. Webster, M. S., K. A. Tarvin, E. M. Tuttle, and S. Pruett-Jones. 2007. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61 : 2205 2211. (Pubitemid 47340769)