Partitioning sexual selection into its mating success and fertilization success components

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2049-2053

  Pischedda, Alison ^a   Rice, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Male fitness; Mate choice; Variance components

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL SEPARATION; COPULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; LABORATORY; LIFE CYCLE; LIFESPAN; MALE; MATING SUCCESS; MEASUREMENT; MUTATION; NONHUMAN; PARITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REARING; SEXUAL SELECTION; TIME;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; MALE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 84857131725     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1110841109     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Darwin C (1871) The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (Murray, London).
2. Andersson M (1994) Sexual Selection (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ).
3. Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 45:525-567.
4. Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765-788.
5. Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems (Harvard Univ Press, Boston).
6. Eberhard WG (1996) Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ).
7. Smith RL (1984) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (Academic, New York).
8. Birkhead TR, Møller AP, eds (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic, New York).
9. Simmons LW (2001) Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ).
10. Birkhead TR, Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nat Rev Genet 3:262-273. (Pubitemid 34279795)
11. Birkhead TR (2010) How stupid not to have thought of that: Post copulatory sexual selection. J Zool (Lond) 281:78-93.
12. Eberhard WG (2009) Postcopulatory sexual selection: Darwin's omission and its consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(Suppl 1):10025-10032.
13. Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2:349-368.
14. Greenacre ML, Ritchie MG, Byrne BC, Kyriacou CP (1993) Female song preference and the period gene in Drosophila. Behav Genet 23:85-90. (Pubitemid 23096935)
15. Iliadi K, et al. (2001) Sexual and reproductive behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster from a microclimatically interslope differentiated population of 'Evolution Canyon'(Mount Carmel, Israel). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:2365-2374. (Pubitemid 33096102)
16. Markow TA (1988) Reproductive behavior of Drosophila melanogaster and D. nigrospiracula in the field and in the laboratory. J Comp Psychol 102:169-173.
17. Markow TA, Quaid M, Kerr S (1978) Male mating experience and competitive courtship success in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 276:821-822. (Pubitemid 9061988)
18. Clark AG, Begun DJ, Prout T (1999) Female x male interactions in Drosophila sperm competition. Science 283:217-220.
19. Gromko MH, Pyle DW (1978) Sperm competition, male fitness, and repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 32:588-593.
20. Harshman LG, Clark AG (1998) Inference of sperm competition from broods of fieldcaught Drosophila. Evolution 52:1334-1341. (Pubitemid 28537244)
21. Price CSC, Dyer KA, Coyne JA (1999) Sperm competition between Drosophila males involves both displacement and incapacitation. Nature 400:449-452. (Pubitemid 29361797)
22. Miller GT, Pitnick S (2002) Sperm-female coevolution in Drosophila. Science 298:1230-1233. (Pubitemid 35285489)
23. Manier MK, et al. (2010) Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster. Science 328:354-357.
24. Rice WR, et al. (2005) Inter-locus antagonistic coevolution as an engine of speciation: Assessment with hemiclonal analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(Suppl 1):6527-6534. (Pubitemid 40628300)
25. Kuijper B, Morrow EH (2009) Direct observation of female mating frequency using time-lapse photography. Fly (Austin) 3:118-120.
26. Orteiza N, Linder JE, Rice WR (2005) Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J Evol Biol 18:1315-1323. (Pubitemid 41725681)
27. Imhof M, Harr B, Brem G, Schlötterer C (1998) Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol 7:915-917. (Pubitemid 28348681)
28. Pischedda AMK (2010) Sexual selection and sexual conflict in a Drosophila melanogaster model system. PhD dissertation (Univ of California, Santa Barbara).
29. Snow AA, Spira TP (1991) Pollen vigour and the potential for sexual selection in plants. Nature 352:796-797. (Pubitemid 21912431)
30. Delph LF, Havens K (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, eds Birkhead TR, Møller AP (Academic, New York), pp 149-166.
31. Hosken DJ, House CM (2011) Sexual selection. Curr Biol 21:R62-R65.
32. Boorman E, Parker GA (1976) Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age and mating status. Ecol Entomol 1:145-155.
33. Morrow EH, Stewart AD, Rice WR (2005) Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:2608-2615. (Pubitemid 43069942)
34. Long TAF, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR (2009) A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females. PLoS Biol 7:e1000254.
35. Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Little MK, Rice WR (2011) Male genotype influences female reproductive investment in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B: Biol Sci 278:2165-2172.
36. Chapman T, et al. (2003) The sex peptide of Drosophila melanogaster: Female postmating responses analyzed by using RNA interference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9923-9928. (Pubitemid 37087044)
37. Service PM, Rose MR (1985) Genetic covariation among life-history components: The effect of novel environments. Evolution 39:943-945.
38. Brittain JE (1982) Biology of mayflies. Annu Rev Entomol 27:119-147.
39. Moritz RFA, et al. (1995) High degree of polyandry in Apis dorsata queens detected by DNA microsatellite variability. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:357-363.
40. Quinn TP (2005) The Behavior and Ecology of Pacific Salmon and Trout (Univ of Washington Press, Seattle, WA).
41. Braithwaite RW, Lee AK (1979) A mammalian example of semelparity. Am Nat 113:151-155.
42. Kraaijeveld-Smit F, Ward S, Temple-Smith P (2002) Multiple paternity in a field population of a small carnivorous marsupial, the agile antechinus, Antechinus agilis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:84-91. (Pubitemid 36064098)
43. Lazenby-Cohen KA, Cockburn A (1988) Lek promiscuity in a semelparous mammal, Antechinus stuartii (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:195-202.
44. De Steven D (1980) Clutch size, breeding success, and parental survival in the tree swallow (Iridoprocne bicolor). Evolution 34:278-291.
45. Lifjeld JT, Dunn PO, Robertson RJ, Boag PT (1993) Extra-pair paternity in monogamous tree swallows. Anim Behav 45:213-229. (Pubitemid 23402738)
46. Odum EP (1941) Annual cycle of the black-capped chickadee: 1. Auk 58:314-333.
47. Smith SM (1988) Extra-pair copulations in black-capped chickadees: The role of the female. Behaviour 107:15-23.
48. LaMunyon CW, Eisner T (1993) Postcopulatory sexual selection in an arctiid moth (Utetheisa ornatrix). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4689-4692. (Pubitemid 23148971)