Prion aggregate structure in yeast cells is determined by the Hsp104-Hsp110 disaggregase machinery

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 211, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 145-158

  O'Driscoll, Jonathan ^a,b   Clare, Daniel ^a,c   Saibil, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b Adaptimmune Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c DIAMOND LIGHT SOURCE LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 104; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 110; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN; HSP104 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; PRION; PROTEIN AGGREGATE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SSE1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; YEAST; YEAST CELL; ENZYMOLOGY; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP110 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; PRIONS; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84980350807     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201505104     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Abrams, J.L., J. Verghese, P.A. Gibney, and K.A. Morano. 2014. Hierarchical functional specificity of cytosolic heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) nucleotide exchange factors in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 289:13155-13167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.530014
2. Aguzzi, A., and L. Rajendran. 2009. The transcellular spread of cytosolic amyloids, prions, and prionoids. Neuron. 64:783-790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.016
3. Al-Amoudi, A., J.J. Chang, A. Leforestier, A. McDowall, L.M. Salamin, L.P. Norlén, K. Richter, N.S. Blanc, D. Studer, and J. Dubochet. 2004a. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections. EMBO J. 23:3583-3588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600366
4. Al-Amoudi, A., L.P. Norlén, and J. Dubochet. 2004b. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitreous sections of native biological cells and tissues. J. Struct. Biol. 148:131-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jjsb.2004.03.010
5. Allen, K.D., R.D. Wegrzyn, T.A. Chernova, S. Müller, G.P. Newnam, P.A. Winslett, K.B. Wittich, K.D. Wilkinson, and Y.O. Chernoff. 2005. Hsp70 chaperones as modulators of prion life cycle: novel effects of Ssa and Ssb on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion [PSI+]. Genetics. 169:1227-1242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.037168
6. +] aggregates with heterogeneous protein composition. Mol. Biol. Cell. 19:2433-2443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0078
7. Balch, W.E., R.I. Morimoto, A. Dillin, and J.W. Kelly. 2008. Adapting proteostasis for disease intervention. Science. 319:916-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1141448
8. Baudin, A., O. Ozier-Kalogeropoulos, A. Denouel, F. Lacroute, and C. Cullin. 1993. A simple and efficient method for direct gene deletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3329-3330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.14.3329
9. Baxa, U., P.W. Keller, N. Cheng, J.S. Wall, and A.C. Steven. 2011. In Sup35p filaments (the [PSI+] prion), the globular C-terminal domains are widely offset from the amyloid fibril backbone. Mol. Microbiol. 79:523-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07466.x
10. Carrell, R.W., and D.A. Lomas. 1997. Conformational disease. Lancet. 350:134-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02073-4
11. Chernoff, Y.O., S.G. Inge-Vechtomov, I.L. Derkach, M.V. Ptyushkina, O.V. Tarunina, A.R. Dagkesamanskaya, and M.D. Ter-Avanesyan. 1992. Dosage-dependent translational suppression in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 8:489-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320080702
12. Chernoff, Y.O., I.L. Derkach, and S.G. Inge-Vechtomov. 1993. Multicopy SUP35 gene induces de-novo appearance of psi-like factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 24:268-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00351802
13. Chernoff, Y.O., S.L. Lindquist, B. Ono, S.G. Inge-Vechtomov, and S.W. Liebman. 1995. Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+]. Science. 268:880-884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7754373
14. Chernova, T.A., K.D. Wilkinson, and Y.O. Chernoff. 2014. Physiological and environmental control of yeast prions. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 38:326-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1574-6976.12053
15. Crow, E.T., and L. Li. 2011. Newly identified prions in budding yeast, and their possible functions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22:452-459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.03.003
16. Dobson, C.M. 2003. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature. 426:884-890. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02261
17. Duennwald, M.L., A. Echeverria, and J. Shorter. 2012. Small heat shock proteins potentiate amyloid dissolution by protein disaggregases from yeast and humans. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001346
18. Escusa-Toret, S., W.I. Vonk, and J. Frydman. 2013. Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness during stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 15:1231-1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2838
19. Fan, Q., K.W. Park, Z. Du, K.A. Morano, and L. Li. 2007. The role of Sse1 in the de novo formation and variant determination of the [PSI+] prion. Genetics. 177:1583-1593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.077982
20. Fandrich, M. 2007. On the structural definition of amyloid fibrils and other polypeptide aggregates. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64:2066-2078. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7110-2
21. +] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation. Mol. Microbiol. 40:1357-1369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02478.x
22. Glover, J.R., A.S. Kowal, E.C. Schirmer, M.M. Patino, J.J. Liu, and S. Lindquist. 1997. Self-seeded fibers formed by Sup35, the protein determinant of [PSI+], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell. 89:811-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80264-0
23. Gong, H., N.V. Romanova, K.D. Allen, P. Chandramowlishwaran, K. Gokhale, G. P. Newnam, P. Mieczkowski, M.Y. Sherman, and Y.O. Chernoff. 2012. Polyglutamine toxicity is controlled by prion composition and gene dosage in yeast. PLoS Genet. 8:e1002634. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002634
24. Halfmann, R., and S. Lindquist. 2008. Screening for amyloid aggregation by semi-denaturing detergent-agarose gel electrophoresis. J. Vis. Exp. 17:838. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/838
25. Hartl, F.U., A. Bracher, and M. Hayer-Hartl. 2011. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 475:324-332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10317
26. Hawes, P., C.L. Netherton, M. Mueller, T. Wileman, and P. Monaghan. 2007. Rapid freeze-substitution preserves membranes in high-pressure frozen tissue culture cells. J. Microsc. 226:182-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01767.x
27. +]. Prion. 6:234-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/pri.19913
28. Higurashi, T., J.K. Hines, C. Sahi, R. Aron, and E.A. Craig. 2008. Specificity of the J-protein Sis1 in the propagation of 3 yeast prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:16596-16601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808934105
29. +] as a cellular stress. Genetics. 156:559-570.
30. Kaganovich, D., R. Kopito, and J. Frydman. 2008. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature. 454:1088-1095. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07195
31. Kampinga, H.H., and E.A. Craig. 2010. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:579-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2941
32. Kawai-Noma, S., C.G. Pack, T. Tsuji, M. Kinjo, and H. Taguchi. 2009. Single mother-daughter pair analysis to clarify the diffusion properties of yeast prion Sup35 in guanidine-HCl-treated [PST] cells. Genes Cells. 14:1045-1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01333.x
33. Kawai-Noma, S., C.G. Pack, T. Kojidani, H. Asakawa, Y. Hiraoka, M. Kinjo, T. Haraguchi, H. Taguchi, and A. Hirata. 2010. In vivo evidence for the fibrillar structures of Sup35 prions in yeast cells. J. Cell Biol. 190:223-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002149
34. King, C.Y., P. Tittmann, H. Gross, R. Gebert, M. Aebi, and K. Wuthrich. 1997. Prion-inducing domain 2-114 of yeast Sup35 protein transforms in vitro into amyloid-like filaments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:6618-6622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.13.6618
35. Kremer, J.R., D.N. Mastronarde, and J.R. McIntosh. 1996. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J. Struct. Biol. 116:71-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1996.0013
36. Kryndushkin, D., and R.B. Wickner. 2007. Nucleotide exchange factors for Hsp70s are required for [URE3] prion propagation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:2149-2154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0128
37. +] prion aggregates are formed by small Sup35 polymers fragmented by Hsp104. J. Biol. Chem. 278:49636-49643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307996200
38. Krzewska, J., and R. Melki. 2006. Molecular chaperones and the assembly of the prion Sup35p, an in vitro study. EMBO J. 25:822-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600985
39. Kukulski, W., M. Schorb, S. Welsch, A. Picco, M. Kaksonen, and J.A. Briggs. 2011. Correlated fluorescence and 3D electron microscopy with high sensitivity and spatial precision. J. Cell Biol. 192:111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201009037
40. Liebman, S.W., and Y.O. Chernoff. 2012. Prions in yeast. Genetics. 191:1041-1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.137760
41. +] prion: making sense of nonsense. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1181-1184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.3.1181
42. Mastronarde, D.N. 1997. Dual-axis tomography: an approach with alignment methods that preserve resolution. J. Struct. Biol. 120:343-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1997.3919
43. Mastronarde, D.N. 2005. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152:36-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007
44. Miller, S.B., C.T. Ho, J. Winkler, M. Khokhrina, A. Neuner, M.Y. Mohamed, D.L. Guilbride, K. Richter, M. Lisby, E. Schiebel, et al. 2015a. Compartment-specific aggregases direct distinct nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregate deposition. EMBO J. 34:778-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201489524
45. Miller, S.B., A. Mogk, and B. Bukau. 2015b. Spatially organized aggregation of misfolded proteins as cellular stress defense strategy. J. Mol. Biol. 427:1564-1574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.006
46. Misselwitz, B., O. Staeck, and T.A. Rapoport. 1998. J proteins catalytically activate Hsp70 molecules to trap a wide range of peptide sequences. Mol. Cell. 2:593-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80158-6
47. Moosavi, B., J. Wongwigkarn, and M.F. Tuite. 2010. Hsp70/Hsp90 co-chaperones are required for efficient Hsp104-mediated elimination of the yeast [PSI(+)] prion but not for prion propagation. Yeast. 27:167-179. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1742
48. Moran, C., G.K. Kinsella, Z.R. Zhang, S. Perrett, and G.W. Jones. 2013. Mutational analysis of Sse1 (Hsp110) suggests an integral role for this chaperone in yeast prion propagation in vivo. G3 (Bethesda). 3:1409-1418. http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.113.007112
49. Mukai, H., T. Kuno, H. Tanaka, D. Hirata, T. Miyakawa, and C. Tanaka. 1993. Isolation and characterization of SSE1 and SSE2, new members of the yeast HSP70 multigene family. Gene. 132:57-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(93)90514-4
50. Mumberg, D., R. Müller, and M. Funk. 1995. Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene. 156:119-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(95)00037-7
51. +] by causing dissolution of the prion seeds. Eukaryot. Cell. 13:635-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.00300-13
52. Paushkin, S.V., V.V. Kushnirov, V.N. Smirnov, and M.D. Ter-Avanesyan. 1997. In vitro propagation of the prion-like state of yeast Sup35 protein. Science. 277:381-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5324.381
53. Rampelt, H., J. Kirstein-Miles, N.B. Nillegoda, K. Chi, S.R. Scholz, R.I. Morimoto, and B. Bukau. 2012. Metazoan Hsp70 machines use Hsp110 to power protein disaggregation. EMBO J. 31:4221-4235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.264
54. Rapsomaniki, M.A., P. Kotsantis, I.E. Symeonidou, N.N. Giakoumakis, S. Taraviras, and Z. Lygerou. 2012. easyFRAP: an interactive, easy-to-use tool for qualitative and quantitative analysis of FRAP data. Bioinformatics. 28:1800-1801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts241
55. Sadlish, H, H Rampelt, J Shorter, RD Wegrzyn, C Andréasson, S Lindquist, and B Bukau 2008. Hsp110 chaperones regulate prion formation and propagation in S. cerevisiae by two discrete activities. PLoS ONE. 3:e1763. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001763
56. Saibil, H.R., A. Seybert, A. Habermann, J. Winkler, M. Eltsov, M. Perkovic, D. Castaño-Diez, M.P. Scheffer, U. Haselmann, P. Chlanda, et al. 2012. Heritable yeast prions have a highly organized three-dimensional architecture with interfiber structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:14906-14911. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211976109
57. Satpute-Krishnan, P., and T.R. Serio. 2005. Prion protein remodelling confers an immediate phenotypic switch. Nature. 437:262-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03981
58. Schindelin, J., I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, et al. 2012. Fiji: an opensource platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9:676-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019
59. + and its determinant, Sup35p. Methods Enzymol. 309:649-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)09043-6
60. Shaner, N.C., R.E. Campbell, P.A. Steinbach, B.N. Giepmans, A.E. Palmer, and R.Y. Tsien. 2004. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:1567-1572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt1037
61. Sharma, D., and D.C. Masison. 2008. Functionally redundant isoforms of a yeast Hsp70 chaperone subfamily have different antiprion effects. Genetics. 179:1301-1311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.089458
62. Sharma, D., C.N. Martineau, M.T. Le Dall, M. Reidy, D.C. Masison, and M. Kabani. 2009. Function of SSA subfamily of Hsp70 within and across species varies widely in complementing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell growth and prion propagation. PLoS ONE. 4:e6644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006644
63. Shorter, J. 2011. The mammalian disaggregase machinery: Hsp110 synergizes with Hsp70 and Hsp40 to catalyze protein disaggregation and reactivation in a cell-free system. PLoS ONE. 6:e26319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026319
64. Song, Y., YX. Wu, G. Jung, Y Tutar, E. Eisenberg, L.E. Greene, and D. C. Masison. 2005. Role for Hsp70 chaperone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion seed replication. Eukaryot. Cell. 4:289-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/EC.4.2.289-297.2005
65. Song, Y., M. Nagy, W. Ni, N.K. Tyagi, W.A. Fenton, F. López-Giráldez, J.D. Overton, A.L. Horwich, and S.T. Brady. 2013. Molecular chaperone Hsp110 rescues a vesicle transport defect produced by an ALS-associated mutant SOD1 protein in squid axoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110:5428-5433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1303279110
66. Sontag, E.M., W.I. Vonk, and J. Frydman. 2014. Sorting out the trash: the spatial nature of eukaryotic protein quality control. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 26:139-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2013.12.006
67. Soto, C., and L.D. Estrada. 2008. Protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Arch. Neurol. 65:184-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2007.56
68. Tessarz, P., A. Mogk, and B. Bukau. 2008. Substrate threading through the central pore of the Hsp104 chaperone as a common mechanism for protein disaggregation and prion propagation. Mol. Microbiol. 68:87-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06135.x
69. Tipton, K.A., K.J. Verges, and J.S. Weissman. 2008. In vivo monitoring of the prion replication cycle reveals a critical role for Sis1 in delivering substrates to Hsp104. Mol. Cell. 32:584-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.003
70. Torrente, M.P., and J. Shorter. 2013. The metazoan protein disaggregase and amyloid depolymerase system: Hsp110, Hsp70, Hsp40, and small heat shock proteins. Prion. 7:457-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/pri.27531
71. Trott, A., L. Shaner, and K.A. Morano. 2005. The molecular chaperone Sse1 and the growth control protein kinase Sch9 collaborate to regulate protein kinase A activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 170:1009-1021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.043109
72. +] prion of yeast: a problem of inheritance. Methods. 39:9-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016Zj.ymeth.2006.04.001
73. Tuite, M.F., R. Marchante, and V. Kushnirov. 2011. Fungal prions: structure, function and propagation. Top. Curr. Chem. 305:257-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/128_2011_172
74. +] aggregation allow insights into cellular organization of yeast prion aggregates. Prion. 6:191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/pri.18986
75. Tyedmers, J., S. Treusch, J. Dong, J.M. McCaffery, B. Bevis, and S. Lindquist. 2010. Prion induction involves an ancient system for the sequestration of aggregated proteins and heritable changes in prion fragmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:8633-8638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003895107
76. van Driel, L.F., J.A. Valentijn, K.M. Valentijn, R.I. Koning, and A.J. Koster. 2009. Tools for correlative cryo-fluorescence microscopy and cryo-electron tomography applied to whole mitochondria in human endothelial cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 88:669-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2009.07.002
77. Venable, J.H., and R. Coggeshall. 1965. A simplified lead citrate stain for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 25:407-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.25.2.407
78. Vishveshwara, N., M.E. Bradley, and S.W. Liebman. 2009. Sequestration of essential proteins causes prion associated toxicity in yeast. Mol. Microbiol. 73:1101-1114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06836.x
79. Wach, A., A. Brachat, R. Pöhlmann, and P. Philippsen. 1994. New heterologous modules for classical or PCR-based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 10:1793-1808. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.320101310
80. Wach, A., A. Brachat, C. Alberti-Segui, C. Rebischung, and P. Philippsen. 1997. Heterologous HIS3 marker and GFP reporter modules for PCR-targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 13:1065-1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19970915)13:11<1065::AID-YEA159>3.0.C0;2-K
81. Wang, Y., A.B. Meriin, N. Zaarur, N.V. Romanova, Y.O. Chernoff, C.E. Costello, and M.Y. Sherman. 2008. Abnormal proteins can form aggresome in yeast: aggresome-targeting signals and components of the machinery. FASEBJ. 23:451-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fj.08-117614
82. Wegrzyn, R.D., K. Bapat, G.P. Newnam, A.D. Zink, and Y.O. Chernoff. 2001. Mechanism of prion loss after Hsp104 inactivation in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4656-4669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.14.4656-4669.2001
83. Weisberg, S.J., R. Lyakhovetsky, A.C. Werdiger, A.D. Gitler, Y. Soen, and D. Kaganovich. 2012. Compartmentalization of superoxide dismutase 1 (S0D1G93A) aggregates determines their toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109:15811-15816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205829109
84. Winkler, J., J. Tyedmers, B. Bukau, and A. Mogk. 2012a. Chaperone networks in protein disaggregation and prion propagation. J. Struct. Biol. 179:152-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2012.05.002
85. Winkler, J., J. Tyedmers, B. Bukau, and A. Mogk. 2012b. Hsp70 targets Hsp100 chaperones to substrates for protein disaggregation and prion fragmentation. J. Cell Biol. 198:387-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201201074
86. Wolff, S., J.S. Weissman, and A. Dillin. 2014. Differential scales of protein quality control. Cell. 157:52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.007
87. Yang, Z., J.Y. Hong, I.L. Derkatch, and S.W. Liebman. 2013. Heterologous Gln/Asn-rich proteins impede the propagation of yeast prions by altering chaperone availability. PLoS Genet. 9:e1003236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003236