Patterns of [PSI+] aggregation allow insights into cellular organization of yeast prion aggregates

Prion

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 191-200

  Tyedmers, Jens ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

PSI+ ; Aggregate organization; Hsp104; IPOD (insoluble protein deposit); Mature prion; Prion fiber severing; Prion induction; Propagon

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; AMYLOID; MONOMER; PROTEIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; CELL AGGREGATION; CYTOPLASM; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; HOMEOSTASIS; IN VITRO STUDY; LIFE CYCLE; MICROSCOPY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PODOSPORA ANSERINA; PRION; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

PRIONS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84863665504     PISSN: 19336896     EISSN: 1933690X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/pri.18986     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Wickner RB. [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1994; 264:566-9; PMID:7909170; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7909170.
2. Prusiner SB. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 1982; 216:136-44; PMID:6801762; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 6801762.
3. Alberti S, Halfmann R, King O, Kapila A, Lindquist S. A systematic survey identifies prions and illuminates sequence features of prionogenic proteins. Cell 2009; 137:146-58; PMID:19345193; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.02. 044.
4. Halfmann R, Alberti S, Lindquist S. Prions, protein homeostasis and phenotypic diversity. Trends Cell Biol 2010; 20:125-33; PMID:20071174; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.12.003.
5. Tuite MF, Serio TR. The prion hypothesis: from biological anomaly to basic regulatory mechanism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:823-33; PMID:21081963; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3007.
6. Crow ET, Li L. Newly identified prions in budding yeast, and their possible functions. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2011; 22:452-9; PMID:21397710; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.03.003.
7. +] are diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:10575-80; PMID:16024723; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504882102.
8. True HL, Lindquist SL. A yeast prion provides a mechanism for genetic variation and phenotypic diversity. Nature 2000; 407:477-83; PMID:11028992; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/35035005.
9. True HL, Berlin I, Lindquist SL. Epigenetic regulation of translation reveals hidden genetic variation to produce complex traits. Nature 2004; 431:184- 7; PMID:15311209; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature02885.
10. +]. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1069- 75; PMID:19160487; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1766.
11. Harrison LB, Yu Z, Stajich JE, Dietrich FS, Harrison PM. Evolution of budding yeast prion-determinant sequences across diverse fungi. J Mol Biol 2007; 368:273-82; PMID:17320905; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jmb.2007.01.070.
12. Tuite MF, Mundy CR, Cox BS. Agents that cause a high frequency of genetic change from [psi+] to [psi-] in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1981; 98:691-711; PMID:7037537.
13. Eaglestone SS, Cox BS, Tuite MF. Translation termination efficiency can be regulated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by environmental stress through a prion-mediated mechanism. EMBO J 1999; 18:1974- 81; PMID:10202160; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ emboj/18.7.1974.
14. Tyedmers J, Madariaga ML, Lindquist S. Prion switching in response to environmental stress. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:294; PMID:19067491; http://dx.doi. org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060294.
15. +] prion in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:6394- 9; PMID:20308573; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1000347107.
16. +]. Evolution 2003; 57:1498-512; PMID:12940355.
17. +] system. Genetics 2010; 184:393- 400; PMID:19917766; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/ genetics.109.110213.
18. Halfmann R, Lindquist S. Epigenetics in the extreme: prions and the inheritance of environmentally acquired traits. Science 2010; 330:629-32; PMID:21030648; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1191081.
19. Derkatch IL, Liebman SW. Prion-prion interactions. Prion 2007; 1:161-9; PMID:19164893; http://dx.doi. org/10.4161/pri.1.3.4837.
20. Tuite MF, Marchante R, Kushnirov V. Fungal prions: structure, function and propagation. Top Curr Chem 2011; 305:257-98; PMID:21717344; http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/128-2011-172.
21. Derkatch IL, Chernoff YO, Kushnirov VV, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Liebman SW. Genesis and variability of [PSI] prion factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1996; 144:1375-86; PMID:8978027.
22. Kochneva-Pervukhova NV, Chechenova MB, Valouev IA, Kushnirov VV, Smirnov VN, Ter-Avanesyan MD. [Psi(+)] prion generation in yeast: characterization of the 'strain' difference. Yeast 2001; 18:489-97; PMID:11284005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.700.
23. Schlumpberger M, Prusiner SB, Herskowitz I. Induction of distinct [URE3] yeast prion strains. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:7035-46; PMID:11564886; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.20.7035-46.2001.
24. Bradley ME, Edskes HK, Hong JY, Wickner RB, Liebman SW. Interactions among prions and prion "strains" in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:16392-9; PMID:12149514; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.152330699.
25. King CY, Diaz-Avalos R. Protein-only transmission of three yeast prion strains. Nature 2004; 428:319- 23; PMID:15029195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature02391.
26. Tanaka M, Chien P, Naber N, Cooke R, Weissman JS. Conformational variations in an infectious protein determine prion strain differences. Nature 2004; 428:323-8; PMID:15029196; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature02392.
27. Krishnan R, Lindquist SL. Structural insights into a yeast prion illuminate nucleation and strain diversity. Nature 2005; 435:765-72; PMID:15944694; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03679.
28. +] prion reveals stability of amyloid fibers as the key determinant of yeast prion variant propagation. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:20748-55; PMID:20442412; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M110.115303.
29. Uptain SM, Sawicki GJ, Caughey B, Lindquist S. Strains of [PSI(+)] are distinguished by their efficiencies of prion-mediated conformational conversion. EMBO J 2001; 20:6236-45; PMID:11707395; http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/emboj/20.22. 6236.
30. Diaz-Avalos R, King CY, Wall J, Simon M, Caspar DL. Strain-specific morphologies of yeast prion amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:10165- 70; PMID:16006506; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.0504599102.
31. Tanaka M, Collins SR, Toyama BH, Weissman JS. The physical basis of how prion conformations determine strain phenotypes. Nature 2006; 442:585-9; PMID:16810177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature04922.
32. +] prion in yeast. Genetics 2003; 165:23-33; PMID:14504215.
33. Shorter J, Lindquist S. Prions as adaptive conduits of memory and inheritance. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:435- 50; PMID:15931169; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/ nrg1616.
34. Chernoff YO, Uptain SM, Lindquist SL. Analysis of prion factors in yeast. Methods Enzymol 2002; 351:499-538; PMID:12073366; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0076-6879(02)51867-X.
35. Tuite MF, Cox BS. Propagation of yeast prions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:878-90; PMID:14625537; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1247.
36. Wickner RB, Edskes HK, Shewmaker F, Nakayashiki T. Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nat Rev Microbiol 2007; 5:611-8; PMID:17632572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1708.
37. Alberti S, Halfmann R, Lindquist S. Biochemical, cell biological and genetic assays to analyze amyloid and prion aggregation in yeast. Methods Enzymol 2010; 470:709-34; PMID:20946833; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0076- 6879(10)70030-6.
38. Patino MM, Liu JJ, Glover JR, Lindquist S. Support for the prion hypothesis for inheritance of a phenotypic trait in yeast. Science 1996; 273:622-6; PMID:8662547; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 273.5275.622.
39. +] determinant is mediated by oligomerization of the SUP35-encoded polypeptide chain release factor. EMBO J 1996; 15:3127-34; PMID:8670813.
40. Edskes HK, Gray VT, Wickner RB. The [URE3] prion is an aggregated form of Ure2p that can be cured by overexpression of Ure2p fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:1498-503; PMID:9990052; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.4. 1498.
41. Sondheimer N, Lindquist S. Rnq1: an epigenetic modifier of protein function in yeast. Mol Cell 2000; 5:163- 72; PMID:10678178; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/ S1097-2765(00)80412-8.
42. +] prion aggregates are formed by small Sup35 polymers fragmented by Hsp104. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:49636-43; PMID:14507919; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307996200.
43. Bagriantsev SN, Kushnirov VV, Liebman SW. Analysis of amyloid aggregates using agarose gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 2006; 412:33-48; PMID:17046650; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(06)12003-0.
44. Scherzinger E, Lurz R, Turmaine M, Mangiarini L, Hollenbach B, Hasenbank R, et al. Huntingtin-encoded polyglutamine expansions form amyloid-like protein aggregates in vitro and in vivo. Cell 1997; 90:549-58; PMID:9267034; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80514-0.
45. Wegrzyn RD, Bapat K, Newnam GP, Zink AD, Chernoff YO. Mechanism of prion loss after Hsp104 inactivation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:4656- 69; PMID:11416143; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.21.14.4656-69.2001.
46. Zhou P, Derkatch IL, Liebman SW. The relationship between visible intracellular aggregates that appear after overexpression of Sup35 and the yeast prion-like elements [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)]. Mol Microbiol 2001; 39:37-46; PMID:11123686; http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02224.x.
47. Kimura Y, Koitabashi S, Fujita T. Analysis of yeast prion aggregates with amyloid-staining compound in vivo. Cell Struct Funct 2003; 28:187-93; PMID:12951439; http://dx.doi.org/10.1247/csf.28.187.
48. Du Z, Park KW, Yu H, Fan Q, Li L. Newly identified prion linked to the chromatin-remodeling factor Swi1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 2008; 40:460-5; PMID:18362884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.112.
49. Patel BK, Gavin-Smyth J, Liebman SW. The yeast global transcriptional co-repressor protein Cyc8 can propagate as a prion. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11:344- 9; PMID:19219034; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb1843.
50. +] in yeast is a nuclear-residing prion form of the global transcriptional regulator Sfp1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:10573-7; PMID:20498075; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1005949107.
51. Kawai-Noma S, Ayano S, Pack CG, Kinjo M, Yoshida M, Yasuda K, et al. Dynamics of yeast prion aggregates in single living cells. Genes Cells 2006; 11:1085-96; PMID:16923127; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2443.2006.01004.x.
52. +], a heritable prion-like factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell 1997; 89:811-9; PMID:9182769; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092- 8674(00)80264-0.
53. Taylor KL, Cheng N, Williams RW, Steven AC, Wickner RB. Prion domain initiation of amyloid formation in vitro from native Ure2p. Science 1999; 283:1339-43; PMID:10037606; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1339.
54. Vitrenko YA, Gracheva EO, Richmond JE, Liebman SW. Visualization of aggregation of the Rnq1 prion domain and cross-seeding interactions with Sup35NM. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:1779-87; PMID:17121829; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1074/jbc.M609269200.
55. King CY, Tittmann P, Gross H, Gebert R, Aebi M, Wüthrich K. Prion-inducing domain 2-114 of yeast Sup35 protein transforms in vitro into amyloid-like filaments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:6618- 22; PMID:9192614; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.94.13.6618.
56. Speransky VV, Taylor KL, Edskes HK, Wickner RB, Steven AC. Prion filament networks in [URE3] cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 2001; 153:1327- 36; PMID:11402074; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.153.6.1327.
57. Kawai-Noma S, Pack CG, Kojidani T, Asakawa H, Hiraoka Y, Kinjo M, et al. In vivo evidence for the fibrillar structures of Sup35 prions in yeast cells. J Cell Biol 2010; 190:223-31; PMID:20643880; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb. 201002149.
58. Tyedmers J, Treusch S, Dong J, McCaffery JM, Bevis B, Lindquist S. Prion induction involves an ancient system for the sequestration of aggregated proteins and heritable changes in prion fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:8633-8; PMID:20421488; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003895107.
59. Krzewska J, Melki R. Molecular chaperones and the assembly of the prion Sup35p, an in vitro study. EMBO J 2006; 25:822-33; PMID:16467849; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600985.
60. +] prion), the globular C-terminal domains are widely offset from the amyloid fibril backbone. Mol Microbiol 2011; 79:523-32; PMID:21219467; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2958.2010.07466.x.
61. Brachmann A, Baxa U, Wickner RB. Prion generation in vitro: amyloid of Ure2p is infectious. EMBO J 2005; 24:3082-92; PMID:16096644; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600772.
62. +]. J Mol Biol 2007; 365:773-82; PMID:17097676; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.069.
63. Du Z, Crow ET, Kang HS, Li L. Distinct subregions of Swi1 manifest striking differences in prion transmission and SWI/SNF function. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:4644- 55; PMID:20679490; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.00225-10.
64. +] aggregates with heterogeneous protein composition. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:2433-43; PMID:18353968; http://dx.doi. org/10.1091/mbc.E08-01-0078.
65. Ganusova EE, Ozolins LN, Bhagat S, Newnam GP, Wegrzyn RD, Sherman MY, et al. Modulation of prion formation, aggregation and toxicity by the actin cytoskeleton in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2006; 26:617- 29; PMID:16382152; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.26.2.617-29.2006.
66. +] and [Het-s](y), in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:1449- 61; PMID:20219972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc. E09-11-0927.
67. Satpute-Krishnan P, Serio TR. Prion protein remodelling confers an immediate phenotypic switch. Nature 2005; 437:262-5; PMID:16148935; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature03981.
68. Song Y, Wu YX, Jung G, Tutar Y, Eisenberg E, Greene LE, et al. Role for Hsp70 chaperone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prion seed replication. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:289-97; PMID:15701791; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/EC.4.2.289-97. 2005.
69. Wu YX, Greene LE, Masison DC, Eisenberg E. Curing of yeast [PSI+] prion by guanidine inactivation of Hsp104 does not require cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:12789-94; PMID:16123122; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 0506384102.
70. Satpute-Krishnan P, Langseth SX, Serio TR. Hsp104- dependent remodeling of prion complexes mediates protein-only inheritance. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:24; PMID:17253904; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.0050024.
71. Greene LE, Park YN, Masison DC, Eisenberg E. Application of GFP-labeling to study prions in yeast. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16:635-41; PMID:19519522; http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/092986609788490221.
72. Borchsenius AS, Müller S, Newnam GP, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Chernoff YO. Prion variant maintained only at high levels of the Hsp104 disaggregase. Curr Genet 2006; 49:21-9; PMID:16307272; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00294-005-0035- 0.
73. Derdowski A, Sindi SS, Klaips CL, DiSalvo S, Serio TR. A size threshold limits prion transmission and establishes phenotypic diversity. Science 2010; 330:680- 3; PMID:21030659; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1197785.
74. Ness F, Ferreira P, Cox BS, Tuite MF. Guanidine hydrochloride inhibits the generation of prion "seeds" but not prion protein aggregation in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:5593-605; PMID:12101251; http://dx.doi. org/10.1128/MCB.22.15.5593-605.2002.
75. Mathur V, Hong JY, Liebman SW. Ssa1 overexpression and [PIN(+)] variants cure [PSI(+)] by dilution of aggregates. J Mol Biol 2009; 390:155-67; PMID:19422835; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.063.
76. Borchsenius AS, Wegrzyn RD, Newnam GP, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Chernoff YO. Yeast prion protein derivative defective in aggregate shearing and production of new 'seeds'. EMBO J 2001; 20:6683- 91; PMID:11726504; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1093/ emboj/20.23.6683.
77. Kawai-Noma S, Pack CG, Tsuji T, Kinjo M, Taguchi H. Single mother-daughter pair analysis to clarify the diffusion properties of yeast prion Sup35 in guanidine- HCl-treated [PSI] cells. Genes Cells 2009; 14:1045-54; PMID:19674118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2443.2009.01333.x.
78. Romanova NV, Chernoff YO. Hsp104 and prion propagation. Protein Pept Lett 2009; 16:598-605; PMID:19519517; http://dx.doi. org/10.2174/092986609788490078.
79. Newnam GP, Birchmore JL, Chernoff YO. Destabilization and recovery of a yeast prion after mild heat shock. J Mol Biol 2011; 408:432-48; PMID:21392508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. jmb.2011.02.034.
80. Bradley ME, Liebman SW. Destabilizing interactions among [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)] yeast prion variants. Genetics 2003; 165:1675-85; PMID:14704158.
81. Lund PM, Cox BS. Reversion analysis of [psi- ] mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet Res 1981; 37:173-82; PMID:7021322; http://dx.doi. org/10.1017/S0016672300020140.
82. Liu JJ, Lindquist S. Oligopeptide-repeat expansions modulate 'protein-only' inheritance in yeast. Nature 1999; 400:573-6; PMID:10448860; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/22919.
83. Chernoff YO, Derkach IL, Inge-Vechtomov SG. Multicopy SUP35 gene induces de-novo appearance of psi-like factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 1993; 24:268-70; PMID:8221937; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00351802.
84. Ter-Avanesyan MD, Kushnirov VV, Dagkesamanskaya AR, Didichenko SA, Chernoff YO, Inge-Vechtomov SG, et al. Deletion analysis of the SUP35 gene of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveals two non-overlapping functional regions in the encoded protein. Mol Microbiol 1993; 7:683-92; PMID:8469113; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01159.x.
85. +] prion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1997; 147:507-19; PMID:9335589.
86. Chernova TA, Romanyuk AV, Karpova TS, Shanks JR, Ali M, Moffatt N, et al. Prion induction by the short-lived, stress-induced protein Lsb2 is regulated by ubiquitination and association with the actin cytoskeleton. Mol Cell 2011; 43:242-52; PMID:21777813; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.001.
87. Chernoff YO, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Derkach IL, Ptyushkina MV, Tarunina OV, Dagkesamanskaya AR, et al. Dosage-dependent translational suppression in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1992; 8:489-99; PMID:1523883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ yea.320080702.
88. Vishveshwara N, Bradley ME, Liebman SW. Sequestration of essential proteins causes prion associated toxicity in yeast. Mol Microbiol 2009; 73:1101-14; PMID:19682262; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365- 2958.2009.06836.x.
89. Derkatch IL, Bradley ME, Masse SV, Zadorsky SP, Polozkov GV, Inge-Vechtomov SG, et al. Dependence and independence of [PSI(+)] and [PIN(+)]: a two-prion system in yeast? EMBO J 2000; 19:1942- 52; PMID:10790361; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ emboj/19.9.1942.
90. Fernandez-Bellot E, Guillemet E, Cullin C. The yeast prion [URE3] can be greatly induced by a functional mutated URE2 allele. EMBO J 2000; 19:3215- 22; PMID:10880435; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ emboj/19.13.3215.
91. Derkatch IL, Bradley ME, Hong JY, Liebman SW. Prions affect the appearance of other prions: the story of [PIN(+)]. Cell 2001; 106:171-82; PMID:11511345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00427-5.
92. Osherovich LZ, Weissman JS. Multiple Gln/Asn-rich prion domains confer susceptibility to induction of the yeast [PSI(+)] prion. Cell 2001; 106:183-94; PMID:11511346; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092- 8674(01)00440-8.
93. Salnikova AB, Kryndushkin DS, Smirnov VN, Kushnirov VV, Ter-Avanesyan MD. Nonsense suppression in yeast cells overproducing Sup35 (eRF3) is caused by its non-heritable amyloids. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:8808-12; PMID:15618222; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M410150200.
94. Taneja V, Maddelein ML, Talarek N, Saupe SJ, Liebman SW. A non-Q/N-rich prion domain of a foreign prion, [Het-s], can propagate as a prion in yeast. Mol Cell 2007; 27:67-77; PMID:17612491; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007. 05.027.
95. Kaganovich D, Kopito R, Frydman J. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 2008; 454:1088-95; PMID:18756251; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature07195.
96. He C, Klionsky DJ. Regulation mechanisms and signaling pathways of autophagy. Annu Rev Genet 2009; 43:67-93; PMID:19653858; http://dx.doi. org/10.1146/annurev-genet-102808-114910.
97. Nakatogawa H, Suzuki K, Kamada Y, Ohsumi Y. Dynamics and diversity in autophagy mechanisms: lessons from yeast. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:458- 67; PMID:19491929; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nrm2708.
98. Derkatch IL, Uptain SM, Outeiro TF, Krishnan R, Lindquist SL, Liebman SW. Effects of Q/N-rich, polyQ and non-polyQ amyloids on the de novo formation of the [PSI+] prion in yeast and aggregation of Sup35 in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:12934-9; PMID:15326312; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas. 0404968101.
99. Kimura Y, Koitabashi S, Kakizuka A, Fujita T. The role of pre-existing aggregates in Hsp104-dependent polyglutamine aggregate formation and epigenetic change of yeast prions. Genes Cells 2004; 9:685-96; PMID:15298677; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1356- 9597.2004.00759.x.
100. Tyedmers J, Mogk A, Bukau B. Cellular strategies for controlling protein aggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010; 11:777-88; PMID:20944667; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nrm2993.
101. Aguilaniu H, Gustafsson L, Rigoulet M, Nyström T. Asymmetric inheritance of oxidatively damaged proteins during cytokinesis. Science 2003; 299:1751- 3; PMID:12610228; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1080418.
102. Liu B, Larsson L, Caballero A, Hao X, Oling D, Grantham J, et al. The polarisome is required for segregation and retrograde transport of protein aggregates. Cell 2010; 140:257-67; PMID:20141839; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2009.12.031.
103. Winkler J, Seybert A, König L, Pruggnaller S, Haselmann U, Sourjik V, et al. Quantitative and spatio-temporal features of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli and consequences on protein quality control and cellular ageing. EMBO J 2010; 29:910- 23; PMID:20094032; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ emboj.2009.412.
104. + chaperone Hsp104 is part of a network that links the actin cytoskeleton with the inheritance of damaged proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:3738- 45; PMID:19398583; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.00201-09.
105. Chernoff YO. Stress and prions: lessons from the yeast model. FEBS Lett 2007; 581:3695-701; PMID:17509571; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet. 2007.04.075.
106. Perrett S, Jones GW. Insights into the mechanism of prion propagation. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18:52- 9; PMID:18243685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j. sbi.2007.12.005.
107. Tuite M, Stojanovski K, Ness F, Merritt G, Koloteva- Levine N. Cellular factors important for the de novo formation of yeast prions. Biochem Soc Trans 2008; 36:1083-7; PMID:18793193; http://dx.doi. org/10.1042/BST0361083.
108. Jones GW, Tuite MF. Chaperoning prions: the cellular machinery for propagating an infectious protein? Bioessays 2005; 27:823-32; PMID:16015602; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20267.
109. Manogaran AL, Hong JY, Hufana J, Tyedmers J, Lindquist S, Liebman SW. Prion formation and polyglutamine aggregation are controlled by two classes of genes. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:1001386; PMID:21625618; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal. pgen.1001386.
110. Chernova TA, Allen KD, Wesoloski LM, Shanks JR, Chernoff YO, Wilkinson KD. Pleiotropic effects of Ubp6 loss on drug sensitivities and yeast prion are due to depletion of the free ubiquitin pool. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:52102-15; PMID:14559899; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M310283200.
111. Allen KD, Chernova TA, Tennant EP, Wilkinson KD, Chernoff YO. Effects of ubiquitin system alterations on the formation and loss of a yeast prion. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:3004-13; PMID:17142456; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc. M609597200.
112. Redeker V, Hughes C, Savistchenko J, Vissers JP, Melki R. Qualitative and quantitative multiplexed proteomic analysis of complex yeast protein fractions that modulate the assembly of the yeast prion Sup35p. PLoS One 2011; 6:23659; PMID:21931608; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023659.
113. Chernoff YO, Lindquist SL, Ono B, Inge-Vechtomov SG, Liebman SW. Role of the chaperone protein Hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [psi+]. [psi+]. Science 1995; 268:880-4; PMID:7754373; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1126/science.7754373.
114. Sweeny EA, Shorter J. Prion proteostasis: Hsp104 meets its supporting cast. Prion 2008; 2:135-40; PMID:19242125; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ pri.2.4.7952.
115. Haslberger T, Bukau B, Mogk A. Towards a unifying mechanism for ClpB/Hsp104-mediated protein disaggregation and prion propagation. Biochem Cell Biol 2010; 88:63-75; PMID:20130680; http://dx.doi. org/10.1139/O09-118.
116. +] prion by guanidine hydrochloride is the result of Hsp104 inactivation. Mol Microbiol 2001; 40:1357-69; PMID:11442834; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02478.x.
117. Jung G, Masison DC. Guanidine hydrochloride inhibits Hsp104 activity in vivo: a possible explanation for its effect in curing yeast prions. Curr Microbiol 2001; 43:7-10; PMID:11375656; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s002840010251.
118. Glover JR, Lindquist S. Hsp104, Hsp70 and Hsp40: a novel chaperone system that rescues previously aggregated proteins. Cell 1998; 94:73-82; PMID:9674429; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81223-4.
119. Weibezahn J, Tessarz P, Schlieker C, Zahn R, Maglica Z, Lee S, et al. Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB. Cell 2004; 119:653- 65; PMID:15550247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. cell.2004.11.027.
120. Zietkiewicz S, Krzewska J, Liberek K. Successive and synergistic action of the Hsp70 and Hsp100 chaperones in protein disaggregation. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:44376-83; PMID:15302880; http://dx.doi. org/10.1074/jbc.M402405200.
121. Shorter J, Lindquist S. Hsp104 catalyzes formation and elimination of self-replicating Sup35 prion conformers. Science 2004; 304:1793-7; PMID:15155912; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1098007.
122. Shorter J, Lindquist S. Destruction or potentiation of different prions catalyzed by similar Hsp104 remodeling activities. Mol Cell 2006; 23:425-38; PMID:16885031; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel. 2006.05.042.
123. Inoue Y, Taguchi H, Kishimoto A, Yoshida M. Hsp104 binds to yeast Sup35 prion fiber but needs other factor(s) to sever it. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:52319- 23; PMID:15448141; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M408159200.
124. Tipton KA, Verges KJ, Weissman JS. In vivo monitoring of the prion replication cycle reveals a critical role for Sis1 in delivering substrates to Hsp104. Mol Cell 2008; 32:584-91; PMID:19026788; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.003.
125. Higurashi T, Hines JK, Sahi C, Aron R, Craig EA. Specificity of the J-protein Sis1 in the propagation of 3 yeast prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:16596-601; PMID:18955697; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.0808934105.
126. Masison DC, Kirkland PA, Sharma D. Influence of Hsp70s and their regulators on yeast prion propagation. Prion 2009; 3:65-73; PMID:19556854; http:// dx.doi.org/10.4161/pri.3.2.9134.
127. Summers DW, Douglas PM, Cyr DM. Prion propagation by Hsp40 molecular chaperones. Prion 2009; 3:59-64; PMID:19535913; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ pri.3.2.9062.
128. Aron R, Higurashi T, Sahi C, Craig EA. J-protein co-chaperone Sis1 required for generation of [RNQ+] seeds necessary for prion propagation. EMBO J 2007; 26:3794-803; PMID:17673909; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601811.
129. Bailleul-Winslett PA, Newnam GP, Wegrzyn RD, Chernoff YO. An antiprion effect of the anticytoskeletal drug latrunculin A in yeast. Gene Expr 2000; 9:145-56; PMID:11243411.
130. Bailleul PA, Newnam GP, Steenbergen JN, Chernoff YO. Genetic study of interactions between the cytoskeletal assembly protein sla1 and prion-forming domain of the release factor Sup35 (eRF3) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1999; 153:81-94; PMID:10471702.
131. Serio TR, Cashikar AG, Kowal AS, Sawicki GJ, Moslehi JJ, Serpell L, et al. Nucleated conformational conversion and the replication of conformational information by a prion determinant. Science 2000; 289:1317-21; PMID:10958771; http://dx.doi. org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1317.
132. Eaglestone SS, Ruddock LW, Cox BS, Tuite MF. Guanidine hydrochloride blocks a critical step in the propagation of the prion-like determinant [PSI(+)] of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:240-4; PMID:10618402; http://dx.doi. org/10.1073/pnas.97.1.240.
133. Byrne LJ, Cole DJ, Cox BS, Ridout MS, Morgan BJ, Tuite MF. The number and transmission of [PSI] prion seeds (Propagons) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 2009; 4:4670; PMID:19262693; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0004670.
134. Wang Y, Meriin AB, Zaarur N, Romanova NV, Chernoff YO, Costello CE, et al. Abnormal proteins can form aggresome in yeast: aggresome-targeting signals and components of the machinery. FASEB J 2009; 23:451-63; PMID:18854435; http://dx.doi. org/10.1096/fj.08-117614.