Prospects for application of breakthrough technologies in breeding: The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing

Russian Journal of Genetics

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 676-687

  Khlestkina, E K ^a,b   Shumny, V K ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b NOVOSIBIRSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

advanced breeding techniques; CRISPR Cas9 nontransgenic modified plants; genome editing; genomic selection; marker assisted selection; molecular markers; plant breeding; site directed mutagenesis

Indexed keywords

ZINC FINGER NUCLEASE;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ARTICLE; BIOTIC STRESS; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA MICROARRAY; GENOTYPE; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

EID: 84980318089     PISSN: 10227954     EISSN: 16083369     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1134/S102279541607005X     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Moose, S.P. and Mumm, R.H., Molecular plant breeding as the foundation for 21st century crop improvement, Plant Physiol., 2008, vol. 147, pp. 969–977. http://dxdoiorg/ doi 10.1104/pp.108.118232
2. Heffner, E.L., Lorenz, A.J., Jannink, J.-L., and Sorrells, M.E., Plant breeding with genomic selection: gain per unit time and cost, Crop Sci., 2010, vol. 50, pp. 1681–1690. doi 10.2135/cropsci2009.11.0662
3. Khlestkina, E.K., Molecular markers in genetic studies and breeding, Russ. J. Genet., Appl. Res., 2014, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 236–244.
4. Gelvin, S.B., The introduction and expression of transgenes in plants, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 1998, vol. 9, pp. 227–232. doi 10.1016/0304-4238(93)90023-J
5. Feng, Z., Zhang, B., Ding, W., et al., Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system, Cell Res., 2013, vol. 23, pp. 1229–1232. doi 10.1038/cr.2013.114
6. Li, J.F., Norville, J.E., Aach, J., et al., Multiplex and homologous recombination-mediated genome editing in Arabidopsis and Nicotiana benthamiana using guide RNA and Cas9, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 688–691. doi 10.1038/nbt.2654
7. Nekrasov, V., Staskawicz, B., Weigel, D., et al., Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 691–693. doi 10.1038/nbt.2655
8. Shan, Q., Wang, Y., Li, J., et al., Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 686–688. doi 10.1038/nbt.2650
9. Xie, K. and Yang, Y., RNA-guided genome editing in plants using a CRISPR-Cas system, Mol. Plant, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 1975–1983. doi 10.1093/mp/sst119
10. Beckmann, J.S. and Soller, M., Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1983, vol. 67, pp. 35–43. doi 10.1007/BF00303919
11. Burr, B., Evola, S.V., Burr, F.A., and Beckmann, J.S., The application of restriction fragment length polymorphism to plant breeding, Genetic Engineering, Setlow, J.K., et al., Eds., New York: Plenum Press, 1983, pp. 45–59.
12. Tanksley, S.D., Molecular markers in plant breeding, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 1983, vol. 1, pp. 3–8. doi 10.1007/BF02680255
13. Khlestkina, E.K. and Salina, E.A., SNP markers: methods of analysis, ways of development, and comparison on an example of common wheat, Russ. J. Genet., 2006, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 585–594. doi 10.1134/S1022795406060019
14. Landjeva, S., Korzun, V., and Börner, A., Molecular markers: actual and potential contributions to wheat genome characterization and breeding, Euphytica, 2007, vol. 156, pp. 271–296. doi 10.1007/s10681-007- 9371-0
15. Khlestkina, E.K., Molecular methods for analyzing the structure-function organization of genes and genomes in higher plants, Russ. J. Genet., Appl. Res., 2012, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 243–251.
16. Brennan, J.P. and Martin, P.J., Returns to investment in new breeding technologies, Euphytica, 2007, vol. 157, pp. 337–349. doi 10.1007/s10681-007-9378-6
17. Brumlop, S., Reichenbecher, W., Tappeser, B., and Finckh, M.R., What is the SMARTest way to breed plants and increase agrobiodiversity?, Euphytica, 2013, vol. 194, pp. 53–66. doi 10.1007/s10681-013-0960-9
18. Timonova, E.M., Leonova, I.N., Röder, M.S., and Salina, E.A., Marker-assisted development and characterization of a set of Triticum aestivum lines carrying different introgressions from the T. timopheevii genome, Mol. Breed., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 123–136. doi 10.1007/s11032-012-9776-x
19. Baenziger, P.S., Wesenberg, D.M., Smail, V.M., et al., Agronomic performance of wheat doubled haploid lines derived from cultivars by anther culture, Plant Breed., 1989, vol. 103, pp. 101–109. doi 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1989tb00357x
20. Leonova, I.N., Molecular markers: Implementation in crop plant breeding for identification, introgression and gene pyramiding, Russ. J. Genet., Appl. Res., 2013, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 464–473.
21. William, H., Trethowan, R., and Crosby-Galvan, E., Wheat breeding assisted by markers: CIMMYT’s experience, Euphytica, 2007, vol. 157, pp. 307–319. doi 10.1007/s10681-007-9405-7
22. Xu, Y. and Crouch, J.H., Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice, Crop Sci., 2008, vol. 48, pp. 391–407. doi 10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0191
23. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R.W., and Brown, P.O., Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray, Science, 1995, vol. 270, pp. 467–470. doi 10.1126/science. 270.5235.467
24. Wang, D.G., Fan, J.B., Siao, C.J., et al., Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of singlenucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome, Science, 1998, vol. 280, pp. 1077–1082. doi 10.1126/science. 280.5366.1077
25. Jaccoud, D., Peng, K., Feinstein, D., and Kilian, A., Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping, Nucleic Acids Res., 2001, vol. 29. e25. doi 10.1093/nar/29.4e25
26. Prashar, A., Hornyik, C., Young, V., et al., Construction of a dense SNP map of a highly heterozygous diploid potato population and QTL analysis of tuber shape and eye depth, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2014, vol. 127, pp. 2159–2171. doi 10.1007/s00122-014-2369-9
27. Jighly, A., Oyiga, B.C., Makdis, F., et al., Genomewide DArT and SNP scan for QTL associated with resistance to stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) in elite ICARDA wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2015, vol. 128, pp. 1277–1295. doi 10.1007/s00122-015-2504-2
28. Wu, Q., Chen, Y., Fu, L., et al., QTL mapping of flag leaf traits in common wheat using an integrated highdensity SSR and SNP genetic linkage map, Euphytica, 2016. doi 10.1007/s10681-015-1603-0
29. Zhang, F., Xie, X., Xu, M., et al., Detecting major QTL associated with resistance to bacterial blight using a set of rice reciprocal introgression lines with high density SNP markers, Plant Breed., 2015, vol. 134, pp. 286–292. doi 10.1111/pbr.12256
30. Kiseleva, A.A., Shcherban, A.B., Leonova, I.N., et al., Identification of new heading date determinants in wheat 5B chromosome, BMC Plant Biol., 2016, vol. 16, supp l. doi 10.1186/s12870-015-0688-x
31. Heffner, E.L., Jannink, J.-L., and Sorrells, M.E., Genomic selection accuracy using multifamily prediction models in a wheat breeding program, Plant Genome, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 65–75. doi 10.3835/plantgenome2010.12.0029
32. Charmet, G. and Storlie, E., Implementation of genome-wide selection in wheat, Russ. J. Genet., Appl. Res., 2012, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 298–303.
33. Elshire, R.J., Glaubitz, J.C., Sun, Q., Poland, J.A., Kawarnoto, K., Buckler, E.S., and Mitchell, S.E., A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species, PLoS One, 2011, vol. 6. e19379. doi 10.1371/journalpone.0019379
34. Paux, E., Sourdille, P., Mackay, I., and Feuillet, C., Sequence-based marker development in wheat: advances and applications to breeding, Biotechnol. Adv., 2012, vol. 30, pp. 1071–1088. doi 10.1016/jbiotechadv. 2011.09.015
35. Poland, J., Endelman, J., Dawson, J., et al., Genomic selection in wheat breeding using genotyping-bysequencing, Plant Genome, 2012, vol. 5, pp. 103–113. doi 10.3835/plantgenome2012.06.0006
36. Kim, C., Guo, H., Kong, W., et al., Application of genotyping by sequencing technology to a variety of crop breeding programs, Plant Sci., 2016, vol. 242, pp. 14–22. doi 10.1016/jplantsci.2015.04.016
37. Schlegel, R., Hybrid breeding boosted molecular genetics in rye, Vavilov. Zh. Genet. Selekt., 2015, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 589–603. doi 10.18699/VJ15.076
38. Kempe, K., Rubtsova, R., and Gils, M., Split-gene system for hybrid wheat seed production, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2014, vol. 111, pp. 9097–9102. doi 10.1073/pnas.1402836111
39. Smith, J., Grizot, S., Arnould, S., et al., A combinatorial approach to create artificial homing endonucleases cleaving chosen sequences, Nucleic Acids Res., 2006, vol. 34. e149. doi 10.1093/nar/gkl720
40. Urnov, F.D., Miller, J.C., Lee, Y.L., et al., Highly efficient endogenous human gene correction using designed zinc-finger nucleases, Nature, 2005, vol. 435, pp. 646–651. doi 10.1038/nature03556
41. Miller, J.C., Holmes, M.C., Wang, J., et al., An improved zinc-finger nuclease architecture for highly specific genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 2007, vol. 25, pp. 778–785. doi 10.1038/nbt1319
42. Romer, P., Hahn, S., Jordan, T., et al., Plant pathogen recognition mediated by promoter activation of the pepper Bs3 resistance gene, Science, 2007, vol. 318, pp. 645–648. doi 10.1126/science.1144958
43. Boch, J., Scholze, H., Schornack, S., et al., Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors, Science, 2009, vol. 326, pp. 1509–1512. doi 10.1126/science.1178811
44. Moscou, M.J. and Bogdanove, A.J., A simple cipher governs DNA recognition by TAL effectors, Science, 2009, vol. 326, p. 1501. doi 10.1126/science.1178817
45. Christian, M., Cermak, T., Doyle, E.L., et al., Targeting DNA double-strand breaks with TAL effector nucleases, Genetics, 2010, vol. 186, pp. 757–761. doi 10.1534/genetics.110.120717
46. Miller, J.C., Tan, S., Qiao, G., et al., A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing, Nat. Biotechnol., 2011, vol. 29, pp. 143–148. doi 10.1038/nbt.1755
47. Cong, L., Ran, F.A., Cox, D., et al., Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems, Science, 2013, vol. 339, pp. 819–823. doi 10.1126/science. 1231143
48. Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K.M., et al., RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9, Science, 2013, vol. 339, pp. 823–826. doi 10.1126/science.1232033
49. Barrangou, R., Fremaux, C., Deveau, H., et al., CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes, Science, 2007, vol. 315, pp. 1709–1712. doi 10.1126/science.1138140
50. Grissa, I., Vergnaud, G., and Pourcel, C., The CRISPRdb database and tools to display CRISPRs and to generate dictionaries of spacers and repeats, BMC Bioinf., 2007, vol. 8, p. 172. doi 0.1186/1471- 2105-8-172
51. Feng, Z., Mao, Y., Xu, N., et al., Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2014, vol. 111, pp. 4632–4637. doi 10.1073/pnas.1400822111
52. Gao, Y. and Zhao, Y., Specific and heritable gene editing in Arabidopsis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2014, vol. 111, pp. 4357–4358. doi 10.1073/pnas.1402295111
53. Brooks, C., Nekrasov, V., Lippman, Z.B., and Van Eck, J., Efficient gene editing in tomato in the first generation using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated9 system, Plant Physiol., 2014, vol. 166, pp. 1292–1297. doi 10.1104/pp.114.247577
54. Fauser, F., Schiml, S., and Puchta, H., Both CRISPR/Cas-based nucleases and nickases can be used efficiently for genome engineering in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J., 2014, vol. 79, pp. 348–359. doi 10.1111/tpj.12554
55. Jia, W., Yang, B., and Weeks, D.P., Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and inheritance of modified genes in the T2 and T3 generations, PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9. e99225. doi 10.1371/journalpone.0099225
56. Schiml, S., Fauser, F., and Puchta, H., The CRISPR/Cas system can be used as nuclease for in planta gene targeting and as paired nickases for directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis resulting in heritable progeny, Plant J., 2014, vol. 80, pp. 1139–1150. doi 10.1111/tpj.12704
57. Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Wei, P., et al., The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation, Plant Biotechnol. J., 2014, vol. 12, pp. 797–807. doi 10.1111/pbi.12200
58. Zhou, H., Liu, B., Weeks, D.P., et al., Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice, Nucleic Acids Res., 2014, vol. 42, pp. 10903–10914. doi 10.1093/nar/gku806
59. Svitashev, S., Young, J.K., Schwartz, C., et al., Targeted mutagenesis, precise gene editing, and site-specific gene insertion in maize using Cas9 and guide RNA, Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 169, pp. 931–945. doi 10.1104/pp.15.00793
60. Xu, R.F., Li, H., Qin, R.Y., et al., Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, e11491. doi 10.1038/srep11491
61. Cho, S.W., Kim, S., Kim, J.M., and Kim, J.S., Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 230–232. doi 10.1038/nbt.2507
62. Mao, Y., Zhang, H., Xu, N., et al., Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants, Mol. Plant, 2013, vol. 6, pp. 2008–2011. doi 10.1093/mp/sst121
63. Masterson, J., Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms, Science, 1994, vol. 264, pp. 421–424. doi 10.1126/science. 264.5157.421
64. Wolfe, K.H., Yesterday’s polyploidization and the mystery of diploidization, Nat. Rev. Genet., 2001, vol. 2, pp. 233–241. doi 10.1038/35072009
65. Lozano-Juste, J. and Cutler, S.R., Plant genome engineering in full bloom, Trends Plant Sci., 2014, vol. 19, pp. 284–287. doi 10.1016/jtplants.2014.02.014
66. Upadhyay, S.K., Kumar, J., Alok, A., and Tuli, R., RNA-guided genome editing for target gene mutations in wheat, G3: Genes Genomes Genet., 2013, vol. 3, pp. 2233–2238. doi 10.1534/g3.113.008847
67. Jia, H. and Wang, N., Targeted genome editing of sweet orange using Cas9/sgRNA, PLoS One, 2014, vol. 9. e93806. doi 10.1371/journalpone.0093806
68. Xie, K., Zhang, J., and Yang, Y., Genome-wide prediction of highly specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in model plants and major crops, Mol. Plant, 2014, vol. 7, pp. 923–926. doi 10.1093/mp/ssu009
69. Doebley, J., Genetics, development and plant evolution, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 1993, vol. 3, pp. 865–872.
70. Doebley, J. and Lukens, L., Transcriptional regulators and the evolution of plant form, Plant Cell, 1998, vol. 10, pp. 1075–1082. http://dxdoiorg/ doi 10.1105/ tpcdoi 10.7.1075
71. Purugganan, M.D., The molecular evolution of development, BioEssays, 1998, vol. 20, pp. 700–711. doi 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199809)
72. Khlestkina, E.K., Rö der, M.S., and Salina, E.A., Relationship between homoeologous regulatory and structural genes in allopolyploid genome–a case study in bread wheat, BMC Plant Biol., 2008, vol. 8, p. 88. doi 10.1186/1471-2229-8-88
73. Purugganan, M.D., Rounsley, S.D., Schmidt, R.J., and Yanofsky, M.F., Molecular evolution of flower development: diversification of the plant MADS-box regulatory gene family, Genetics, 1995, vol. 140, pp. 345–356.
74. Barrier, M., Robichaux, R.H., and Purugganan, M.D., Accelerated regulatory gene evolution in an adaptive radiation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2001, vol. 98, pp. 10208–10213. doi 10.1073/pnas.181257698
75. Remington, D.L. and Purugganan, M.D., GAI homologues in the Hawaiian Silversword alliance (Asteraceae–Madiinae): molecular evolution of growth regulators in a rapidly diversifying plant lineage, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2002, vol. 19, pp. 1563–1574.
76. Dias, A.P., Braun, E.L., McMullen, M.D., and Grotewold, E., Recently duplicated maize R2R3 Myb genes provide evidence for distinct mechanisms of evolutionary divergence after duplication, Plant Physiol., 2003, vol. 131, pp. 610–620. http://dxdoiorg/ doi 10.1104/pp.012047
77. Shoeva, O.Y., Khlestkina, E.K., Berges, H., and Salina, E.A., The homoeologous genes encoding chalcone–flavanone isomerase in Triticum aestivum L.: structural characterization and expression in different parts of wheat plant, Gene, 2014, vol. 538, pp. 334–341. doi 10.1016/jgene.2014.01.008
78. Hsu, P.D., Scott, D.A., Weinstein, J.A., et al., DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases, Nat. Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 827–832. doi 10.1038/nbt.2647
79. McCallum, C.M., Comai, L., Greene, E.A., and Henikoff, S., Targeted screening for induced mutations, Nat. Biotechnol., 2000, vol. 18, pp. 455–457. doi 10.1038/74542
80. Gilbert, L.A., Larson, M.H., Morsut, L., et al., CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes, Cell, 2013, vol. 154, pp. 442–451. doi 10.1016/jcell.2013.06.044
81. Maeder, M.L., Linder, S.J., Cascio, V.M., et al., CRISPR RNA-guided activation of endogenous human genes, Nat. Methods, 2013, vol. 10, pp. 977–979. doi 10.1038/nmeth.2598
82. Piatek, A., Ali, Z., Baazim, H., et al., RNA-guided transcriptional regulation in planta via synthetic dCas9-based transcription factors, Plant Biotechnol. J., 2014, vol. 13, pp. 578–579. doi 10.1111/pbi.12284
83. Anton, T., Bultmann, S., Leonhardt, H., and Markaki, Y., Visualization of specific DNA sequences in living mouse embryonic stem cells with a programmable fluorescent CRISPR/Cas system, Nucleus, 2014, vol. 5, pp. 163–172. doi 10.4161/nucl.28488
84. Chen, B., Gilbert, L.A., Cimini, B.A., et al., Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system, Cell, 2013, vol. 155, pp. 1479–1491. doi 10.1016/jcell.2013.12.001
85. Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Shan, Q., et al., Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew, Nat. Biotechnol., 2014, vol. 32, pp. 947–951. doi 10.1038/nbt.2969
86. Liang, Z., Zhang, K., Chen, K., and Gao, C., Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system, J. Genet. Genomics, 2014, vol. 41, pp. 63–68. doi 10.1016/jjgg.2013.12.001
87. Lawrenson, T., Shorinola, O., Stacey, N., et al., Induction of targeted, heritable mutations in barley and Brassica oleracea using RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease, Genome Biol., 2015, vol. 16, p. 258. doi 10.1186/s13059-015-0826-7
88. Jiang, W., Zhou, H., Bi, H., et al., Demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9/sgRNA-mediated targeted gene modification in Arabidopsis, tobacco, sorghum and rice, Nucleic Acids Res., 2013, vol. 41. e188. doi 10.1093/ nar/gkt780
89. Endo, M., Mikami, M., and Toki, S., Multigene knockout utilizing off-target mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in rice, Plant Cell Physiol., 2015, vol. 56, pp. 41–47. doi 10.1093/pcp/pcu154
90. Cai, Y., Chen, L., Liu, X., et al., CRISPR/Cas9- mediated genome editing in soybean hairy roots, PLoS One, 2015, vol. 10. e0136064. doi 10.1371/journal. pone.0136064
91. Jacobs, T.B., LaFayette, P.R., Schmitz, R.J., and Parrott, W.A., Targeted genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9, BMC Biotechnol., 2015, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 16. doi 10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2
92. Li, Z., Liu, Z.B., Xing, A., et al., Cas9-guide RNA directed genome editing in soybean, Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 169, pp. 960–970. doi 10.1104/pp.15.00783
93. Sun, X., Hu, Z., Chen, R., et al., Targeted mutagenesis in soybean using the CRISPR-Cas9 system, Sci. Rep., 2015, vol. 5, p. 10342. doi 10.1038/srep10342
94. Martinelli, F., Grillone, G., and Sgroi, F., Proposal of a genome editing system for genetic resistance to tomato spotted wilt virus, Am. J. Appl. Sci., 2014, vol. 11, pp. 1904–1913. doi 10.3844/ajassp.2014.1904.1913
95. Ito, Y., Nishizawa-Yokoi, A., Endo, M., et al., CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of the RIN locus that regulates tomato fruit ripening, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2015, vol. 467, no. 1, pp. 76–82. doi 10.1016/jbbrc.2015.09.117
96. Wang, S., Zhang, S., Wang, W., et al., Efficient targeted mutagenesis in potato by the CRISPR/Cas9 system, Plant Cell Rep., 2015, vol. 34, pp. 1473–1476. doi 10.1007/s00299-015-1816-7
97. Doebley, J.F., Gaut, B.S., and Smith, B.D., The molecular genetics of crop domestication, Cell, 2006, vol. 127, pp. 1309–1321. doi 10.1016/jcell.2006. 12.006
98. Ainley, W.M., Sastry-Dent, L., Welter, M.E., et al., Trait stacking via targeted genome editing, Plant Biotechnol. J., 2013, vol. 11, pp. 1126–1134. doi 10.1111/pbi.12107
99. Hartung, F. and Schiemann, J., Precise plant breeding using new genome editing techniques: opportunities, safety and regulation in the EU, Plant J., 2014, vol. 78, pp. 742–752. doi 10.1016/jtibtech.2014.11.008
100. Podevin, N., Davies, H.V., Hartung, F., et al., Sitedirected nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding, Trends Biotechnol., 2013, vol. 31, pp. 375–383. doi 10.1016/jtibtech. 2013.03.004