Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 333-341

  Wolfe, Kenneth H ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIPLOIDY; GENE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT; POLYPLOIDY; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENES, PLANT; GENOME, PLANT; HUMANS; PLANTS; POLYPLOIDY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 0035344021     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/35072009     Document Type: Review

References (66)

1. Spofford, J. B. Phylogenetic mechanism. Science 175, 617-618 (1972).
2. Lewin, B. Genes in tandem. Nature 230, 314 (1971).
3. Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1970).
4. Nadeau, J. H. & Taylor, B. A. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 814-818 (1984).
5. Ohno, S. Ancient linkage groups and frozen accidents. Nature 244, 259-262 (1973).
6. Nadeau, J. H. in Advanced Techniques in Chromosome Research (ed. Adolph, K. W.) 269-296 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991).
7. Schughart, K., Kappen, C. & Ruddle, F. H. Duplication of large genomic regions during the evolution of vertebrate homeobox genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7067-7071 (1989).
8. Ruddle, F. H., Bentley, K. L., Murtha, M. T. & Risch, N. Gene loss and gain in the evolution of the vertebrates. Development S155-S161 (1994).
9. Hughes, A. L. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 48, 565-576 (1999).
10. Skrabanek, L. & Wolfe, K. H. Eukaryote genome duplication - where's the evidence? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 694-700 (1998).
11. Ohno, S. Gene duplication and the uniqueness of vertebrate genomes circa 1970-1999. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 517-522 (1999).
12. Meyer, A. & Schartl, M. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11, 699-704 (1999).
13. Holland, P. W. H. Introduction: gene duplication in development and evolution. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 515-516 (1999).
14. Martin, A. Is tetralogy true? Lack of support for the 'one-to-four' rule. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 89-93 (2001).
15. Wang, Y. & Gu, X. Evolutionary patterns of gene families generated in the early stage of vertebrates. J. Mol. Evol. 51, 88-96 (2000).
16. Nadeau, J. H. & Sankoff, D. Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution. Genetics 147, 1259-1266 (1997).
17. Martin, A. P. Increasing genomic complexity by gene duplication and the origin of vertebrates. Am. Nat. 154, 111-128 (1999).
18. Uorente, B. et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts. 18. Comparative analysis of chromosome maps and synteny with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 487, 101-112 (2000).
19. Gibson, T. J. & Spring, J. Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 28, 259-264 (2000).
20. Wolfe, K. Robustness - it's not where you think it is. Nature Genet. 25, 3-4 (2000).
21. International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860-921 (2001).
22. Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304-1351 (2001).
23. Lundin, L. G. Evolution of the vertebrate genome as reflected in paralogous chromosomal regions in man and the house mouse. Genomics 16, 1-19 (1993). A classic paper that identified numerous apparent duplicated chromosomal regions in mammals.
24. Katsanis, N., Fitzgibbon, J. & Fisher, E. M. C. Paralogy mapping: identification of a region in the human MHC triplicated onto human chromosomes 1 and 9 allows the prediction and isolation of novel PBX and NOTCH loci. Genomics 35, 101-108 (1996).
25. Kasahara, M., Nakaya, J., Satta, Y. & Takahata, N. Chromosomal duplication and the emergence of the adaptive immune system. Trends Genet. 13, 90-92 (1997).
26. Pébusque, M.-J., Coulier, F., Birnbaum, D. & Pontarotti, P. Ancient large scale genome duplications: phylogenetic and linkage analyses shed light on chordate genome evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1145-1159 (1998).
27. Wraith, A. et al. Evolution of the neuropeptide Y receptor family: gene and chromosomal duplications deduced from the cloning and mapping of the five receptor subtypes in pig. Genome Res. 10, 302-310 (2000).
28. Spring, J. Vertebrate evolution by interspecific hybridisation - are we polyploid? FEBS Lett. 400, 2-8 (1997).
29. Sidow, A. Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6, 715-722 (1996).
30. Hughes, A. L. Phylogenetic tests of the hypothesis of block duplication of homologous genes on human chromosomes 6, 9, and 1. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 854-870 (1998). One of the first reports of wildly heterogeneous duplication date estimates from genes thought to form a duplicated chromosomal region.
31. Hughes, A. L., da Silva, J. & Friedman, R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. (in the press).
32. Wolfe, K. H. & Shields, D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708-713 (1997).
33. Pál, C., Papp, B. & Hurst, L. D. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics (in the press).
34. Vision, T. J., Brown, D. G. & Tanksley, S. D. The origins of genomic duplications in Arabidopsis. Science 290, 2114-2117 (2000).
35. Smith, N. G., Knight, R. & Hurst, L. D. Vertebrate genome evolution: a slow shuffle or a big bang? Bioessays 21, 697-703 (1999).
36. Friedman, R. & Hughes, A. L. Gene duplication and the structure of eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res. 11, 373-381 (2001).
37. Gaut, B. S. & Doebley, J. F. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6809-6814 (1997).
38. Gaut, B. S., Le Thierry d'Ennequin, M., Peek, A. S. & Sawkins, M. C. Maize as a model for the evolution of plant nuclear genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7008-7015 (2000).
39. Gaut, B. S. Patterns of chromosomal duplication in maize and their implications for comparative maps of the grasses. Genome Res. 11, 55-66 (2001). Interesting exploration of methods for statistically testing genome duplication hypotheses.
40. Allendorf, F. W. & Danzmann, R. G. Secondary tetrasomic segregation of MDH-B and preferential pairing of homeologues in rainbow trout. Genetics 145, 1083-1092 (1997).
41. Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Extent of genomic rearrangement after genome duplication in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4447-4452 (1998).
42. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408, 796-815 (2000). Supplementary figure 1 (http://www.tigr.org/-salzberg/MUMmer-index.html) contains dot-matrix DNA comparisons of all pairs of Arabidopsis chromosomes.
43. Amores, A. et al. Zebrafish box clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282, 1711-1714 (1998).
44. Postlethwait, J. H. et al. Zebrafish comparative genomics and the origins of vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 10, 1890-1902 (2000).
45. Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Yeast genome evolution in the post-genome era. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 548-554 (1999).
46. Hughes, A. L. Adaptive evolution of genes and genomes (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1999).
47. Hurst, L. D. The evolution of genomic anatomy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 108-112 (1999).
48. Mewes, H. W. et al. Overview of the yeast genome. Nature 387, 87-565 (1997).
49. Coissac, E., Maillier, E. & Netter, P. A comparative study of duplications in bacteria and eukaryotes: the importance of telomeres. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 1062-1074 (1997).
50. Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Updated map of duplicated regions in the yeast genome. Gene 238, 253-261 (1999).
51. Baumgartner, U., Hamilton, B., Piskacek, M., Ruis, H. & Rottensteiner, H. Functional analysis of theZn(2)Cys(6) transcription factors Oaf1 p and Pip2p. Different roles in fatty acid induction of β-oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22208-22216 (1999).
52. Vision, T. J. & Brown, D. G. in Comparative Genomes: Empirical and Analytical Approaches to Gene Order Dynamics, Map Alignment and the Evolution of Gene Families (eds Sankoff, D. & Nadeau, J. H.) 479-491 (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. 2000).
53. Llorente, B. et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts. 20. Evolution of gene redundancy compared to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 487, 122-133 (2000).
54. Keogh, R. S., Seoighe, C. & Wolfe, K. H. Evolution of gene order and chromosome number in Saccharomyces, Kluyveromyces and related fungi. Yeast 14, 443-457 (1998).
55. Seoighe, C. et al. Prevalence of small inversions in yeast gene order evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14433-14437 (2000).
56. Louis, E. J. The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 11, 1553-1573 (1995).
57. Ku, H. M., Vision, T., Liu, J. & Tanksley, S. D. Comparing sequenced segments of the tomato and Arabidopsis genomes: large-scale duplication followed by selective gene loss creates a network of synteny. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 9121-9126 (2000).
58. Paterson, A. H. et al. Comparative genomics of plant chromosomes. Plant Cell 12, 1523-1540 (2000).
59. Graur, D. & Li, W.-H. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1999).
60. Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The evolutionary fate and consequences of duplicate genes. Science 290, 1151-1155 (2000). Global study of the frequency of occurrence and degree of divergence of duplicated genes in several eukaryotlc genomes. This paper shows that duplicated genes arise at a high rate but have a short half-life.
61. Gibson, T. J. & Spring, J. Genetic redundancy in vertebrates: polyploidy and persistence of genes encoding multidomain proteins. Trends Genet. 14, 46-49 (1998).
62. Hughes, A. L. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 256, 119-124 (1994).
63. Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531-1545 (1999).
64. Lynch, M. & Force, A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics 154, 459-473 (2000).
65. Blanchard, J. L. & Lynch, M. Organellar genes: why do they end up in the nucleus? Trends Genet. 16, 315-320 (2000).
66. Wagner, A. The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions. Genetics 154, 1389-1401 (2000).