Plant breeding with Genomic selection: Gain per unit time and cost

Crop Science

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1681-1690

  Heffner, Elliot L ^a   Lorenz, Aaron J ^a   Jannink, Jean Luc ^a   Sorrells, Mark E ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOS; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 78650127985     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.11.0662     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Akbari, M., P. Wenzl, V. Caig, J. Carling, L. Xia, S.Y. Yang, G. Uszynski, V. Mohler, A. Lehmensiek, H. Kuchel, M.J. Hayden, N. Howes, P. Sharp, P. Vaughan, B. Rathmell, E. Huttner, and A. Kilian. 2006. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113:1409-1420.
2. Bernardo, R. 2008. Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: Learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci. 48:1649-1664.
3. Bernardo, R., and J.M. Yu. 2007. Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci. 47:1082-1090.
4. Bonnett, D.G., G.J. Rebetzke, and W. Spielmeyer. 2005. Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Mol. Breed. 15:75-85.
5. Bulmer, M.G. 1971. Effect of selection on genetic variability. Am. Nat. 105:201-211.
6. Chao, S.M., W.J. Zhang, J. Dubcovsky, and M.E. Sorrells. 2007. Evaluation of genetic diversity and genome-wide linkage disequilibrium among US wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) germplasm representing different market classes. Crop Sci. 47:1018-1030.
7. Cochran, W.G. 1951. Improvement by means of selection. In J. Neyman (ed.) Proc. 2nd Berkeley Symp. On Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, CA. 31 July-12 Aug. 1950. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
8. de Roos, A.P.W., B.J. Hayes, R.J. Spelman, and M.E. Goddard. 2008. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179:1503-1512.
9. Falconer, D.S., and T.F.C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longmans Green, Harlow, Essex, UK. Fehr, W.R. 1987. Principles of cultivar development. Volume 1. Theory and technique. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
10. Genz, A., F. Bretz, T. Miwa, X. Mi, F. Leisch, F. Scheipl, and T. Hothorn. 2009. mvtnorm: Multivariate Normal and t Distributions. R package version 0.9-7. URL http://CRAN.Rproject.org (verified 18 June 2010).
11. Gianola, D., G. de los Campos, W.G. Hill, E. Manfredi, and R. Fernando. 2009. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet. Genetics 183:347-363.
12. Habier, D., R.L. Fernando, and J.C.M. Dekkers. 2007. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389-2397.
13. Habier, D., R.L. Fernando, and J.C.M. Dekkers. 2009. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 182:343-353.
14. Hayes, B.J., P.J. Bowman, A.J. Chamberlain, and M.E. Goddard. 2009. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J. Dairy Sci. 92:433-443.
15. Heffner, E.L., M.E. Sorrells, and J.L. Jannink. 2009. Genomic Selection for Crop Improvement. Crop Sci. 49:1-12.
16. Hill, W.G. 1974. Variability of Response to Selection in Genetic Experiments. Biometrics 30:363-366.
17. Hospital, F., L. Moreau, F. Lacoudre, A. Charcosset, and A. Gallais. 1997. More on the efficiency of marker-assisted selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1181-1189.
18. König, S., H. Simianer, and A. Willam. 2009. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J. Dairy Sci. 92:382-391.
19. Lande, R., and R. Thompson. 1990. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743-756.
20. Longin, C.F.H., H.F. Utz, A.E. Melchinger, and J.C. Reif. 2007. Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids. II. Optimum type and number of testers in two-stage selection for general combining ability. Theor. Appl. Genet. 114:393-402.
21. Lorenzana, R.E., and R. Bernardo. 2009. Accuracy of genotypic value predictions for marker-based selection in biparental plant populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120:151-161.
22. Meuwissen, T.H.E., B.J. Hayes, and M.E. Goddard. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819-1829.
23. Muir, W.M. 2007. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUPestimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 124:342-355.
24. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Online.] Available at: http://www.Rproject.org (verified 18 June 2010). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Vienna, Austria.
25. Schaeffer, L.R. 2006. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 123:218-223.
26. Seitz, G. 2005. The use of doubled haploids in corn breeding. p. 1-7. In Proc. Ill. Corn Breeders School. 41st. Univ. of Illinois. 7-8 Mar. 2005. Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
27. Tomerius, A.M. 2001. Optimizing the development of seed-parent lines in hybrid rye breeding. Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
28. Utz, H.F. 1969. Mehrstufenselektion in der Pflanzenzüchtung. (In German.) Ph.D. diss. Univ. of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
29. VanRaden, P.M. 2004. Invited review: Selection on net merit to improve lifetime profit. J. Dairy Sci. 87:3125-3131.
30. VanRaden, P.M., C.P. Van Tassell, G.R. Wiggans, T.S. Sonstegard, R.D. Schnabel, J.F. Taylor, and F.S. Schenkel. 2009. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 92:16-24.
31. Varshney, R.K., S.N. Nayak, G.D. May, and S.A. Jackson. 2009. Next-generation sequencing technologies and their implications for crop genetics and breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 27:522-530.
32. von Bubnoff, A. 2008. Next-generation sequencing: The race is on. Cell 132:721-723.
33. Wong, C.K., and R. Bernardo. 2008. Genomewide selection in oil palm: Increasing selection gain per unit time and cost with small populations. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116:815-824.
34. Wricke, G., and W.E. Weber. 1986. Quantitative genetics and selection in plant breeding. Walter De Gruyter and Co., Berlin.
35. Xu, Y.B., and J.H. Crouch. 2008. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: From publications to practice. Crop Sci. 48:391-407.
36. Zhong, S.Q., J.C.M. Dekkers, R.L. Fernando, and J.L. Jannink. 2009. Factors affecting accuracy from genomic selection in populations derived from multiple inbred lines: A barley case study. Genetics 182:355-364.