An atomic structure of the human 26S proteasome

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 778-785

  Huang, Xiuliang ^a   Luan, Bai ^a   Wu, Jianping ^a   Shi, Yigong ^a  

^a TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; DEUBIQUITINASE; PROTEASOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; PROTEIN BINDING;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GOLD STANDARD; HEK293 CELL LINE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROGEN BOND; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SURFACE PROPERTY; ALPHA HELIX; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN QUATERNARY STRUCTURE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CRYOELECTRON MICROSCOPY; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION, ALPHA-HELICAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, QUATERNARY;

EID: 84978676943     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3273     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Finley, D., Chen, X. & Walters, K.J. Gates, channels, and switches: elements of the proteasome machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 77-93 (2016).
2. Deveraux, Q., Ustrell, V., Pickart, C. & Rechsteiner, M. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 7059-7061 (1994).
3. Husnjak, K. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453, 481-488 (2008).
4. Zhang, F. et al. Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 34, 473-484 (2009).
5. Wang, F. et al. Structure and mechanism of the hexameric MecA-ClpC molecular machine. Nature 471, 331-335 (2011).
6. Lander, G.C. et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186-191 (2012).
7. Yao, T. & Cohen, R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419, 403-407 (2002).
8. Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611-615 (2002).
9. Nyquist, K. & Martin, A. Marching to the beat of the ring: polypeptide translocation by AAA+ proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 53-60 (2014).
10. Pick, E., Hofmann, K. & Glickman, M.H. PCI complexes: beyond the proteasome, CSN, and eIF3 Troika. Mol. Cell 35, 260-264 (2009).
11. Maytal-Kivity, V., Reis, N., Hofmann, K. & Glickman, M.H. MPN+, a putative catalytic motif found in a subset of MPN domain proteins from eukaryotes and prokaryotes, is critical for Rpn11 function. BMC Biochem. 3, 28 (2002).
12. Estrin, E., Lopez-Blanco, J.R., Chacón, P. & Martin, A. Formation of an intricate helical bundle dictates the assembly of the 26S proteasome lid.. Structure 21, 1624-1635 (2013).
13. Tomko, R.J. Jr. et al. A single a helix drives extensive remodeling of the proteasome lid and completion of regulatory particle assembly. Cell 163, 432-444 (2015).
14. Wang, Q., Young, P. & Walters, K.J. Structure of S5a bound to monoubiquitin provides a model for polyubiquitin recognition. J. Mol. Biol. 348, 727-739 (2005).
15. Zhang, N. et al. Structure of the s5a:k48-linked diubiquitin complex and its interactions with rpn13. Mol. Cell 35, 280-290 (2009).
16. Sakata, E. et al. Localization of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 by electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1479-1484 (2012).
17. Amerik, A.Y. & Hochstrasser, M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1695, 189-207 (2004).
18. Lee, B.H. et al. USP14 deubiquitinates proteasome-bound substrates that are ubiquitinated at multiple sites. Nature 532, 398-401 (2016).
19. Hu, M. et al. Crystal structure of a UBP-family deubiquitinating enzyme in isolation and in complex with ubiquitin aldehyde. Cell 111, 1041-1054 (2002).
20. Hu, M. et al. Structure and mechanisms of the proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme USP14. EMBO J. 24, 3747-3756 (2005).
21. Lowe, J. et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3-4 A resolution. Science 268, 533-539 (1995).
22. Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2-4A resolution. Nature 386, 463-471 (1997).
23. Unno, M. et al. The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10, 609. 618 (2002).
24. Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomicresolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10, 584-590 (2013).
25. Park, S. et al. Reconfiguration of the proteasome during chaperone-mediated assembly. Nature 497, 512-516 (2013).
26. Campbell, M.G., Veesler, D., Cheng, A., Potter, C.S. & Carragher, B. 2.8 A resolution reconstruction of the Thermoplasma acidophilum 20S proteasome using cryo-electron microscopy. eLife 4, e06380 (2015).
27. da Fonseca, P.C. & Morris, E.P. Cryo-EM reveals the conformation of a substrate analogue in the human 20S proteasome core. Nat. Commun. 6, 7573 (2015).
28. Harshbarger, W., Miller, C., Diedrich, C. & Sacchettini, J. Crystal structure of the human 20S proteasome in complex with carfilzomib. Structure 23, 418-424 (2015).
29. Lasker, K. et al. Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 1380-1387 (2012).
30. Beck, F. et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14870-14875 (2012).
31. da Fonseca, P.C., He, J. & Morris, E.P. Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol. Cell 46, 54-66 (2012).
32. Matyskiela, M.E., Lander, G.C. & Martin, A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 781-788 (2013).
33. led, P. et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7264-7269 (2013).
34. Unverdorben, P. et al. Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5544-5549 (2014).
35. Aufderheide, A. et al. Structural characterization of the interaction of Ubp6 with the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8626-8631 (2015).
36. Bohn, S. et al. Localization of the regulatory particle subunit Sem1 in the 26S proteasome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 435, 250-254 (2013).
37. Bashore, C. et al. Ubp6 deubiquitinase controls conformational dynamics and substrate degradation of the 26S proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 712-719 (2015).
38. Luan, B. et al. Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2642-2647 (2016).
39. Lee, B.H. et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 467, 179-184 (2010).
40. Wang, X. et al. Mass spectrometric characterization of the affinity-purified human 26S proteasome complex. Biochemistry 46, 3553-3565 (2007).
41. Thompson, D., Hakala, K. & DeMartino, G.N. Subcomplexes of PA700, the 19 S regulator of the 26 S proteasome, reveal relative roles of AAA subunits in 26 S proteasome assembly and activation and ATPase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 24891-24903 (2009).
42. Yu, Y. et al. Interactions of PAN's C-termini with archaeal 20S proteasome and implications for the eukaryotic proteasome-ATPase interactions. EMBO J. 29, 692-702 (2010).
43. Tian, G. et al. An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1259-1267 (2011).
44. Forster, A., Masters, E.I., Whitby, F.G., Robinson, H. & Hill, C.P. The 1.9 A structure of a proteasome-11S activator complex and implications for proteasome-PAN/PA700 interactions. Mol. Cell 18, 589-599 (2005).
45. Kusmierczyk, A.R., Kunjappu, M.J., Funakoshi, M. & Hochstrasser, M. A multimeric assembly factor controls the formation of alternative 20S proteasomes.. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 237-244 (2008).
46. Wendler, P., Ciniawsky, S., Kock, M. & Kube, S. Structure and function of the AAA+ nucleotide binding pocket. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1823, 2-14 (2012).
47. Banerjee, S. et al. 2.3 A resolution cryo-EM structure of human p97 and mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Science 351, 871.875 (2016).
48. Wang, J. et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 9, 177-184 (2001).
49. Yamada-Inagawa, T., Okuno, T., Karata, K., Yamanaka, K. & Ogura, T. Conserved pore residues in the AAA protease FtsH are important for proteolysis and its coupling to ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 50182-50187 (2003).
50. Schweitzer, A. et al. Structure of the human 26S proteasome at a resolution of 3.9 A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7816-7821 (2016).
51. Dambacher, C.M., Worden, E.J., Herzik, M.A., Martin, A. & Lander, G.C. Atomic structure of the 26S proteasome lid reveals the mechanism of deubiquitinase inhibition.. eLife 5, e13027 (2016).
52. Smith, D.M. et al. Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol. Cell 27, 731-744 (2007).
53. Glynn, S.E., Martin, A., Nager, A.R., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 139, 744-756 (2009).
54. Pettersen, E.F. et al. UCSF Chimera: a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612 (2004).
55. Leggett, D.S., Glickman, M.H. & Finley, D. Purification of proteasomes, proteasome subcomplexes, and proteasome-associated proteins from budding yeast.. Methods Mol. Biol. 301, 57-70 (2005).
56. Mindell, J.A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334-347 (2003).
57. Scheres, S.H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
58. Zhou, Q. et al. Cryo-EM structure of SNAP-SNARE assembly in 20S particle. Cell Res. 25, 551-560 (2015).
59. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F.J. & Tagare, H.D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63-65 (2014).
60. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126-2132 (2004).
61. Stein, N. CHAINSAW: a program for mutating pdb files used as templates in molecular replacement. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 41, 641-643 (2008).
62. Tomko, R.J. Jr. & Hochstrasser, M. The intrinsically disordered Sem1 protein functions as a molecular tether during proteasome lid biogenesis.. Mol. Cell 53, 433-443 (2014).
63. Adams, P.D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58, 1948-1954 (2002).
64. Murshudov, G.N., Vagin, A.A. & Dodson, E.J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 53, 240-255 (1997).
65. Amunts, A. et al. Structure of the yeast mitochondrial large ribosomal subunit. Science 343, 1485-1489 (2014).