Structure of the human 26S proteasome at a resolution of 3.9 Å

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 113, Issue 28, 2016, Pages 7816-7821

  Schweitzer, Andreas ^a   Aufderheide, Antje ^a   Rudack, Till ^b   Beck, Florian ^a   Pfeifer, Günter ^a   Plitzko, Jürgen M ^a   Sakata, Eri ^a   Schulten, Klaus ^b,c   Förster, Friedrich ^a,d   Baumeister, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

AAA ATPase; Cryo electron microscopy; Integrative modeling; Proteostasis

Indexed keywords

26S PROTEASOME; ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; PROTEASOME; PROTEIN RPN1; PROTEIN RPN2; PROTEIN RPN3; PROTEIN RPT6; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; ENZYME SUBUNIT; ERYTHROCYTE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING SITE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; YEAST; CHEMISTRY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, TRANSMISSION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; YEASTS;

EID: 84978042613     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608050113     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Voges D, Zwickl P, Baumeister W (1999) The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu Rev Biochem 68:1015-1068.
2. Finley D, Chen X, Walters KJ (2016) Gates, channels, and switches: Elements of the proteasome machine. Trends Biochem Sci 41(1):77-93.
3. Śledź P, Baumeister W (2016) Structure-driven developments of 26S proteasome inhibitors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 56:191-209.
4. Asano S, et al. (2015) Proteasomes: A molecular census of 26S proteasomes in intact neurons. Science 347(6220):439-442.
5. Löwe J, et al. (1995) Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution. Science 268(5210):533-539.
6. Groll M, et al. (1997) Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 386(6624):463-471.
7. Unno M, et al. (2002) The structure of the mammalian 20S proteasome at 2.75 A resolution. Structure 10(5):609-618.
8. Förster F, Unverdorben P, Sledz P, Baumeister W (2013) Unveiling the long-held secrets of the 26S proteasome. Structure 21(9):1551-1562.
9. Luan B, et al. (2016) Structure of an endogenous yeast 26S proteasome reveals two major conformational states. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(10):2642-2647.
10. Lander GC, et al. (2012) Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482(7384):186-191.
11. Unverdorben P, et al. (2014) Deep classification of a large cryo-EM dataset defines the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(15):5544-5549.
12. Lasker K, et al. (2012) Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(5):1380-1387.
13. Beck F, et al. (2012) Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(37):14870-14875.
14. Dambacher CM, Worden EJ, Herzik MA, Martin A, Lander GC (2016) Atomic structure of the 26S proteasome lid reveals the mechanism of deubiquitinase inhibition. eLife 5:e13027.
15. Matyskiela ME, Lander GC, Martin A (2013) Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(7):781-788.
16. Śledź P, et al. (2013) Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(18):7264-7269.
17. Shi Y, et al. (2016) Rpn1 provides adjacent receptor sites for substrate binding and deubiquitination by the proteasome. Science 351(6275):831.
18. van Nocker S, et al. (1996) The multiubiquitin-chain-binding protein Mcb1 is a component of the 26S proteasome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and plays a nonessential, substrate-specific role in protein turnover. Mol Cell Biol 16(11):6020-6028.
19. Husnjak K, et al. (2008) Proteasome subunit Rpn13 is a novel ubiquitin receptor. Nature 453(7194):481-488.
20. Yao T, Cohen RE (2002) A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419(6905):403-407.
21. Verma R, et al. (2002) Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298(5593):611-615.
22. da Fonseca PC, He J, Morris EP (2012) Molecular model of the human 26S proteasome. Mol Cell 46(1):54-66.
23. Liu CW, et al. (2006) ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome. Mol Cell 24(1):39-50.
24. Schwanhäusser B, et al. (2011) Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 473(7347):337-342.
25. Chen X, Lee BH, Finley D, Walters KJ (2010) Structure of proteasome ubiquitin receptor hRpn13 and its activation by the scaffolding protein hRpn2. Mol Cell 38(3):404-415.
26. Lander GC, Martin A, Nogales E (2013) The proteasome under the microscope: The regulatory particle in focus. Curr Opin Struct Biol 23(2):243-251.
27. Goh BC, et al. (2016) Computational methodologies for real-space structural refinement of large macromolecular complexes. Annu Rev Biophys 45:253-278.
28. Perilla JR, et al. (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations of large macromolecular complexes. Curr Opin Struct Biol 31:64-74.
29. da Fonseca PC, Morris EP (2008) Structure of the human 26S proteasome: Subunit radial displacements open the gate into the proteolytic core. J Biol Chem 283(34):23305-23314.
30. Smith DM, et al. (2007) Docking of the proteasomal ATPases' carboxyl termini in the 20S proteasome's alpha ring opens the gate for substrate entry. Mol Cell 27(5):731-744.
31. Tian G, et al. (2011) An asymmetric interface between the regulatory and core particles of the proteasome. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18(11):1259-1267.
32. Nyquist K, Martin A (2014) Marching to the beat of the ring: Polypeptide translocation by AAA+ proteases. Trends Biochem Sci 39(2):53-60.
33. Wendler P, Ciniawsky S, Kock M, Kube S (2012) Structure and function of the AAA+ nucleotide binding pocket. Biochim Biophys Acta 1823(1):2-14.
34. Sauer RT, Baker TA (2011) AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu Rev Biochem 80:587-612.
35. Smith DM, Fraga H, Reis C, Kafri G, Goldberg AL (2011) ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell 144(4):526-538.
36. Zhang F, et al. (2009) Structural insights into the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol Cell 34(4):473-484.
37. Glickman MH, et al. (1998) A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 94(5):615-623.
38. Paraskevopoulos K, et al. (2014) Dss1 is a 26S proteasome ubiquitin receptor. Mol Cell 56(3):453-461.
39. Bohn S, et al. (2013) Localization of the regulatory particle subunit Sem1 in the 26S proteasome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 435(2):250-254.
40. Pathare GR, et al. (2014) Crystal structure of the proteasomal deubiquitylation module Rpn8-Rpn11. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(8):2984-2989.
41. Worden EJ, Padovani C, Martin A (2014) Structure of the Rpn11-Rpn8 dimer reveals mechanisms of substrate deubiquitination during proteasomal degradation. Nat Struct Mol Biol 21(3):220-227.
42. Banerjee S, et al. (2016) 2.3 Å resolution cryo-EM structure of human p97 and mechanism of allosteric inhibition. Science 351(6275):871-875.
43. Nickell S, et al. (2005) TOM software toolbox: Acquisition and analysis for electron tomography. J Struct Biol 149(3):227-234.
44. Scheres SH (2012) RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J Struct Biol 180(3):519-530.
45. Trabuco LG, Villa E, Schreiner E, Harrison CB, Schulten K (2009) Molecular dynamics flexible fitting: A practical guide to combine cryo-electron microscopy and X-ray crystallography. Methods 49(2):174-180.
46. Ribeiro JV, et al. (2016) QwikMD-Integrative Molecular Dynamics Toolkit for novices and experts. Sci Rep 6:26536-26540.
47. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33-38, 27-28.
48. Phillips JC, et al. (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781-1802.
49. Cox J, et al. (2014) Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(9):2513-2526.
50. Steen H, Mann M (2004) The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5(9):699-711.
51. Aufderheide A, et al. (2015) Structural characterization of the interaction of Ubp6 with the 26S proteasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(28):8626-8631.
52. Li X, et al. (2013) Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat Methods 10(6):584-590.
53. Rohou A, Grigorieff N (2015) CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol 192(2):216-221.
54. Scheres SH (2014) Beam-induced motion correction for sub-megadalton cryo-EM particles. eLife 3:e03665.
55. Cardone G, Heymann JB, Steven AC (2013) One number does not fit all: Mapping local variations in resolution in cryo-EM reconstructions. J Struct Biol 184(2):226-236.
56. Goddard TD, Huang CC, Ferrin TE (2007) Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J Struct Biol 157(1):281-287.
57. Harshbarger W, Miller C, Diedrich C, Sacchettini J (2015) Crystal structure of the human 20S proteasome in complex with carfilzomib. Structure 23(2):418-424.
58. Sali A, Blundell TL (1993) Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 234(3):779-815.
59. He J, et al. (2012) The structure of the 26S proteasome subunit Rpn2 reveals its PC repeat domain as a closed toroid of two concentric α-helical rings. Structure 20(3):513-521.
60. Leaver-Fay A, et al. (2011) ROSETTA3: An object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 487:545-574.
61. Kaufmann KW, Lemmon GH, Deluca SL, Sheehan JH, Meiler J (2010) Practically useful: What the Rosetta protein modeling suite can do for you. Biochemistry 49(14):2987-2998.
62. Trabuco LG, Villa E, Mitra K, Frank J, Schulten K (2008) Flexible fitting of atomic structures into electron microscopy maps using molecular dynamics. Structure 16(5):673-683.
63. Mackerell AD, Jr, Feig M, Brooks CL, III (2004) Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem 25(11):1400-1415.
64. Stone JE, McGreevy R, Isralewitz B, Schulten K (2014) GPU-accelerated analysis and visualization of large structures solved by molecular dynamics flexible fitting. Faraday Discuss 169:265-283.
65. Tyka MD, et al. (2011) Alternate states of proteins revealed by detailed energy landscape mapping. J Mol Biol 405(2):607-618.
66. Lindert S, McCammon JA (2015) Improved cryoEM-Guided Iterative Molecular Dynamics: Rosetta protein structure refinement protocol for high precision protein structure prediction. J Chem Theory Comput 11(3):1337-1346.
67. Greber BJ, et al. (2014) The complete structure of the large subunit of the mammalian mitochondrial ribosome. Nature 515(7526):283-286.
68. Adams PD, et al. (2002) PHENIX: Building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 58(Pt 11):1948-1954.
69. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66(Pt 4):486-501.