Marching to the beat of the ring: Polypeptide translocation by AAA+ proteases

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 53-60

  Nyquist, Kristofor ^a,b   Martin, Andreas ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

AAA+ protease; ATP hydrolysis; Protein translocation; Subunit coordination

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE DEPENDENT PROTEINASE; ENDOPEPTIDASE CLPX; POLYPEPTIDE; PROTEASOME; PROTEOME;

ALLOSTERISM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; ENZYME SUBUNIT; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; OLIGOMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEIN UNFOLDING; REVIEW;

AAA+ PROTEASE; ATP HYDROLYSIS; PROTEIN TRANSLOCATION; SUBUNIT COORDINATION;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; ATP-DEPENDENT PROTEASES; ESCHERICHIA COLI; ESCHERICHIA COLI PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEOLYSIS;

EID: 84892882219     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2013.11.003     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Sauer R.T., Baker T.A. AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011, 80:587-612.
2. Hanson P.I., Whiteheart S.W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6:519-529.
3. Neuwald A.F., et al. AAA+: a class of chaperone-like ATPases associated with the assembly, operation, and disassembly of protein complexes. Genome Res. 1999, 9:27-43.
4. Truscott K.N., et al. Unfolded protein responses in bacteria and mitochondria: a central role for the ClpXP machine. IUBMB Life 2011, 63:955-963.
5. Giudice E., Gillet R. The task force that rescues stalled ribosomes in bacteria. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2013, 38:403-411.
6. Finley D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78:477-513.
7. Martin A., et al. Diverse pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine mediate unassisted and adaptor-dependent recognition of ssrA-tagged substrates. Mol. Cell 2008, 29:441-450.
8. Matyskiela M.E., Martin A. Design principles of a universal protein degradation machine. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425:199-213.
9. Kirstein J., et al. Adapting the machine: adaptor proteins for Hsp100/Clp and AAA+ proteases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:589-599.
10. Inobe T., Matouschek A. Protein targeting to ATP-dependent proteases. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:43-51.
11. Baker T.A., Sauer R.T. ATP-dependent proteases of bacteria: recognition logic and operating principles. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31:647-653.
12. Maillard R.A., et al. ClpX(P) generates mechanical force to unfold and translocate its protein substrates. Cell 2011, 145:459-469.
13. Aubin-Tam M., et al. Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine. Cell 2011, 145:257-267.
14. Wang J., et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure 2001, 9:177-184.
15. Park E., et al. Role of the GYVG pore motif of HslU ATPase in protein unfolding and translocation for degradation by HslV peptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:22892-22898.
16. Martin A., et al. Pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine grip substrates to drive translocation and unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:1147-1151.
17. Koga N., et al. Paddling mechanism for the substrate translocation by AAA+ motor revealed by multiscale molecular simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:18237-18242.
18. Zhang F., et al. Mechanism of substrate unfolding and translocation by the regulatory particle of the proteasome from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii. Mol. Cell 2009, 34:485-496.
19. Siddiqui S.M., et al. Role of the processing pore of the ClpX AAA+ ATPase in the recognition and engagement of specific protein substrates. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:369-374.
20. Barkow S.R., et al. Polypeptide translocation by the AAA+ ClpXP protease machine. Chem. Biol. 2009, 16:605-612.
21. Lee C., et al. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Mol. Cell 2001, 7:627-637.
22. Too P.H., et al. Slippery substrates impair function of a bacterial protease ATPase by unbalancing translocation versus exit. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288:13243-13257.
23. Rape M., Jentsch S. Taking a bite: proteasomal protein processing. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:E113-E116.
24. Palombella V.J., et al. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is required for processing the NF-κB1 precursor protein and the activation of NF-κB. Cell 1994, 78:773-785.
25. Schrader E.K., et al. A three-part signal governs differential processing of Gli1 and Gli3 proteins by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:39051-39058.
26. Lyubimov A.Y., et al. The nuts and bolts of ring-translocase structure and mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2011, 21:240-248.
27. Martin A., et al. Rebuilt AAA+ motors reveal operating principles for ATP-fuelled machines. Nature 2005, 437:1115-1120.
28. Smith G.R., et al. A link between sequence conservation and domain motion within the AAA+ family. J. Struct. Biol. 2004, 146:189-204.
29. Erzberger J.P., Berger J.M. Evolutionary relationships and structural mechanisms of AAA+ proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2006, 35:93-114.
30. Wendler P., et al. Structure and function of the AAA+ nucleotide binding pocket. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1823:2-14.
31. Glynn S.E., et al. Crystal structures of asymmetric ClpX hexamers reveal nucleotide-dependent motions in a AAA+ protein-unfolding machine. Cell 2010, 139:744-756.
32. Stinson B.M., et al. Nucleotide binding and conformational switching in the hexameric ring of a AAA+ machine. Cell 2013, 153:628-639.
33. Hersch G.L., et al. Asymmetric interactions of ATP with the AAA+ ClpX6 unfoldase: allosteric control of a protein machine. Cell 2005, 121:1017-1027.
34. Glynn S.E., et al. Dynamic and static components power unfolding in topologically closed rings of a AAA+ proteolytic machine. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:616-622.
35. Bochtler M., et al. The structures of HslU and the ATP-dependent protease HslU-HslV. Nature 2000, 403:800-805.
36. Cha S., et al. Crystal structure of Lon protease: molecular architecture of gated entry to a sequestered degradation chamber. EMBO J. 2010, 29:3520-3530.
37. Yakamavich J.A., et al. Asymmetric nucleotide transactions of the HslUV protease. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 380:946-957.
38. Horwitz A.A., et al. ATP-induced structural transitions in PAN, the proteasome-regulatory ATPase complex in Archaea. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:22921-22929.
39. Bieniossek C., et al. The crystal structure of apo-FtsH reveals domain movements necessary for substrate unfolding and translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:21579-21584.
40. Lander G.C., et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 2012, 482:186-191.
41. Beck F., et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:14870-14875.
42. Matyskiela M.E., et al. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013, 20:781-788.
43. Taraska J.W., et al. Mapping the structure and conformational movements of proteins with transition metal ion FRET. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:532-537.
44. Hwang W., Lang M.J. Nucleotide-dependent control of internal strains in ring-shaped AAA+ motors. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2013, 6:65-73.
45. Schmidt H., et al. Insights into dynein motor domain function from a 3.3-Å crystal structure. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19:492-497. S1.
46. Huang J., et al. Lis1 acts as a 'clutch' between the ATPase and microtubule-binding domains of the dynein motor. Cell 2012, 150:975-986.
47. Singleton M.R., et al. Crystal structure of T7 gene 4 ring helicase indicates a mechanism for sequential hydrolysis of nucleotides. Cell 2000, 101:589-600.
48. Smith D.M., et al. ATP binds to proteasomal ATPases in pairs with distinct functional effects, implying an ordered reaction cycle. Cell 2011, 144:526-538.
49. Śledź P., et al. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:7264-7269.
50. Moffitt J.R., et al. Intersubunit coordination in a homomeric ring ATPase. Nature 2009, 457:446-450.
51. Chistol G., et al. High degree of coordination and division of labor among subunits in a homomeric ring ATPase. Cell 2012, 151:1017-1028.
52. Sen M., et al. The ClpXP protease unfolds substrates with a constant pulling frequency but using different gears. Cell 2013, 155:636-646.
53. Enemark E.J., Joshua-Tor L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 2006, 442:270-275.
54. Thomsen N.D., Berger J.M. Running in reverse: the structural basis for translocation polarity in hexameric helicases. Cell 2009, 139:523-534.
55. Itsathitphaisarn O., et al. The hexameric helicase DnaB adopts a nonplanar conformation during translocation. Cell 2012, 151:267-277.
56. Bolon D.N., et al. Nucleotide-dependent substrate handoff from the SspB adaptor to the AAA+ ClpXP protease. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:343-350.
57. Kainov D.E., et al. Structural basis of mechanochemical coupling in a hexameric molecular motor. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:3607-3617.