Ubp6 deubiquitinase controls conformational dynamics and substrate degradation of the 26S proteasome

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 712-719

  Bashore, Charlene ^a   Dambacher, Corey M ^b   Goodall, Ellen A ^a   Matyskiela, Mary E ^a,d   Lander, Gabriel C ^b   Martin, Andreas ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CELGENE CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; DEUBIQUITINASE; PROTEASOME; RPN11 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBP6 DEUBIQUITINASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ATP DEPENDENT 26S PROTEASE; MACROMOLECULE; MULTIENZYME COMPLEX; PROTEINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UBP6 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME DEGRADATION; ENZYME SUBSTRATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; UBIQUITINATION; CHEMISTRY; MACROMOLECULE; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ENDOPEPTIDASES; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84940984237     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.3075     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Finley, D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 477-513 (2009).
2. Goldberg, A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 426, 895-899 (2003).
3. Goldberg, A.L. Functions of the proteasome: from protein degradation and immune surveillance to cancer therapy. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35, 12-17 (2007).
4. Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science 298, 611-615 (2002).
5. Yao, T. & Cohen, R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature 419, 403-407 (2002).
6. Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4Å resolution. Nature 386, 463-471 (1997).
7. Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine grip substrates to drive translocation and unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1147-1151 (2008).
8. Maillard, R.A. et al. ClpX(P) generates mechanical force to unfold and translocate its protein substrates. Cell 145, 459-469 (2011).
9. Aubin-Tam, M.-E., Olivares, A.O., Sauer, R.T., Baker, T.A. & Lang, M.J. Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine. Cell 145, 257-267 (2011).
10. Xu, P. et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 137, 133-145 (2009).
11. Kim, W. et al. Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modifed proteome. Mol. Cell 44, 325-340 (2011).
12. Saeki, Y. et al. Lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome. EMBO J. 28, 359-371 (2009).
13. Zhang, N. et al. Structure of the s5a:k48-linked diubiquitin complex and its interactions with rpn13. Mol. Cell 35, 280-290 (2009).
14. Riedinger, C. et al. Structure of Rpn10 and its interactions with polyubiquitin chains and the proteasome subunit Rpn12. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 33992-34003 (2010).
15. Elsasser, S., Chandler-Militello, D., Müller, B., Hanna, J. & Finley, D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 26817-26822 (2004).
16. Zhang, D. et al. Together, Rpn10 and Dsk2 can serve as a polyubiquitin chain-length sensor. Mol. Cell 36, 1018-1033 (2009).
17. Mayor, T., Graumann, J., Bryan, J., MacCoss, M.J. & Deshaies, R.J. Quantitative profling of ubiquitylated proteins reveals proteasome substrates and the substrate repertoire infuenced by the Rpn10 receptor pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1885-1895 (2007).
18. Lander, G.C. et al. Complete subunit architecture of the proteasome regulatory particle. Nature 482, 186-191 (2012).
19. Beck, F. et al. Near-atomic resolution structural model of the yeast 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14870-14875 (2012).
20. Beckwith, R., Estrin, E., Worden, E.J. & Martin, A. Reconstitution of the 26S proteasome reveals functional asymmetries in its AAA+ unfoldase. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1164-1172 (2013).
21. Matyskiela, M.E., Lander, G.C. & Martin, A. Conformational switching of the 26S proteasome enables substrate degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 781-788 (2013).
22. ͆ledź, P. & Unverdorben, P. Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP-γS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide-dependent substrate translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7264-7269 (2013).
23. Hu, M. et al. Structure and mechanisms of the proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme USP14. EMBO J. 24, 3747-3756 (2005).
24. Leggett, D.S. et al. Multiple associated proteins regulate proteasome structure and function. Mol. Cell 10, 495-507 (2002).
25. Elsasser, S. et al. Proteasome subunit Rpn1 binds ubiquitin-like protein domains. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 725-730 (2002).
26. Hanna, J. et al. Deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell 127, 99-111 (2006).
27. Peth, A., Besche, H.C. & Goldberg, A.L. Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasome by binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which causes 20S gate opening. Mol. Cell 36, 794-804 (2009).
28. Peth, A., Kukushkin, N., Bossé, M. & Goldberg, A.L. Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasomal ATPases by binding to Usp14 or Uch37 homologs. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 7781-7790 (2013).
29. Lee, B.-H. et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 467, 179-184 (2010).
30. Torres, E.M. et al. Identifcation of aneuploidy-tolerating mutations. Cell 143, 71-83 (2010).
31. Dephoure, N. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals posttranslational responses to aneuploidy in yeast. eLife 3, e03023 (2014).
32. Walters, B.J. et al. A catalytic independent function of the deubiquitinating enzyme USP14 regulates hippocampal synaptic short-term plasticity and vesicle number. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 592, 571-586 (2014).
33. Levchenko, I. A specifcity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. Science 289, 2354-2356 (2000).
34. Dong, K.C. et al. Preparation of distinct ubiquitin chain reagents of high purity and yield. Structure 19, 1053-1063 (2011).
35. Borodovsky, A. et al. A novel active site-directed probe specifc for deubiquitylating enzymes reveals proteasome association of USP14. EMBO J. 20, 5187-5196 (2001).
36. Asano, S. et al. A molecular census of 26S proteasomes in intact neurons. Science 347, 439-442 (2015).
37. Chu, B.W. et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase UBE3C enhances proteasome processivity by ubiquitinating partially proteolyzed substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34575-34587 (2013).
38. Aufderheide, A. et al. Structural characterization of the interaction of Ubp6 with the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8626-8631 (2015).
39. Marshall, A.G. et al. Genetic background alters the severity and onset of neuromuscular disease caused by the loss of ubiquitin-specifc protease 14 (Usp14). PLoS ONE 8, e84042 (2013).
40. Chen, P.-C. et al. The proteasome-associated deubiquitinating enzyme Usp14 is essential for the maintenance of synaptic ubiquitin levels and the development of neuromuscular junctions. J. Neurosci. 29, 10909-10919 (2009).
41. Crosas, B. et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell 127, 1401-1413 (2006).
42. Aviram, S. & Kornitzer, D. The ubiquitin ligase Hul5 promotes proteasomal processivity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 985-994 (2010).
43. Inobe, T., Fishbain, S., Prakash, S. & Matouschek, A. Defning the geometry of the two-component proteasome degron. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 161-167 (2011).
44. Gomez, T.A., Kolawa, N., Gee, M., Sweredoski, M.J. & Deshaies, R.J. Identifcation of a functional docking site in the Rpn1 LRR domain for the UBA-UBL domain protein Ddi1. BMC Biol. 9, 33 (2011).
45. Unverdorben, P. et al. Deep classifcation of a large cryo-EM dataset defnes the conformational landscape of the 26S proteasome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5544-5549 (2014).
46. Worden, E.J., Padovani, C. & Martin, A. Structure of the Rpn11-Rpn8 dimer reveals mechanisms of substrate deubiquitination during proteasomal degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 220-227 (2014).
47. Lander, G.C. et al. Appion: an integrated, database-driven pipeline to facilitate EM image processing. J. Struct. Biol. 166, 95-102 (2009).
48. Saeki, Y., Isono, E. & Toh, E.A. Preparation of ubiquitinated substrates by the PY motif-insertion method for monitoring 26S proteasome activity. Methods Enzymol. 399, 215-227 (2005).
49. Verma, R. et al. Proteasomal proteomics: identifcation of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affnity-purifed proteasomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 3425-3439 (2000).
50. Kather, I., Bippes, C.A. & Schmid, F.X. A stable disulfde-free gene-3-protein of phage fd generated by in vitro evolution. J. Mol. Biol. 354, 666-678 (2005).
51. Pickart, C.M. & Raasi, S. Controlled synthesis of polyubiquitin chains. Methods Enzymol. 399, 21-36 (2005).
52. Carragher, B. et al. Leginon: an automated system for acquisition of images from vitreous ice specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 132, 33-45 (2000).
53. Roseman, A.M. FindEM: a fast, effcient program for automatic selection of particles from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 145, 91-99 (2004).
54. Scheres, S.H.W. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519-530 (2012).
55. Goddard, T.D., Huang, C.C. & Ferrin, T.E. Visualizing density maps with UCSF Chimera. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 281-287 (2007).