Assessment of template-based modeling of protein structure in CASP11

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 84, Issue , 2016, Pages 200-220

  Modi, Vivek ^a   Xu, Qifang ^a   Adhikari, Sam ^a   Dunbrack, Roland L ^a  

^a FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP; Homology modeling; Protein structure prediction; Structural biology; Template based modeling

Indexed keywords

CASP11 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; DENSITY; DNA TEMPLATE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATA BANK; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; BACTERIUM; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; INTERNET; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; VIRUS;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HUMANS; INTERNET; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; VIRUSES;

EID: 84977495221     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25049     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Sali A, Blundell TL. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol 1993;234:779–815.
2. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL: an automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:3381–3385.
3. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinform 2008;9:40.
4. Krivov GG, Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009; 77:778–795.
5. Browne WJ, North A, Phillips D, Brew K, Vanaman TC, Hill RL. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine α-lactalbumin based on that of hen’s egg-white lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1969;42:65–86.
6. Greer J. Model for haptoglobin heavy chain based upon structural homology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980;77:3393–3397.
7. Söoding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 2005;21:951–960.
8. Li Y. Conformational sampling in template-free protein loop structure modeling: an overview. Computat Struct Biotechnol J 2013;5: e201302003.
9. Mosimann S, Meleshko R, James MN. A critical assessment of comparative molecular modeling of tertiary structures of proteins*. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 1995;23:301–317.
10. Lemer CMR, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 1995;23:337–355.
11. Martin AC, MacArthur MW, Thornton JM. Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1997;29 (Suppl 1):14–28.
12. Jones TA, Kleywegt GJ. CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1999;37:30–46.
13. Tramontano A, Leplae R, Morea V. Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2001;45 (Suppl 5):22–38.
14. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2003;53(Suppl 6): 395–409.
15. Tramontano A, Morea V. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2003;53 (Suppl 6):352–368.
16. Wang G, Jin Y, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Assessment of fold recognition predictions in CASP6. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2005; 61 (Suppl 7):46–66.
17. Tress M, Ezkurdia I, Grana O, Lopez G, Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2005;61 (Suppl 7):27–45.
18. Read RJ, Chavali G. Assessment of CASP7 predictions in the high accuracy template-based modeling category. Proteins 2007;69 (Suppl 8):27–37.
19. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007;69 (Suppl 8):38–56.
20. Keedy DA, Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Arendall WB, III, Chen VB, Kapral GJ, Gillespie RA, Block JN, Zemla A, Richardson DC, Richardson JS. The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):29–49.
21. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, Tramontano A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins 2009;77 (Suppl 9):18–28.
22. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011;79 (Suppl 10):37–58.
23. Huang YJ, Mao B, Aramini JM, Montelione GT. Assessment of template-based protein structure predictions in CASP10. Proteins 2014;82 (Suppl 2):43–56.
24. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Koppensteiner WA. An attempt to analyse progress in fold recognition from CASP1 to CASP3. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1999;37 (Suppl 3):226–230.
25. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard T, LoConte L, Sillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1999;37:149–170.
26. Lesk AM, Lo Conte L, Hubbard TJ. Assessment of novel fold targets in CASP4: predictions of three-dimensional structures, secondary structures, and interresidue contacts. Proteins 2001;45 (Suppl 5):98–118.
27. Aloy P, Stark A, Hadley C, Russell RB. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure, and contacts in CASP5. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2003;53 (Suppl 6):436–456.
28. Vincent JJ, Tai CH, Sathyanarayana BK, Lee B. Assessment of CASP6 predictions for new and nearly new fold targets. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2005;61 (Suppl 7):67–83.
29. Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, Clarke ND. Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2007;69 (Suppl 8):57–67.
30. Kryshtafovych A, Monastyrskyy B, Fidelis K. CASP prediction center infrastructure and evaluation measures in CASP10 and CASP ROLL. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2014;82 (Suppl. 2):7–13.
31. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370–3374.
32. Antczak PLM, Ratajczak T, Blazewicz J, Lukasiak P. SphereGrinder-reference structure-based tool for quality assessment of protein structural models. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2015. IEEE. p 665–668.
33. Mariani V, Biasini M, Barbato A, Schwede T. LDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests. Bioinformatics 2013;29:2722–2728.
34. Taylor TJ, Bai H, Tai CH, Lee B. Assessment of CASP10 contactassisted predictions. Proteins 2014;82 (Suppl 2):84–97.
35. Kinch LN, Li W, Schaeffer RD, Dunbrack RL, Jr, Monastyrskyy B, Kryshtafovych A, Grishin NV. CASP11 target classification. Proteins, 2016 in press.
36. Davis IW, Murray LW, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. MOLPRO-BITY: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W615–W619.
37. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, III, de Bakker PI, Word JM, Prisant MG, Richardson JS, Richardson DC. Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2003;50:437–450.
38. Theobald DL, Wuttke DS. THESEUS: maximum likelihood superpositioning and analysis of macromolecular structures. Bioinformatics 2006;22:2171–2172.
39. Theobald DL, Steindel PA. Optimal simultaneous superpositioning of multiple structures with missing data. Bioinformatics 2012;28: 1972–1979.
40. Lukasiak P, Antczak M, Ratajczak T, Szachniuk M, Blazewicz J. Quality assessment methodologies in analysis of structural models. Proceedings of the 25th European conference on operational research, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2012. pp 8–11.
41. Larsson P, Skwark MJ, Wallner B, Elofsson A. Assessment of global and local model quality in CASP8 using Pcons and ProQ. Proteins 2009;77 (Suppl 9):167–172.
42. Cao R, Bhattacharya D, Adhikari B, Li J, Cheng J. Massive integration of diverse protein quality assessment methods to improve template based modeling in CASP11. Proteins 2015.
43. Moult J, Fidelis K, Kryshtafovych A, Schwede T, Tramontano A. Critical Assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—progress and new directions in Round XI. Proteins, in press.
44. Joo K, Joung I, Lee SY, Kim JY, Cheng Q, Manavalan B, Joung JY, Heo S, Lee J, Nam M, Lee IH, Lee SJ, Lee J. Template based protein structure modeling by global optimization in CASP11. Proteins 2015.
45. Shapovalov MV, Dunbrack RL, Jr. A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions. Structure 2011;19:844–858.
46. Xu D, Zhang Y. Ab initio protein structure assembly using continuous structure fragments and optimized knowledge-based force field. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2012;80:1715–1735.
47. Li Y, Zhang Y. REMO: a new protocol to refine full atomic protein models from C-alpha traces by optimizing hydrogen-bonding networks. Proteins 2009;76:665–676.
48. Canutescu AA, Shelenkov AA, Dunbrack RL, Jr. A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci 2003; 12:2001–2014.
49. Bhattacharya D, Cheng J. 3Drefine: consistent protein structure refinement by optimizing hydrogen bonding network and atomiclevel energy minimization. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2013;81: 119–131.
50. Leaver-Fay A, Tyka M, Lewis SM, Lange OF, Thompson J, Jacak R, Kaufman K, Renfrew PD, Smith CA, Sheffler W. ROSETTA3: an object-oriented software suite for the simulation and design of macromolecules. Methods Enzymol 2011;487:545–574.