Assessment of comparative modeling in CASP2

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1997, Pages 14-28

  Martin, Andrew C R ^a   MacArthur, Malcolm W ^a   Thornton, Janet M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CASP2; Comparative modeling; Model assessment; Protein; Structure

Indexed keywords

DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASE; GLUCAN SYNTHASE; GLUTATHIONE TRANSFERASE; PECTATE LYASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; POLYRIBONUCLEOTIDE NUCLEOTIDYLTRANSFERASE; THREONINE DEHYDRATASE;

ARTICLE; GEOMETRY; MOLECULAR MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0031302732     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1997)1+<14::AID-PROT4>3.0.CO;2-O     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chothia, C., Lesk, A.M. The relation between the divergence of sequence and structure in proteins. EMBO J. 5:823-826, 1986.
2. Hubbard, T.J.P., Blundell, T.L. Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins: Definitions useful for protein modeling. Protein Eng. 1:159-171, 1987.
3. Flores, T.P., Orengo, C.A., Moss, D.S., Thornton, J.M. Comparison of conformational characteristics in structurally similar protein pairs. Protein Sci. 2:1811-1826, 1993.
4. Browne, W.J., North, A.C.T., Phillips, D.C., Brew, K., Vanaman, T.C., Hill, R.L. A possible three-dimensional structure of bovine α-lactalbumin based on that of Hen's egg-white lysozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 42:65-86, 1969.
5. Moult, J. The current state of the art in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 7:422-427, 1996.
6. Sánchez, R., Šali, A. Advances in comparative protein modeling. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:206-214, 1997.
7. Johnson, M.S., Srinivasan, N., Sowdhamini, R., Blundell, T.L. Knowledge-based protein modelling. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 29:1-68, 1994. P
8. Lee, R.H. Protein model building using structural homology. Nature 356:543-544, 1992.
9. Greer, J. Comparative modelling of homologous proteins. Methods Enzymol. 202:239-252, 1991.
10. Greer, J. Comparative model-building of the mammalian serine proteases. J. Mol. Biol. 153:1027-1042, 1981.
11. Sutcliffe, M.J., Haneef, I., Carney, D., Blundell, T.L. Knowledge based modelling of homologous proteins. Part I: Three-dimensional frameworks derived from the simultaneous superposition of multiple structures. Protein Eng. 1:377-384, 1987.
12. Bernstein, F.C., Koetzle, T.F., Williams, G.J.B., et al. The protein data bank: A computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J. Mol. Biol. 112:535-542, 1977.
13. Taylor, W.R., Orengo, C.A. Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol. 208:208-229, 1989.
14. Kabsch, W., Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure. Biopolymers 22:2577-2637, 1983.
15. Needleman, S.B., Wunsch, C.D. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 48:443-453, 1970.
16. McLachlan, A.D. Rapid comparison of protein structures. Acta Crystallogr. A38:871-873, 1982.
17. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Moss, D.S., Thornton, J.M. PROCHECK: A program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26:283-291, 1993.
18. Sayle, R.A., Milner-White, E.J. Rasmol. Biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:374-376, 1995.
19. Moult, J., Judson, R., Fidelis, K., Pedersen, J.T. A large-scale experiment to assess protein structure prediction methods. Proteins 23:ii-iv, 1995.
20. Laskowski, R.A., MacArthur, M.W., Thornton, J.M. Evaluation of protein coordinate data sets. In: 'From First Map to Final Model, Proceedings of the CCP4 Study Weekend, 6-7 January 1994, DL/SCI/R35.' Bailey, S., Hubbard, R., Waller, D., eds. Warrington, UK: Daresbury Laboratory, 1994:149-159.
21. Laskowski, R.A., Thornton, J.M., Humblet, C., Singh, J. X-SITE: Use of empirically derived atomic packing preferences to identify favourable interaction regions in the binding sites of proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 259:175-201, 1996.
22. Peitsch, M.C. Protein modelling by E-mail. Bio/Technology 13:658-660, 1995.
23. Peitsch, M.C. ProMod and Swiss-Model: Internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. Biochem. Soc. Trans. (London) 24:274-279, 1996.
24. Bruccoleri, R.E. Application of systematic conformational search to protein modelling. Mol. Simul. 10:151-174, 1993.
25. Vriend, G. WHAT IF: A molecular modelling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8:52-56, 1990.
26. Aszodi, A., Taylor, W.R. Homology modelling by distance geometry. Folding Design 1:325-334, 1996.
27. Aszodi, A., Gradwell, M.J., Taylor, W.R. Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 251:308-326, 1995.
28. Harrison, R.W., Chatterjee, D., Weber, I.T. Analysis of 6 protein structures predicted by comparative modeling techniques. Proteins 23:463-471, 1995.
29. Harrison, R. W. Stiffness and energy-conservation in molecular-dynamics: An improved integrator. J. Comp. Chem. 14:1112-1122, 1993.
30. Kraulis, P.J. MOLSCRIPT: A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24:946-950, 1991.