CASP5 Assessment of Fold Recognition Target Predictions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 53, Issue SUPPL. 6, 2003, Pages 395-409

  Kinch, Lisa N ^b   Wrabl, James O ^b   Krishna, S Sri ^a   Majumdar, Indraneel ^a   Sadreyev, Ruslan I ^b   Qi, Yuan ^a   Pei, Jimin ^a   Cheng, Hua ^a   Grishin, Nick V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment quality; CASP5; Domain structure; Protein fold prediction; Structure comparison; Threading

Indexed keywords

AB INITIO CALCULATION; AUTOMATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0242362168     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.10557     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Kinch LN, Qi Y, Hubbard T, Grishin NV. CASP5 target classification. Proteins 2003;Suppl. 6:340-351.
2. Hubbard TJ. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:15-21.
3. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Rost B. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 1999;342:220-223.
4. Zemla A, Venclovas, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and evaluation of predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:13-21.
5. Zemla A. LGA program: a method for finding 3-D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
6. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:22-29.
7. Holm L, Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 2000;16:566-567.
8. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
9. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998;11:739-747.
10. Ortiz AR, Strauss CE, Olmea O. MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison. Protein Sci 2002;1111:2606-2621.
11. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Prlic A, Malik R, Andreeva A, Wiederstein M. Assessment of the CASP4 fold recognition category. Proteins 2001;Suppl:55-67.
12. Levitt M. Competitive assessment of protein fold recognition and alignment accuracy. Proteins 1997;Suppl 1:92-104.
13. Murzin AG. Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:88-103.
14. Lemer CM, Rooman MJ, Wodak SJ. Protein structure prediction by threading methods: evaluation of current techniques. Proteins 1995;23:337-355.
15. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-3402.
16. Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST-a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem Sci 1998;23:444-447.
17. Lackner P, Koppensteiner WA, Sippl MJ, Domingues FS. ProSup: a refined tool for protein structure alignment. Protein Eng 2000;13:745-752.
18. Grishin VN, Grishin NV. Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1523-1534.
19. Koehl P. Protein structure similarities. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001;11:348-353.
20. Zemla A. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6.
21. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. Redefining the goals of protein secondary structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1994;235:13-26.
22. Sauder JM, Arthur JW, Dunbrack RL Jr. Large-scale comparison of protein sequence alignment algorithms with structure alignments. Proteins 2000;40:6-22.
23. Bujnicki JM, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. LiveBench-2: large-scale automated evaluation of protein structure prediction servers. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:184-191.
24. Tramontano A, Leplae R, Morea V. Analysis and assessment of comparative modeling predictions in CASP4. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:22-38.
25. Tramontano A, Morea V. Assessment of homology based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:352-368.
26. Marti-Renom MA, Madhusudhan MS, Fiser A, Rost B, Sali A. Reliability of assessment of protein structure prediction methods. Structure (Camb) 2002;103:435-440.
27. Kendall MG, Stuart A, Ord JK. Kendall's advanced theory of statistics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1987. v. p. 77-80, 365-368.
28. Russell RB, Aloy P. Predictions without templates: new folds, secondary structure and contacts in CASP5. Proteins 2003;Suppl.
29. Ginalski K, Elofsson A, Fischer D, Rychlewski L. 3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1015-1018.
30. Simons KT, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997;268:209-225.
31. Simons KT, Bonneau R, Ruczinski II, Baker D. Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA. Proteins 1999;37:171-176.
32. Kihara D, Lu H, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. TOUCHSTONE: an ab initio protein structure prediction method that uses threading-based tertiary restraints. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001;98:10125-10130.
33. CASP5 Progress. Proteins 1993.
34. Esnouf RM. An extensively modified version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities. J Mol Graph Model 1997;15:132-134, 112-113.