Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 37, Issue SUPPL. 3, 1999, Pages 149-170

  Orengo, Christine A ^a   Bray, J E ^a   Hubbard, T ^b   LoConte, L ^a   Sillitoe, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ab initio prediction assessment; Protein structure prediction; Residue contacts prediction; Secondary structure prediction

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TARGETING; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS;

EID: 0032828469     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<149::AID-PROT20>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bystroff C, Baker D. Prediction of local structure in proteins using a library of sequence-structure motifs. J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577.
2. Deleted in Proofs.
3. Simons KT, Ruczinski I, Kooperberg C, Fox BA, Bystroff C, Baker D. Improved recognition of native-like protein structures using a combination of sequence-dependent and sequence-independent features of proteins. Proteins 1999;34:82-95.
4. Rost B, Sander C, Schneider R. PHD - an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 1994;10:53-60.
5. Orengo CA, Michie AD, Jones S, Jones DT, Swindells MB, Thornton JM. CATH - a heirarchic classification of protein domain structures. Structure 1997;5:1093-1108.
6. Abola EE, Bernstein FC, Bryant SH, Koetzle TF, Weng J. Protein Databank. In: Allen FH, Bergerhoff G, Sievers R, editors. Crystallographic Databases - Information Content, Software Systems, Scientific Applications. 1987. p 107-132.
7. Holm L, Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J Mol Biol 1993;233:123-138.
8. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Spouge JL, Bryant SH. The VAST protein structure comparison method. Biophysical Journal 1997;72:Pt2, p MP298.
9. Taylor WR, Orengo CA. Protein structure alignment. J Mol Biol 1998;208:1-22.
10. Lesk AM. CASP2: Report on ab initio predictions. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:151-166.
11. Reva BA, Finkelstein AV, Skolnick J. What is the probability of a chance prediction of a protein structure with an RMSD of 6 angstrom? Folding & Design 1998;3:141-147.
12. Orengo CA, Brown NP, Taylor WR. Fast structure alignment for protein data-bank searching. Proteins 1992;14:139-167.
13. Hubbard TJP. RMS/coverage graphs: a qualitative method for comparing three-dimensional protein structure predictions. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:15-21.
14. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Reinhard A, Fidelis K, Hubbard TJ. Numerical criteria for the evaluation of ab initio predictions of protein structure. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:140-150.
15. Richardson J. The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. Adv Prot Chem 1981;34:167-339.
16. Karplus K, Sjolander K, Barrett C, Cline M, Haussler D, Hughey R, Holm L, Sander C. Predicting protein structure using hidden Markov models. Proteins Suppl 1997;1:134-139.
17. Reva BA, Finkelstein AV. Search for the most stable folds of protein chains. II. Computation of stable architectures of proteins using a self-consistent molecular field theory. Protein Eng 1996;9: 399-411.
18. Veith M, Kolinski A, Brooks CL, Skolnick J. Prediction of the folding pathways and structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper. J Mol Biol 1994;237:361-367.
19. Xu Y, Xu D, Uberbacher EC. An efficient computational method for globally optimal threading. J Comp Biol 1998;5:609-626.
20. Moult J, Melamud E, Zhang H, Wang Z, et al. Submitted Abstracts for CASP3. 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl.gov/casp3/.
21. Yang A, Honig B. PrISM: protein informatics system for modeling. Submitted abstracts for CASP3. 1999. http://predictioncenter. llnl.gov/casp3/.
22. Liwo A, Pillardy J, Kazmierkiewicz R, Wawak RJ, Groth M, Czaplewski C, Oldziej S, Scheraga HA. Prediction of protein structure using a knowledge-based off-lattice united-residue force field and global optimization methods. Theoretical Chem Acc 1999;101:16-20.
23. Lee J, Lino A, Ripoll DR, Pillardy J, Scheraga HA. Calculation of protein conformation by global optimization of a potential energy function. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:204-208.
24. Osguthorpe DJ. Improved ab initio predictions with a simplified, flexible geometry model. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:186-193.
25. Samudrala R, Moult J. An all-atom distance-dependent conditional probability discriminatory function for protein structure prediction. J Mol Biol 1998;275:895-916.
26. Samudrala R, Xia Y, Huang E, Levitt M. Ab initio protein structure prediction using a combined hierarchical approach. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:194-198.
27. Huber T, Torda AE. Protein fold recognition without Boltzmann statistics or explicit physical basis. Protein Sci 1998;7:142-149.
28. Orengo CA, Thornton JM. Alpha plus beta folds revisited - some favored motifs. Structure 1993;1:105-120.
29. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J Mol Biol 1998;277:419-448.
30. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Rotkiewicz P, Ilkowski B, Skolnick J. Ab initio folding of proteins using restraints derived from evolutionary information. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:177-185.
31. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature 1992;358:86-89.
32. Lomize AL, Mosberg HI. Thermodynamic model of secondary structure for alpha-helical peptides and proteins. Biopolymers 1997;42:239-269.
33. Lomize AL, Pogozheva ID, Mosberg HI. Prediction of protein structure: the problem of fold multiplicity. Proteins Suppl 1999;3: 199-203.
34. Murzin AG. Structure classification-based assessment of CASP3 predictions for the fold recognition targets. Proteins Suppl 1999;3: 88-103.
35. Kolinski A, Skolnick J. Assembly of protein structure from sparse experimental data: an efficient Monte Carlo model. Proteins 1998;32:475-494.
36. Kolinski A, Jaroszewski L, Rotkiewicz P, Skolnick J. An efficient Monte Carlo model of protein chains. Modeling the short-range correlations between side group centers of mass. J Chem Phys 1998; in press.
37. Huber T, Torda AE. Protein fold recognition without Boltzmann statistics or explicit physical basis. Protein Sci 1998;7:142-149.
38. Sippl MJ, Lackner P, Domingues FS, Koppensteiner WA. An attempt to analyse progress in fold recognition from CASP1 to CASP3. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:226-230.
39. Weber IT. Submitted Abstracts for CASP3. 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl.gov/casp3/.
40. Huang ES, Samudrala R, Ponder J. Distance geometry generates native-like folds for small helical proteins using the consensus distances of predicted protein structures. Prot Sci 1998;7:1998-2003.
41. Srinivasan R, Rose GD. LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein. Proteins 1995;22:81-99.
42. Sayle RA, Milner-White EJ. RASMOL: a biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374-376.
43. Cuff JA, Clamp ME, Siddiqui AS, Finlay M, Barton GJ. Jpred: a consensus secondary structure prediction server. Bioinformatics 1998;14:892-893.
44. Kabsch W, Sander C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure -pattern-recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983;22:2577-2637.
45. Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 1995;23:566-579.
46. Cuff JA, Barton GJ. Evaluation and improvement of multiple sequence methods for protein secondary structure prediction. Proteins 1999;34:508-519.
47. Zemla A, Venclovas C, Fidelis K, Rost B. A modified definition of Sov, a segment-based measure for protein secondary structure prediction assessment. Proteins 1999;34:220-223.
48. Jones DT. Prediction of protein secondary structure at 77% accuracy based on PSIBLAST derived sequence profiles. Submitted Abstracts for CASP3 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl.gov/ casp3; also http://globin.bio.warwick.ac.uk/psipred.
49. Karplus K, Barrett C. Secondary structure prediction using neural nets and SAM T-98 multiple alignments. Submitted Abstracts for CASP3. 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl.gov/casp3/.
50. Lund O, Gorodkin J, Andersen CA, Bohr J, Brunak S. Prediction of protein structure using contacts predicted by neural networks. Submitted Abstracts for CASP3. 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl. gov/casp3.
51. Barrett C, Cline M, Piekhans M, Grate L, Karplus K, Haussler D, Hughey R. Fold recognition using hidden marked models. Submitted abstracts for CASP3 1999. http://predictioncenter.llnl.gov/ casp3.
52. Chandonia JM, Karplus M. New methods for accurate prediction of protein secondary structure. Proteins 1999;35:293-306.
53. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Zhang B, Godzik A. Fold predictions by a hierarchy of sequence, threading and modeling methods. Protein Sci 1998;7:1431-1440.
54. Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST - a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 1998;23:444-447.
55. Lund O, Frimand K, Gorodkin J, Bohr H, Bohr J, Hansen J, Brunak S. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Prot Eng 1997;10:1241-1248.
56. Mirny-Leonid group. How to determine protein folding potential? A new approach to the old problem. J Mol Biol 1996;264:1164-1169.
57. Fariselli P, Casadio R. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Prot Eng 1999;12:15-21.
58. Olmea O, Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Folding & Design 1997;2:S25-S32.
59. Pazos F, Helmer-Citterich M, Ausiello G, Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1997;271:511-523.
60. Hendlich M, Lackner P, Weitckus S, Floeckner H, Froschauer R, Gottsbacher K, Casari G, Sippl MJ. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models: the calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J Mol Biol 1990;216:167-180.
61. Zemla A, Venclovas Č, Moult J, Fidelis K. Processing and analysis of CASP3 protein structure predictions. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:22-29.
62. Yang F, Gustafson KR, Boyd MR, Wlodawer A. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli HdeA. Nature Struct Biol 1998;5:763-764.
63. Slupsky CM, Gentile LN, Donaldson LW, Mackereth CA, Seidel JJ, Graves BJ, McIntosh LP. Structure of the ETS_1 pointed domain and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation site. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1998;95:12129-12134.
64. Lau AY, Schaerer OD, Samson L, Verdine GL, Gllenberger T. Crystal structure of a human alkylbase-DNA repair enzyme complexed to DNA: mechanisms for nucleotide pupping and base excision. Cell 1998;95:249-258.
65. Bewley CA, Gustafson KR, Boyd MR, Covell DG, Bax A, Clore GM. Solution structure of cyanovirin-N, a potent HIV-inactivating protein. Nature Struct Biol 1998;5:571-578.