Assessment of CASP10 contact-assisted predictions

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 82, Issue SUPPL.2, 2014, Pages 84-97

  Taylor, Todd J ^a   Bai, Hongjun ^a   Tai, Chin Hsien ^a   Lee, Byungkook ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

CASP10; Contact assisted; Hybrid prediction; Protein structure prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTACT ASSISTED STRUCTURE PREDICTION; EXPERIMENTATION; INFORMATION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CASP10; CONTACT ASSISTED; HYBRID PREDICTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE PREDICTION;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84893024755     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24367     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Schmitz C, Vernon R, Otting G, Baker D, Huber T. Protein structure determination from pseudocontact shifts using ROSETTA. J Mol Biol 2012;416:668-677.
2. Lange OF, Baker D. Resolution-adapted recombination of structural features significantly improves sampling in restraint-guided structure calculation. Proteins 2012;80:884-895.
3. Lange OF, Rossi P, Sgourakis NG, Song Y, Lee HW, Aramini JM, Ertekin A, Xiao R, Acton TB, Montelione GT, Baker D. Determination of solution structures of proteins up to 40 kDa using CS-Rosetta with sparse NMR data from deuterated samples. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:10873-10878.
4. Raman S, Huang YJ, Mao B, Rossi P, Aramini JM, Liu G, Montelione GT, Baker D. Accurate automated protein NMR structure determination using unassigned NOESY data. J Am Chem Soc 2010;132:202-207.
5. Bowers PM, Strauss CE, Baker D. De novo protein structure determination using sparse NMR data. J Biomol NMR 2000;18:311-318.
6. Shen Y, Vernon R, Baker D, Bax A. De novo protein structure generation from incomplete chemical shift assignments. J Biomol NMR 2009;43:63-78.
7. Meiler J, Baker D. Rapid protein fold determination using unassigned NMR data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:15404-15409.
8. Sulkowska JI, Morcos F, Weigt M, Hwa T, Onuchic JN. Genomics-aided structure prediction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:10340-10345.
9. Hirst SJ, Alexander N, McHaourab HS, Meiler J. RosettaEPR: an integrated tool for protein structure determination from sparse EPR data. J Struct Biol 2011;173:506-514.
10. Zemla A. LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3370-3374.
11. Cong Q, Kinch LN, Pei J, Shi S, Grishin VN, Li W, Grishin NV. An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment. Bioinformatics 2011;27:3371-3378.
12. Kinch L, Yong Shi S, Cong Q, Cheng H, Liao Y, Grishin NV. CASP9 assessment of free modeling target predictions. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl 10):59-73.
13. Vincent JJ, Tai CH, Sathyanarayana BK, Lee B. Assessment of CASP6 predictions for new and nearly new fold targets. Proteins 2005;61(Suppl 7):67-83.
14. Jauch R, Yeo HC, Kolatkar PR, Clarke ND. Assessment of CASP7 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):57-67.
15. Kopp J, Bordoli L, Battey JN, Kiefer F, Schwede T. Assessment of CASP7 predictions for template-based modeling targets. Proteins 2007;69(Suppl 8):38-56.
16. Ben-David M, Noivirt-Brik O, Paz A, Prilusky J, Sussman JL, Levy Y. Assessment of CASP8 structure predictions for template free targets. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):50-65.
17. Keedy DA, Williams CJ, Headd JJ, Arendall WB, III, Chen VB, Kapral GJ, Gillespie RA, Block JN, Zemla A, Richardson DC, Richardson JS. The other 90% of the protein: assessment beyond the Calphas for CASP8 template-based and high-accuracy models. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):29-49.
18. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl 10):37-58.
19. Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J. CASP9 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments. Proteins 2011;79(Suppl 10):196-207.
20. Kinch LN, Wrabl JO, Krishna SS, Majumdar I, Sadreyev RI, Qi Y, Pei J, Cheng H, Grishin NV. CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):395-409.
21. Tress M, Ezkurdia I, Grana O, Lopez G, Valencia A. Assessment of predictions submitted for the CASP6 comparative modeling category. Proteins 2005;61(Suppl 7):27-45.
22. Holm L, Park J. DaliLite workbench for protein structure comparison. Bioinformatics 2000;16:566-567.
23. Bostick DL, Shen M, Vaisman II. A simple topological representation of protein structure: implications for new, fast, and robust structural classification. Proteins 2004;56:487-501.
24. Zotenko E, Dogan RI, Wilbur WJ, O'Leary DP, Przytycka TM. Structural footprinting in protein structure comparison: the impact of structural fragments. BMC Struct Biol 2007;7:53.
25. Gibrat JF, Madej T, Bryant SH. Surprising similarities in structure comparison. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1996;6:377-385.
26. Tramontano A, Morea V. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 2003;53(Suppl 6):352-368.
27. Cozzetto D, Kryshtafovych A, Fidelis K, Moult J, Rost B, Tramontano A. Evaluation of template-based models in CASP8 with standard measures. Proteins 2009;77(Suppl 9):18-28.
28. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley; 1973. xviii, 503 p.
29. Mukherjee S, Zhang Y. MM-align: a quick algorithm for aligning multiple-chain protein complex structures using iterative dynamic programming. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:e83.
30. Koike R, Ota M. SCPC: a method to structurally compare protein complexes. Bioinformatics 2012;28:324-330.
31. Mizuguchi K, Go N. Comparison of spatial arrangements of secondary structural elements in proteins. Protein Eng 1995;8:353-362.
32. Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins 2004;57:702-710.
33. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. UCSF Chimera-a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 2004;25:1605-1612.